GENOMICS OF PERMETHRIN RESISTANCE IN THE SOUTHERN HOUSE MOSQUITO, CULEX QUINQUEFASCIATUS SAY by William Reid A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 3, 2014 Approved by Nannan Liu, Chair, Alumni Professor Kathy Flanders, Professor John Murphy, Professor Scott R. Santos, Associate Professor ii Abstract The Southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, is a vector of several human diseases including West Nile fever and St. Louis encephalitis, owing to its blood feeding behavior whereby the female takes multiple blood meals. Vector control of mosquitoes has been a critical part of the current global strategy to control mosquito-associated diseases. Insecticides, especially pyrethroids, are important components in the vector-control effort. The successful management of mosquitoes, however, is negatively impacted by the development of resistance to insecticides within mosquito populations and the lack of the knowledge on the molecular basis of blood feeding behavior. The goals of our research, thus, were to gain a better understanding of insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus and to identify the genes that may be involved in preparing the female for the taking of a blood meal with four specific objectives: 1) Characterize the genes up-regulated in insecticide-resistant mosquitoes, 2) Determine the genes that are differentially-expressed in response to insecticide treatment, 3) Investigate the cytochrome P450 detoxification genes in resistance, 4) Examine the changes in the gene expression profiles of newly-eclosed females as they become old enough to take a blood meal and also in response to blood feeding. RNA-Seq was used to investigate the gene expression profiles of a highly permethrin- resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, and to investigate the changes in the gene expression levels after exposure to permethrin. Overall, we identified multiple genes up-regulated in insecticide-resistant mosquitoes, including genes involved in detoxification, regulation, and iii proteases. We further identified that detoxification genes and proteases were up-regulated in response to permethrin exposure, while serum storage proteins were down-regulated, suggesting that fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus delay development to the pupal stage in response to insecticide challenge, possibly in response to a cessation of feeding as a means of behavioral resistance in order to reduce oral exposure to permethrin. To better understand which detoxification genes identified in Cx. quinquefasciatus were important in other mosquito species, we investigated the gene expression profiles of the cytochrome P450 genes in a pyrethroid- resistant field strain of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti using qRT-PCR. We identified that multiple cytochrome P450 genes were up-regulated, and functional studies revealed that two of the up-regulated P450s, CYP4D4 and CYP4J15v1 could confer resistance to permethrin when over-expressed in a GAL4:UAS enhancer trap Drosophila melanogaster system. These cytochrome P450s were likely involved in the permethrin resistance response of mosquitoes. Examination of the genes in response to the blood feeding was conducted by determining the temporal changes in gene expression from newly eclosed female adults to those capable of taking a blood meal using RNA-Seq techniques. We found that while no females would freely take a blood meal prior to 48 h post-eclosion, the main gene expression changes in newly-eclosed females occurred within the initial 12-24 h post-eclosion, including genes encoding salivary proteins, odorant-binding proteins, proteases, and cuticular proteins. A smaller second peak of up-regulated genes was identified at 48 ? 60 h post-eclosion, which coincided with the onset of the maximal time-to-mating for Cx. quinquefasciatus. Taken together, these results suggested that the genes needed for blood feeding in Cx. quinquefasciatus are primarily up-regualted within 12-24 h post-eclosion, while other later genes may be up-regulated in response to mating. iv Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to Dr. Nannan Liu and thank her for all of her help, support, advice, encouragement, and teaching. She the epitome of not only what a graduate advisor should be in graduate education, but also how scientific research is best done. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Kathy Flanders, Dr. John Murphy, Dr. Eric Peatman, and in particular Dr. Scott Santos for introducing me to Linux- I had no idea how powerful a few lines of code could be prior to taking the red pill in your Biocomputing course. I would also like to thank our lab group, in particular Dr. Lee Zhang for all of his help and ideas. Sincere thanks also to Drs. Ting Li, Ting Yang, Chunwang Cao, Huqi Liu, Lin He, and Fang Tang, as well as the rest of our past and present lab members- Li Tian, Ming Li, Feng Liu, Youhui Gong, Xuechun Feng, and Ye Zi, it has been a great time taking this journey with you. I would also like to thank Dr. Julia Pridgeon for recommending me to Auburn, this has been a great experience and I can?t thank you all enough. I would also like to thank the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology for all of the support that they provided in terms of education, professional growth, funding, and resources. I also want to thank my old lab groups in Florida and Vermont who always supported me in my studies and work and I thank all of my friends especially the adventurous Bob and Deb for all of their support over the years. Finally, I especially thank my parents Bill and Linda, and my sister Wendy and her family, without all of your support and encouragement I wouldn?t have gotten this far. Finally, thanks to my Aunt Pat for all of the conversations we had on my way home from the lab, they were really nice times. v Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... x List of Illustrations ........................................................................................................................ xii List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................................... xvi Chapter 1: Literature Review .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Insects and insecticides ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Insecticide resistance ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Mechanisms of insecticide resistance ................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Increased metabolic detoxification ................................................................................ 3 1.3.1.1 Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-mediated detoxification ................................. 3 1.3.1.2 Hydrolase-mediated detoxification ......................................................................... 4 1.3.1.3 Glutathione S-transferase-mediated detoxification ................................................. 5 1.4 Target site insensitivity ......................................................................................................... 5 1.4.1 Insensitivity of the voltage-sensitive sodium ion channel ............................................. 5 1.4.2 Insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase .............................................................................. 7 1.4.3 Insensitivity of the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor ................................................ 7 1.5 Other mechanisms of insecticide resistance ......................................................................... 8 1.5.1 Decreased penetration .................................................................................................... 8 1.5.2 Behavioral/Other resistance ........................................................................................... 9 1.6 Insecticide cross resistance ................................................................................................. 10 1.7 Interaction of insecticide resistance factors ........................................................................ 10 1.8 Culex quinquefasciatus an insect pest..................................................................................11 1.9 Insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus .................................................................... 12 1.10 Next generation sequencing .............................................................................................. 15 vi 1.10.1 Illumina mRNA-Seq sequencing ............................................................................... 16 1.10.2 Gene expression analysis using RNA-Seq ................................................................. 17 Chapter 2: Research Goal and Specific Objectives ...................................................................... 18 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 The goal of research and specific objectives ...................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Characterization of the genes differentially expressed between the HAmCqG8 strain and its parental HAmCqG0 strain .......................................................................................... 20 2.2.2 Characterize the genes differentially expressed upon exposure to permethrin ............ 20 2.2.3 Characterization of the up-regulation of P450 genes in a different mosquito species . 21 2.2.4 Characterization of the changes in gene expression in newly eclosed female Cx. quinquefasciatus ................................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Significance......................................................................................................................... 23 Chapter 3: The Transcriptome Profile of the Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Following Permethrin Selection ..................................................................................................................... 24 3.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 24 3.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 27 3.3.1 Mosquito strains ........................................................................................................... 27 3.3.2 RNA extraction ............................................................................................................ 28 3.3.3 RNA library preparation, RNA Seq sequencing, Data analysis, and gene expression processing ............................................................................................................................. 28 3.3.4 Gene expression validation using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) ................. 29 3.3.5 Annotation, gene grouping, and functional gene enrichment analysis ........................ 31 3.4 Results ................................................................................................................................. 32 3.4.1 Illumina RNA Seq data analysis .................................................................................. 32 3.4.2 Transcriptome profile: SCOP general categories and detailed function categories ..... 33 3.4.3 Transcriptome profile: superfamily.............................................................................. 34 3.4.4 Transcriptome profile: differential gene expression between HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 ............................................................................................................................................... 36 3.4.5. Functional enrichment analysis of GO terms for differentially expressed genes ....... 39 3.4.6. The molecular functional parenthood relationships of the GO terms among up- regulated genes and their interconnection ............................................................................. 41 3.5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 45 3.6 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 52 vii Chapter 4: Gene Expression Profiles of the Southern House Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus During Exposure to Permethrin .................................................................................................... 53 4.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 54 4.3 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 55 4.3.1 Mosquito strains ........................................................................................................... 55 4.3.2 Permethrin exposure treatments ................................................................................... 56 4.3.3. RNA extraction ........................................................................................................... 56 4.3.4. RNA library preparation, RNA Seq sequencing, Data analysis, and gene expression processing ............................................................................................................................. 57 4.3.5. Annotation, gene grouping, and functional gene enrichment analysis ....................... 58 4.3.6. Selected gene expression validation using qRT-PCR ................................................. 59 4.4 Results ................................................................................................................................. 59 4.4.1. Gene Abundance ......................................................................................................... 60 4.4.2. Up-regulated Genes .................................................................................................... 60 4.4.4. Functional enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) terms among the differentially- expressed genes ..................................................................................................................... 65 4.4.5. qRT-PCR Validation of Selected Genes ...................................................................... 71 4.5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 74 4.6 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 78 4.7 Disclosure ........................................................................................................................... 78 Chapter 5: Gene expression analysis of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of Aedes aegypti and functional testing of selected family 4 cytochrome P450 genes ................................................... 79 5.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 79 5.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 80 5.3 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................ 81 5.3.1. Mosquito Strains ......................................................................................................... 81 5.3.2. Bioassays..................................................................................................................... 81 5.3.3 RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR gene expression analysis. ............... 82 5.3.4 Functional testing of selected cytochrome P450 genes. .............................................. 83 5.4 Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................... 88 5.5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 99 5.6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 100 viii Chapter 6: Temporal gene expression profiles of pre and post blood-fed adult females of the Southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus ..................................................................... 101 6.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 101 6.2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 102 6.3 Materials and Methods ...................................................................................................... 103 6.3.1 Mosquito strains ......................................................................................................... 103 6.3.2 Pre-determination of time period for mosquitoes to take their first blood meal ........ 104 6.3.3 RNA extraction .......................................................................................................... 104 6.3.4 RNA library preparation, RNA Seq sequencing, Data analysis, and gene expression processing ........................................................................................................................... 104 6.3.5 qPCR gene expression ............................................................................................... 105 6.4 Results ............................................................................................................................... 106 6.4.1 Determination of the pre-blood meal time period...................................................... 107 6.4.2 RNA Seq characterization of the pre-blood meal and mating time periods in Cx. quinquefasciatus. ................................................................................................................ 108 6.4.3 Validation of selected RNA Seq genes using qPCR. ..................................................114 6.5 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................118 6.6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 121 Chapter 7: Research Summary and Future Studies ..................................................................... 122 7.1 Research Summary ........................................................................................................... 122 7.2 Edsysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase in Culex quinquefasciatus as a novel target for mosquito management ............................................................................................................ 124 7.3 Use of VitA gene as a screening tool for bisacylhydrazines against mosquitoes .............. 126 7.4 Determination of gene copy number in the highly pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus ............................................................................................................... 128 7.4 References ......................................................................................................................... 135 Appendix 3.1. List and sequences of the qRT-PCR primers used. ............................................. 167 Appendix 3.2. Lognormal distributions for expressed genes in HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 by superfamily. ................................................................................................................................. 169 Appendix 3.3. Complete list of all differentially upregulated genes? in HAmCqG8. .................. 174 Appendix 3.4. List of genes downregulated by at least two-fold in HAmCqG8 when compared to HAmCqG0. ................................................................................................................................... 185 ix Appendix 3.5. List of differentially upregulated genes in HAmCqG8 which contained functionally-enriched Gene Ontology terms. .............................................................................. 237 Appendix 4.1. List and sequences of the qRT-PCR primers used. ............................................. 242 Appendix 4.2: Genes up-regulated in the pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Culex quinquefasciatus following permethrin challenge. ..................................................................... 244 Appendix 4.3. Genes down-regulated in the pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Culex quinquefasciatus following permethrin challenge. ..................................................................... 254 Appendix 6.1. List of primers used for the qRT-PCR determination of genes. .......................... 262 Appendix 6.2. Complete list of up- and down-regulated genes for sugar-fed only females for the HAmCqG8 strain of Culex quinquefasciatus for the initial 72h post-eclosion. ........................... 263 x List of Tables Table 3.1. Number of paired end reads from the Illumina HiSeq sequencing and the percentage of reads mapped to the Cx. quinquefasciatus (strain: Johannesburg) predicted transcriptome .... 32 Table 3.2. Numbers of differentially-expressed genes and their cumulative gene expression level in HAmCqG8 sorted by the Structural Classification of Proteins general function category ........ 37 Table 3.3. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis results for differentially expressed genes in HAmCqG8 ....................................................................................................................... 38 Table 3.4. qRT-PCR validation of selected up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 as identified by the RNASeq quantification. ................................................................................................................ 44 Table 4.2: Number of differentially-expressed genes in the highly-permethrin resistant strain of Culex quinquefasciatus, HAmCqG8, following a 24 h exposure to either acetone, or permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates compared to a zero hour untreated time point. ....................................... 62 Table 4.3. Genes up-regulated and down-regulated 24h-post treatment following treatment with permethrin at either the LC50 or the LC70 rate. ............................................................................. 63 Table 4.4. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis results for differentially expressed genes in the HAmCqG8 strain following a 24h exposure to permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates. ....................................................................................................................................................... 68 Table 4.5. Differentially-expressed genes associated with functionally-enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the HAmCqG8 strain following a 24h exposure to permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates. .............................................................................................................................................. 69 Table 5.1. List of primers used for the qRT-PCR determination of P450 gene expression level and the primers designed to generate the constructs for the functional testing in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. ............................................................................................................. 84 xi Table 5.2. Resistance ratio of the permethrin-resistant strain of Ae. aegypti Puerto Rico compared to the laboratory permethrin-susceptible strain Orlando in the presence and absence of the cytochrome P450 metabolic inhibitor piperonyl butoxide (PBO). ......................................... 89 Table 5.3. List of cytochrome P450 genes differentially expressed between the adult females of the pyrethroid-resistant strain of Aedes aegypti (Puerto Rico) and the laboratory susceptible strain (Orlando). ............................................................................................................................ 91 Table 5.4. Relative cytochrome P450 gene expression values in the pyrethroid-resistant Puerto Rico strain compared with the pyrethroid-susceptible Orlando strain. ......................................... 93 Table 6.1. Number of paired end reads from the Illumina HiSeq sequencing and the percentage of reads mapped to the Cx. quinquefasciatus (strain: Johannesburg) predicted transcriptome. . 109 Table 6.2. Expression levels of genes in Culex quinquefasciatus, strain HAmCqG8 for genes previously identified as up-regulated in non-blood-fed female Aedes aegypti and linked to nutritional status with regard to blood-feeding competency. .......................................................113 Table 7.1. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the pyrethroid-resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, HAmCqG8, compared to the parental reference strain HAmCqG0. ................ 129 Table 7.2. List of genes containing SNPs/indels in the HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus when compared to the HAmCqG0 strain for genes shown to be up-regulated in the HAmCqG8 strain. ........................................................................................................................................... 129 xii List of Illustrations 8Figure 3.1. Total proportions of cumulative gene expression levels in HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 for the SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html. ...................................................................... 34 Figure 3.2. Log normal bean-plots for all expressed genes within SCOP superfamilies (SCOP version 1.75; supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html) in HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8. The distribution along the Y axis indicates a higher level of gene expression, while the distribution along the X axis indicates the proportion of genes expressed at the given level of gene expression along the Y axis. Distributions are oriented along a common central baseline so that distributions in red (HAmCqG0) have more genes expressed at a given gene expression level (log FPKM) if the distribution is further to the left on the X axis, while distributions in blue (HAmCqG8) are higher if they are further to the right of the X axis. The central vertical baseline for each superfamily is a mirror point for the two distributions. .................................................. 36 Figure 3.3. Combined gene expression levels for all up- and down-regulated genes within a general function category in HAmCqG8 compared to those expressed in HAmCqG0. .................. 39 Figure 3.4. Parent-Child association for functionally enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms among genes that were up-regulated in HAmCqG8. GO terms associated with the up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 were considered statistically at <0.001 using the g:SCS threshold in g:Cocoa (http://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gcocoa.cgi). Colored boxes represent statistically functionally enriched GO terms, while the nonsignificantly-enriched GO term is marked in white and provided to display all of the parent-child relationships in the network. Lines and/or arrows represent connections between or among different GO terms. Solid lines represent relationships between two enriched GO terms. Dashed lines represent relationships between enriched and xiii unenriched terms to connect all of the nodes on the directed acyclic graph ................................. 42 Figure 4.1. Venn diagram analysis of the total numbers of differentially-expressed up- and down-regulated genes in the fourth instar of the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus following a 24h exposure to either an acetone control, or two rates of permethrin (LC50 and LC70). Overlapping circles represent genes that were co-up- or co-down- regulated in two or more groups. .................................................................................................. 61 Figure 4.2. Gene ontology term functional enrichment analysis of the differentially-expressed up- and down-regulated genes identified in the fourth instar of the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus following a 24h exposure to permethrin. ................... 67 Figure 4.3. Gene expression levels for proteases (upper panels A and B) and larval storage proteins (lower panels C and D). Bars superseded with a ?*? indicate that the expression level between the permethrin susceptible S-lab strain and the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus were significantly different at the ?=0.01 level of significance. Bars shown superior to the dependent axis zero line indicate genes that were up-regulated relative to a comparative acetone blank treatment control, while genes inferior to the dependent axis zero line indicate genes that were down-regulated relative to a comparative acetone blank treatment control ........................................................................................................................................... 73 Figure 5.1. Two-point mortality for the Orlando strain of Aedes aegypti and the different generations of the Puerto Rico Ae. aegypti strain. The 0.8 ng per female (low dose) represents the maximum dose that results in survival in the pyrethroid-susceptible Orlando strain, while the 6.25 ng per female represents the high dose. Puerto Rico generations F1, F2, F6, F7, F8, F14, and F17 did not have sufficient numbers for testing. .................................................................... 90 Figure 5.2. RT-PCR of transgenic D. melanogaster expressing Aedes aegypti cytochrome P450 genes. The (-) and (+) within gene represent the amplified products from the non-transgenic line (-) and the transgenic line (+) of D. melanogaster, respectively. ................................................. 98 Figure 5.3. Survivorship of transgenic D. melanogaster lines following a 24h exposure to either permethrin or beta-cypermethrin. Bars within dose superceeded by the same letter are not xiv significantly different at the ?=0.05 level of significance. BDRC 24484 is the non-transgenic line of D. melanogaster, which had no surviving individuals at any of the doses of the insecticides tested. ............................................................................................................................................ 99 Figure 6.1. Box and whisker plot of the percentage of females from even-aged populations of Cx. quinquefasciatus strain HAmCqG8 freely taking an offered blood meal. The black lines within a bar represent the median percentage of females who freely took a blood meal. The upper and lower whiskers represent the highest and lowest observations, respectively, while the bars themselves represent the interquartile range (Q1 - Q3). ............................................................. 107 Figure 6.2. Total gene expression within the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) general function categories for adult sugar-fed female Culex quinquefasciatus, strain HAmCqG8, for the initial 72 h post-eclosion. Gene expression values expressed are summed within each SCOP category to provide an overall profile of the complete distribution of all gene expression within the mosquitoes. ............................................................................................................................110 Figure 6.4. Heat map displaying the relative increases in gene expression for selected genes for the initial 72 h post-eclosion for adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus, strain HAmCqG8, and for 72 h post blood meal. Females offered a blood meal were 6 days old at the time of the blood feeding..........................................................................................................................................115 Figure 6.5. Temporal gene expression of vitellogenin genes in adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus for the 72 h time period immediately following eclosion and for the 72 h time period immediately following the blood meal. .......................................................................................117 Figure 7.1 Temporal expression of the ecdysone-inducible gene E74 and the ecdysteroid glucosyltransferase gene CPIJ003694. ....................................................................................... 125 Figure 7.2. Dose-dependent effect of ecdysone agonists on the gene expression of the VitA gene (CPIJ001357 / CPIJ001358) against adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus. .................................. 127 Figure 7.3. Distribution of SNPs and indels identified within the up-regulated genes in the pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus within the general function categories of the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) datatbase. Individual points within xv category represent the actual number of SNPs/indels for a given gene, while the box-whisker plots represent the quartile values, where the internal black bar within each box represents the median value of SNPs/indels per gene within SCOP general function category. ....................... 134 xvi List of Abbreviations ANOVA Analysis of Variance BDRC Bloomington Drosophila Resource Center cDNA copy Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid DDT Dichloro Diphenyl Trichloroethane DEF S,S,S- tributyl phosphorotrithioate DEM diethyl maleate DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid FDR False discovery rate FPKM Fragments per kilo base of gene for every million reads mapped GABA gamma amino butyric acid GAL4:UAS Galactose 4: Upstream Activator Sequence GEO Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI) GO Gene Ontology GRN1 gustatory receptor neuron 1 GRN2 gustatory receptor neuron 2 HAIB Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology IMD immunodeficient Kdr knock down resistant LC50 Lethal concentration that kills 50% of the population xvii LC70 Lethal concentration that kills 70% of the population LPS lipopolysaccharide m/tr metabolism/transport mRNA messenger RiboNucleic Acid NCBI National Center for Biotechnology Information NONA Non annotated nt nucleotide OP Organophosphate P450 Cytochrome P450 PBO Piperonyl Butoxide PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction Ppm parts per million qRT-PCR quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Rdl resistance to dieldrin RNA Ribonucleic acid RNA-Seq Ribonucleic acid sequencing (massively parallel) RPKM Reads per kilo base of gene for every million reads mapped SCOP Structural Classification of Proteins SNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphism TOR target of rapamycin vitA vitellogenin A Vssc Voltage sensitive sodium channel WHO World Health Organization 1 Chapter 1: Literature Review 1.1 Insects and insecticides Insects consume or spoil roughly one-third of all food/fiber produced for human consumption and use (Johnson and Triplehorn, 2004). Insects are also direct parasites of humans, and some can vector the etiological agents of several diseases (Lounibos, 2002). In order to combat the losses of food, fiber, and to decrease the transmission rates of human pathogens by insects, chemicals (insecticides) have been developed to kill pestiferous insects (Casida and Quistad, 1998). Insecticides work by directly targeting a vital system or process of the insect, including systems such as the nervous, integument, or muscular systems, and processes such as development and molting (Yu, 2008). As a result, insecticides target specific molecules within the insect and, when applied at toxic levels, cause specific symptoms. For example, the insecticides methoprene and pyriproxyfen are mimics of juvenile hormone that disrupt the molting process of immature insects, notably killing holometabolous insects as they enter the pupal stage (Dhadialla et al., 1998). Other insecticides, such as organophosphates, target the nervous system of insects by inhibiting the action of acetylcholinesterase, which prevents the degradation of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in insects, resulting in a sustained nervous impulse that ultimately results in death of the insect (Casida and Quistad, 1998; Yu, 2008). While insecticides provide protection to food, fiber, animals, and humans, their overuse or improper use can ultimately lead to their failure. The first documented failure of an insecticide to manage an insect pest was recorded for Paris Green, which was used for the management of the San Jose scale in the Western US (Melander, 1914). Insecticide resistance is largely believed to be a pre- adaptive phenomenon resulting from the selection of genetically-based trait(s) within a 2 population of insects, resulting in the ability of the target insect pest to resist the insecticide challenge. The repeated exposure of insects to insecticides led to genetic changes within the insect populations to increase the proportion of individuals within the population that harbor genetically-based traits that confer insecticide resistance (Georghiou, 1972; Liu 2008). 1.2 Insecticide resistance Insecticide resistance is a phenomenon where an insecticide fails to kill the target insect. The resistance to insecticides within populations of insects is largely believed to be pre-adaptive, in that individuals within the population harbor traits that confer the tolerance/resistance to insecticides, which upon challenge with an insecticide results in the selection of these traits that are then passed on to successive insect generations (Georghiou, 1972; Liu 2008). As such, insecticide resistance has a genetic basis. As a consequence of the genetic basis and subsequent trait/gene selection, the repeated use of an insecticide against an insect population results in an enrichment of insecticide resistance traits/genes within the population. Thus insecticide resistance arises from the repeated use of insecticides which enriches the prevalence of these traits/genes within in the population, ultimately resulting in a failure of insect control (Georghiou and Saito 1983). 1.3 Mechanisms of insecticide resistance Insecticide resistance can be broadly classified into two categories: physiological and behavioral (Yu, 2008). Physiological resistance can be further characterized into: target-site insensitivity, metabolic resistance and reduced uptake/acquisition. The first category, target-site insensitivity, is when there is a physical change in the target site resulting in a decreased efficacy 3 of the chemical. The second category, metabolic resistance, occurs due to the ability of the insect to metabolize the insecticide into less-toxic, more easily excretable forms. The third category, reduced uptake/acquisition, represents changes in the cuticular structure of the insect that results in less of the insecticide being absorbed. Finally the behavioral resistance includes behavioral adaptations of the insect that confer indirect resistance to the insect such as the ability to avoid consuming a toxin/toxicant, or other mechanisms such as the acquisition of endosymbiotic microbes capable of degrading insecticides (Yu, 2008). 1.3.1 Increased metabolic detoxification Insects encounter multiple naturally-present toxins, for which they have a multitude of enzymes capable of mitigating the negative impact of the toxins by degrading them into less- toxic, more easily excretable forms, and are able to degrade insecticides as well. The enzymes involved in the degradation of insecticides can be broadly classified into two categories: phase I, and phase II enzymes. Phase I enzymes are the enzymes that are primarily responsible for the degradation and catalyze the oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis reactions, such as cytochrome P450s and carboxylesterases. Phase II enzymes serve to mitigate the toxic effects of an insecticide by conjugating small molecules to the insecticide such as sugars, amino acids, or glutathione. 1.3.1.1 Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-mediated detoxification Of all of the phase I reactions, oxidation reactions, which are carried out by cytochrome P450s, is considered to be the most important (Yu, 2008). Cytochrome P450s are present in all divisions of life (Scott and Wen, 2001), and perform various physiological functions in insects 4 including the biosynthesis and degradation of ecdysteroids, cuticle formation, fatty acid synthesis and metabolism, as well as the detoxification of xenobiotics (Chavez et al., 2000; Warren et al., 2002; Petryk et al., 2003; Warren et al., 2004; Namiki et al., 2005; Ono et al., 2006; Rewitz and Gilbert, 2008; Guittard et al., 2011, Qiu et al., 2012). The numbers of P450 genes in insects ranges from as low as 37 in the human body louse Pecidulus humanus (Lee et al., 2010) to 204 in the Southern House Mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus (Arensburger et al., 2010; Yang and Liu, 2011). Cytochrome P450s are arranged into clans, families, and subfamilies, based on sequence similarity, among which, insect cytochrome P450s are found in clans 2, 3, 4, and mito clan (Feyeresen, 1999). Many studies have investigated the role of cytochrome P450s in insecticide resistance (Strode et al., 2008; Pridgeon et al., 2009; Bariami et al., 2012; Fonseca- Gonzalez et al., 2011; Yang and Liu, 2011; Poupardin et al., 2010; Saavedra-Rodriguez et al., 2012; Strode et al., 2012) and the functionality of selected cytochrome P450s has been tested, notably among mosquito species (Boonseupsekul et al., 2008; McLaughlin et al., 2008; Muller et al., 2008; Stevenson et al., 2011; 2012). 1.3.1.2 Hydrolase-mediated detoxification Hydrolase (esterase) mediated detoxification has been documented for nearly all insect classes, notably among organophosphorous (OP) insecticides (Li et al., 2007). Hydrolase- mediated resistance has been identified to be due to gene duplication and neo-functionalization of esterase genes in multiple insect species, whereby the amino acid sequences of carboxylesterases become modified to degrade OP compounds (Oppenoorth and Van Asperen, 1960; Campbell et al., 1998; Claudianos et al., 1999). Esterase gene duplication and amplification has also been demonstrated to serve as a means of general protection against 5 insecticides via sequestration of the toxicant (Field and Devonshire, 1998). 1.3.1.3 Glutathione S-transferase-mediated detoxification Phase II reactions are conjugation reactions that include the addition of small molecules onto the insecticide, rendering it more easily excreted. Although there are multiple phase II reactions, such as the conjugation of glucose to OP compounds via uridine diphosphate glucosyl transferase (Bull and Whitten, 1972), the major enzymes involved in the phase II detoxification of insecticides are the glutathione S-transferases (Feyereisen, 1995; Hemingway and Ranson, 2000). Insect glutathione S-transferases have two subunits and may be both cytosolic and microsomal and have been proposed to serve as protection to the cell membrane (Yu, 2002). Glutathione S-transferases have been shown to confer insecticide resistance for multiple insect species against OP compounds (Huang et al., 1998), organochlorine compounds (Ranson et al., 2001; Syvanen et al., 1996), as well as pyrethroids (Syvanen et al., 1994; Vontas et al., 2002). They have also been shown to be involved in pyrethroid resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus, where pretreatment of larvae with the glutathione S-transferase inhibitor diethyl maleate (DEM) resulted in a 3-fold decrease in permethrin resistance for a field-collected strain exhibiting multiple insecticide resistance (Xu et al., 2005). 1.4 Target site insensitivity 1.4.1 Insensitivity of the voltage-sensitive sodium ion channel The voltage sensitive sodium ion channels (Vssc) of insects are the major ion channels involved in perpetuating the depolarization phase of action potentials. They are targets of DDT, pyrethroids, oxadiazines, as well as a variety of naturally-occurring neurotoxins (Dong, 2007; 6 Cestele and Catterall, 2000; Wang and Wang, 2003). Amino acid substitutions in the Vssc that lead to structural changes can confer insecticide resistance. The first observation of this phenomenon was in the house fly Musca domestica, where resistance to DDT was found to coincide with a loss of the typically rapid knock-down effect of DDT leading to the term 'knock- down resistant', or kdr for short (Farnham, 1977). Presently, the term 'kdr' is used to refer to the specific mutation in M. domestica, which was identified to be due to a single nucleotide change from a C to a T at position After investigating the DNA sequence of the target of DDT, which is the voltage-gated sodium channel. L1014F in Anopheles gambiae (Martinez-Torres et al.,1998), Blatella germanica (Liu et al., 2000), Culex pipiens, Myzus persicae (Martinez-Torres et al., 1999), Culex quinquefasciatus (Xu et al., 2006b), Hematobia irritans (Guerrero et al., 1997), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Lee et al., 1999) and Plutella xylostella (Schuler et al., 1998); alternative L1014 mutations such as L1014S in An. gambiae (Ranson et al., 2000), Cx. pipiens (Martinez-Torres et al., 1999), and L1014H in Heliothis virescens (Park and Taylor, 1999), and Musca domestica (Park et al., 1997). Recent studies on Cx. quinquefasciatus traced the frequency of both synonymous and non-synonymous SNPs throughout the pressuring to two distinct field strains of Cx. quinquefasciatus. The results showed that combinations of SNPs became fixed in the population as the level of permethrin resistance increased (Li et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2012a), notably three non-synonymous SNP changes which were L982F, A109S, and W1573R, which were comparable to L1014F, A99S, and W1594R in M. domestica, respectively. Li et al., 2012 and Xu et al., 2012a further co-identified six synonymous that were found to be statistically correlated to permethrin resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus. These correlation of these novel SNPs in the Vssc to increasing insecticide resistance suggests their involvement in insecticide resistance (Li et al., 2012). 7 1.4.2 Insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter in insects that spans the synapse of two neurons to continue the nervous impulse from nerve to nerve via the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Following the signal transmission, acetylcholinesterase degrades acetylcholine into choline and acetic acid, terminating the nervous stimulation. Organophosphorous and carbamate compounds are both inhibitors of acetylcholine, and resistance to these two insecticides has been identified and linked to insensitivity of acetylcholinesterase in mosquitoes, houseflies, and multiple other insect species as well (Fournier and Mutero, 1994; Casida and Durkin 2013). Multiple non- synonymous mutations in the acetylcholinesterase molecule have been documented in diverse insect species including D. melanogaster, Aphis gossypii, Lucilia cuprina, Ae. aegypti, Cx. pipiens, An. gambiae, and An. albimanus (Mutero et al., 1994; Vaughan et al. 1997; Chen et al., 2001; Boublik et al., 2002; Weill et al., 2003; Weill et al., 2004; Menozzi et al., 2004). Not all of the non-synonymous mutations identified in these insects confer insecticide resistance, while various combinations of the other mutations, for example the combination of the two mutations S431F and A302S confers a high level of resistance to both OP compounds and carbamates in the aphids M. persicae and A. gossypii (Benting and Nauen, 2004; Andrews et al., 2004). 1.4.3 Insensitivity of the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major insect neurotransmitter for inhibitory neurons, which are neurons that play an important role in nervous impulse transduction by hyperpolarizing the nerve, making an action potential less likely (Otsuka et al., 1966). The GABA receptor, itself, forms a multimeric Cl- channel, which when bound to GABA, results in 8 an influx of Cl- into the nerve cell, resulting in hyperpolarization of the membrane ((ffrench- Constant et al., 1993; Buckingham et al., 2005). The GABA channel is the target for several insecticides, inlcuding cyclodienes, phenylpyrazoles, and avermectin (Abalis et al., 1986; Gant et al., 1998). Multiple studies have identified resistance in the GABA receptor, the first of which was the identification of rdl (resistance to dieldrin locus), which is the result of an amino acid change from alanine to serine at position 302 (A302S) in the M2 domain of the Cl- channel in Drosophila melanogaster (ffrench-Constant et al., 1993). The same A302S (or A302G in for some insects) has since been identified in a multitude of insects including Drosophila simulans, Musca domestica, Blatella germanica, Aedes aegypti, Bemisia tabaci, Tribolium castaneum, Hypothenemus hampei, and Myzus persicae (ffrench-Constant et al., 1993; Zhang et al., 1994; Andreev et al., 1999; ffrench-Constant et al., 1993). The rdl locus that has been shown to confer not only dieldrin resistance, but resistance to other insecticides that target the GABA receptor, such as phenylpyrazoles (e.g. fipronil) as well. 1.5 Other mechanisms of insecticide resistance 1.5.1 Decreased penetration A minor increase in the resistance to insecticides as a result of changes in the cuticular structure of insect has long been proposed (Plapp and Hoyer, 1968; Terriere, 1982). Earlier work demonstrated higher protein and lipid contents in the cuticle of DDT-resistant Heliothis virescens, and mutiple-insecticide resistant Musca domestica (Vinson and Law, 1971; Patil and Guthrie, 1979). Recent work using scanning electron measurements has shown that the females of pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles funestus had significantly thicker cuticles than pyrethroid-susceptible females (Wood et al., 2010). Gene-based evidence for the involvement of 9 cuticular genes has also been demonstrated in the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata, where three structural glycine-rich cuticular genes were found to be highly induced upon exposure to the organophosphate aziphosmethyl (Zhang et al., 2008). More recently, tissue-specific qRT-PCR has shown that along with the up-regulation of cuticlar structural genes, the majority of the metabolic genes contributing to insecticide resistance in the common bed bug Cimex lectularius are expressed in the epidermal layer (Zhu et al., 2013). 1.5.2 Behavioral/Other resistance Behavioral resistance refers to changes in the behavior of the insect that results in avoidance of the insecticide (Chareonviriyaphap et al. 2013). Behavioral resistance is broadly classified into non-contact spatial repellency (where the insect avoids the chemical without contact) and direct contact excitation (where the insect becomes hypersensitive to the chemical and moves away from the toxin/toxicant following exposure (Roberts et al., 1997). An example of behavioral resistance is that of the German cockroach Blatella germanica to survive a hydramethylnon-spiked corn-syrup bait by developing an aversion to D-glucose, which led to a decrease in efficacy from 90 to 39% in only five years of exposure (Silverman and Bieman, 1993), which has been recently been discovered to be the result of changes in the peripheral gustatory receptor neurons GRN1 and GRN2, which are stimulated by sugar which encourages feeding and bitter compounds which suppresses feeding, respectively (Wada-Katsamata et al., 2013). In glucose-averse roaches, GRN1 exhibits a low response to D-glucose relative to wild- type roaches, while GRN2 is stimulated in a dose dependent fashion, even though GRN2 has no response to D-glucose in wild-type B. germanica (Wadu-Katsamata et al., 2013). This ultimately results in glucose-averse B. germanica avoiding the hydramethylnon-spiked corn-syrup bait due 10 to the high concentration of D-glucose. 1.6 Insecticide cross resistance The development of insecticide resistance in an insect can lead to cross-resistance to a different insecticide, even if the insect has never been exposed to the second insecticide. Examples of this are in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella where selection of a strain using permethrin, conferred cross-resistance to other pyrethroids (Yu and Nguyen, 1996), the Southern House Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus where resistance to fenitrothion also conferred resistance to DDT and dichlorvos (Hassall, 1990), and the house fly Musca domestica where a the highly pyrethroid-resistant ALHF strain was identified to have cross-resistance to type I and type II pyrethroids, as well as the carbamate propoxur due to the high activity of monooxygenases (Liu and Yue, 2001). 1.7 Interaction of insecticide resistance factors The factors that confer insecticide resistance to insects may, independently, confer only a small level of resistance, whereas the combination of factors may confer multiplicative resistance (Georghiou, 1972). Studies using crosses of an insecticide resistant strain of M. domestica with an insecticide susceptible strain possessing recessive molecular markers unique to each of the five autosomes of M. domestica have allowed researchers to investigate the additive or multiplicative effects of insecticide resistance factors that are borne on different autosomes and their possible interaction. Georghiou (1972) identified that autosomes 2, 3, and 5 independently conferred 3.2, 1.7, and 1.0, respectively, when compared to the susceptible strain. When autosomes 2, 3, and 5 were combined, however, it resulted in a nearly complete restoration of 11 resistance. Other work using a similar house fly crossing strategy has shown that trans-acting factors may influence the expression of resistance genes, such as CYP6D1, which is located on autosome 1, but whose expression is controlled by a factor on autosome 2 (Liu and Scott, 1997). Recently, the factors involved in a multiple-insecticide resistant strain of M. domestica have been investigated using a combination of RNA-Seq gene expression profiling and various house fly crosses between the insecticide resistant and the insecticide susceptible strains. The results of this study indicated that factors on autosomes 2 and 5, notably cytochrome P450s and regulation genes may be largely responsible for the metabolic resistance to insecticides in M. domestica, with minor pesticide-metabolism factors present on autosomes 1 and 3 (Li et al., 2013). Other studies have identified that microbes may slow the development of insecticide resistance (Broderick et al., 2006). For example, correlations have been made between the density of Wolbachia infection in insecticide resistant mosquitoes and have been shown to be responsible, in part to the reproductive fitness of mosquitoes (Duron et al., 2006). Finally microbes may confer insecticide resistance to insects by directly degrading them. A recent study in Japan has identified that colonies of Burkholderia in sugar cane fields, where fenitrothion was repeatedly and heavily applied, had developed the capacity to utilize fenitrothion as a carbon source. When the bean bug Riptortus pedestris feeds on the sugar cane, it acquires the bacterium which colonizes the midgut of the insect, where it confers resistance to fenitrothion by using any fenitrothion injected by R. pedestris as a food source (Kikuchi et al., 2012). 1.8 Culex quinquefasciatus an insect pest The mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say is a primary vector of several disease causing agents including: West Nile virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus, 12 Japanese Encephalitis virus, Chikunguja virus, Wucheria bancroftii (Nasci and Miller, 1996; Arensburger et al., 2010). Culex quinquefasciatus has a global distribution, and is found predominantly in tropical, subtropical, and warmer portions of the temperate regions. In nature, Cx. quinquefasciatus is anautogenous, requiring a blood meal in order to provision its eggs (Gelbi? and Rozsypalov?, 2012). The primary hosts of Cx. quinquefasciatus are birds, however they also feed on humans, mammals, and amphibians (Mackay et al. 2010, Unlu et al. 2010). The degree to which Cx. quinquefasciatus feeds on humans in North America has been shown to vary from as low as 1% in a study in California (Reisen et al. 1990) to 50% in a study conducted in Arizona (Zinser et al. 2004). In Alabama, it is the predominant mosquito species in urban areas (Fonseca et al., 2004; Cupp et al., 2011). Current approaches to controlling mosquitoes in the state rely primarily on source reduction and the application of insecticides, primarily pyrethroids and organophosphates, for both larval and adult mosquitoes (Liu et al., 2004). 1.9 Insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus The Southern house mosquito Cx. quinquefasciatus has been reported to have resistance to and varying degrees of insecticide susceptibility to >20 different insecticides (Hamdan et al., 2005; Pridgeon et al., 2008; Norris and Norris, 2011), however, since pyrethroid insecticides are the most widely used insecticides for the control of mosquitoes indoors (Liu et al., 2006) and since pyrethroids represent one-quarter of the worldwide insecticide market (Hemingway et al., 2004), much of the research to investigate insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus has focused on resistance to pyrethroids. Insecticide resistance mechanisms in Cx. quinquefasciatus can include factors sucah as increased sequestering (Scott 1991; Feyereisen 1995), however the major inseticide resistance factors pertain to target site insensitivity and metabolic detoxification 13 (Liu et al., 2006). Two multiple-insecticide resistant field strains of Cx. quinquefasciatus (HAmCqG0, and MAmCq G0) have been collected from two geographically-diverse regions of Alabama (Liu et al., 2004). These field strains contained both the kdr-like mutation L982F (L1014F) as well as multiple metabolic-based resistance factors (Xu et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2006b). Pretreatment of the MAmCq G0 and HAmCq G0 strains with the cytochrome P450 inhibitor piperonyl butoxide (PBO) resulted in a 10-fold decrease in resistance to permethrin, while treatments with the hydrolase inhibitor S,S,S,-tributylphosphorotrithioate (DEF) and the glutathione S-transferase inhibitor diethyl maleate (DEM) resulted in decreases of only 3 and 2- fold, respectively (Xu et al., 2005). These results demonstrated that along with the kdr-like Vssc mutation, the majority of insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus is attributable to cytochrome P450-mediated metabolic detoxification (Xu et al., 2005). Similar results were obtained from collections of Cx. quinquefasciatus worldwide from regions as diverse as Saudi Arabia (Kasai et al., 1998), California (McAbee, 2003), and West Africa (Chandre et al., 1998). Hardstone et al. (2010) further identified that there are epistatic (interactions that are non- additive) effects between the kdr-like Vssc mutation and cytochrome P450s in Cx. quinquefasciatus with regard to permethrin resistance. In their study, they crossed a permethrin resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus containing the kdr-like mutation and cytochrome P450 metabolic detoxification (Jpal strain) with a lab susceptible strain (S-lab) to obtain a strain possessing P450-mediated resistance, but no kdr-like mutation. It was found that cytochrome P450-mediated detoxification alone conferred only 4% of the same resistance as the combination of the kdr-like mutation and the P450-mediated detoxification. They further found that if the cytochrome P450s of the Jpal strain were inhibited by PBO, the strain lost nearly all resistance to permethrin, reducing from ~28000-fold resistant to 70-fold resistant when compared to a 14 laboratory susceptible strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus. The HAmCq G0 and MAmCq G0 strains were further pressured with permethrin in the laboratory to obtain strains with a high level of pyrethroid resistance (Xu et al., 2006a). As a result of the permethrin pressuring, the genes involved in pyrethroid resistance were identified to be over-expressed when compared to their respective parental strains (Liu et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2011; Yang and Liu, 2011). This allowed for techniques such as suppression subtractive hybridization to be conducted to identify genes that are involved in permethrin resistance, including genes involved in cellular and molecular metabolism, signal transduction and regulation, vesicular and molecular transport, protein biosynthesis and ubiquitinization, cytoskeletal network, and others (Liu et al., 2007). Liu et al. (2007) discussed, for the first time, the possible involvement of cellular signaling in cytochrome P450 gene expression in mosquitoes and the link to insecticide resistance. Studies utilizing qRT- PCR have also been conducted to characterize the gene expression profiles of cytochrome P450s in insecticide resistant strains of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Liu et al. (2011) identified that four cytochrome P450 genes, CYP6AA7, CYP9J40, CYP9J34, and CYP9M10 were constitutively up- regulated in the larval stages in highly permethrin-resistant Cx. quinquefasciatus, while only CYP6AA7 was up-regulated in adult mosquitoes. Liu et al. (2011) further identified that three of these cytochrome P450 genes (CYP6AA7, CYP9J34, and CYP9M10) were inducted to a higher level of gene expression following a 24 h exposure to permethrin at the LC50 rate. The use of the two highly insecticide resistant strains of Cx. quinquefasciatus (HAmCq and MAmCq) also allowed for gene expression profiling of the entire compliment of the 204 cytochrome P450 genes predicted to be present in the Cx. quinquefasciatus genome (Arensburger et al., 2010) and to link selected cytochrome P450 over-expressed genes to permethrin resistance. In their study, Yang and Liu (2011) identified that multiple cytochrome P450 genes were up-regulated across 15 the two permethrin resistant lines tested when compared to their parental low insecticide resistance strains (HAmCqG8 to HAmCqG0 and S-lab, and MAmCqG6 to MAmCqG0 and S-lab, respectively). Yang and Liu (2011) further confirmed the up-regulation of CYP6AA7, CYP9J40, CYP9J34, and CYP9M10 in larval permethrin-resistant Cx. quinquefasciatus, and further identified that CYP6AA7 and CYP4C52v1 were up-regulated across both strains of permethrin- resistant Cx. quinquefasciatus and all lifestages. This highlighted the importance of CYP6AA7 and CYP4C52v1 in permethrin resistance for all life stages, while other cytochrome P450s, notably CYP9J40, CYP9J34, and CYP9M10 may be of particular importance for permethrin resistance in the larval stage. In addition to the deep level of knowledge of cytochrome P450 mediated resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus, research has been done to investigate the sequence changes (SNPs) associated with the Vssc during pressuring with permethrin. SNP analyses of the successive generations of the two highly permethrin-resistant strains HAmCqG8 and MAmCqG6 as they were undergoing laboratory selection with permethrin identified a total of nine (three non-synonymous and six synonymous) SNPs in the Vssc that were statistically correlated to the increase in resistance to permethrin (Xu et al., 2012a; Li et al., 2012). This suggested that as permethrin resistance increases, there is a need for additional target site modifications to maintain the insensitivity of the Vssc in the presence of higher permethrin concentrations. 1.10 Next generation sequencing With the advent of next generation sequencing, the ability to rapidly acquire large amounts of sequence information in a short period of time became available. Several technologies have been developed and are in current use as of 2012, including the Illumina-based 16 Solexa technology, the SOLiD technology, the Roche 454 technology, and the Ion Torrent technology (Metzker, 2010). 1.10.1 Illumina mRNA-Seq sequencing In Illumina mRNA-Seq sequencing, the compliment of mRNA is extracted from the RNA fraction via oligo-dT hybridization or ribosomal RNA subtraction. The mRNA is then reverse transcribed into double stranded DNA, sheared into appropriate lengths (~300 nucleotides) and two unique Y-adapters are added to the ends of the molecule (Metzker, 2010). Due to the lack of complementarity of the Y-adapters at their 5'-end, a PCR generation step can be conducted that will allow for the selective amplification of only those fragments containing the two adapters (one on each end of the fragment). The fragments are then flowed across a silica slide flow cell that is coated with a sequence that is complimentary to the adapters, to which they bind and serve as the template for the extension of the covalently-bound adapters. The bound adapters are then extended using a DNA polymerase (Metzker, 2010). This step generates a second template at the end of the molecule, which can then anneal to a second covalently-bond adapter on the silica slide, where it serves as the template for the generation of the reverse strand via bridge amplification (Harris et al., 2008). This cycle is repeated to obtain localized spots or 'polonies' where single-stranded unique forward and reverse strands are present. Once the polonies have been generated, the PCR reaction proceeds in the presence of all four nucleotide bases containing a reversible allyl protecting group on the 3'-hydroxyl on the sugar and a second allyl group connecting a unique fluorophore to the nucleobase (Metzker et al., 1994; Canard and Sarfati, 1994). Once a base has been added to the growing chain, the remaining nucleotides are flushed from the flow cell and the slide is excited successively with two different wavelengths that excite 17 the fluorophores that are then read for each polony using a camera (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Following the recording of the flourophore (which indicates which base was incorporated), a palladium-catalysed tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine-mediated deallylation reaction removes the fluorophore and restores the 3'-hydroxyl on the deoxyribose sugar allowing for the next base to be incorporated and read (Bentley et al., 2008). This cycle is repeated to identify the next base and ultimately, obtain the nucleotide sequence. 1.10.2 Gene expression analysis using RNA-Seq To determine the gene expression levels of genes using the RNA-Seq methodology, the individual reads are mapped to a nucleotide reference and the total number of times that a read matches to a sequence within a gene is recorded (Rapaport et al.,2013). Since all genes are fragmented into lengths of ~300 nt, the longer the gene is, the more fragments into which the gene will be divided. Therefore, the total number of fragments that are mapped to a gene are normalized by gene length in order to account for the additional possibility of longer genes to have mapped fragments. For this reason, the number of reads mapped is divided by the number of thousand nucleotides per gene, or reads/fragments mapped per kilobases of sequence for every million reads mapped (RPKM/FPKM) (Oshlack and Wakeffeld, 2009). For example, if 500 reads mapped to a given gene, and the gene was 2500 nt long, the 500 mapped reads would be divided by 2.5 to yield 200 and subsequently divided through by every million reads mapped, allowing genes to be compared both within, and between samples (Rapaport et al., 2013). 18 Chapter 2: Research Goal and Specific Objectives 2.1 Introduction Mosquitoes serve as the vectors of several human and animal pathogens. Insecticides are used to suppress mosquito populations and protect humans and animals from disease. Insecticide resistance, however, results from the repeated use of chemical insecticides and becomes a practical problem in the management of mosquito borne diseases. The Southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say is a globally-distributed mosquito and is the primary vector of West Nile virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus, Japanese Encephalitis virus, Chikungunja virus, and Wucheria bancroftii (Nasci and Miller, 1996; Fonseca et al., 2004; Arensburger et al., 2010; Cupp et al., 2011). One strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, HAmCqG0, which has resistance to pyrethroids, has been further selected with permethrin for eight generations in the laboratory to produce the HAmCqG8 strain, and has ~300-fold higher resistance level than the HAmCqG0 parental strain (Xu et al., 2006a; Li and Liu, 2010). Multiple studies have identified various factors involved in insecticide resistance based on the HAmCq G8 strain, including variations in the sodium channel (Xu et al., 2006b; Li et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2012a), cytochrome P450s (Liu et al., 2011, Yang and Liu, 2011; Gong et al., 2013), and other previously uncharacterized factors (Liu et al., 2007). Taken together, these results indicate that insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus is the result of multiple factors. Therefore, I hypothesize that the use of RNA-Seq, which can concurrently estimate the gene expression levels of all genes, to probe the gene expression profiles of the HAmCqG8 strain, will elucidate novel mechanisms of insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus. The questions raised are: 1) what genes are up-regulated in the HAmCqG8 strain, both constitutively and upon exposure to 19 permethrin; and 2) are the genes identified as important to insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus important in other mosquitoes. In addition to the investigation of insecticide resistance genes, we were also interested in possible new targets for the development of insecticides against Cx. quinquefasciatus. For this, we chose to investigate the anautogenous blood feeding requirement of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus require a period of time before they are capable of taking the blood meal during which, the female mates and continues with the necessary development to be competent for the acquisition of the blood meal itself (Williams and Patterson, 1969). Many studies have shown that genes and gene up-regulation are involved in the processing of the blood meal and subsequently, vitellogenesis (Chen et al., 2004, Hansen et al., 2005, Bryant et al., 2010). Therefore I hypothesize that the use of RNA-Seq to characterize the gene expression profiles of newly-eclosed female Cx. quinquefasciatus will reveal genes involved in the requirements of the female for the taking of a blood meal. The two questions raised are: 1) what changes in gene expression occur during the early time points post-eclosion, and 2) are these gene changes related to vitellogenesis. 2.2 The goal of research and specific objectives In order to answer these two questions in 2.1 and gain valuable insights into insecticide resistance and they physiology of Cx. quinquefasciatus, the long-term goal of my project is to first, characterize the gene expression profiles of the highly permethrin-resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus HAmCqG8 both in the absence of, and in presence of permethrin, and second, to characterize the gene expression profiles of Cx. quinquefasciatus during the early stages following eclosion in the female as they pertain to blood feeding. To achieve my long-term goals, 20 the following objectives will be performed: 1) characterization of the genes differentially expressed between the HAmCqG8 strain and its parental HAmCqG0 strain; 2) characterize the genes differentially expressed upon exposure to permethrin; 3) using the superfamily of cytochrome P450 genes, characterization of the up-regulation of P450 genes in a different mosquito species; 4) characterization of the changes in gene expression in newly eclosed female Cx. quinquefasciatus. 2.2.1 Characterization of the genes differentially expressed between the HAmCqG8 strain and its parental HAmCqG0 strain Earlier studies have investigated the genes involved in insecticide resistance in the HAmCqG8 strain through various technologies including SNP reaction analysis (Xu et al., 2006b; Li et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2012b), suppression subtractive hybridization (Liu et al., 2007), and qRT-PCR (Yang and Liu, 2011). With the advent of next generation sequencing, we are now able to concurrently probe the gene expression levels of nearly all genes within Cx. quinquefasciatus (Metzker et al., 2010). This is further aided by the availability of the annotated genome for Cx. quinquefasciatus (Arensburger et al., 2010). To identify the genes that are differentially expressed between the highly permethrin-resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus HAmCqG8 and its parental low-resistance strain HAmCqG0, we will conduct RNA-Seq on the most pyrethroid- resistant life stage, the fourth instar (Li and Liu, 2010), then conduct tests of differential gene expression and functional enrichment of associated gene ontology (GO) terms. 2.2.2 Characterize the genes differentially expressed upon exposure to permethrin 21 A recent study in our lab has identified that in the HAmCqG8 strain, several cytochrome P450 genes are up-regulated during an exposure to permethrin (Gong et al., 2013). Following a similar approach as outlines in 2.2.1, we will expose fourth instar HAmCqG8 to permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates for 24 h, which is an exposure period that has previously been shown to result in gene up-regulation (Zhu et al., 2008b; Gong et al., 2013). In addition an acetone control at the same rate of acetone (200 ppm) will be treated for the same 24 h interval. All samples will be sequenced using RNA-Seq, mapped to the Cx. quinquefaciatus genome and compared to an untreated zero hour reference. Following this, tests of differential gene expression, Venn diagram analyses, and functional enrichment of associated gene ontology (GO) terms will be used to identify the changes in gene expression for a highly permethrin-resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus during permethrin exposure. 2.2.3 Characterization of the up-regulation of P450 genes in a different mosquito species Previous work has shown that different mosquito species have different susceptibilities to insecticides (Beckage et al., 2004; Pridgeon et al., 2008). In order to investigate the factors involved in insecticide resistance and to see if there are comparisons between different mosquito species, we will use the superfamily of cytochrome P450 genes to characterize the gene expression levels in Aedes aegypti to compare with the gene expression values of insecticide resistant Cx. quinquefasciatus (Yang and Liu, 2011). We will use qRT-PCR to proble the gene expression of all cytochrome P450 genes in the Ae. aegypti genome (Nene et al., 2007) to identify up-regulated P450 genes. Based on these results we will select several P450 genes for functional study using the GAL4:UAS enhancer trap methodology (Brand and Perrimon, 1993; 22 Bischof et al., 2007) to test the P450 gene for its functional capacity to degrade the type I pyrethroid permethrin and the type II pyrethroid beta-cypermethrin. 2.2.4 Characterization of the changes in gene expression in newly eclosed female Cx. quinquefasciatus Newly-eclosed Cx. quinquefasciatus females require a period of time before they will freely take a blood meal (Williams and Patterson, 1969). To characterize the genes that may be involved in preparing the female for the taking of a blood meal, we will first determine the time course for which females will take a blood meal by collecting newly-eclosed adults in 12 h intervals and subsequently providing them with a blood meal at 24 h post-eclosion and every 12 h thereafter until 144 h post-eclosion. Once the time course for blood feeding has been determined, we will utilize RNA-Seq technology to probe the gene expression profiles of adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus from 2 h post-eclosion and every 12 h following until a time point that represents the age at which roughly half of the mosquitoes would take a blood meal. The gene expression values from the RNA-Seq sequencing will be estimated and differential gene expression will be tested as a time series to identify genes that are differentially expressed through the post-eclosion through to blooding time period. To identify if the genes detected as differentially-expressed throughout the time series by the RNA-Seq survey, we will characterize a set of genes identified as differentially-expressed in the RNA-Seq results along with selected genes known to be linked to vitellogenesis in mosquitoes including vitellogenins (Hansen et al., 2004). We will then test to see if the gene expression changes in Cx. quinquefasciatus during the early time point following eclosion are related to vitellogenesis by select genes identified as involved in vitellogenesis by the qRT-PCR work. We will then use 20-hydroxyecdysone as well 23 as ecdysone agonists to treat Cx. quinquefasciatus to see if we can induce the expression of E74 which regulates the expression of vitellogenin (Guoquiang et al., 2002). This will determine if the differentially-expressed genes in the early stages of adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus following eclosion are involved in the vitellogenesis competency of the mosquito. 2.3 Significance Characterization of gene expression profiles at the whole transcriptome level can elucidate patterns of gene expression that may otherwise go undetected in a posteriori approaches. The use of RNA-Seq to survey for uncharacterized factors involved in insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus provides an ideal start point for future studies to identify the regulatory pathways involved in insecticide resistance, which may ultimately lead to an improvement of mosquito management. The same RNA-Seq technology applied to the previously uncharacterized early post-eclosion time points of Cx. quinquefasciatus adult females also represents the possibility for the discovery of new factors involved in host seeking and blood meal acquisition, which could represent novel targets for the development of new insecticides against Cx. quinquefasciatus. 24 Chapter 3: The Transcriptome Profile of the Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Following Permethrin Selection William R. Reid1, Lee Zhang1,2, Feng Liu1, Nannan Liu1? 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA 2Genomics and Sequencing Laboratory, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA ?To whom correspondence should be addressed Accepted in PLoS ONE: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047163 3.1 Abstract To better understand the genetic variation in the insecticide resistant mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, and to gain valuable insights into the gene interaction and the complex regulation system involved in the development of insecticide resistance, we conducted a whole transcriptome analysis of Culex mosquitoes following permethrin selection. Gene expression profiles for the lower resistant parental mosquito strain HAmCqG0 and their permethrin-selected high resistant offspring HAmCqG8 were compared and a total of 367 and 3982 genes were found to be up- and down-regulated, respectively, in HAmCqG8, indicating that multiple genes are involved in response to permethrin selection. However, a similar overall cumulative gene expression abundance was identified between up- and down-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 mosquitoes following permethrin selection, suggesting a homeostatic response to insecticides through a balancing of the up- and down-regulation of the genes. While structural and/or cuticular structural functions were the only two enriched GO terms for down-regulated genes, the 25 enriched GO terms obtained for the up-regulated genes occurred primarily among the catalytic and metabolic functions where they represented three functional categories: electron carrier activity, binding, and catalytic activity. Interestingly, the functional GO terms in these three functional categories were overwhelmingly overrepresented in P450s and proteases/serine proteases. The important role played by P450s in the development of insecticide resistance has been extensively studied but the function of proteases/serine proteases in resistance is less well understood. Hence, the characterization of the functions of these proteins, including their digestive, catalytic and proteinase activities; regulation of signaling transduction and protein trafficking, immunity and storage; and their precise function in the development of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes will provide new insights into how genes are interconnected and regulated in resistance. Keywords: Pyrethroid resistance, gene expression, Culex quinquefasciatus, transcriptome, up- regulation 3.2 Introduction Mosquitoes are known vectors of parasites and pathogens of both human and animal diseases and their control is an important part of the global strategy to control mosquito-associated diseases (WHO, 1957). Insecticides are the most important component of this vector-control effort, and pyrethroids such as permethrin are currently the most widely used insecticides for the indoor control of mosquitoes worldwide and the only chemical recommended for the treatment of mosquito nets, the main tool for preventing malaria in Africa (Najera and Zaim, 2001). However, the development of resistance to insecticides, especially to pyrethroids, in mosquito vectors has become a global problem (Hemingway et al., 2000; Phillips, 2001; Liu et al., 2004; 26 Xu et al., 2005; Liu, 2008). An improved understanding of the mechanisms governing insecticide resistance is therefore necessary to provide a knowledge base for the development of novel strategies to prevent resistance development and other tools to control resistant mosquitoes; ultimately reducing the prevalence of mosquito-borne diseases. Resistance has been assumed to be a pre-adaptive phenomenon, in that prior to insecticide exposure rare individuals already exist who carry an altered genome that results in one or more possible mechanisms (factors) allowing survival from the selection pressure of insecticides (Sawicki and Denholm, 1984;.Brattsten et al., 1986) In addition, some studies propose that resistance can also be induced by insecticide exposure (Vontas et al., 2010), and overall, the rate of development of resistance in field populations of insects depends upon the levels of genetic variability in a population (Liu and Scott, 1995; Liu and Yue, 2001). Efforts to characterize the genetic variation involved in insecticide resistance have therefore been fundamental in understanding the development of resistance and studying resistance mechanisms, as well as in practical applications such as designing novel strategies to prevent or minimize the spread and evolution of resistance development and the control of insect pests (Roush et al., 1990). The mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say is a primary vector of West Nile virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus, Japanese Encephalitis virus, Chikungunja virus, Wucheria bancroftii, and pathogens that cause lymphatic filariasis (Nasci and Miller, 1996; Arensburger et al., 2010). This mosquito species has a global distribution, especially throughout tropical and temperate climates of the world (Fonseca et al., 2004; Cupp et al., 2011). In Alabama, Cx. quinquefasciatus is the predominant mosquito species in urban areas. Current approaches to controlling mosquitoes in the state rely primarily on source reduction and the application of insecticides, primarily pyrethroids and organophosphates, for both larval and 27 adult mosquitoes (Liu et al., 2004). One northern Alabama Culex strain, HAmCqG0 collected from Huntsville, has demonstrated the ability to develop resistance and/or cross-resistance to not only pyrethroids and organophosphates (OPs), but also relatively new insecticides such as fipronil and imidacloprid (Liu et al., 2004). The HAmCqG0 mosquito strain has been further selected with permethrin for eight generations in the laboratory to produce the HAmCqG8 strain, which has a much higher level of resistance to permethrin than the parental strain, HAmCqG0 (Xu et al., 2006a; Li et al., 2009; Li and Liu, 2010). In an effort to better understand the genetic variation in resistant mosquitoes and gain valuable insights into the genes involved in the development of permethrin resistance in Culex mosquitoes, we chose the most resistant life stage (fourth instar larvae)(Li and Liu, 2010) and conducted a whole transcriptome analysis of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus following permethrin selection and examined the gene expression profiles between the lower resistant parental strain HAmCqG0 and their permethrin- selected high resistant offspring HAmCqG8 using Illumina RNA Seq (Morin et al., 2008). 3.3 Materials and Methods 3.3.1 Mosquito strains Culex quinquefasciatus strain HAmCqG0 is a low insecticide resistant strain with a 10-fold level of resistance to permethrin compared with the laboratory susceptible S-Lab strain (Li and Liu, 2010). It was originally collected from Huntsville, Alabama in 2002 and established in laboratory without further exposure to insecticides (Liu et al., 2004). The HAmCqG8 strain is the 8th generation of permethrin-selected HAmCqG0 offspring and has a 2,700-fold level of resistance (Li and Liu, 2010). All mosquitoes were reared at 25?2oC under a photoperiod of 12:12 (L:D) h. The mosquito was reared strictly under identical rearing conditions for the two mosquito 28 populations to enter into the fourth instar stage at the same time, which was achieved through the controlling of the egg raft collection, egg hatching, and subsequent larval development and sample collection. 3.3.2 RNA extraction A total of 200 fourth instar larvae of the HAmCqG8 and HAmCqG8 mosquito populations were pooled, flash frozen on dry ice and immediately processed for RNA extraction. The fourth instar lifestage was selected because it is the most permethrin-resistant lifestage (Li and Liu, 2010) which should provide for the greatest differences in gene expression between the low- and highly-permethrin resistant mosquito strains. Total RNA was extracted using the hot acid phenol extraction method (Liu and Scott, 1997), after which a total of 30?g of RNA was treated with DNase I using the DNA-Free kit from Ambion (Austin, TX) to remove any contaminant DNA. Total RNA was re-extracted with two successive acid phenol: chloroform (1:1) steps followed by a final chloroform extraction to remove any residual phenol. The RNA was then precipitated over ethanol and resuspended in sterile distilled water. After a 1?g aliquot of RNA had been visually inspected for quality and for DNA contamination on a 1% agarose gel, total RNA was sent for RNA-Seq analysis (Hudson Alpha Institute of Biotechnology [HAIB]). 3.3.3 RNA library preparation, RNA Seq sequencing, Data analysis, and gene expression processing RNA quality was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and an Invitrogen Qubit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Libraries were then prepared using the Illumina Tru-Seq RNA Sample Prep Kits (Illumina, San Diego, CA) for mRNA-Seq and a 3' poly A tail selection method. Samples were barcoded and run as one of four samples on a single lane of an 29 Illumina Hi Seq 2000 chip. Samples for the mRNA Seq were run using the PE-50 module (HAIB). Base calling, initial removal of low quality reads, and barcode parsing were conducted by the staff at HAIB. Data were sorted by coordinate using Picardtools (http://picard.sourceforge.net) and checked for mate-pair matching. Paired end reads were then mapped to the Cx quinquefasciatus genome from Vectorbase (Megy et al., 2009) using Tophat (Trapnell et al., 2009) with mate pair interval of 200 bases and the gtf basefeatures file. The --no- novel-juncs flag was used in the alignment to suppress the discovery of novel spliceforms in order to estimate gene expression levels based on the Vectorbase annotation of the genes. Read counts were determined using Cufflinks, and the testing of differential expression was estimated using Cuffdiff (Roberts et al., 2011). Both Cufflinks and Cuffdiff were used because these programs provide a more accurate estimation of the gene expression value by adjusting for transcript fragment biases that occur at the ends of the transcripts and fragments during the library generation protocol (Kasper et al., 2010). To adjust for the unequal coverage across a gene, Cuffdiff uses a negative binomial distribution (Anders and Huber, 2010) and applies a likelihood function to estimate gene expression that reduces bias, increases reproducibility across libraries, and gives better correlated gene expression levels as estimated by qRT-PCR and determines differentially-expressed genes at the ?=0.05 false discovery rate (FDR) (Kasper et al., 2010). After analysis, only genes with expression values ?1, as measured in number of fragments mapped for every thousand bases of gene length for every million fragments sequenced (FPKM), were retained for expression comparisons (Gan et al., 2010). 3.3.4 Gene expression validation using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) 30 The 4th instar larvae of each mosquito population had their RNA extracted for each experiment using the acidic guanidine thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method (Liu and Scott, 1997). Total RNA (0.5 ?g/sample) from each mosquito sample was reverse-transcribed using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Stratagene) in a total volume of 20 ?l. The quantity of cDNAs was measured using a spectrophotometer prior to qRT-PCR, which was performed with the SYBR Green master mix Kit and ABI 7500 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Each qRT- PCR reaction (15 ?l final volume) contained 1x SYBR Green master mix, 1 ?l of cDNA, and a specific primer pair designed according to gene sequences (Appendix 3.1) at a final concentration of 3-5 ?M. All samples, including the no-template negative control, were performed in triplicate. The reaction cycle consisted of an initial UDG glycosylase step at 50?C for 2 min followed by a melting stage at 95?C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95?C for 15 sec and 60?C for 1 min. Specificity of the PCR reactions was assessed by a melting curve analysis for each PCR reaction using Dissociation Curves software. Relative expression levels for the genes were calculated by the 2-??CT method using SDS RQ software (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). The 18S ribosome RNA gene, an endogenous control, was used to normalize the expression of target genes (Yang and Liu, 2011; Liu et al., 2011). Preliminary qRT-PCR experiments with the primer pair (Appendix 3.1) for the 18S ribosome RNA gene designed according to the sequences of the 18S ribosome RNA gene had revealed that the 18S ribosome RNA gene expression remained constant in of HAmCqG8 and HAmCqG8 mosquito populations, so the 18S ribosome RNA gene was used for internal normalization in the qRT-PCR assays. Each experiment was repeated three to four times with different preparations of RNA samples. The statistical significance of the gene expressions was calculated using a Student's t-test for all 2- sample comparisons and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple sample 31 comparisons (SAS v9.1 software); a value of P?0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3.3.5 Annotation, gene grouping, and functional gene enrichment analysis The genes were annotated for SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html (Gough et al., 2001). Additional gene information for carboxylesterases was taken from the Vectorbase annotation for the Johannesburg strain version 1.1 (www.vectorbase.org) (Megy et al., 2009). Gene Ontology is a method of gene annotation that was introduced in 1998 (Ashburner et al., 2009). It is composed of three sets of structured gene ontology terms (GO terms) that have a carefully controlled vocabulary. These three sets represent 1) Cellular Component, which describe where the protein product is located at the sub-cellular and macromolecular complex level, 2) Biological Process, which denote gene products that are part of, or are themselves, biological processes, and 3) Molecular Function, which describe what the gene product does with regard to its function. Each gene may have multiple GO terms within each of the three sets of GO term ontology. Since the vocabulary of GO terms is carefully controlled, the occurrence of a given GO term can be compared between two distinct sets of genes. This allowed us to conduct an enrichment analysis of GO terms in the differentially-expressed gene sets against the entire expressed gene set using the Gene Ontology terms as annotated for the predicted genes in the Cx. quinquefasciatus genome using the online tool g:Profiler biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/welcome.cgi (Reimand et al., 2007; Reimand et al., 2011). The g:Cocoa tool was used to test for GO term enrichment using a gSCS threshold for the significance threshold and a static background containing only genes with expression values of ?1. This analysis took all of the GO terms associated with the differentially 32 down- or up-regulated gene sets and determined if a given GO term was statistically over- represented using a hypergeometric distribution to quantify the sampling probability that a given GO term is statistically more abundant in the up- or down-regulated gene set when compared to the abundance of that same GO term among the entire expressed gene set. 3.4 Results 3.4.1 Illumina RNA Seq data analysis The maximum numbers of 51 nt paired-end reads that passed Illumina quality filtering were 32,540,882 and 37,184,673 for HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8, respectively (Table 3.1), which is consistent with the data typically obtained in an RNA Seq reaction that is based on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 single lane consisting of eight barcoded samples with a maximum number of reads passing filter of ~46 million (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, CA). Reads were mapped to the Cx. quinquefasciatus genome (version: CpipJ1.2) from Vectorbase (www.vectorbase.org) (Megy et al., 2009). Table 3.1. Number of paired end reads from the Illumina HiSeq sequencing and the percentage of reads mapped to the Cx. quinquefasciatus (strain: Johannesburg) predicted transcriptome Mosquito strain HAmCqG0 HAmCqG8 Total reads 32540882? 37184673 Additional reads discarded 31509? 16219 Reads mapped 23008772 30586459 ?Total number of FASTQ (DNA sequence with quality scores) reads passing the Illumina quality filter ?Number of reads discarded due to low quality of one or both of the paired end reads Overall, the sequenced fragments mapped to a total of 14,440 genes, with 12,451 of these having a FPKM value of ?1.0 in both HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8, which was used as the minimum value 33 to detect gene expression (Gan et al., 2010). All sequence traces and expression values have been submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus at NCBI, reference accessions GSE33736 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE33736 and SRA048095 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRA048095). 3.4.2 Transcriptome profile: SCOP general categories and detailed function categories All expressed genes from both HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 were annotated for protein superfamily using the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) annotations version 1.73 supplied for Cx. quinquefasciatus (http://supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY) (Hubbard et al., 1997), classified in terms of eight SCOP general categories, extra?cellular processes, intra?cellular processes, general, information, metabolism, regulation, not annotated, and other/unknown, according to the general function of the proteins. The genes expressed in both HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 were sorted into each of the eight SCOP general categories (Vogel et al., 2004) and then the expression values of each of these genes were summed within SCOP general category to obtain the proportion of total gene expression attributable to each of the SCOP categories (Fig. 3.1). Overall, the proportions of total gene expression were similar for HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8, however there were notable differences between the two mosquito strains for the metabolism category, which accounted for 32% of the gene expression in the entire HAmCqG8 genome compared to 26% in HAmCqG0, suggesting an up-regulation of genes relating to metabolism in response to permethrin selection. Another difference in the total gene expression was in the not annotated category in HAmCqG0, where it accounted for 23% of the gene expression in the entire genome compared to only 18% in HAmCqG8, suggesting the down regulation of a set of genes without functional annotation in response to permethrin selection. 34 Figure 3.1. Total proportions of cumulative gene expression levels in HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 for the SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html. 3.4.3 Transcriptome profile: superfamily Genes were further categorized into protein superfamilies at a gene annotation level lower than detailed function to compare the distribution of the expression levels between HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8. This allowed us to evaluate changes in the general gene expression within each of the superfamilies following permethrin selection. A log FPKM transformation was used to normalize the gene expression values and these were then plotted as beanplots (Fig. 3.2, Appendix 3.2). The distribution of each superfamily was broadly classified as unimodal, bimodal, or multimodal (Appendix 3.2) according to the similarities of gene expression within that superfamily. In addition, the values of skewness and kurtosis for the gene expression distribution were calculated, representing the symmetry of the gene distributions within the log normal 35 distributions (a positive skewness represents a gene distribution where a majority of genes have low expression levels and a negative skewness one where a majority of the genes have high expression levels) and the degree of sharpness of the curve (in leptokurtic distributions, groups of genes are expressed at similar expression levels and in platykurtic distributions, genes are expressed across a range of expression levels). Overall, all the superfamilies were comparable for HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8, both in terms of expression levels and in numbers of genes (as shown along the Y and the X axes, respectively, in Fig. 3.2, and in Appendix 3.2). This suggested that the permethrin selection may not have significantly influenced the overall expression levels of the genes in most superfamilies, however, in some cases the overall gene expression distribution in the two strains did differ slightly in a few superfamilies. For example, the Di- Copper containing center gene superfamily showed a multi modal distribution with three expression peaks in both HAmCqG8 and HAmCqG0. However, while the magnitudes of all three expression peaks were similar for a number of genes in HAmCqG8, the peak with the lower mode of expression was >2-fold higher than the intermediate peak, and more than 5-fold higher than the highest mode in HAmCqG0. Similar patterns were also found for the C-type lectin-like, NAP-like, and PLP binding barrel superfamilies. These slight changes in the gene expression distribution pattern may reflect the influence of up-regulated genes on the overall gene expression pattern in each of the superfamilies. The lysozyme-like superfamily, compared with HAmCqG0 which had a single mode, contained two modes in HAmCqG8 with one distribution positively and the other negatively skewed, suggesting that while some genes in this superfamily were up-regulated in HAmCqG8 compared with HAmCqG0, the others may be down regulated. 36 Figure 3.2. Log normal bean-plots for all expressed genes within SCOP superfamilies (SCOP version 1.75; supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html) in HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8. The distribution along the Y axis indicates a higher level of gene expression, while the distribution along the X axis indicates the proportion of genes expressed at the given level of gene expression along the Y axis. Distributions are oriented along a common central baseline so that distributions in red (HAmCqG0) have more genes expressed at a given gene expression level (log FPKM) if the distribution is further to the left on the X axis, while distributions in blue (HAmCqG8) are higher if they are further to the right of the X axis. The central vertical baseline for each superfamily is a mirror point for the two distributions. 3.4.4 Transcriptome profile: differential gene expression between HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 37 Looking at the above SCOP general categories, detailed function categories and superfamily categories there is an overall similarity in the pattern of gene expression over the whole transcriptome level between the lower resistance parental mosquito HAmCqG0 and their permethrin selected offspring HAmCqG8. We therefore went on to characterize the gene expression level between the two mosquito strains using the Cuffdiff algorithm and applying a >2-fold differential expression cut off threshold. A total of 3982 down- and 367 up-regulated genes were identified in HAmCqG8 (Table 3.2, Appendix 3.3;3.4) compared to HAmCqG0. Overall, although there were more than 10 times the number of genes down-regulated than up- regulated, the cumulative gene expression values (FPKM) between the down- and up-regulated genes (1.43 ? 105 and 1.53 ? 105, respectively) were similar (Table 3.3). Interestingly, the predominant SCOP general function category for the down-regulated genes was the non- annotated category (NONA, 2016 genes), which accounted for 50% of the down-regulated genes (Table 3.2, Fig. 3.3), and represented 77% of the total cumulative expression (FPKM) of all of the down-regulated genes. Table 3.2. Numbers of differentially-expressed genes and their cumulative gene expression level in HAmCqG8 sorted by the Structural Classification of Proteins general function category Down-regulated? Up-regulated SCOP? general function category #genes FPKM* range and (cumulative) #genes FPKM range and (cumulative) Extra-cellular processes 101 0.1 - 126.4 (1.29 ? 103) 20 1.0 - 121.8 (5.42 ? 102) General 355 0.1 - 192.1 (4.31 ? 103) 39 1.0 - 1750.5 (5.99 ? 104) Information 171 0.1 - 344.9 (3.68 ? 103) 5 4.3 - 66.0 (1.05 ? 102) Intra-cellular processes 359 0.1 - 255.4 (5.18 ? 103) 58 1.7 - 5763.6 (1.28 ? 104) Metabolism 397 0.1 - 737.5 (1.15 ? 104) 91 1.1 - 47162.3 (1.02 ? 105) NONA? 2016 0.0 - 33037.0 (1.10 ? 105) 125 1.0 - 5766.3 (2.62 ? 104) Other 57 0.6 - 167.1 (1.26 ? 103) 5 7.5 - 1742.1 (3.76 ? 103) Regulation 526 0.0 - 584.3 (5.56 ? 103) 24 1.5 - 865.9 (1.25 ? 103) TOTAL 3982 (1.43 ? 105) 367 (1.53 ? 105) ?Down-regulated /Up-regulated genes represent those genes that differed in their expression level (FPKM) in HAmCqG8 by more than two fold when compared to the parental strain HAmCqG0 ? SCOP general function categories annotated using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation (version 1.75) *Fragments mapped Per Kilo bases of reference sequence for every Million fragments sequenced ?NONA: Not annotated 38 Table 3.3. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis results for differentially expressed genes in HAmCqG8 GO level GO term? Term domain and name # hits p-value? Down-regulated genes Molecular function - - structural molecule activity (GO:0005198) 163 1.08 ? 10-11 structural constituent of cuticle (GO:0042302) 85 3.19 ? 10-18 Up-regulated genes Biological process (GO:0008150) 193 4.28 ? 10-10 metabolic process (GO:0008152) 139 1.02 ? 10-7 oxidation-reduction process (GO:0055114) 38 5.39 ? 10-9 proteolysis (GO:0006508) 55 2.35 ? 10-16 Molecular function (GO:0003674) 250 9.80 ? 10-6 Catalytic activity (GO:0003824) 162 2.09 ? 10-13 oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491) 47 1.05 ? 10-10 monooxygenase activity (GO:0004497) 29 2.84 ? 10-15 hydrolase activity (GO:0016787) 90 1.29 ? 10-12 peptidase activity (GO:0008233) 54 2.16 ? 10-14 peptidase activity, acting on L-amino acid peptides (GO:0070011) 52 1.99 ? 10-15 exopeptidase activity (GO:0008238) 10 4.66 ? 10-5 carboxypeptidase activity (GO:0004180) 7 1.03 ? 10-4 endopeptidase activity (GO:0004175) 41 1.47 ? 10-12 metallopeptidase activity (GO:0008237) 20 6.26 ? 10-10 metalloendopeptidase activity (GO:0004222) 11 2.42 ? 10-6 serine hydrolase activity (GO:0017171) 30 4.39 ? 10-9 serine-type peptidase activity (GO:0008236) 30 4.39 ? 10-9 serine-type endopeptidase activity (GO:0004252) 28 1.89 ? 10-8 hydrolase activity, acting on glycosyl bonds (GO:0016798) 15 1.23 ? 10-7 hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds (GO:0004553) 13 1.17 ? 10-6 Electron carrier activity (GO:0009055) 28 6.65 ? 10-14 Binding activity - - tetrapyrrole binding (GO:0046906) 32 1.55 ? 10-17 iron ion binding (GO:0005506) 33 3.19 ? 10-15 heme binding (GO:0020037) 32 1.32 ? 10-17 ?Annotation from the Gene Ontology consortium (version 1.2084; release date: 12:07:2011) ? Cumulative hypergeometric p-values for GO terms of genes that were differentially up- regulated in when tested against all genes with expression levels of FPKM > 1 using the g:SCS threshold. * GO Terms that do not have values for the number of hits or p-values were not statistically enriched in the functional enrichment analysis, but are included in the table to provide all parenthood connections. This result is consistent with the results for the SCOP general categories, where a decrease in the total gene expression was found in the NONA category for HAmCqG8 compared to HAmCqG0. In contrast, only 17% of the cumulative expression of the up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 was in the NONA category. Nevertheless, the highest cumulative gene expression of up-regulated genes 39 was in the metabolism general function category (Table 3.2, Fig 3.3), which accounted for 67% (FPKM) of all of the up-regulated gene expression, while the cumulative expression of this category accounted for only 8% of the total cumulative expression of the down-regulated genes. Taken together, these results not only reveal equally dynamic changes in abundance for both the increases and decreases in the total gene expression for different categories in Cx. quinquefasciatus following permethrin selection, but also indicate an important feature of metabolic gene up-regulation in response to insecticide resistance and permethrin selection that is consistent with the data from the SCOP general category analysis, where the total expression in the metabolism general category was found to be higher in HAmCqG8 than in HAmCqG0. Figure 3.3. Combined gene expression levels for all up- and down-regulated genes within a general function category in HAmCqG8 compared to those expressed in HAmCqG0. 3.4.5. Functional enrichment analysis of GO terms for differentially expressed genes 40 To interpret the gene expression data and gain more insight into the biological mechanisms driving the up- and down-regulated genes, Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment or functional enrichment analysis (Castillo-Davis and Hartl, 2002; Reimand et al., 2007; Reimand et al., 2011) was performed to identify significantly enriched GO terms among the up- and down regulated genes in HAmCqG8. GO terms are groups of genes sharing common biological function, regulation, or interaction (http://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gconvert.cgi). A statistical analysis reveals which GO terms are over-represented and have hence been ?enriched?, or are more prevalent, within the down- or up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8. Each gene can have multiple GO terms and these are part of a carefully-controlled vocabulary that allows for genes of various annotations to be grouped according to common attributes such as their cellular components, biological processes, or molecular functions (Ashburner et al., 2009). Overall, the functional enrichment analysis showed that among the down-regulated gene set in HAmCqG8, the terms GO:000581 (structural molecule activity) and GO:0042302 (structural constituent of cuticle) were the only statistically over represented GO terms (P=1.08 ? 10-11 and 3.19 ? 10-18, respectively) (Table 3.3). For the 3982 down-regulated genes in HAmCqG8, there were 85 hits for GO:000581 and 163 hits for GO:0042302, indicating that 85 of the 3982 down-regulated genes had the structural molecule activity function and 163 the structural constituent of cuticle GO terms. Since these were the only enriched molecular function GO terms among the down- regulated gene set, there are likely to be changes of gene expression in the structural component of the cuticle in the HAmCqG8 mosquitoes compared to the parental HAmCqG0 strain. The functional enrichment analysis of the 367 up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 identified 25 statistically enriched GO terms (Table 3.3), four of which were in the categories biological process (GO:0008150), metabolic process (GO:0008152), proteolysis (GO:0006508), and 41 oxidation-reduction process (GO:0055114). Among these four enriched GO terms, biological process (GO:0008150) and metabolic process (GO;0008152) were the predominant GO terms, with 193 and 139 hits, respectively, suggesting that the major up-regulated genes were involved in biological and metabolic processes. The remaining 21 statistically enriched GO terms were in the molecular function category (Table 3.3) and the GO terms for catalytic activity (GO:0003824), hydrolase activity (GO:0016787), peptidase activity (GO:0008233), peptidase activity acting on L-amino acid peptides (GO:0070011), and oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491) were the predominant GO terms, with hits that ranged from 162 to 47. Comparing the statistically enriched GO terms between the up- and down-regulated genes, these two sets of genes had obvious differences in their functions: the down-regulated genes primarily represented structural or cuticular structural activity functions, while the up-regulated genes were predominantly related to catalytic, metabolic, and proteolytic activity. 3.4.6. The molecular functional parenthood relationships of the GO terms among up- regulated genes and their interconnection The relationships among the GO terms in the molecular function category were investigated in the up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 by determining whether their connection was a part of the same process or whether a parenthood process was involved (Ashburner et al., 2009). Overall, 3 functional sets of GO terms were found to be significantly overrepresented among the GO terms for molecular function (Fig. 3.4, Table 3.3), namely electron carrier activity, binding, and catalytic activity. The electron carrier activity set was mainly associated with GO terms in cytochrome P450 genes (Appendix 3.5). 42 Figure 3.4. Parent-Child association for functionally enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms among genes that were up-regulated in HAmCqG8. GO terms associated with the up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 were considered statistically at <0.001 using the g:SCS threshold in g:Cocoa (http://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gcocoa.cgi). Colored boxes represent statistically functionally enriched GO terms, while the nonsignificantly-enriched GO term is marked in white and provided to display all of the parent-child relationships in the network. Lines and/or arrows represent connections between or among different GO terms. Solid lines represent relationships between two enriched GO terms. Dashed lines represent relationships between enriched and unenriched terms to connect all of the nodes on the directed acyclic graph. The category for binding had three child branch nodes, all of which were related to metal binding: tetrapyrrole binding, iron binding, and heme binding (Fig. 3.4). These child branch nodes were again associated with the GO terms that were mainly overrepresented among cytochrome P450 genes (Appendix 3.5). The next major category was catalytic activity, which had two main child branch nodes: oxidoreductase activity with an additional branch node for 43 monooxygenase activity, both of which had their GO terms present in the genes annotated as cytochrome P450s (Appendix 3.5); and hydrolase activity, which contained three additional branch nodes. Of these additional hydrolase branch nodes, the first was for hydrolase activity of glycosyl bonds, with an additional sub-branch node for hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds. This was significantly overrepresented among the enzymes corresponding to the function of hydrolyzing glycosyl compounds such as alpha-L-fucosidases, alpha amylases and alpha glucosidases. The other two additional hydrolase branch nodes were peptidase/proteinase activity, which had an additional six sub-branch nodes relating to different peptidase/proteinase activities, and serine hydrolase activity, which had two additional sub-branch nodes for serine- type peptidase activity and serine-type endopeptidase activity (Fig. 3.4). The peptidase/proteinase and serine hydrolase activity nodes interconnected through the GO term nodes of endopeptidase activity and peptidase activity acting on L-amino acid peptides, suggesting that the GO terms associated with proteinase activity among the differentially up- regulated gene set in HAmCqG8 were interconnected. Therefore, investigating the relationships among these enriched GO term categories of up-regulated genes revealed that functional categories were mainly overrepresented among P450s and proteases/serine proteases. Indeed, the up-regulation of gene expression in these two categories was further confirmed by validation study of gene expression using qRT-PCR. Overall, the qRT-PCR validation data was consistent with the RNA-Seq data, showing a general trend of differential expression of genes between HAmCqG8 and HAmCqG0. A total of 14 up-regulated P450 genes and 24 protease related genes, which showed ? 2-fold higher expression in HAmCqG8 compared with HAmCqG8 in the RNA-Seq data, were selected for the study (Table 3.4). 44 Table 3.4. qRT-PCR validation of selected up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 as identified by the RNASeq quantification. Fold overexpression in HAmCqG8? Gene category Vectorbase Annotation? RNASeq qRT-PCR Cytochrome P450 CPIJ002538 CYP6AG12? 3.7 2.1?? CPIJ005959 CYP6AA7? 7.3 2.1 CPIJ005957 CYP6AA9? 6.6 2.8 CPIJ010546 CYP9J34? 13.4 2.9 CPIJ009478 CYP4D42v1? 2.4 3.2 CPIJ005956 CYP6BZ2? 3.3 3.7 CPIJ010537 CYP9J45? 4.8 3.8 CPIJ012470 CYP9AL1? 9.2 3.8 CPIJ014218 CYP9M10? 3.7 4.2 CPIJ010225 CPY12F7? 3.9 5.2 CPIJ010227 CYP12F13? 7.1 5.2 CPIJ010543 CYP9J40? 7.2 6.0 CPIJ005955 CYP6P14? 8.2 6.3 CPIJ020229 CYP4D42v2? 2.4 7.0 Protease CPIJ002139 HzC4 chymotrypsinogen 4.3 1.1 ? 0.11 CPIJ002130 kallikrein-7 2.4 1.5 ? 0.50 CPIJ013319 metalloproteinase 3.5 1.5 ? 0.10 CPIJ009106 angiotensin-converting enzyme 2.7 1.5 ? 0.84 CPIJ001240 cathepsin B-like thiol protease 5.3 1.6 ? 0.46 CPIJ019428 trypsin 2 3.4 1.6 ? 0.04 CPIJ004086 angiotensin-converting enzyme 5.7 1.7 ? 0.62 CPIJ008873 prolylcarboxypeptidase 3.5 1.7 ? 1.09 CPIJ002135 trypsin alpha-4 5.9 1.8 ? 0.84 CPIJ016012 tryptase-2 2.2 1.8 ? 0.10 CPIJ002142 chymotrypsin BI 2.8 2.0 ? 0.42 CPIJ006803 zinc metalloproteinase nas-7 4.5 2.0 ? 0.21 CPIJ007383 endothelin-converting enzyme 1 2.5 2.1 ? 1.08 CPIJ010224 metalloproteinase 2.9 2.4 ? 0.74 CPIJ014523 elastase-3A 3.0 2.4 ? 0.71 CPIJ019029 metalloproteinase 2.6 3.6 ? 0.70 CPIJ002128 mast cell protease 2 16.1 3.6 ? 0.04 CPIJ006542 chymotrypsin-2 19.7 5.4 ? 1.84 CPIJ010805 carboxypeptidase A1 4.4 6.9 ? 3.72 CPIJ006076 hypodermin-B 17.0 11.6 ? 4.96 CPIJ001743 carboxypeptidase A2 5.4 16.3 ? 5.48 CPIJ003623 coagulation factor XII 7.1 54.2 ? 19.79 CPIJ001742 zinc carboxypeptidase 3.0 99.5 ? 19.35 CPIJ009594 nephrosin 21.7 144.3 ? 13.8 ?Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.2, June 2008; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ ?Expressed as fold change in gene expression in HAmCqG8 compared to HAmCqG0 ?Annotations for cytochrome P450 genes were taken from the most current annotation based on: Nelson (2009) The Cytochrome P450 Homepage. Human Genomics 4, 59-65: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html ??Data reprinted from Yang and Liu, 2011 All 14 cytochrome P450s were up-regulated by at least 2-fold in the HAmCqG8 strain compared 45 with HAmCqG0, which was consistent with the data generated using the RNAseq. Among the 23 up-regulated proteinase genes that have been identified by RNAseq, 14 of them (60%) were up- regulated by at least 2-fold in the HAmCqG8 strain and nine were up-regulated with a range of 1.5- to 1.8-fold compared with HAmCqG0 (Table 3.4). However, one of the proteinase genes had an expression level of 1.1-fold in HAmCqG8 compared with HAmCqG0, which was significantly different from the RNAseq data. 3.5 Discussion Based on the findings of our previous research, which has included synergism studies on the inhibition of metabolic enzymes (Xu et al., 2005), studies on the target site insensitivity of sodium channels in permethrin resistance (Xu et al., 2006b), gene expression profiles of resistance from a resistant-susceptible mosquito subtractive library (Liu et al., 2007), research into the genetic inheritance of permethrin resistance (Li and Liu, 2010), and, most recently, studies of the gene expression and characterization of P450 genes covering the entire genome sequence of resistant mosquitoes (Yang and Liu, 2011; Liu et al., 2011), it seems clear that a multiple mechanism/gene-interaction phenomenon is responsible for the development of permethrin resistance in Culex mosquitoes. We consider it very likely that normal biological and physiological pathways and gene expression signatures are altered in the resistant mosquitoes through changes in multiple gene expression in the resistant mosquitoes following insecticide selection that allow them to adapt to environmental or insecticide stress. While a great deal of effort has been devoted to identifying and characterizing the mechanisms and genes involved in insecticide resistance, and significant progress has been made, our previous approaches to characterizing the individual genes associated with insecticide resistance have not yet resulted in 46 a global understanding of the complex processes responsible for resistance. The recent genome sequencing of Cx. quinquefasciatus (Arensburger et al., 2010) has made direct comparisons of gene expression at the whole genome level between samples possible. The whole transcriptome analysis of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus following permethrin selection using Illumina RNA Seq reported here has allowed us to compare the cumulative gene expression in HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 mosquitoes in the SCOP general function categories and superfamilies, enabling us to evaluate major changes in the gene expression within each of the categories in the mosquitoes following permethrin selection using their median expression values. In general, similar levels of total cumulative gene expression were identified in the HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 mosquitoes in each of the general function categories, suggesting that the permethrin selection may not change the majority of the gene expression occurring in the mosquito genome, but that the changes that are found in only a select number of genes should be correlated to the permethrin selection process undergone by HAmCqG8. Results from our previous studies (Liu et al., 2004, Xu et al., 2005; Liu and Yue, 2001, Xu et al., 2006a, Liu et al., 2007) and from many others (David et al., 2005; Strode et al., 2006; Strode et al, 2008, Muller et al., 2008; Marcombe et al., 2009; Vontas et al., 2005) suggest that the interaction of multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms or genes may be responsible for insecticide resistance. While it is unclear whether and how these up-regulated genes are associated with insecticide resistance, the findings reported in these papers suggest that insecticide resistance in mosquitoes involves both multiple gene up-regulation and multiple complex interaction mechanisms. Taken together, the above findings suggest that not only is insecticide resistance conferred via multi-resistance mechanisms or up-regulated genes, but it is mediated through the interaction of resistance genes. The current study identified a total of 367 47 and 3982 genes that were up- and down-regulated, respectively, in permethrin selected offspring HAmCqG8 compared with the parental HAmCqG0 strain. These results provide further evidence to confirm our hypothesis that multiple gene expression in resistant mosquitoes changes following insecticide selection, thus allowing them to adapt to environmental or insecticide stress. Further, when we validated our RNAseq data using qRT-PCR, we were able to confirm that all of the cytochrome P450 genes identified as upregulated along with 60% of the proteases were indeed upregulated. Previous work using human colorectal cell lines showed that among 192 human exons , 88% of those identified as overexpressed using RNASeq could be validated as having either higher or lower expression using qRT-PCR, although the fold expression between the two strains was variable (Griffith et al., 2010). This suggested that the RNAseq methodology was suitable for the identification of genes putatively involved in insecticide resistance based on gene expression level, although some genes of interest may be overlooked due to differences in gene sequence, or genes involved in cell signaling that do not need to be more than two-fold expressed in order to be of importance to insecticide resistance. To interpret the gene expression data and gain fresh insights into the biological mechanisms affected by the up- and down-regulated genes/proteins, we characterized the GO term enrichment, or functional enrichment, by identifying the significantly enriched GO terms among the up- and down-regulated genes in the low resistance parental strain and the high resistance eighth generation offspring. As described earlier, three categories of GO terms are used to describe gene products: biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components (Ashburner et al., 2009). This approach facilitates efforts to understand the functional relevance of genes, allowing genes or family members that share functional and structural properties to be studied as a whole. Our comparison of the enriched GO terms in the 48 up- and down-regulated genes in HAmCqG8 revealed that the two enriched GO terms for the down-regulated genes represented primarily structural or cuticular structural functions and 50% of all the down-regulated genes, representing 77% of the total cumulative expression of those genes, were non-annotated. In contrast, the enriched GO terms for the up-regulated genes represented mainly the catalytic, metabolic, and proteolytic functions, and only 17% of the cumulative expression of the up-regulated genes was in the NONA category. Nevertheless, from an overall cumulative gene expression point of view, we saw similar expression levels between the up- and down-regulated genes in permethrin selected HAmCqG8. Taken together, these results not only revealed different patterns in the enriched GO terms/functions for both the up- and down regulated genes, but also equally the dynamic changes in the abundance of both the total increased and the total decreased gene expression in Culex mosquitoes following permethrin selection, suggesting a homeostatic response of mosquitoes to insecticides through a balancing of up- and down-regulation of genes (Morgan 1997; 2001). A number of mechanisms have been proposed for the balancing of up- and down- regulation, including: 1) an adaptive homeostatic response that protects the cell from the deleterious effects of oxidizing species, nitric oxide, or arachidonic acid metabolites from catalytic and/or metabolic enzymes (Morgan 2001; White and Coon, 1980); 2) a homeostatic or pathological response to inflammatory processes (Morgan, 1997); and/or 3) a need for the tissue to utilize its transcriptional machinery and energy for the synthesis of other components involved in the inflammatory response (Morgan, 1989). These hypotheses all offer reasonable explanations for our observation of both up- and down-regulation of multiple genes in the resistant mosquitoes following permethrin selection. For example, down-regulation of genes with structural or cuticular structural functions could be linked to the homeostatic response that 49 mosquitoes utilize to protect the cell from the toxic effects of oxidizing species derived from the extra metabolic proteolytic, and/or catalytic enzymes and metabolites that result from the up- regulated metabolic enzymes. This homeostatic response might also balance the usage of energy, O2, and the other components needed for the syntheses of the up-regulated gene products and the catalytic or metabolic processes known to play important roles in mosquito resistance. The functional relationships among the enriched GO terms of up-regulated genes/proteins allowed us to identify the key components involved in insecticide resistance and gain an insight into the molecular mechanisms in resistant mosquitoes as a whole. Three molecular function categories, namely electron carrier activity, binding, and catalytic activity, were significantly overrepresented among the GO terms for the up-regulated genes. Investigating the relationships among these enriched GO term categories revealed that functional categories were mainly overrepresented among P450s and proteases/serine proteases. Among these two key components, the importance of P450s has been extensively studied and it has been demonstrated that basal and up-regulation of P450 gene expression can significantly affect the disposition of xenobiotics or endogenous compounds in the tissues of organisms, thus altering their pharmacological and/or toxicological effects (Pavek and Dvorak, 2008). In many cases, increased P450-mediated detoxification has been found to be associated with enhanced metabolic detoxification of insecticides, as evidenced by the increased levels of P450 proteins and P450 activity that result from constitutive overexpression of P450 genes in insecticide resistant insects (Carino et al., 1992; Liu and Scott, 1997; Liu and Scott, 1998; Zhu et al., 2008a; Zhu et al., 2008b; Zhu and Liu, 2008; Zhu et al., 2010; Hardstone et al., 2010; Feyereisen et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2011). In addition, multiple P450 genes have been identified as being up-regulated in several individual resistant organisms, including house flies and mosquitoes (Zhu et al., 2008a; Zhu and Liu, 2008; 50 Marcombe et al., 2009; Itokawa et al., 2010; Yang and Liu, 2011; Liu et al., 2011), thus increasing the overall expression levels of P450 genes. Our recent studies on the characterization of P450s, their expression profiles, and their important role in the response to insecticide treatment found that multiple P450 genes were up-regulated in resistant and permethrin selected Cx quinquefasciatus (Yang and Liu, 2011; Liu et al., 2011). These findings together strongly suggest that overexpression of multiple P450 genes is likely to be a key factor governing the increased levels of detoxification of insecticides and insecticide resistance. In contrast to the well-known role of P450s in insecticide resistance, apart from a few examples, less is known about the function of proteases/serine proteases in resistance. Proteases are a potent class of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of peptide bonds and are known to be involved in a wide range of physiological functions, including the digestion of dietary protein, blood coagulation, immune response, hormone activation, and development (Krem et al., 2000). In addition to their digestive, catalytic, proteinase activities, proteases/serine proteases are involved in the regulation of signaling transduction (Burysek et al., 2002; Trejo, 2003; Ramsay et al., 2008; Marrs et al., 2012) and cellular protein trafficking in eukaryotic cells (Lemberg, 2011). Indeed, the up-regulation of protease genes have been identified in in DDT resistant An. gambiae (Vontas et al., 2005), fenitrothion resistant house flies, Musca domestica (Ahmed et al., 1998; Wilkins et al., 1999), as well as DDT resistant D. melanogaster (Pedra et al., 2004). It has been suggested that the up-regulation of proteases may enable insects to rapidly degrade proteins for their re-synthesis into detoxification enzymes as has been postulated for M. domestica when challenged with the insecticide fenitrothion (Wilkins et al., 1999). In addition, two serine protease genes from Cx. pipiens pallens have been found to be up-regulated in a deltamethrin- resistant strain (Wu et al., 2004). These reports, together with the findings reported here, suggest 51 the importance of the up-regulation of proteases in insecticide resistance. Whether the up- regulated proteases identified in the resistant mosquitoes play a role in the degradation of proteins for biosynthesis of the up-regulated metabolic proteins, particularly P450s and the other proteins involved in the regulation of insecticide resistance, or whether there is some form of interaction with the up-regulated genes associated with signaling transduction and protein trafficking needs further investigation. In conclusion, this study not only provides a catalog of genes that were co-up- and down- regulated and information about their potential functions, but may also ultimately lead to a deeper understanding of transcriptional regulation and the interconnection of co-regulated genes, including metabolic genes, genes with catalytic activities, genes with proteolytic activities, and genes with, perhaps, functions involved in the regulation, signaling transduction, and protection of cells and tissues in resistant mosquitoes. It has been suggested that co-overexpressed genes are frequently co-regulated (Blalock et al., 2004; Clarke and Zhu, 2006). Therefore, characterizing these co-regulated genes as a whole will represent a good starting point for characterizing the transcriptional regulatory network and pathways in insecticide resistance, improving our understanding of the dynamic, interconnected network of genes and their products that are responsible for processing environmental input, for example the response to insecticide pressure, and the regulation of the phenotypic output, in this case, the insecticide resistance of insects (Clarke and Zhu, 2006). The new information presented here will provide fundamental new insights into precisely how insecticide resistance is regulated and how the genes involved are interconnected and regulated in resistance. 52 3.6 Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Drs. Peter W. Atkinson, Peter Arensburger and the Culex quinquefasciatus genome community for the efforts they have devoted to determining the genome sequence and making the information available in VectorBase. We would also like to thank Ting Yang for technical support with the qRT-PCR validation, and the Hudson Alpha Institute of Biotechnology for their expertise in conducting the RNA sequencing work and for all of their help and support with this study. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions for our manuscript. 53 Chapter 4: Gene Expression Profiles of the Southern House Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus During Exposure to Permethrin William R. Reid1, Lee Zhang1,2, Youhui Gong1.3, Ting Li1, Nannan Liu1? 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA 2Genomics and Sequencing Laboratory, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA 3Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China ?To whom correspondence should be addressed Prepared for publication in Insect Science 4.1 Abstract Insecticide resistance is a major obstacle to the management of disease-vectoring mosquitoes worldwide. The genetic changes and detoxification genes involved in insecticide resistance have been extensively studied in populations of insecticide-resistant, however few studies have focused on the resistance genes up-regulated upon insecticide exposure and the possible regulation pathways involved in insecticide resistance. To characterize the changes in gene expression during insecticide exposure, and to investigate the possible connection of known regulation pathways with insecticide resistance, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis of a highly- permethrin resistant strain of Culex quinquefasciatus following permethrin exposure. Gene expression profiles revealed a total of 224 and 146 up- and down-regulated, when compared to a blank acetone carrier treated control, respectively, suggesting that there were multiple, but 54 specific genes were involved in permethrin resistance. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the up-regulated genes contained multiple detoxification genes including a glutathione S- transferase and multiple cytochrome P450 genes, as well as several immune-related genes, while the down-regulated genes consisted primarily of proteases and carbohydrate metabolism and transport. Further analysis showed that permethrin exposure resulted in a decrease in the expression of serum storage proteins and likely represented a resulted in a delay in the development of the fourth instar possibly due to a decrease in feeding. This effect was more pronounced in an insecticide-resistant strain than in an insecticide-susceptible strain and may represent a behavioral mechanism of insecticide resistance in Culex mosquitoes. 4.2 Introduction Mosquitoes carry and transmit parasites and pathogens, impacting human and animal health and resulting in economic losses (WHO, 1957). Insecticides, notably pyrethroids such as permethrin, are routinely applied to manage mosquito populations in order to mitigate the negative impact of mosquitoes, however, the development of insecticide resistance, especially to pyrethroids, has become a global problem (Phillips, 2001; Liu et al, 2004; Hemingway et al., 2002; Xu et al, 2005; Liu 2008; Liu et al., 2009). Insecticide resistance is presumed to be a pre- adaptive phenomenon, indicating that the genes involved in insecticide resistance and the pathways that control their regulation are already present within the insect (Sawicki and Denholm, 1984; Brattsten et al., 1986). In addition, some studies propose that resistance can also be induced by insecticide exposure (Vontas et al., 2010; Gong et al., 2013), indicating that there are underlying pathways within the insect that respond to an insecticide challenge, and that these pathways may be involved in insecticide resistance. 55 The mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus Say is a primary vector of West Nile virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus, Japanese Encephalitis virus, and lymphatic filariasis (Nasci and Miller, 1996; Arensberger et al., 2010). This mosquito species has a global distribution, especially throughout tropical and temperate climates of the world (Fonseca et al., 2004; Cupp et al., 2011). In Alabama, Cx. quinquefasciatus is the predominant mosquito species in urban areas, and insecticide resistance has been documented for this mosquito in the field (Liu et al., 2005). One strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, collected from Alabama, has been pressured with permethrin for eight generations in the laboratory to produce the HAmCqG8 strain, which is a highly permethrin-resistant strain that allows for the identification of genes putatively involved in insecticide resistance based on gene expression profiles (Xu et al., 2006a; Li et al., 2009, Li and Liu, 2010, Yang and Liu, 2011, Reid et al., 2012, Gong et al., 2013). The objective of our study was to characterize the expression levels of genes induced upon exposure to permethrin when compared to an acetone blank carrier and identify the possible activation of gene pathways in Cx. quiquefasciatus. 4.3 Materials and Methods 4.3.1 Mosquito strains Culex quinquefasciatus strain HAmCqG8 is a highly-insecticide resistant strain that was originally collected from Huntsville, Alabama in 2002 (Liu et al., 2004) and subsequently pressured in the laboratory with permethrin for eight successive generations to achieve a 2,700- fold level of resistance to permethrin compared with the laboratory susceptible S-Lab strain (Li and Liu, 2010). All mosquitoes were reared at 25?2oC under a photoperiod of 12:12 (L:D) h. 56 4.3.2 Permethrin exposure treatments A total of 400 fourth instar larvae were collected and transferred to 3 L of water in plastic containers measuring 20.5 x 35 x 11 cm for each treatment. The mosquito rearing was conducted so that the two mosquito populations entered into the fourth instar stage at the same time. This was achieved through the controlling of the egg raft collection, egg hatching, and subsequent larval development and sample collection under identical rearing conditions. Four treatments were conducted: untreated time 0h, acetone treated 24h post-application, and permethrin mixed in an acetone carrier at the LC50 and the LC70 rate (24h post-application). The treatments were considered to be representative of the LC50 and LC70 rates if the percentage of dead larvae after the 24 h permethrin exposure was 50?5% and 70?5%, respectively. The final volume of acetone was adjusted to 600 ?l per 3 L for the acetone and permethrin treatments. No acetone was added to the untreated time 0h sample and no mortality was observed for either the 0h untreated treatment, or the 24 h acetone exposure treatment. A single container was used for the acetone 24 h treatment, while two pans each were used for the LC50 and LC70 treatments in order to obtain enough surviving larvae for RNA extraction. 4.3.3. RNA extraction A total of 200 surviving fourth instar larvae of each treatment were pooled, flash frozen on dry ice and immediately processed for RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using the hot acid phenol extraction method as outlined by Chomczynski and Sacchi (1987), after which a total of 30 ?g of RNA was treated with DNase I using the DNA-Free kit from Ambion (Austin, TX) to remove any contaminant DNA. Total RNA was re-extracted with two successive acid phenol: chloroform (1:1) steps followed by a final chloroform extraction to remove any residual 57 phenol. The RNA was then precipitated over ethanol and re-suspended in sterile distilled water. After a 1?g aliquot of RNA had been visually inspected for quality and for DNA contamination on a 1% agarose gel, total RNA was sent for RNA-Seq analysis (Hudson Alpha Institute of Biotechnology [HAIB]). 4.3.4. RNA library preparation, RNA Seq sequencing, Data analysis, and gene expression processing RNA quality was assessed using a Qubit fluorimeter and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer by the HAIB. Libraries were then prepared using the Illumina mRNA-Seq kit using a 3' poly A tail selection method. Samples were barcoded and run as one of four samples on a single lane of an Illumina Hi Seq 2000 chip. Samples for the mRNA Seq were run using the PE-50 module (HAIB), which results in paired end reads that are each 50 nucleotides long, spanning a 300 nt stretch of the mRNA sequence. Base calling, initial removal of low quality reads, and barcode parsing were conducted by the staff at HAIB. Data were sorted by coordinate using Picardtools (http://picard.sourceforge.net) and checked for mate-pair matching. Paired end reads were then trimmed for adapter and low quality reads were removed using Trimmomatic (Lohse et al., 2012). Surviving reads were then mapped to the Cx quinquefasciatus genome JHBv1.3 from Vectorbase (Arensberger et al., 2010; Megy et al., 2012) using Tophat2 (Trapnell et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2011) with mate pair interval of 200 bases and the gtf basefeatures file. The --no- novel-juncs flag was used in the alignment to suppress the discovery of novel spliceforms in order to estimate gene expression levels based on the Vectorbase annotation of the genes. Read counts were determined using Cufflinks, and the testing of differential expression was estimated using Cuffdiff (Roberts et al., 2011) for each 24h exposure treatment compared to the untreated 58 0h treatment. Both Cufflinks and Cuffdiff were used because these programs provide a more accurate estimation of the gene expression value by adjusting for transcript fragment biases that occur at the ends of the transcripts and fragments during the library generation protocol (Kasper et al., 2010). Genes identified as up- or down-regulated when compared to the 0h untreated sample were then subjected to Venn diagram analysis to generate a list of genes that were up- or down-regulated in the permethrin treatments, but not in the acetone treatment. Only genes with expression values ?1, as measured in number of fragments mapped for every thousand bases of gene length for every million fragments sequenced (FPKM), were retained for expression comparisons (Gan et al., 2010). 4.3.5. Annotation, gene grouping, and functional gene enrichment analysis The genes were annotated using the Vectorbase CpipJv1.3 annotation (Megy et al., 2012) and further annotated using the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) general and detailed functions for Cx. quinquefasciatus available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html (Gough et al., 2001). Functional gene enrichment of GO terms was conducted using the online tool g:Profiler biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/welcome.cgi (Reimand et al., 2007; 2011) and gene identification number discrepancies between CpipJv1.2 and CpipJ1.3 were resolved using the 'Gene annotation changes CpipJ1.2 to CpipJ1.3' file from Vectorbase (Megy et al., 2012). The g:Cocoa tool was used to test for GO term enrichment on genes that were up- or down-regulated in the permethrin treatments using a gSCS threshold for the significance threshold and a static background containing only genes with expression values of ?1. This analysis took all of the GO terms associated with the differentially down- or upregulated gene sets and determined if a given GO 59 term was statistically over-represented using a hypergeometric distribution to quantify the sampling probability that a given GO term is statistically more abundant in the up- or down- regulated gene set when compared to the abundance of that same GO term among the entire expressed gene set. 4.3.6. Selected gene expression validation using qRT-PCR Acetone and permethrin (LC50) exposures were independently replicated in triplicate following the methodology for insecticide exposure previously described above. The RNA from three independent samples of 100 fourth instar larvae from both the S-lab and the HAmCqG8 strains was obtained using the extraction method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (1987), and treated with DNase I using the DNA-Free kit from Ambion (Austin, TX) to remove any contaminant DNA. The DNase I was inactivated using the inactivation buffer from Ambion and cDNA was generated from the template RNA using the First strand cDNA synthesis kit from Roche (Indianapolis, IN). qRT-PCR was conducted on an ABI 7500 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) using the ABI SyBr Green mastermix kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and relative gene expression was determined by using the 2(-??Ct) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001) using a portion of the 18S rRNA gene as the reference gene and subtracting the acetone treatment from the LC50 permethrin treatment. Statistical significance between the S-lab and HAmCqG8 strain was tested using a Welch's T-test in R (R Core Team, 2013).The primers used are provided in Appendix 4.1. 4.4 Results 60 4.4.1. Gene Abundance The number of paired-end reads that passed Illumina quality filtering ranged from 25,723,783 to 30,431,848, which provided a similar depth of coverage for each of the four treatments tested (Table 4.1), which allowed us to compare the gene expression levels for all four samples tested. The adapter trimming and low-quality removal step removed an additional ~2 million paired end reads from each of the treatments resulting in a final set of reads that ranged from 24 to 28.5 million reads (Table 4.1). Tophat2 and Cufflinks were then used to map the reads to the Cx. quinquefasciatus genome (version: CpipJ1.3) from Vectorbase (www.vectorbase.org) and to estimate gene abundance, which identified a total of 11,595 genes that had an FPKM ?1.0. This was consistent with our previous study where 12,451 expressed genes were identified in the fourth instar stage of HAmCqG8, (Reid et al., 2012). All sequence traces and expression values have been submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus at NCBI, reference accession GSE51399 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE51399. Following the determination of gene abundance, the genes were tested for differential gene expression using Cuffdiff by comparing the untreated 0 h time point with each of the 24 hour exposure treatments: acetone, permethrin LC50, and permethrin LC70. 4.4.2. Up-regulated Genes 61 The differential gene expression testing identified a total of 331 up-regulated genes, which included 107, 214, and 216 genes in the acetone, permethrin LC50, and permethrin LC70 treatments, respectively (Fig. 4.1; Table 4.2). Figure 4.1. Venn diagram analysis of the total numbers of differentially-expressed up- and down-regulated genes in the fourth instar of the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus following a 24h exposure to either an acetone control, or two rates of permethrin (LC50 and LC70). Overlapping circles represent genes that were co-up- or co-down- regulated in two or more groups. Among the genes up-regulated in the permethrin treatments, the majority were present within the SCOP functional categories of 'no annotation', 'metabolism', 'intra-cellular processes', and 'general' (Table 4.3). Forty-six of the genes were up-regulated in the acetone and both permethrin treatments, with an additional 11 and 26 genes shared between the acetone and the permethrin LC50, and acetone and the permethrin LC70 treatments, respectively. The remaining up-regulated genes were present only in the permethrin treated samples and included 80 genes up-regulated in the permethrin LC50 treatment, 67 genes up-regulated in the permethrin LC70 treatment, and 77 genes up- regulated in both the permethrin LC50 and LC70 treatments. 62 Table 4.2: Number of differentially-expressed genes in the highly-permethrin resistant strain of Culex quinquefasciatus, HAmCqG8, following a 24 h exposure to either acetone, or permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates compared to a zero hour untreated time point. Down-regulated (24h post application) Up-regulated (24h post application) Permethrin Permethrin SCOP? general function Acetone LC50 LC70 Ace LC50 LC70 Extra-cellular processes 7 7 7 2 2 5 General 8 10 12 20 34 30 Information 0 0 3 3 4 5 Intra-cellular processes 28 42 42 17 34 47 Metabolism 50 97 91 21 47 43 No annotation 19 24 16 29 73 66 Other 2 3 4 2 3 4 Regulation 11 16 16 13 17 16 TOTAL 125 199 191 107 214 216 ?Structural Classification of Proteins database (SCOP) general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html Although several of the genes up-regulated in the permethrin treatment were present in the SCOP 'no annotation? category, there was lower-level annotation for several of these genes using the functional annotation from Vectorbase, including 10 cuticular genes, two cercropin genes, CPIJ005108 and CPIJ010699, and a high-affinity nuclear juvenile hormone (JH) binding protein CPIJ006964 (Appendix 4.2). Within the SCOP 'metabolism' category, the greatest numbers of up-regulated genes among the permethrin-treatments were contained within the redox category, including nine cytochrome P450 genes (CYP325BF1-de1b, CYP325BF1v2, CYP6BY2, CYP6M14, CYP4H34, CYP6N19, CYP6M16, CYP6M13, CYP6M15) (Table 4.3; Appendix 4.2). Within the SCOP 'general' category, the greatest number of up-regulated genes were contained within the small molecule binding category, which contained two fatty acyl-CoA reductases (CPIJ007244, CPIJ007245) and a glutathione S-transferase (CPIJ002679) (Table 4.3; Appendix 63 4.2). Finally, within the SCOP 'intra-cellular processes' category, the greatest number of up- regulated genes was present in the proteases category which contained two trypsin-like serine proteases (CPIJ002140, CPIJ016012), two metalloproteases (CPIJ002142, CPIJ002156) and nephrosin (CPIJ009594) (Table 4.3; Appendix 4.2). 4.4.3. Down-regulated Genes A total of 271 genes were determined to be down-regulated, which included 107, 214, and 216 genes in the acetone, permethrin LC50, and permethrin LC70 treatments, respectively (Fig. 4.1; Table 4.2). Sixty-four of the down-regulated genes were down-regulated in all of the 24 hour exposure treatments (acetone, permethrin LC50, and permethrin LC70), with an additional 10 genes down-regulated in both the acetone and the permethrin LC50 treatment, and seven genes down-regulated in both the acetone and the LC70 treatment (Fig. 4.1). Table 4.3. Genes up-regulated and down-regulated 24h-post treatment following treatment with permethrin at either the LC50 or the LC70 rate. SCOP Functional annotation? Up-regulated Down-regulated General function Detailed function Superfamilies Genes Superfamilies Genes Extra-cellular processes Blood clotting 0 0 1 1 Cell adhesion 3 3 2 2 Immune response 0 0 1 1 Toxins/defense 1 1 0 0 General General 7 9 2 2 Small molecule binding 5 20 4 4 Information Chromatin structure 1 1 1 1 DNA replication/repair 2 3 1 1 Translation 0 0 1 1 Intra-cellular processes Cell cycle, Apoptosis 1 1 0 0 Cell motility 3 4 0 0 Ion m/tr 4 10 1 2 Phospholipid m/tr 1 3 1 2 Proteases 7 19 5 24 64 Protein modification 1 2 1 1 Transport 3 5 0 0 Metabolism Amino acids m/tr 0 0 1 2 Carbohydrate m/tr 4 6 2 18 Coenzyme m/tr 1 1 1 1 E- transfer 1 1 1 1 Energy 0 0 1 1 Lipid m/tr 1 1 0 0 Nitrogen m/tr 0 0 1 1 Nucleotide m/tr 1 1 0 0 Other enzymes 3 10 8 32 Polysaccharide m/tr 1 3 1 1 Redox 5 16 3 9 Secondary metabolism 3 4 1 7 Transferases 0 0 3 3 Regulation DNA-binding 3 3 3 3 Kinases/phosphatases 1 3 1 3 Receptor activity 0 0 2 2 Signal transduction 6 9 0 0 Other Unknown function 4 4 1 2 Viral proteins 0 0 1 1 No annotation No annotation 1 81 1 17 TOTAL 74 224 53 146 ?SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html Forty-four genes were down-regulated in the acetone treatment alone, while 26, 21, and 99 genes were down-regulated in the permethrin LC50, the permethrin LC70, and both the permethrin LC50 and LC70 treatments, respectively. Among the genes that were down-regulated only in the permethrin treatments, more than half of the genes (76) were present in the SCOP 'metabolism' category, most notably the carbohydrate metabolism/transport, other enzymes, and redox categories, which contained a carboxylesterase (CPIJ018233), four alpha amylase genes (CPIJ005062, CPIJ005725, CPIJ801597, CPIJ801761), two alpha-glucosidases (CPIJ009306, CPIJ013169), and multiple hexamerin and larval serum storage proteins (CPIJ000056, CPIJ001820, CPIJ9033, CPIJ007783, CPIJ009032) (Table 4.3; Appendix 4.3). The second 65 largest down-regulated SCOP general function category was 'intra-cellular processes', and contained, notably, the proteases category, which contained multiple trypsin-like serine proteases (Table 4.3; Appendix 4.3). 4.4.4. Functional enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) terms among the differentially- expressed genes Following the identification of the up- and down-regulation genes, we conducted a functional enrichment analysis on the gene ontology (GO) terms associated with the differentially- expressed genes. This type of analysis will identify GO terms that are statistically enriched among either the up- or the down-regulated genes in comparison to all of the genes expressed. Among the up-regulated genes, the Biological Process GO terms associated with immune response, and oxidation-reduction processes were predominant, while the predominant Molecular Function GO terms were oxidoreductase activity, monooxygenase activity, and structural constituent of cuticle (Table 4.4). Among the down-regulated genes, the Biological Process GO terms associated with carbohydrate metabolic process, lipid metabolic process, and proteolysis were identified, while the majority of the Molecular Function GO terms were associated with protease functions, phosphatidylcholine 1-acylhydrolase activity, and alkaline phosphatase activity (Table 4.4). When the functionally-enriched GO terms from the up- and down-regulated genes were connected into a network through their parent-child terms, the network revealed that the functionally-enriched GO terms among the up- and down-regulated genes shared only three higher-level nodes: metabolic process, catalytic activity, and organic substance metabolic process (Fig. 4.2). This indicated that the functionally-enriched GO terms from the up-regulated genes formed distinct clusters from the functionally-enriched GO terms 66 from the down-regulated genes. In particular, GO terms associated with proteolytic and primary metabolic processes were functionally-enriched among the down-regulated genes, while the GO terms structural constituent of cuticule, oxidoreductase activity, and various immune response GO terms were functionally-enriched among the up-regulated genes (Fig. 4.2). 67 Figure 4.2. Gene ontology term functional enrichment analysis of the differentially-expressed up- and down-regulated genes identified in the fourth instar of the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus following a 24h exposure to permethrin. 68 When the genes associated with the functionally-enriched GO terms were compiled, a total of 29 and 200 genes were shared among the up- and down-regulated gene sets, respectively. Table 4.4. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis results for differentially expressed genes in the HAmCqG8 strain following a 24h exposure to permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates. GO level GO term? Term domain and name # hits p-value? Up-regulated genes Biological Process* GO:0009607 response to biotic stimulus 3 1.47?10-4 GO:0002376 immune system process 3 2.33?10-2 GO:0051704 multi-organism process 3 5.86?10-4 GO:0051707 response to other organism 3 GO:0009617 response to bacterium 3 1.47?10-4 GO:0006952 defense response 3 3.09?10-2 GO:0042742 defense response to bacterium 3 1.47?10-4 GO:0006955 immune response 3 2.33?10-2 GO:0045087 innate immune response 3 5.05?10-3 GO:1901615 organic hydroxy compound metabolic process 4 3.74?10-2 GO:0006066 alcohol metabolic process 4 2.55?10-2 GO:0055114 oxidation-reduction process 14 1.44?10-2 Molecular Function* GO:0016491 oxidoreductase activity 16 2.09?10-3 GO:0004497 monooxygenase activity 7 2.19?10-2 GO:0042302 structural constituent of cuticle 8 5.70?10-4 GO:0008812 choline dehydrogenase activity 4 1.39?10-3 GO:0050660 flavin adenine dinucleotide binding 5 3.62?10-2 Down-regulated genes Biological Process* GO:0005975 carbohydrate metabolic process 21 4.50?10-8 GO:0006629 lipid metabolic process 11 8.54?10-4 GO:0006508 Proteolysis 28 6.76?10-10 Molecular Function* GO:0017171 serine hydrolase activity 16 8.90?10-6 GO:0016798 hydrolase activityacting on glycosyl bonds 12 1.71?10-7 GO:0004553 hydrolase activityhydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds 9 1.20?10-4 GO:0008233 peptidase activity 29 7.76?10-11 GO:0008238 exopeptidase activity 12 2.15?10-10 GO:0004180 carboxypeptidase activity 9 7.32?10-8 GO:0008237 metallopeptidase activity 10 3.40?10-4 GO:0004181 metallocarboxypeptidase activity 5 8.19?10-3 GO:0004175 endopeptidase activity 15 1.17?10-3 GO:0008236 serine-type peptidase activity 16 8.90?10-6 GO:0008970 phosphatidylcholine 1-acylhydrolase activity 3 1.82?10-3 GO:0004035 alkaline phosphatase activity 4 4.88?10-6 ?Annotation from the Gene Ontology consortium (version 1.2084; release date: 12:07:2011) ? Cumulative hypergeometric p-values for GO terms of transcripts that were differentially upregulated in when tested against all transcripts with expression levels of FPKM > 1 using the g:SCS threshold. *Higher-level GO terms have been removed Of particular interest among the up-regulated genes with functionally-enriched GO terms were 69 nine cytochrome P450 genes (CYP325BF1-de1b, CYP325BF1v2, CYP6BY2, CYP6M14, CYP4H34, CYP6N19, CYP6M16, CYP6M13, CYP6M15), eight cuticular genes (CPIJ001839, CPIJ004289, CPIJ004293, CPIJ008231, CPIJ013788, CPIJ016318, CPIJ017925, CPIJ018582), and three genes involved in the insect immune response: two cecropin genes (CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699), and a salivary peptide gene (CPIJ010700) (Table 4.5). Table 4.5. Differentially-expressed genes associated with functionally-enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the HAmCqG8 strain following a 24h exposure to permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates. GO term Genes sharing a given GO term* Up-regulated response to biotic stimulus CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 immune system process CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 multi-organism process CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 response to other organism CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 response to bacterium CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 defense response CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 defense response to bacterium CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 immune response CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 innate immune response CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699, CPIJ010700 organic hydroxy compound metabolic process CPIJ017482, CPIJ001367, CPIJ007619, CPIJ017491 alcohol metabolic process CPIJ017482, CPIJ001367, CPIJ007619, CPIJ017491 oxidation-reduction process CPIJ800256, CPIJ800177, CPIJ800178, CPIJ800210, CPIJ800175, CPIJ800176, CPIJ800180, CPIJ017482, CPIJ017198, CPIJ015953, CPIJ013724, CPIJ001367, CPIJ007619 oxidoreductase activity CPIJ800256, CPIJ800177, CPIJ800178, CPIJ800210, CPIJ800175, CPIJ800176, CPIJ800180, CPIJ017482, CPIJ017198, CPIJ015953, CPIJ013724, CPIJ007244, CPIJ007245, CPIJ001367, CPIJ007619 monooxygenase activity CPIJ800256, CPIJ800177, CPIJ800178, CPIJ800210, CPIJ800175, CPIJ800176, CPIJ800180 structural constituent of cuticle CPIJ004293, CPIJ001839, CPIJ017925, CPIJ016318, CPIJ004289, CPIJ008231, CPIJ018582, CPIJ013788 choline dehydrogenase activity CPIJ017482, CPIJ001367, CPIJ007619, CPIJ017491 FAD binding CPIJ017482, CPIJ013724, CPIJ001367, CPIJ007619, CPIJ017491 Down-regulated carbohydrate metabolic process CPIJ801597, CPIJ801761, CPIJ003338, CPIJ003955, CPIJ004229, CPIJ004320, CPIJ004321, CPIJ004323, CPIJ004325, CPIJ004733, CPIJ005062, CPIJ005725, CPIJ008529, CPIJ008530, CPIJ008531, CPIJ009306, CPIJ010291, CPIJ012138, CPIJ013169, CPIJ013477, CPIJ014181 lipid metabolic process CPIJ801475, CPIJ801474, CPIJ802146, CPIJ002726, CPIJ004224, CPIJ004225, CPIJ004226, CPIJ004227, CPIJ004228, CPIJ004230, CPIJ005462 proteolysis CPIJ011433, CPIJ801485, CPIJ801477, CPIJ801679, CPIJ801680, CPIJ802425, CPIJ002128, CPIJ002133, CPIJ002136, CPIJ002137, CPIJ002911, CPIJ002943, 70 CPIJ004060, CPIJ006077, CPIJ006079, CPIJ008873, CPIJ008874, CPIJ008876, CPIJ009738, CPIJ010641, CPIJ010801, CPIJ010805, CPIJ010806, CPIJ011383, CPIJ011617, CPIJ012036, CPIJ014108, CPIJ018060 serine hydrolase activity CPIJ011433, CPIJ802425, CPIJ002128, CPIJ002133, CPIJ002136, CPIJ002137, CPIJ002911, CPIJ006077, CPIJ006079, CPIJ008873, CPIJ008874, CPIJ008876, CPIJ010641, CPIJ011383, CPIJ011617, CPIJ018060 hydrolase activity acting on glycosyl bonds CPIJ801597, CPIJ801761, CPIJ003338, CPIJ004229, CPIJ004320, CPIJ004321, CPIJ004323, CPIJ004325, CPIJ005725, CPIJ008529, CPIJ008530, CPIJ008531 hydrolase activity hydro- lyzing O-glycosyl compounds CPIJ003338, CPIJ004229, CPIJ004320, CPIJ004321, CPIJ004323, CPIJ004325, CPIJ008529, CPIJ008530, CPIJ008531 peptidase activity CPIJ011433, CPIJ801485, CPIJ801477, CPIJ801679, CPIJ801680, CPIJ802425, CPIJ002128, CPIJ002133, CPIJ002136, CPIJ002137, CPIJ002911, CPIJ002943, CPIJ004060, CPIJ006077, CPIJ006079, CPIJ008873, CPIJ008874, CPIJ008876, CPIJ009738, CPIJ010641, CPIJ010801, CPIJ010805, CPIJ010806, CPIJ011383, CPIJ011617, CPIJ012036, CPIJ014108, CPIJ015407, CPIJ018060 exopeptidase activity CPIJ801679, CPIJ801680, CPIJ002911, CPIJ004060, CPIJ008873, CPIJ008874, CPIJ008876, CPIJ010801, CPIJ010805, CPIJ010806, CPIJ012036, CPIJ015407 carboxypeptidase activity CPIJ801679, CPIJ801680, CPIJ002911, CPIJ008873, CPIJ008874, CPIJ008876, CPIJ010801, CPIJ010805, CPIJ010806 metallopeptidase activity CPIJ801485, CPIJ801477, CPIJ801679, CPIJ801680, CPIJ002943, CPIJ004060, CPIJ010801, CPIJ010805, CPIJ010806, CPIJ012036 metallocarboxypeptidase activity CPIJ801679, CPIJ801680, CPIJ010801, CPIJ010805, CPIJ010806 endopeptidase activity CPIJ011433, CPIJ801485, CPIJ801477, CPIJ002128, CPIJ002133, CPIJ002136, CPIJ002137, CPIJ002943, CPIJ004060, CPIJ006077, CPIJ006079, CPIJ010641, CPIJ011383, CPIJ011617, CPIJ012036 serine-type peptidase activity CPIJ011433, CPIJ802425, CPIJ002128, CPIJ002133, CPIJ002136, CPIJ002137, CPIJ002911, CPIJ006077, CPIJ006079, CPIJ008873, CPIJ008874, CPIJ008876, CPIJ010641, CPIJ011383, CPIJ011617, CPIJ018060 phosphatidylcholine 1- acylhydrolase activity CPIJ801475, CPIJ801474, CPIJ004227 alkaline phosphatase activity CPIJ001262, CPIJ001264, CPIJ001265, CPIJ018121 ?Annotation from the Gene Ontology consortium (version 1.2084; release date: 12:07:2011) *Vectorbase: https://www.vectorbase.org/organisms/culex-quinquefasciatus; release: CpipJ1.3 2012-04-02 Among the down-regulated genes associated with the functionally-enriched GO terms, the majority of the genes were associated with proteolytic activity including two aminopeptidase N precurors (CPIJ004060, CPIJ012036), a lysosomal pro-X carboxypeptidase (CPIJ008876), and an xaa-pro aminopeptidase I (CPIJ015407). In addition, four genes associated with the GO term 'carbohydrate metabolic process' were gram-negative bacteria binding proteins (CPIJ004320, CPIJ004320, CPIJ004320, CPIJ004320), indicating that there were genes involved in the immune response of Cx. auinquefasciatus among both the up- and down-regulated genes, 71 however, these genes in the up-regulated gene set had different immune response functions than the down-regulated immune genes. 4.4.5. qRT-PCR Validation of Selected Genes The differential up-regulation of cuticular genes in the permethrin treatments compared to the acetone treatment coincided with the up-regulation of juvenile hormone (JH) binding protein CPIJ006964 (Appendix 4.3). This led us to hypothesize that there may be a developmental delay of Cx. quinquefasciatus when exposed to permethrin. To investigate if the permethrin exposure delayed the development of the fourth instar HAmCqG8 strain, we conducted qRT-PCR analysis on five storage serum proteins (CPIJ000056, CPIJ001820, CPIJ009033, CPIJ007783, CPIJ009032) and one carboxylesterase (CPIJ018233) previously identified as highly-expressed in the fourth instar stage of Cx. quinquefasciatus (Reid et al., 2012). If there is a developmental delay in Cx. quinquefasciatus upon exposure to permethrin, there should be a corresponding decrease in the expression of storage serum proteins in the permethrin treatment relative to the acetone treatment, moreover, if the response to insecticide exposure is related to insecticide resistance, the corresponding decrease in the expression of storage serum proteins should be more pronounced in the highly permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain, than when compared to the pyrethroid susceptible S-lab strain. We further investigated six proteases, that had been previously identified as up-regulated in the HAmCqG8 strain compared to its parental low permethrin resistant strain HAmCqG0 (Reid et al., 2012). The proteases investigated included four genes that were up-regulated upon permethrin exposure (two metalloproteases, CPIJ001240 and CPIJ009594, and two trypsin-like serine proteases, CPIJ002140 and CPIJ016012), as well as 72 two genes that were down-regulated upon permethrin exposure (CPIJ002142 and CPIJ002156). Following a 24h exposure to permethrin at the LC50 rate, one protease, CPIJ009594 was significantly up-regulated (P<0.01) in the HAmCqG8 strain compared to the S-lab strain, while one protease, CPIJ002142, was significantly down-regulated (P<0.01) (Fig. 4.3). When the fourth instar from the two Cx.quinquefasciatus strains were exposed to permethrin at the LC50 rate for the longer 48h time period, the up-regulation of CPIJ009594 doubled in the permethrin susceptible S-lab strain, but tripled in the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain, suggesting that CPIJ009594 (nephrosin) is involved not only in response to permethrin exposure, but to insecticide resistance as well. When the gene expression levels of the larval serum storage proteins were investigated, all six storage proteins had significantly greater down-regulation in the HAmCqG8 strain than in the S- lab strain, with three of these genes, CPIJ000056, CPIJ001820, and CPIJ018233 being down- regulated in both mosquito strains relative to a comparable acetone exposure treatment (Fig. 4.3). 73 Figure 4.3. Gene expression levels for proteases (upper panels A and B) and larval storage proteins (lower panels C and D). Bars superseded with a ?*? indicate that the expression level between the permethrin susceptible S-lab strain and the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus were significantly different at the ?=0.01 level of significance. Bars shown superior to the dependent axis zero line indicate genes that were up-regulated relative to a comparative acetone blank treatment control, while genes inferior to the dependent axis zero line indicate genes that were down-regulated relative to a comparative acetone blank treatment control. The down-regulation of larval serum storage proteins was more pronounced following the longer (48h) permethrin exposure, where all six genes were down-regulated in both the S-lab and the HAmCqG8 strains compared to the 48h acetone exposure treatment, with four of the genes, CPIJ000056, CPIJ001820, CPIJ007783, and CPIJ018233 having a significantly greater (P<0.01) down-regulation in the HAmCqG8 strain compared to the permethrin susceptible S-lab strain. 74 4.5 Discussion Overall, a total of 224 genes were up-regulated in response to permethrin exposure and 146 genes were down-regulated. Several of the genes up-regulated were found among categories previously identified as up-regulated in response to permethrin exposure including cytochrome P450s and a glutathione S-transferase (Liu et al., 2011; Gong et al., 2013). In addition to the expected genes, we identified several novel profiles. The first was the down-regulation of multiple proteases in the permethrin treated Cx. quinquefasciatus. Some of the down-regulated proteases represent genes that are known to be involved in cell signaling including two aminopeptidase N precurors (CPIJ004060, CPIJ012036), a lysosomal pro-X carboxypeptidase (CPIJ008876), and an xaa-pro aminopeptidase I (CPIJ015407), while there were fewer proteases within the up-regulated genes, notably one protease, a nephrosin CPIJ009594, which was further confirmed to be up-regulated in the HAmCqG8 strain compared to the permethrin susceptible S- lab strain. While no role for nephrosin has been proposed for mosquitoes, it is known to be involved in the immune response in fish (Boutet et al., 2006; Darawiroj et al., 2008). Darawiroj et al. (2008) further identified that nephrosin was down-regulated the common carp, Cyprinus carpio, when exposed to a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment to mimic a gram-negative bacterium exposure. Interestingly, we identified that during the permethrin exposure, genes involved in gram-negative bacteria binding were down-regulated, while nephrosin was up- regulated. These results suggested that exposure to permethrin results in changes in the immune response status of Cx. quinquefasicatus, and further suggested that nephrosin is involved. The hypothesis that there is a correlation between the insect immune response and insecticide resistance was further supported by our finding that two cecropin genes (CPIJ005108, CPIJ010699) were up-regulated upon permethrin exposure. In insects, there are multiple immune 75 response pathways, with gram-negative bacteria activating the 'immune deficiency' (IMD) pathway and fungi and gram-positive bacteria activating the Toll pathway (DeGregorio et al., 2002; Hedengren-Olcott, 2004; Pan et al., 2012). Cecropin genes have been shown to be regulated via the Toll pathway (Hedengren-Olcott et al., 2004; Pan et al., 2012), while genes regulated by the IMD pathway (eg/ gram-negative bacteria binding) were down-regulated. Work by Ogawa et al. (2005) found a similar trend in human macrophages, where LPS-inducible genes were inhibited by nuclear receptors downstream of the Toll receptor. In addition, there are additional insect immune pathways, such as the JAK-STAT pathway, which is up-regulated in An. aquasalis in response to Plasmodium vivax infection (Bahia et al., 2011), and the prophenyloxidase (PPO) pathway, however no PPO or JAK-STAT regulated genes were identified in the up- or down-regulated genes in the permethrin exposed Cx. quinquefasciatus. Work by Russell and Dunn (1996) demonstrated that antibacterial proteins were up-regulated in the midgut of Manduca sexta during the wandering stage, while recent work on M. sexta by Xu et al. (2012b) has further shown that along with immune genes, other genes involved in metabolism and transport were up-regulated during the wandering stage. When fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus were exposed to permethrin at either the LC50 or LC70 rates, we identified that multiple gram-negative bacteria binding genes were down-regulated relative to the acetone control treatment, as were 18 genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and transport (Table 4.3), suggesting that the acetone treated fourth instar were further along with development to the pupa than the permethrin treated fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus. Although Cx. quinquefasciatus does not exhibit a wandering stage similar to M. sexta, it is possible that the relatively higher expression levels of the gram-negative bacteria binding genes and the carbohydrate metabolism and transport genes indicate that the larvae in the acetone treatment 76 were closer to pupation than the larvae in either of the permethrin treatments, since these mentioned genes are known to be up-regulated in M. sexta during wandering. The differences in the gene expression profiles of immune response genes between permethrin exposed and control mosquitoes could indicate a delay in development in the fourth instar stage of Cx. quinquefasciatus when exposed to permethrin. A possible connection between the developmental delay and the immune response status of Cx. quinquefasciatus could be due to the status of the nutritional signaling target of rapamycin (TOR) receptor. TOR signaling and downstream TOR kinase is involved in the control of cellular activity in response to nutrient availability (Hansen et al., 2004) and in the larval stages of D. melanogaster TOR signaling in the fat body has been shown to restrict growth via a humoral mechanism, such that when nutrients are limited, the TOR pathway is suppressed (Colombani et al., 2003). In addition, connections between the TOR pathway and various immune response pathways have been identified. Turnquist et al. (2010) identified that inhibition of mTOR (mammalian TOR) induced production of Interleukin-12p70, which Lichtenegger et al. (2012) identified to be controlled by the Toll pathway. Taken together, these studies connected the TOR and Toll pathways in humans, if a similar connection exists in mosquitoes as well, it may explain the observed differences in the immune gene expression profiles between permethrin exposed and non-exposed fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus, that is: if fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus cease feeding, the resulting decrease in TOR activity could lead to an increase in Toll pathway gene expression. Feeding aversion to insecticide formulations has been documented in other insects, most notably glucose aversion in hydramethylnon baits in Blatella germanica, where roaches that fed on glucose-spiked hydramethylon developed an aversion to glucose (Silverman and Bieman, 1993). The underlying mechanism of glucose aversion has been identified to be due to changes in the binding properties of the gustatory 77 receptors of B. germanica to glucose, where GRN1, which detects glucose in wild type roaches became insensitive in glucose averse roaches, while GRN2, which detects bitter compounds in wild type roaches, is stimulated by glucose in glucose averse roaches (Wada-Katsumata et al., 2013). Thus the observed differences in the expression of immune-related genes in permethrin- exposed Cx. quinquefasciatus may be the result of changes in TOR signaling due to a decrease of nutrient availability as a consequence of a cessation of feeding in order to reduce the oral exposure of the larvae to permethrin. A delay in the development in permethrin-exposed fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus due to a cessation of feeding may represent a behavioral resistance response to limit the oral exposure of the mosquito larvae to the toxicant. To further investigate if fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus are developmentally-delayed when exposured to permethrin, we investigated the gene expression levels of serum storage proteins that are up-regulated in the fourth instar prior to pupation. The results showed that the serum storage proteins were down- regulated in the permethrin treatments relative the acetone control for both the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain, and in the permethrin susceptible S-lab strain. This indicated that the development to pupation for fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus is likely delayed in multiple strains upon exposure to permethrin. Furthermore, the level of down-regulation for the serum storage proteins was significantly greater (P<0.01) for the permethrin resistant HAmCqG8 strain than for the S-lab strain, suggesting that while permethrin may cause a developmental delay in the S-lab strain, the effect is significantly greater in a permethrin resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Taken together these results suggested that there may a behavioral resistance phenomenon among fourth instar Cx. quinquefasciatus to limit oral exposure in response to permethrin exposure mediated by a cessation of feeding. 78 4.6 Acknowledgements We thank the Hudson Alpha Intsitute for Biotechnology (Huntsville, Alabama) for the preparation and sequencing of the RNA-Seq libraries. 4.7 Disclosure All authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, that might potentially bias this work 79 Chapter 5: Gene expression analysis of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of Aedes aegypti and functional testing of selected family 4 cytochrome P450 genes William R. Reid1?, Anne Thornton2??, Julia Pridgeon3?*, James J. Becnel3, Fang Tang4, Alden Estep2,3, Gary G. Clark3, Sandra Allen3 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA 2Navy Entomology Center of Excellence, Jacksonville, FL, 32312, USA 3CMAVE-USDA-ARS, 1600 SW23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32682, USA 4Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China ?These authors contributed equally ?Current address: Department of Medicine and Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Foege Building S-250, Box 355065 3720 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98195-5065 ?Current address: Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit, USDA, ARS, 990 Wire Road, Auburn, AL 36832 *To whom correspondence should be addressed Submitted for publication in the Journal of Medical Entomology 5.1 Abstract The expression levels of 164 cytochrome P450 genes in the Aedes aegypti genome were determined for a pyrethroid-resistant strain of Ae. aegypti collected from Puerto Rico. Comparison of the gene expression levels with a pyrethroid-susceptible laboratory strain confirmed the up-regulation of certain cytochrome P450 genes identified in other 80 geographically-diverse populations of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes as well as additional genes. To determine if the cytochrome P450s identified as up-regulated were capable of conferring metabolic resistance in mosquitoes, transgenic Drosophila melanogaster lines over- expressing selected cytochrome P450 genes were generated and tested for their ability to survive an insecticidal challenge of either permethrin or beta-cypermethrin. Our study adds to the knowledge-base of the gene expression profiles of cytochrome P450 genes in insecticide- resistant Ae. aegypti and the putative functions of these P450 genes. 5.2 Introduction The yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, is a globally-distributed mosquito and the major vector of dengue virus (Gubler, 1988; Warren and Mahmoud, 1990; Gubler and Clark, 1995). Management of Ae. aegypti is primarily through chemical means, including pyrethroids which are preferred due to their low mammalian toxicity and high efficacy against mosquitoes (Hougard et al., 2002; Juntarajumnong et al., 2012; Manda et al., 2013). The repeated use of insecticides, however, has led to an increase in insecticide resistance among mosquitoes (Hemingway et al., 2004, ffrench-Constant et al., 2004; Liu, 2008), which makes the management of Ae. aegypti populations problematic since higher doses of insecticide are needed to obtain the same level of control, ultimately leading to insecticide failure (Vulule et al., 1994; Curtis et al., 1998; Liu, 2008). Insecticide resistance is a multi-faceted phenomenon for which the major mechanisms are considered to be: target site insensitivity, reduced penetration rate, and metabolic detoxification. In the latter mechanism, three major classes of enzymes degrade insecticides; they include: cytochrome P450s, hydrolases, and glutathione-S-transferases (Feyereisen, 1995; ffrench-Constant et al., 2004; Hemingway et al., 2004; Yang and Liu, 2011; 81 Reid et al., 2012; Gong et al., 2013). Among these three categories, studies have investigated the role of cytochrome P450s in Ae. aegypti (Strode et al., 2008; Pridgeon et al., 2009; Bariami et al., 2012; Fonseca-Gonzalez et al., 2011; Poupardin et al., 2010; Saavedra-Rodriguez et al., 2012; Strode et al., 2012) and the functionality of selected cytochrome P450s in Ae. aegypti and other mosquitoes including Anopheles gambiae (Boonseupsekul et al., 2008; McLaughlin et al., 2008; Muller et al., 2008; Stevenson et al., 2011; 2012). Collectively, these studies have investigated the importance of multiple cytochrome P450s in pyrethroid resistance in Ae. aegypti and their putative functional roles. The goal of our study was to add to this knowledge-base by determining the gene expression levels of adult females of a pyrethroid-resistant field population of Ae. aegypti and to estimate the functionality of selected, previously uncharacterized, cytochrome P450s for their ability to confer resistance to pyrethroids in Ae. aegypti. 5.3 Materials and Methods 5.3.1. Mosquito Strains The Orlando strain of Ae. aegypti has been continuously reared at the Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, ARS USDA in Gainesville, FL since 1952 (Clark et al., 2011). The Puerto Rico strain of Ae aegypti was collected in urban San Juan, PR in October 2008 and continuously reared in the laboratory as outlined in Clark et al., 2011. No insecticide pressuring was performed on the Puerto Rico Ae. aegypti strain, and each generation was tested to ensure that the level of pyrethroid resistance was present within the population. 5.3.2. Bioassays 82 For all bioassays, the adult female life stage was used. Adult topical assays were performed as described in Pridgeon et al., 2007. Two to five day old adults were collected by aspiration, anesthetized at 4?C for 60 minutes, then females were sorted from males and three 250cc plastic cups containing 10 adult females each were covered with two layers of tulle mesh and provided with cotton balls saturated with 10% sucrose for feeding. A total of three cups (30 insects) were used for each permethrin dose and all experiments were repeated in triplicate, with the exception of the two-point concentration testing of each generation where a single replicate was used due to the small mosquito colony size. The LC50 values were determined using six concentrations that resulted in mortality ranging from 10 - 90%along with an acetone (blank carrier) and untreated controls. Prior to application, females were anesthetized for 30 seconds with CO2 and placed on a 4?C chill table (BioQuip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA). A 0.5?l droplet of either acetone (controls), or permethrin dissolved in acetone was applied directly to the dorsal surface of the thorax using a 700 series syringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV). In the P450 inhibition assay, piperonyl butoxide (PBO), the inhibitor of P450s was applied topically to adult female Ae. aegypti one hour prior to the application of the permethin to allow for the PBO to inhibit the cytochrome P450 activity in the mosquitoes. The maximal concentration of PBO that could be applied to adult female Ae. aegypti was first tested against the Orlando strain and a rate of 0.8?g per female was determined to be the minimum concentration to result in mortality. Subsequently, a rate of 0.4 ?g was used for each female for the PBO inhibitor assays and resulted in no mortality in both the Orlando and Puerto Rico strains. 5.3.3 RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR gene expression analysis. 83 Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer's protocol as outlined in Pridgeon et al., 2008. First strand cDNA synthesis was conducted on 5 ?g of total RNA in a 20 ?l reaction mixture using oligo-dT20 primer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resulting cDNA was further diluted 5-fold and a total of 1 ?l was used for each 15 ?l qRT-PCR reaction. Quantitative PCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix on an ABI 7300 quantitative PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The primers used for each of the cytochrome P450 genes were designed against the Liverpool strain genome v1.1 (Nene et al., 2007) (Table 1). The relative expression levels of each of the cytochrome P450 genes was normalized to rpL24 within mosquito strain and then the fold change in the gene expression level in Puerto Rico compared to Orlando was calculated using the equation 2-??Ct using SDS Software (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Testing to identify statistically significant up-regulated genes was performed using a Welch's T-test in R (R Core Team, 2013). 5.3.4 Functional testing of selected cytochrome P450 genes. The full lengths of the up-regulated P450 genes from the Puerto Rico strain of Ae. aegypti were amplified from cDNA using platinum Taq DNA polymerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with specific primer pairs (Table 1) based on the 5? and 3? end sequences of the genes. PCR products of the full length genes were purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The purified PCR products were ligated into pCR 2.1 vector using the Original TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as described by the manufacturer. The full lengths of the genes were cloned in One Shot TOPO 10F? cells using the One Shot TOP10F? Chemically Competent E. coli kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cloning and sequence analyses of the cDNAs 84 were repeated at least three times and three TA clones from each replication were verified by sequencing. Table 5.1. List of primers used for the qRT-PCR determination of P450 gene expression level and the primers designed to generate the constructs for the functional testing in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. Primer Gene? Vectorbase? Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse primer (5'-3') Clan2 P450 CYP15B1 AAEL002067 CGGATTCGTTCCTTCGATAA ATGGAATTCAGCACCGAAAC CYP18A1 AAEL004870 CAGTGAAGGTCAGCTGTGGA CGAGACGGAGAGGTACTTGC CYP303A1ae AAEL012144 GATAGCACGAGCACGACAAA CCAAGTCCGGGTTTCATAGA CYP304B2xx/yy AAEL014412 GATTGGAAGGAGCAGAGACG CCTTTCACCGGTTAGCACAT CYP304B3yy/xx AAEL014411 GGTCAGTTCTACCGGACCAA TCAAATGCCTCAGCACAAAG CYP304C1 AAEL014413 GGGAGAATCTACCGGAAAGG CTCGCGGTACATTTTGGTTT CYP305A6 AAEL002071 GCTCCCATTCTTCGGTAACA TTCCCAATCTGGTTCCCATA CYP305A5 AAEL002043 AGCCCTCTCCAAGCAGTACA AGCCTTGTCCCCATAGTCCT CYP306A1 AAEL004888 TCGTGTGATATCCGCAATGT GCGAGGTTAGTCAGCGTTTC CYP307A1 AAEL009762 GCCCTGCTGAAAAGTCTACG GCCTTTGTCGGTAACGTGAT CYP307A1 AAEL009768 GAGTCAGCCTCAGGAAGTGG CCCGTTCTGATTCAACACCT CYP307B1 AAEL006875 ATCATGGAAGCGCTGAGACT GGTTCTCCCAGAGGTTCTCC Clan3 P450 CYP6F2 AAEL014678 CGTGAGTGCACCCAAGACTA GAGCGTACGGTTTGCTCTTC CYP6F3 AAEL014684 GTGGCGTTTGGCATTAAGAT CCGTACGACACCGTTTTTCT CYP6M5 AAEL009117 TGGATCTGCTGATCGCTATG AGCACTTCTTGGACGCATTT CYP6M6 AAEL009128 AGAAAATACCCACCCGTTCC GGTCGAATCTTTTCGGATCA CYP6M10 AAEL009125 TGAGTGCAACTCGATGAAGG ATTCCACCGTGCTTTTTACG CYP6M11 AAEL009127 TTGTTCACGACAGGCAGAAG CCTCGCTGCTTTTATTCTCG CYP6N6 AAEL009126 TTCTTCATCGGTGCTGTGAG TTTGCGCAAGTTCGTACAAG CYP6N9 AAEL009121 ACCGCAACCCAAGACTACAC AAACGCATCCCGATACAGAC CYP6N11 AAEL009119 CTGCCTGTCTACGCAATTCA CAAAATTTTCAACGGGCTTG CYP6N11 AAEL009138 TGGGTTATCTGGCGCTATTC ACACATCCTTGGCAAAGTCC CYP6N12 AAEL009124 TTCACTTGCGCGATCACTAC TGCAGCAATTTCCTCAACAG CYP6N13 AAEL009137 ACAATGTCCCGAACTCGAAC CATCATTCCGAATCGTGTTG CYP6N14 AAEL009133 ACGTTTTCTTCCGGGAAACT TTTCGCCCATTTTTCTGAAC CYP6N15 AAEL009122 GTCAAGGCGTACCGTTCATT CGCGATCGTGAAAGTACTGA CYP6N16 AAEL010151 AAAACCTCGCAAGAAAAGCA GCCACCACCTCGTTCATACT CYP6N17 AAEL010158 AAGCATCACCCAGAACCAAC ACCTTCTTGGCCAGGTTCTT CYP6P12v1 AAEL012491 GGCAGTTTTTGGTGGACAGT CTGCTCGAACACCTTCTTCC CYP6S3 AAEL009120 AGGCAGATGGGGAAGAGAAT TCAACAGCTGCATGAAGTCC CYP6Y3 AAEL009132 GCTAGTGGCTGCCGTTCTAC CAGAGGCGAAGTCAACATGA CYP6Z6 AAEL009123 CGAGGTGTCTACTGCAACGA TAACTTGTGCCCAACATCCA CYP6Z7 AAEL009130 GAGATCCGTTTTCTGCAAGC GGTTCGCGATTCTCAGCTAC CYP6Z8 AAEL009131 CCTGAGATGATCCGATTCGT CTCTTCGAAACCCAAAGCTG CYP6Z9 AAEL009129 TCCAATGGAGCAATCACGTA ATCGTTCCGGAATGTAGCAC CYP6AA5v1 AAEL012492 CCAGCTTCGAGCCTTTTATG TGAAGACTCTGTCGGCAATG CYP6AG3 AAEL007024 CCGAACGTTTTAACCCAGAA CTCGTTTGCCGAAAAGTAGC CYP6AG5 AAEL006984 ACATTCCGCAGAAGATGGTC TAGGTGGATAGCCCAGATCG CYP6AG6 AAEL006992 ACACCCGCGTTTACTACGTC GCGCATCACAAGCAAAGATA CYP6AG7 AAEL006989 TGTTTCCAGCTGCATCTTTG TTTCGCTTGCATCACGATAG CYP6AG8 AAEL003890 ACCAGCACACGGAAAGTACC AACCTGCATACGACCGAAAC CYP6AH1 AAEL007473 CTGCGTGCTGAAAGAGTACG ATCCGCTTACCAACGTCATC CYP6AH1 AAEL015641 CTGCGTGCTGAAAGAGTACG ATCCGCTTACCAACGTCATC CYP6AK1 AAEL004941 AAGGATTGTACGCCGATTTG CTCAAGGAATCCGGTTACGA CYP6AL1 AAEL008889 AACCGAGAATGCACCAAAAC CGACTGTTCGTCACTGGAGA CYP6AL3 AAEL009656 GGCAAAGGTTCATCAGGAAA CACTATGGGTGTGCCCTTCT 85 CYP6BB2 AAEL014893 TAGTCGCTAAGGACGGAGGA AAGTACTCCGGATCGTGGTG CYP6BZ1 AAEL012494 GTAGGGCAAATGCTGTGGAT ACTCCGTTGAACGTTGTTCC CYP6CA1 AAEL014680 TCGAGGGACTTTCAGCACTT AACAAATCGGCCACGTCTAC CYP6CB1 AAEL002046 TAAGCAGCGCACCTCCTATT AAAATCAACGGTCAGCATCC CYP6CB1 AAEL009018 GAGTGCAACAGCATGAGGAA GTCATCGTCGTTCAGCTTCA CYP6CB2 AAEL002872 GTTTCGGAGATGGTCCAAGA GGTTGAAGCATCAGCAGTGA CYP6CC1v1 AAEL014890 GGGAACAGTTGGCAGGATAA AAGTCCGTGTTTGGGTCTTG CYP6CD1 AAEL005006 TGGCCATTCTCTAGCGTTCT TGCAGGTGGTGTAATCCGTA CYP9J2 AAEL006805 ACCGTTACGCCAACAAAGAC GACGATTTTCGATCGGTTGT CYP9J6 AAEL002638 CAGCGTCAAACCAAGGGTAT GTTTCAAATCCAGCCAGGAA CYP9J7 AAEL014606 CGGATATGGTGCACTTGTTG GGTTCAACGCCAGTTCGTAT CYP9J8 AAEL006811 CCTCAACCGCAAGTACCAAT GTCCTTGACACCGATTTGCT CYP9J9 AAEL006793 TGATCGCTCAGTGTTTCCTG TTCGTAGGTCAATGGCTTCC CYP9J9 AAEL014605 TGATCGCTCAGTGTTTCCTG TTCGTAGGTCAATGGCTTCC CYP9J10 AAEL006798 TATGGCGGAGTTTTTCAAGG CACCGATAGCGATTGGAAGT CYP9J15 AAEL006795 GTACTACCCACAGCCGGAAA ACACAACCGCTTTCATCTCC CYP9J16 AAEL006815 ACGATTGCCATACACAACGA TCTGCGTCTTCTCCGTAGGT CYP9J17 AAEL009699 GGAGAAATTGGGGGTTGATT TCATCCATCTCGTGCTTCAG CYP9J17 AAEL006784 GAAAGGGAGCACTGAAGCAC AGGTCAAACCCGTAGACACG CYP9J18v1 AAEL006804 TCCCAGATCCAGATCGTTTC AATTTGCGTCTTTTCCGTTG CYP9J19 AAEL006810 CCAACCTTTCTCGTTGGAAA CTTCTACGGGTTGGTCGGTA CYP9J19 AAEL014611 CATCCAGAACGATCCGAAGT GTCCGCTCCAGACTGAACTC CYP9J20v1 AAEL006814 ACGGAACGACATGATCAACA AGCAACTCGTAGGCCAAGAA CYP9J20v2 AAEL014604 TGAGGTTGATGTTCGAGCTG CCCATTGGTGAAGAACTCGT CYP9J21 AAEL014612 GTACAGCGTCTTTCCGAAGC TGCATCAACAGGTGGATCAT CYP9J22 AAEL006802 TGTTGATGCAGGCAAAGAAG CTGCCAGGAAAAAGACGAAG CYP9J23 AAEL014615 GTGCACCTTTCCGGAGTTTA AAGGGTCTTCTCGAACAGCA CYP9J24 AAEL014613 TTCCCAACGTATGCGTTACA GAGGAACTTCCGTCTTGCTG CYP9J26 AAEL014609 AGATGATCGCACAGTGCTTG GGGCCACATTCTCAGTGTTT CYP9J27 AAEL014616 ACGGCAAGAAAATGATGGAC CGGTTCCATGACTCTCCCTA CYP9J27 AAEL014607 CGGCACGGTAAGAAAATGAT AGCCTTGATCGTCTCCTGAA CYP9J28 AAEL014617 TTTCCTCGACAAACCGATTC AAAGTCCTTAACGGCCACCT CYP9J29 AAEL014610 GATGAGCAGCACAGGTCAAA AGTGGATTGCCCATTTGAAG CYP9J30 AAEL014603 TCAAAGTCCTCGGGATGTTC ATATTACGCCATCGCTGACC CYP9J31 AAEL002633 TTTTCAGCGATTGAGTGTCG ATATCCTTGGTCTGGCGTTG CYP9J32 AAEL008846 GCCGTGACTACGTTTTGGAT CTCGATCCAATGCAATTCCT CYP9M4 AAEL001320 GGTTGATCACGAAGGACGTT AACCGTCGTAAATCCAGCAC CYP9M5 AAEL001288 GTCGGTTCTCAGCTTCGTTC ATGGTCCTCGAACGTGTAGG CYP9M6 AAEL001312 CAGTGGCCACCTACGATTTT CGCTGGATCGTGGATAAGAT CYP9M7 AAEL001292 AGGACTATGGCCGGTTTTCT GCCCTAGAATCGGATCAACA CYP9M8 AAEL009591 AGCTGCCACTGTAGCCACTT TTTGCTGCATCGATTCGTAG CYP9M9 AAEL001807 CACTAAGGAAATGGCCTCCA TCCGGATCAAATCTTTCTGG CYP9AE1 AAEL003748 CAGTTCGGGATGGAGTTGTT TCAACTCGTCGTCACTCCAG CYP329B1 AAEL003763 CTTCCTGGACGAAAGCAAAG TAGTTCCGAATCCACGGAAG Clan4 P450 CYP4C38 AAEL012266 GAAAAGTCCCACGGCTATGA CTTTCGTGATGAAGGGGAAA CYP4C50 AAEL008017 AAATTCGGAAGCAGAAGCAA ATGCCTCGATCAACAGATCC CYP4C51 AAEL008018 CAATCGACAAGCTCAGACCA GCATTATGCGTCCGATTTCT CYP4C52 AAEL008023 TTCCTCGATCGGGTCATTAG GCTTTTCTCCACCAGCTTTG CYP4D23 AAEL007816 GTTCAACAAGCGCAAGATCA TTTATCGGAGTTCCCATTGC CYP4D24 AAEL007815 TACTTCACCCCGTACCGAAG AGGGGTCTCCCGTCTACTGT CYP4D37 AAEL007795 GGAGACGGTTTGCTTCTGAG CAAAGCGTACAGCAGCACAT CYP4D38 AAEL007807 CAAGCAACCCGATGAATTTT CGAGCCAGTTGGAGAGGTAG CYP4D39 AAEL007808 CGTCGCAGCAATAAAACTCA CCTCTCGATGGTGAGGAAAA CYP4G35 AAEL008345 GGACCGATGGCTTCAGAATA GCATCAAGCAAAAGCAACAA CYP4G35 AAEL006824 GGTCGTCAAGCAGAAGAAGG GAAATCCAGATCGTCCCTGA CYP4G36 AAEL004054 AACACCAATAGCGTGGAAGG CCCATCATCGAAAGGAAGAA 86 CYP4H28 AAEL003380 ACACCGAAGGTGAAACCAAG GGGCCATCAACGAGAAGTAA CYP4H29 AAEL007830 TGCAGGCTGTCAAAGAAATG GATTCTTGCCTTGCTTGCTC CYP4H30 AAEL003399 GCTGCTGAAAATAGCGAACC GTCCCCCAGGAATAGGACAT CYP4H31 AAEL002085 ACAATTCGTGACGGTGTTCA TTGGATTCTTCTGGGCATTC CYP4H32 AAEL007812 ATCCAAATGCTTGGGAACAG CTTCCTCTCGGATGTCTTCG CYP4H33 AAEL013798 CAGTAATTGATGCGCGAAGA ATGACCCTCGAACATGAAGG CYP4J13 AAEL013555 CAGGACCGTTGGAAGTTGAT AGAGCGCACAGTACCGTTTT CYP4J14 AAEL013554 AAGTTGTCCACGGTTTCTGG GAACGAATGAACCGGAAGAA CYP4J15v1 AAEL013556 GCTGGATTCGCTTTTACTCG GAAAGCTCGGGATGACTGAG CYP4J15v2 AAEL014829 AAACATCGATGGGCGTTAAG AGCCGCTTTATAGCCTGTCA CYP4J16 AAEL015663 AACGGATCATGAACCCTCTG TTCCGCCAGCAGAAGACTAT CYP4J17 AAEL015370 AGAATTCCCCTACCGCTTGT GGCCAGTAAGGTATCCAGCA CYP4J17 AAEL014019 GGAGGAGATCGAAACCATGA ACTGTGCATCCTCCAAAACC CYP4K3 AAEL007798 GGAAGTGCAACGGAAATTGT CTTCGGACTTTGAGGCGTAG CYP4AR2 AAEL010154 CGGAGGTTTGCAATGATTCT CGTCTGGGTACTTTGCCATT CYP325E3 AAEL000338 CAATAGGGTGTTTCGGGAGA CTGTTAAGGATGCGGGTGTT CYP325G2 AAEL012766 CTTATCGGTTGTGGCCATCT CTGCATATCTTCCGGGTTGT CYP325G3 AAEL012772 TACCCTTTGATCGGAAGTGC ACCGGTGAAGTGAACAGTCC CYP325K2 AAEL005771 ATTTTGCCCGCTATCTTCCT TTCTCCTGGCAATAGGGATG CYP325K3 AAEL005788 ATTCCGAAGGGAACTGTCCT CAAGTCGGTGCTGAGTTCAA CYP325L1v1 AAEL011770 TCGGTGGAAACGAAACTACC GTTCGTCCGAGGATTGTTGT CYP325M1 AAEL012773 AGACGAAAAGTTCGCAGCAT CCTCTTGATAGCAGCGTTCC CYP325M2 AAEL012769 TTCGTTCTTTTGGGTTCCAC TGCTGCTTTCCAACGTATTG CYP325M2 AAEL015591 TTCGTTCTTTTGGGTTCCAC TGCTGCTTTCCAACGTATTG CYP325M3 AAEL012765 CGATCTGTGTGGAGAGCAAA GTTTTCGCCGTTGTTTCATT CYP325M4 AAEL011769 CGTTGAATCCTTCGTTTGGT GGCCGTTGCATAGATTTGAT CYP325M5 AAEL011761 TGGAAAAATCAACGGAAAGC TCGCTGCATATCGAAGTCAC CYP325N1 AAEL012770 GTACCTTGAAGCGCAAGAGG TGTTCAGCATTCCTTGCTTG CYP325N2 AAEL012762 CTTGCCCGGATAGAAATCAA TCCGGGTTGAAGTTTTTGAC CYP325P1 AAEL000340 CGTGGTTGATTTCGGAGTTT GCCTGGGTGTGATTTCTGTT CYP325Q1 AAEL006044 ACCACGGAAGCTCTGAAAAA CATCTGGTCCCCATACATCC CYP325Q2 AAEL015563 ACGAAAGTGCGGAAAGAAGA CAGGTGTAGGAAACGGCATT CYP325R1 AAEL005775 CGGCTTACTCATGGGTTGTT TATCCACTGGAGTCCCTTCG CYP325S1 AAEL000326 CCGATTTTCTTCGACAGCTC GCAAAATTCTCCGGATCAAA CYP325S2 AAEL000325 GCCGAAATCATGGAACACTT CCACATATCCGCTCTTCGAT CYP325S3 AAEL000357 TTGCTCGGCAGTGTATCAAG TCCGGTAGGAAATTGTCTGG CYP325T2 AAEL012761 GAGTTTGCCATCCGGATCTA CCTGCTGCAACACTTTTCAA CYP325T2 AAEL015475 CTCATGGCCTATGCCTGTTT GCCATGTTTTGCCTTACGAT CYP325U1 AAEL000320 GGGGAAAAATGGTGAGGAAT ATTCAGTGCCTTACGCTGCT CYP325X1 AAEL005695 CTGTACCGGTTTGCTGGATT TCGTCATCTTCTCGCAACAC CYP325X2 AAEL005696 TGTCGTTCTACCCGGAAATC TCGAACTCGGCCATATTTTC CYP325X4 AAEL005700 GGCTCAACTCCAGCTTCAAC CGAATTCCTCTTTCCCTTCC CYP325Y1 AAEL006257 GAAATCGTGCTCGATGGAAT AGATAGGCAAATGGGTGACG CYP325Y2v2 AAEL015362 AGGAAGCCCTCCGTATTTGT ATGCCTTTGCTGAACTGCTT CYP325Y3 AAEL006246 GGCATACGCATCCCTAAAGA TCTGCATAATCCGCAACAAA CYP325Y3 AAEL015361 CAATCGCTTGGTGAGGATTT CCTCCGGGTACATTGCTAGA CYP325Z1 AAEL010273 CACCAAATCCAAGCCAAAGT GTCTTTCCGCCTGTGAAGAG CYP325AA1 AAEL004012 TGCTTTCGTGGATCGTAGTG CACCAGCTCTGGATGCTGTA Mito P450 CYP12F5 AAEL001960 ACAAGGAGAAAGCTGGCAAA CATCGAGAACTCCCAATCGT CYP12F6 AAEL002005 TACATCGTTGACTCCGGACA CGAAGCGATCACTTTGTTGA CYP12F7 AAEL002031 CTGGAAACGATGGGTGTTCT GATAACCGCGTCATCAACCT CYP12F8 AAEL006827 TGGATAAGGTTGCCCTTCAG TCTCCAGATCGAGGGAAGAA CYP49A1 AAEL008638 GTGCATCAAAGAAACGCTGA CGGTCTGGTTCTGGGAAATA CYP301A1 AAEL014594 CCTGGAACCGAACTTGACAT CGTCCTTCACCCAAGTTCAT CYP302A1v1 AAEL011463 TTTCGATGTACGGTTGGACA GCTTTCGATACGCTGGAGTC CYP302A1v2 AAEL015655 TTTCGATGTACGGTTGGACA GCTTTCGATACGCTGGAGTC 87 CYP314A1 AAEL010946 GCGGAGACAAGCAAAAGAAC ACGATTTCGGCGATTGTATC CYP315A1 AAEL011850 ATTCATTGGACGCTTTTTGG TCCCTTCGTAACCACCTTTG Other P450 reductase AAEL003349 TTCCTTCCCCGCTTTTATCT CTGTGTAGCGGTGCTTGTGT 60S RP-L24 AAEL008329 GAGGCAGTAAAATTTCGCCA AGGTGAAAGTCTTGCCATCG Drosophila constructs CYP4D24 AAEL007815 CCGCTCGAGCAAAATGCTTAT CTTATTGGCT CTAGCTCGAGCCGCACCCTGC TTCTGATCCT CYP4H29 AAEL007830 CCGGAATTCCAAAATGGTGCC TCTTCTGATG CTAGCTCGAGTCGTGGCACAA TCTTCACAAA CYP4J15v1 AAEL013556 CCGGAATTCCAAAATGTTGCT TATTCTAACGC CTAGCTCGAGTCTCCTCTCAA ACCTAACCTC CYP4H33 AAEL013798 CCGGAATTCCAAAATGGATTT CCTAACGAAT CTAGCTCGAGAATTCTTTCCA CTAGCTTAAT ?Nomenclature for the cytochrome P450 genes was taken for the Ae. aegypti cytochrome P450 database at: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html ?Vectorbase Ae. aegypti predicted gene set v. AaegL1.1. http://aaegypti.vectorbase.org/ The clones were then sub-cloned into the pUASTattB vector (a gift from Dr. Johannes Bischof, University of Zurich) (Brand and Perrimon, 1993; Bischof et al., 2007). The plasmid of each pUASTattB-up-regulated gene was transformed into the germ line of D. melanogaster (Bloomington stock #24484, genotype M{vas-int.Dm}ZH-2A, M{3xP3-RFP.attP'}ZH-58A), resulting in site specific integration on chromosome 2R (Bateman et al., 2006; Rainbow Transgenic Flies Inc., Camarillo, CA). Flies were then reciprocally-crossed against a W1118 strain to obtain transgenic D. melanogaster with the orange eye phenotype. The flies were then balanced against a D. melanogaster balancer strain (Bloomington stock #6312, genotype: w[1118]/Dp(1;Y)y[+]; sna[Sco]/CyO, P{ry[+t7.2]=sevRas1.V12}FK1) to generate a homozygous line containing the cytochrome P450 transgene on chromosome 2R. The insertion of the up-regulated genes in the transgenic fruit fly lines were further confirmed using RT-PCR. Transgenic virgin female D. melanogaster were then crossed with male GAL4-expressing D. melanogaster (Bloomington stock #3954, genotype: P{Act5C-GAL4}17bFO1) which expresses GAL4 under control of the Act5C promoter, resulting in ubiquitous non-tissue-specific expression. The F1 generation of these crosses expressed GAL4 and contained a single copy of the Cytochrome P450 transgene, which was under control of the UAS enhancer. Permethrin 88 toxicity bioassays were then conducted on 2-3 day post eclosion female Drosophila of F1 UAS- GAL4 crosses to examine the toxicity of pyrethroids to transgenic flies. Briefly, serial concentrations of each pyrethroid solution in acetone, ranging from 25 ng/?L to 100 ng/?L that gave >0 and <100% mortality to the tested insects were prepared. Two hundred ?L of each permethrin concentration solution was evenly coated on the inside of individual 20 mL glass scintillation vials. Fifteen female flies were transferred to each of the prepared vials, and three vials were used for each concentration for each bioassay replicate. The vials were plugged with cotton balls soaked with 5% sucrose and the mortality was scored after 24 hr exposure to the pyrethroids. Each bioassay was independently replicated three times using only flies that exhibited the correct morphological marker (GAL4 red eyes). The D. melanogaster strain (Bloomington stock #24484, genotype: M{vas-int.Dm}ZH-2A, M{3xP3-RFP.attP'}ZH-58A) containing the empty pUAST vector donated insert, but no transgene from M. domestica was used as the control reference strain following the identical crossing protocol of virgin control females with GAL4 expressing males to obtain the F1 generation for testing. Preliminary testing determined that vials coated with 2 and 0.3?g of permethrin and beta-cypermethrin, respectively, resulted in nearly complete mortality of the empty-vector control line. Subsequently, the lowest insecticide concentrations chosen were 5 and 0.5 ?g of permethrin and beta-cypermethrin, respectively, which resulted in 100% mortality of the control mosquitoes for all bioassay replicates. All tests were run at 27oC and mortality was assessed after 24 h. All D. melanogaster were reared on Jazz-Mix Drosophila food (Fisher Scientific, Kansas City, MO) at 25?2oC under a photoperiod of 12:12 (L:D) h following standard protocols (Ashburner et al., 2005). 5.4 Results and Discussion 89 Topical application of permethrin revealed that the level of permethrin resistance within the Puerto Rico strain was 73 times higher than in the laboratory insecticide susceptible Orlando strain (Table 2). Table 5.2. Resistance ratio of the permethrin-resistant strain of Ae. aegypti Puerto Rico compared to the laboratory permethrin-susceptible strain Orlando in the presence and absence of the cytochrome P450 metabolic inhibitor piperonyl butoxide (PBO). Strain LD50 (95% CI) ng/insect Slope (SE) ?2 df Fold resistance Orlando 0.21 (0.12 ? 0.41) 2.89 (0.44) 8.02 4 1.00 +PBO 0.14 (0.09 ? 0.23) 2.08 (0.29) 6.37 5 0.68 Puerto Rico 15.20 (1.00 ? 29.90) 1.48 (0.26) 1.39 7 73.07 +PBO 3.28 (2.02 - 5.85) 0.96 (0.14) 3.99 7 15.76 Following a 1 hour pre-treatment of adult mosquitoes with the cytochrome P450 inhibitor piperonyl butoxide (PBO), the resistance ratio of the Puerto Rico strain was decreased to 15-fold compared to the insecticide susceptible Orlando strain and 23-fold compared to the Orlando strain pre-treated with the PBO (Table 2). These results showed that when the cytochrome P450s in the Orlando strain were inhibited by PBO, the resistance level of adult females decreased to 0.7-fold (30% decrease), whereas when the cytochrome P450s in the Puerto Rico strain were inhibited by PBO, the resistance level of adult females decreased to 15-fold (~80% decrease). This suggested that cytochrome P450s may have a role in the level of permethrin resistance observed in the Puerto Rico strain of Ae. aegypti. We further tracked the level of resistance in each generation using a two-point primary component analysis to trace the attenuation of permethrin resistance in the Puerto Rico strain. The two doses of permethrin selected were 0.8 ng per female, because this rate represented the LD95 for the pyrethroid-susceptible Orlando strain, while the higher dose (6.25 ng per female) was intermediate to the LD50 for the Puerto Rico 90 strain and complete mortality in the Orlando strain. Overall, the level of resistance was found to decrease within the first 18 generations, suggesting that to identify which cytochrome P450s were involved in the observed resistance, all of the cytochrome P450 gene expression levels in both the Puerto Rico and Orlando strains required assessment (Fig. 1). Of the 164 cytochrome P450s investigated for their gene expression levels, a total of 33) cytochrome P450s were significantly up-regulated (p<0.05) with ? 2-fold increases, while eight cytochrome P450s were significantly down-regulated (p<0.05) with ?2-fold decreases (Table 3). The remaining 123 cytochrome P450 genes showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between the Puerto Rico and Orlando strains of Ae. aegypti (Table 4). Among the up-regulated genes, the majority were in families CYP4, CYP6, and CYP9 which had 9, 11, and 7 genes, respectively (Table 3). Figure 5.1. Two-point mortality for the Orlando strain of Aedes aegypti and the different generations of the Puerto Rico Ae. aegypti strain. The 0.8 ng per female (low dose) represents the maximum dose that results in survival in the pyrethroid-susceptible Orlando strain, while the 6.25 ng per female represents the high dose. Puerto Rico generations F1, F2, F6, F7, F8, F14, and F17 did not have sufficient numbers for testing. The remaining up-regulated cytochrome P450 genes included three in clan 4 - CYP325 genes, 91 two in the mito clan - CYP12F genes, and one in clan 2 - CYP15B1. Earlier studies by multiple researchers have shown up-regulation of cytochrome P450 genes in insecticide resistant Ae. aegypti (Strode et al., 2008; Marcombe et al., 2009; Bariami et al., 2012; Saavedra-Rodriguez et al., 2012). Table 5.3. List of cytochrome P450 genes differentially expressed between the adult females of the pyrethroid-resistant strain of Aedes aegypti (Puerto Rico) and the laboratory susceptible strain (Orlando). Gene? Name? Fold expression in Puerto Rico Studies that also identified as up-regulated in insecticide-resistant Ae. aegypti Up-regulated Clan 2 AAEL002067 CYP15B1 2.51?0.03** Clan 3 AAEL007024 CYP6AG3 2.33?0.05** AAEL006989 CYP6AG7 2.28?0.08** AAEL014893 CYP6BB2 3.01?0.18** (Bariami et al., 2012; Saavedra-Rodriguez et al., 2012) AAEL002046 CYP6CB1 14.46?0.28** (Strode et al., 2008; Bariami et al., 2012; Saavedra-Rodriguez et al., 2012) AAEL009018 CYP6CB1 10.60?0.41** (Strode et al., 2008; Bariami et al., 2012) AAEL014678 CYP6F2 4.38?0.11** AAEL009127 CYP6M11 5.70?0.31** (Poupardin et al., 2008; Marcombe et al., 2009; Bariami et al., 2012) AAEL009121 CYP6N9 2.31?0.04** (Bariami et al., 2012) AAEL009124 CYP6N12 3.38?0.16** (Bariami et al., 2012) AAEL009137 CYP6N13 3.53?0.01** AAEL009123 CYP6Z6 3.16?0.02** (Marcombe et al, 2009; Saavedra-Rodriguez et al., 2012) AAEL006805 CYP9J2 12.17?2.83** AAEL006798 CYP9J10 2.89?0.29** (Strode et al., 2008; Bariami et al., 2012) AAEL006814 CYP9J20v1 3.29?0.20** AAEL014612 CYP9J21 3.94?0.42** AAEL014609 CYP9J26 2.76?0.22** (Strode et al., 2008; Bariami et al., 2012) AAEL014616 CYP9J27 2.85?0.13** (Strode et al., 2008; Bariami et al., 2012 ) AAEL002633 CYP9J31 2.30?0.07** Clan 4 AAEL013556 CYP4J15v1 2.30?0.06** (Marcombe et al, 2009?) AAEL014829 CYP4J15v2 3.85?0.22** (Marcombe et al, 2009?) AAEL007815 CYP4D24 2.81?0.09** AAEL008345 CYP4G35 3.03?0.08** AAEL006824 CYP4G35 3.44?0.30** AAEL007830 CYP4H29 2.52?0.18** AAEL003399 CYP4H30 3.85?0.18** AAEL013798 CYP4H33 2.73?0.03** AAEL004054 CYP4G36 2.84?0.23** (Saavedra-Rodriguez et al., 2012) AAEL012766 CYP325G2 2.06?0.04 AAEL012772 CYP325G3 3.61?0.20** AAEL011769 CYP325M4 2.72?0.11** Mito clan AAEL002005 CYP12F6 2.14?0.06* (Strode et al., 2008) 92 AAEL006827 CYP12F8 2.30?0.06** Down- regulated Clan 3 AAEL009119 CYP6N11 0.33?0.01? AAEL009131 CYP6Z8 0.06?0.01? AAEL006784 CYP9J17 0.31?0.06? AAEL014611 CYP9J19 0.04?0.01? AAEL014610 CYP9J29 0.39?0.07? AAEL003748 CYP9AE1 0.38?0.08? Clan 4 AAEL007812 CYP4H32 0.36?0.02? AAEL014019 CYP4J17 0.44?0.03? AAEL012765 CYP325M3 0.31?0.02? ?Nomenclature for the cytochrome P450 genes was taken for the Ae. aegypti cytochrome P450 database at: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html ?Vectorbase Ae. aegypti predicted gene set v. AaegL1.1. http://aaegypti.vectorbase.org/ *significantly up-regulated (>2-fold) at the P<0.05 level of significance **significantly up-regulated (>2-fold) at the P<0.01 level of significance ?significantly down-regulated (>2-fold) at the P<0.01 level of significance In our study, we found that several of the cytochrome P450 genes that we identified as up- regulated the Puerto Rico field strain were also identified in other studies including: CYP6BB2, CYP6CB1, CYP6M1, CYP6N9, CYP6N12, CYP6Z6, CYP9J10, CYP9J26, CYP9J27, CYP4J15, CYP4G36, and CYP12F6. These results provided strong evidence that gene over-expression of cytochrome P450s was responsible for the observed level of permethrin resistance in the Puerto Rico strain of Ae. aegypti. However, further evidence beyond gene over-expression is necessary when characterizing cytochrome P450s for their role in insecticide resistance. Recently, Ptitsyn et al. (2011) showed that the gene expression of multiple genes within Ae. aegypti followed a circadian rhythym, and among these genes were 17 cytochrome P450s, including CYP9J10, which was identified as upregulated in our study and other studies that investigated gene up- regulation in adult female insecticide-resistant Ae. aegypti. In addition, insecticide metabolism studies by Stevenson et al. (2012) have shown that not all up-regulated cytochrome P450s in insecticide resistant mosquitoes can functionally metabolize insecticides. In their study, 93 Stevenson et al. looked at several cytochrome P450s, including two identified as up-regulated in our study, CYP6CB1 and CYP9J26 for which they found that CYP9J26 was functional for metabolizing both permethrin and deltamethrin, while CYP6CB1 did not metabolize either of the two pyrethroids tested. Table 5.4. Relative cytochrome P450 gene expression values in the pyrethroid-resistant Puerto Rico strain compared with the pyrethroid-susceptible Orlando strain. Clan? P450? AAEL? gene number Fold upregulated in Puerto Rico compared to Orlando Clan 2 CYP15B1 AAEL002067 2.51?0.15** CYP18A1 AAEL004870 1.29?0.21 CYP303A1ae AAEL012144 1.15?0.16 CYP304B2xx/yy AAEL014412 1.29?0.17 CYP304B3yy/xx AAEL014411 1.00?0.23 CYP304C1 AAEL014413 1.33?0.17 CYP305A6 AAEL002071 1.41?0.26 CYP305A5 AAEL002043 1.38?0.39 CYP306A1 AAEL004888 0.86?0.33 CYP307A1 AAEL009762 1.30?0.28 CYP307A1 AAEL009768 1.48?0.28 CYP307B1 AAEL006875 1.29?0.17 Clan 3 CYP6F2 AAEL014678 4.38?1.38** CYP6F3 AAEL014684 1.92?0.62 CYP6M5 AAEL009117 0.80?0.38 CYP6M6 AAEL009128 0.69?0.21 CYP6M10 AAEL009125 0.99?0.35 CYP6M11 AAEL009127 5.70?0.44** CYP6N6 AAEL009126 1.62?0.16 CYP6N9 AAEL009121 2.31?0.17** CYP6N11 AAEL009119 0.33?0.01? CYP6N11 AAEL009138 1.50?0.23 CYP6N12 AAEL009124 3.38?0.24** CYP6N13 AAEL009137 3.53?0.31** CYP6N14 AAEL009133 1.45?0.12 CYP6N15 AAEL009122 1.61?0.17 CYP6N16 AAEL010151 1.42?0.13 CYP6N17 AAEL010158 1.48?0.25 CYP6P12v1 AAEL012491 1.46?0.13 CYP6S3 AAEL009120 1.7?0.09 CYP6Y3 AAEL009132 1.5?0.10 CYP6Z6 AAEL009123 3.16?0.07** CYP6Z7 AAEL009130 0.89?0.70 CYP6Z8 AAEL009131 0.06?0.01? 94 CYP6Z9 AAEL009129 1.31?0.06 CYP6AA5v1 AAEL012492 1.61?0.09 CYP6AG3 AAEL007024 2.33?0.06** CYP6AG5 AAEL006984 1.18?0.14 CYP6AG6 AAEL006992 1.29?0.16 CYP6AG7 AAEL006989 2.28?0.16** CYP6AG8 AAEL003890 1.37?0.19 CYP6AH1 AAEL007473 1.51?0.11 CYP6AH1 AAEL015641 1.74?0.26 CYP6AK1 AAEL004941 1.92?0.19 CYP6AL1 AAEL008889 2.06?0.11 CYP6AL3 AAEL009656 0.83?0.16 CYP6BB2 AAEL014893 3.01?0.25** CYP6BZ1 AAEL012494 1.67?0.15 CYP6CA1 AAEL014680 2.15?0.64 CYP6CB1 AAEL002046 14.46?0.05** CYP6CB1 AAEL009018 10.60?0.13** CYP6CB2 AAEL002872 0.52?0.32 CYP6CC1v1 AAEL014890 n/d CYP6CD1 AAEL005006 1.52?0.23 CYP9J2 AAEL006805 12.17?1.23** CYP9J6 AAEL002638 1.86?0.18 CYP9J7 AAEL014606 1.72?0.17 CYP9J8 AAEL006811 2.11?0.82 CYP9J9 AAEL006793 2.45?0.39 CYP9J9 AAEL014605 2.83?0.26 CYP9J10 AAEL006798 2.89?0.28** CYP9J15 AAEL006795 0.70?0.53 CYP9J16 AAEL006815 0.88?0.39 CYP9J17 AAEL009699 0.78?0.24 CYP9J17 AAEL006784 0.31?0.06? CYP9J18v1 AAEL006804 0.77?0.41 CYP9J19 AAEL006810 1.41?0.20 CYP9J19 AAEL014611 0.04?0.01? CYP9J20v1 AAEL006814 3.29?0.44** CYP9J20v2 AAEL014604 2.04?0.50 CYP9J21 AAEL014612 3.94?0.43** CYP9J22 AAEL006802 2.30?0.32 CYP9J23 AAEL014615 3.77?0.31** CYP9J24 AAEL014613 1.84?0.35 CYP9J26 AAEL014609 2.76?0.24** CYP9J27 AAEL014616 2.85?0.16** CYP9J27 AAEL014607 3.17?0.19** CYP9J28 AAEL014617 1.36?0.3 CYP9J29 AAEL014610 0.39?0.07? CYP9J30 AAEL014603 1.37?0.33 95 CYP9J31 AAEL002633 2.30?0.14** CYP9J32 AAEL008846 1.16?0.15 CYP9M4 AAEL001320 1.02?0.30 CYP9M5 AAEL001288 1.18?0.34 CYP9M6 AAEL001312 1.83?0.23 CYP9M7 AAEL001292 1.73?0.38 CYP9M8 AAEL009591 1.55?0.21 CYP9M9 AAEL001807 1.01?0.14 CYP9AE1 AAEL003748 0.38?0.08? CYP329B1 AAEL003763 1.51?0.13 Clan 4 CYP4C38 AAEL012266 1.09?0.15 CYP4C50 AAEL008017 1.20?0.19 CYP4C51 AAEL008018 0.85?0.36 CYP4C52 AAEL008023 0.61?0.42 CYP4D23 AAEL007816 1.68?0.17 CYP4D24 AAEL007815 2.81?0.20** CYP4D37 AAEL007795 1.47?0.30 CYP4D38 AAEL007807 1.44?0.10 CYP4D39 AAEL007808 1.54?0.07 CYP4G35 AAEL008345 3.03?0.07** CYP4G35 AAEL006824 3.44?0.20** CYP4G36 AAEL004054 2.84?0.16** CYP4H28 AAEL003380 1.27?0.71 CYP4H29 AAEL007830 2.52?0.43** CYP4H30 AAEL003399 3.85?0.50** CYP4H31 AAEL002085 1.36?0.51 CYP4H32 AAEL007812 0.36?0.02? CYP4H33 AAEL013798 2.73?0.13** CYP4J13 AAEL013555 1.05?0.15 CYP4J14 AAEL013554 1.00?0.11 CYP4J15v1 AAEL013556 2.30?0.18** CYP4J15v2 AAEL014829 3.85?0.46** CYP4J16 AAEL015663 1.06?0.29 CYP4J17 AAEL015370 1.23?0.42 CYP4J17 AAEL014019 0.44?0.03? CYP4K3 AAEL007798 1.19?0.28 CYP4AR2 AAEL010154 1.09?0.23 CYP325E3 AAEL000338 0.76?0.64 CYP325G2 AAEL012766 2.06?0.31 CYP325G3 AAEL012772 3.61?1.20** CYP325K2 AAEL005771 1.23?0.24 CYP325K3 AAEL005788 2.08?0.19 CYP325L1v1 AAEL011770 1.66?0.07 CYP325M1 AAEL012773 1.28?0.18 CYP325M2 AAEL012769 1.41?0.19 CYP325M2 AAEL015591 1.54?0.19 96 CYP325M3 AAEL012765 0.31?0.02? CYP325M4 AAEL011769 2.72?0.28** CYP325M5 AAEL011761 1.40?0.18 CYP325N1 AAEL012770 0.76?0.34 CYP325N2 AAEL012762 0.98?0.14 CYP325P1 AAEL000340 1.66?0.13 CYP325Q1 AAEL006044 1.16?0.13 CYP325Q2 AAEL015563 1.44?0.30 CYP325R1 AAEL005775 1.76?0.09 CYP325S1 AAEL000326 0.51?0.41 CYP325S2 AAEL000325 0.68?0.10 CYP325S3 AAEL000357 0.56?0.05 CYP325T2 AAEL012761 1.02?0.22 CYP325T2 AAEL015475 0.81?0.13 CYP325U1 AAEL000320 0.14?0.01 CYP325X1 AAEL005695 1.19?0.13 CYP325X2 AAEL005696 1.37?0.12 CYP325X4 AAEL005700 1.39?0.14 CYP325Y1 AAEL006257 1.09?0.20 CYP325Y2v2 AAEL015362 0.50?0.23 CYP325Y3 AAEL006246 1.21?0.20 CYP325Y3 AAEL015361 1.31?0.22 CYP325Z1 AAEL010273 1.30?0.13 CYP325AA1 AAEL004012 1.51?0.21 Mito Clan CYP12F5 AAEL001960 0.47?0.27 CYP12F6 AAEL002005 2.14?0.19* CYP12F7 AAEL002031 1.37?0.11 CYP12F8 AAEL006827 2.30?0.29** CYP49A1 AAEL008638 1.45?0.14 CYP301A1 AAEL014594 1.84?0.15 CYP302A1v1 AAEL011463 1.91?0.15 CYP302A1v2 AAEL015655 1.46?0.22 CYP314A1 AAEL010946 0.77?0.16 CYP315A1 AAEL011850 1.92?0.07 Other NADPH P450 reductase AAEL003349 4.76?0.18** ?Nomenclature for the cytochrome P450 genes was taken for the Ae. aegypti cytochrome P450 database at: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html ?Vectorbase Ae. aegypti predicted gene set v. AaegL1.1. http://aaegypti.vectorbase.org/ *significantly up-regulated (>2-fold) at the P<0.05 level of significance **significantly up-regulated (>2-fold) at the P<0.01 level of significance ?significantly down-regulated (>2-fold) at the P<0.01 level of significance Taken together, these results suggest that the cytochrome P450 genes identified as up- regulated in the Puerto Rico strain of Ae. aegypti may be involved in insecticide resistance, and 97 further investigation to test for functionality is needed to identify if they have a role in insecticide resistance. Multiple studies have investigated the functional role of insect cytochrome P450s (Joussen et al., 2008; Xu et al., 2010; Stevenson et al., 2011; Stevenson et al., 2012; Muller et al., 2008; Muller et al., 2011; Chandor-Proust et al., 2013; Yang and Liu, 2011), with the main focus on characterizing clan 3 cytochrome P450s in families CYP6 and CYP9. In order to add to the growing base of literature for cytochrome P450s involved in insecticide resistance, we selected genes from family CYP4 for further functional studies. Four genes, CYP4D24 (AAEL007815), CYP4H29 (AAEL007830), CYP4J15v1 (AAEL013556), and CYP4H33 (AAEL013789), were tested, among which AAEL013556 had been previously identified as up-regulated in permethrin resistant Ae. aegpyti (Marcombe et al., 2009), while the others had not been previously linked to insecticide resistance in Ae. aegypti. The four P450 genes from the Puerto Rico strain of Ae aegypti were successfully transferred and expressed in D. melanogaster under control of the GAL4-UAS enhancer trap system after full length cloning and sequencing (Fig. 2). When adult female D. melanogaster expressing each of the transgenes were exposed to either permethrin or beta-cypermethrin (Fig. 3), the results showed a moderate increase in survival for transgenic D. melanogaster expressing each of the four CYP4 genes at a rate of 5?g/vial permethrin. CYP4D24 (AAEL007815) demonstrated survivorship at 10?g/vial suggesting that CYP4D24 may be capable of conferring resistance to type I pyrethroids, although CYP4D24 may not be as effective at conferring resistance to pyrethroids as other cytochrome P450s. For example, transgenic D. melanogaster expressing CYP6BQ9 from the QTC279 strain of Tribolium castaneum under the same Act5c-GAL4:UAS control conferred resistance to deltamethrin at a comparable rate (10?g/vial) (Zhu et al., 2010). 98 Figure 5.2. RT-PCR of transgenic D. melanogaster expressing Aedes aegypti cytochrome P450 genes. The (-) and (+) within gene represent the amplified products from the non-transgenic line (-) and the transgenic line (+) of D. melanogaster, respectively. However the type II pyrethroid deltamethrin has been shown to be more toxic to mosquitoes than the type I pyrethroid permethrin (Rettich, F. 1983, Jawara et al., 2001; Allan, 2011). The transgenic D. melanogaster testing further showed that the over-expression of CYP4J15v1 (AAEL013556) conferred a minor level of resistance to both the type I pyrethroid permethrin and the type II pyrethroid beta-cypermethrin, while the remaining transgenic D. melanogaster lines were not significantly different from each other at the ?=0.05 level of significance and had nearly no survival. In addition, CYP4J15v1 was identified to be up-regulated in our study and also in a previous study (Marcombe et al., 2009). Taken together, these results suggest that 99 CYP4J15v1 may have a minor role in conferring pyrethroid resistance to Ae. aegypti. Figure 5.3. Survivorship of transgenic D. melanogaster lines following a 24h exposure to either permethrin or beta-cypermethrin. Bars within dose superceeded by the same letter are not significantly different at the ?=0.05 level of significance. BDRC 24484 is the non-transgenic line of D. melanogaster, which had no surviving individuals at any of the doses of the insecticides tested. 5.5 Conclusions The current study investigated the expression profiles of 164 cytochrome P450 genes in adult females of a permethrin-resistant field strain of Ae. aegypti. Overall, a total of 34 genes were identified to be up-regulated, several of which were also identified in other field populations of insecticide-resistant Ae. aegypti. Functional analysis of some of the lesser-understood cytochrome P450s suggested that two genes, CYP4D24 and CYP4J15v1, were capable of conferring a low-level of resistance to insecticides when over-expressed in transgenic D. melanogaster. Our results add to the body of work that has investigated the gene expression profiles of cytochrome P450s in insecticide resistant field strains of Ae. aegypti, and identified a 100 possible minor role of two family 4 P450 genes, which is important to elucidate the complexity of the role of cytochrome P450 genes in pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes. 5.6 Acknowledgements We thank Neil Sanscrainte, Matthew Brown, Francis Golden, and Nathan Newlon for their assistance with the rearing of the mosquitoes. We also thank the Deployed War-Fighter Protection program for funding. 101 Chapter 6: Temporal gene expression profiles of pre and post blood-fed adult females of the Southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus William R. Reid1 and Nannan Liu1* Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA *To whom correspondence should be addressed Prepared for submission to the Journal of Medical Entomology 6.1 Abstract Prior to acquisition of the first host blood meal, the anautogenous mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus requires a period of time in order to prepare for the blood feeding. In the current study, we found that adult females required a minimum of 48 h post-eclosion before they freely took their first blood meal. We hypothesized that gene expression signatures were altered in the mosquitoes before blood feeding in preparation for the acquisition of the blood meal through changes in multiple gene expression. To identify the genes involved in the acquisition of blood feeding, we quantified the gene expression levels of adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus using RNA Seq throughout a pre-blooding period from 2 to 72 h post eclosion at 12 h intervals. A total of 325 genes were determined to be differentially-expressed throughout the pre-blooding period, with the majority of differentially-expressed genes occurring between the 2 h and 12 h post-eclosion time points. Among the up-regulated genes were salivary proteins, odorant-binding proteins, and proteases, while the majority of the down-regulated genes were hypothetical or cuticular genes. Further analysis of the gene expression profiles following a blood meal suggested that only certain vitellogenin genes were highly expressed, and that vitellogenesis in 102 Cx. quinquefasciatus appears to be a longer process than in Aedes aegypti. Overall, this study reviewed multiple genes that might be involved in adult female competency for blood meal acquisition of mosquitoes. Key words: Vitellogenesis, blood feeding, anautogeny 6.2 Introduction The Southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus is a vector of the causative agents of several diseases including West Nile Fever, St. Louis Encephalitis, Japanese Encephalitis, and lymphatic filariasis. The pathogens vectored by Cx. quinquefasciatus are acquired during the blood meal acquisition, which must be taken by the adult female prior to the formation of each egg raft (Cupp et al., 2011). Newly eclosed females require a period of time before they are capable of taking the blood meal during which, the female mates and continues with the necessary development to be competent for the acquisition of the blood meal itself (Williams and Patterson, 1969). Many studies have shown that genes and gene up-regulation are involved in the processing of the blood meal and subsequently, vitellogenesis (Chen et al., 2004, Hansen et al., 2005, Bryant et al., 2010). Studies that have characterized the transcriptome expression patterns of adult Aedes aegypti (Price et al., 2011) and Anopheles gambiae (Marinotti et al., 2006) have shown that multiple genes are involved in blood feeding and that there are different expression profiles of these genes both prior to and immediately following the blood meal. The temporal characterization of the gene expression profiles of the Cx. quinquefasciatus transcriptome prior to the blood meal would provide valuable insight into the genes needed to prepare the female for the taking of the blood meal, and also could identify novel targets for controlling Cx. 103 quinquefasciatus by preventing the blood feeding. Characterization and identification of key genes that may be involved in the taking of a blood meal could provide novel targets for novel approaches to manage insect disease-vectors. The recent advances in next generation sequencing, including RNA Seq, allows for the characterization the gene expression profiles without requiring a priori knowledge of which genes to investigate. In the current study, we used RNA Seq sequencing to conduct whole transcriptome analyses of adult female mosquitoes during the post-eclosion and pre-vitellogenic stages of development to identify genes that are up- or down- regulated prior to the female freely taking a blood meal and further investigated the temporal expression of selected genes following the taking of a blood meal to identify genes that may be necessary for both taking of the blood meal, and processing of the blood meal in adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus. 6.3 Materials and Methods 6.3.1 Mosquito strains Culex quinquefasciatus strain HAmCqG8, whose parental line was originally collected from Huntsville, Alabama, has been established in the laboratory where it has been continuously reared since 2002 (Liu et al., 2004). All mosquitoes were reared and tested at 25?2oC under a photoperiod of 12:12 (L:D) h and fed a diet of Brewer's yeast (Fleishmann, Chesterfield, MO) for the larval stages and 10% sucrose and horse blood (College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University) for the adult stages fed through a stretched Parafilm membrane in a 37oC heated water jacketed glass holder. 104 6.3.2 Pre-determination of time period for mosquitoes to take their first blood meal The adult mosquitoes (12 h post eclosion) were divided into 17 groups with a minimum of ~60 mosquitoes each in both sexes (~1:1 ratio). The mosquito groups were then independently offered pre-warmed (37oC) horse blood meal (College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University) with an ascending order of every 12 h starting from 24 h after eclosion; i.e., 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 h after ecolosion, respectively. Each group of mosquitoes was fed for a single blood meal for 2 h and the number of the blood fed female mosquitoes from each group were checked after blood-feeding. All blood-feeding time points were repeated in triplicate. 6.3.3 RNA extraction All collected mosquito samples were flash frozen on dry ice and held at -80?C prior to RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using the hot acid phenol extraction method as outlined by Chomczynski and Sacchi (1987). A total of 30 ?g of RNA was then treated with DNase I using the DNA-Free kit from Ambion (Austin, TX) to remove any contaminant DNA and re-extracted with two successive acid phenol: chloroform (1:1) steps followed by a final chloroform extraction to remove any residual phenol. The RNA was then precipitated over ethanol and re- suspended in sterile distilled water. After a 1?g aliquot of RNA had been visually inspected for quality and for DNA contamination on a 1% agarose gel. The total RNAs were subsequently used for either Seq analysis (Hudson Alpha Institute of Biotechnology [HAIB], Huntsville, AL) or gene expression analysis. 6.3.4 RNA library preparation, RNA Seq sequencing, Data analysis, and gene expression 105 processing Total RNA quality was assessed by the HAIB using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and an Invitrogen Qubit to ensure quality. Libraries were then prepared using the Illumina RNA Sample Prep Kits for mRNA Seq and a 3' poly A tail selection method. Samples were barcoded and run as one of four samples on a single lane of an Illumina Hi Seq 2000 chip. Samples for the mRNA Seq were run using the PE-50 module (HAIB) which generated paired end libraries with 50 nt long sequences on each paired end. Base calling, initial removal of low quality reads, and barcode parsing were conducted by the staff at HAIB. Further cleaning of adapter was performed using Trimmomatic (Lohse et al., 2012). Paired end reads were then mapped to the Cx quinquefasciatus genome from Vectorbase (Megy et al., 2009, Arensberger et al., 2010) using Tophat (Trapnell et al., 2009) with mate pair interval of 200 bases and the gtf basefeatures file. The -no-novel-juncs flag was used in the alignment to suppress the discovery of novel spliceforms in order to estimate gene expression levels based on the Vectorbase annotation of the genes. Read counts were determined using Cufflinks, and the testing of differential expression was estimated using Cuffdiff as time series data (Roberts et al., 2011). After analysis, only genes with expression values ?1, as measured in number of fragments mapped for every thousand bases of gene length for every million fragments sequenced (FPKM), were retained for expression comparisons (Gan et al., 2010). All data have been submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus at NCBI as accession #GSE51327. 6.3.5 qPCR gene expression 106 The total RNA from three independent samples of 20 adult female HAmCqG8 mosquitoes was extracted as previously outlined above. The same methodology for obtaining even-aged females immediately following eclosion was used to obtain the non-blood-fed females for RNA extraction, using the same time points as previously indicated: 2, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72h post-eclosion. In order to obtain the material for the RNA extraction for the post-blood meal sampling time points, mosquitoes were initially reared to 7d of age (post-eclosion) prior to the offering of a blood meal. Blood meals were then offered for a 2h period at the onset of the scotophase, after which blooded females were collected at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72h. Females that had not taken a blood meal were removed from the cages immediately following the blood meal and the remaining females that had taken a blood meal were held in the cages along with the males from the initial population. A total of 20 females were selected for each time point and all collections were repeated in triplicate. Total RNA was treated with DNase I using the DNA-Free kit from Ambion (Austin, TX) as previously described to remove any contaminant DNA, and the DNase I was inactivated using the inactivation buffer from Ambion. First strand cDNA was generated from the template RNA using the First strand cDNA synthesis kit from Roche (Indianapolis, IN) and an oligo dT primer. RT-qPCR was conducted on an ABI 7500 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) using theABI SyBr Green mastermix kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and relative gene expression was determined by using the 2(- ??Ct) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001) using a portion of the 18S rRNA gene as the reference gene. The primers used are provided in supplementary table S1. 6.4 Results 107 6.4.1 Determination of the pre-blood meal time period. To see the time period needed for mosquitoes to prepare them for the taking of their first blood meal, we conducted a time course study on blood feeding with adult Cx. quinquefasciatus and tested 11 groups. Each group was offered pre-warmed blood meal starting from 24 h after eclosion followed by an ascending order of every 12 h. Our results showed that Cx. quinquefasciatus needs a minimum of 48 h after eclosion to prepare the female for the blood meal (Fig. 6.1). Figure 6.1. Box and whisker plot of the percentage of females from even-aged populations of Cx. quinquefasciatus strain HAmCqG8 freely taking an offered blood meal. The black lines within a bar represent the median percentage of females who freely took a blood meal. The upper and lower whiskers represent the highest and lowest observations, respectively, while the bars themselves represent the interquartile range (Q1 - Q3). When mosquito populations had reached 96 h of age (post-eclosion), the average number of 108 females taking a blood meal plateaued at ~50% with no observable increase in blood meal taking by females beyond this time point. Under the rearing conditions tested, some females may remain un-mated since the sex ratio was maintained at a consistent ratio. Sebastian and DeMeillon (1967) found that mating was a pre-requisite for blood feeding in the closely-related mosquito Culex pipiens fatigans, and further identified that a sex ratio of 2:1 (males : females) was necessary to maximize insemination, while a sex ratio of 1:1 resulted in an insemination rate of only 83%. Since the sex ratio was held at ~1:1 in our study, this may explain why only 50% of the females took a blood meal (Craig, 1967). Since the objective of the study was to determine the time-to-first blood meal acquisition competency, the 96 h time point represented the minimum time to reach maximum first blood meal acquisition for females in small populations of even-aged mosquitoes. This suggested that under our experimental conditions, the average pre-blood meal competency time period for females ranged ~48 h, after which females became competent to take a blood meal, reaching maximum blood meal acquisition at ~96 h post-eclosion. 6.4.2 RNA Seq characterization of the pre-blood meal and mating time periods in Cx. quinquefasciatus. According to the pre-determination of the first blood meal time, we conducted RNA Seq to characterize the genes that were involved in the taking of a blood meal. Seven post-eclosion time points i.e., 2, 12, 24, 36 48, 60, and 72 h, were selected for the RNA Seq analysis, covering the time period from ecosion to the first sign of the blood feeding (i.e., by 48 h post-eclosion) and to the maximum mating period of Cx. quinquefasciatus, which has been shown to begin mating 24 h after ecolosion and reach a maximum by 72 h (Williams and Patterson, 1969). A total of 200 109 females collected from each of the time points were pooled for the RNA extraction. Except for the 2 h time point, in which mosquito pupae were allowed to eclose over the 2 h period only, pupae were allowed to eclose over a 12 h period and the females were collected at 12 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h time points after eclosion. Overall, the depths of sequencing for the sample time points ranged from 26 to 51 million paired-end reads (Table 6.1) and after mapping the reads to the Cx. quinquefasciatus genome, the genes that were identified as expressed (i.e.: those genes having an FPKM (fragments per kilo base of gene length per million reads mapped) >1 (Gan et al., 2010)), were divided among the Structural Classification Of Proteins (SCOP) general function categories of metabolism, regulation, extra-cellular processes, intra-cellular processes, information, general, other, and no annotation (Murzin et al., 1995, Andreeva et al., 2004, Vogel et al, 2004, Vogel et al., 2005). Table 6.1. Number of paired end reads from the Illumina HiSeq sequencing and the percentage of reads mapped to the Cx. quinquefasciatus (strain: Johannesburg) predicted transcriptome. Sampling time point Total paired end reads? Paired end reads discarded? Paired end reads used for mapping to the Cx. quinquefasciatus genome (JHB v1.2) 2 h 39890830 2950518 36940312 12 h 36030651 2405121 33625530 24 h 41173012 2979773 38193239 36 h 35519459 1894955 33624504 48 h 34587710 1909928 32677782 60 h 27128981 1276065 25852916 72 h 54895903 3819301 51076602 ?Total number of FASTQ (DNA sequence with quality scores) reads passing the Illumina quality filter. ?Number of reads discarded after adapter clipping. When the expressed genes were pooled into their respective SCOP general function categories and their FPKM gene expression values were summed to estimate the total proportion of gene 110 expression within each of the SCOP general function categories, the pattern revealed that there was an overall decrease in total gene expression among the ?No annotation? and the ?General? SCOP general function categories occurring from 2 to the 12 h post-eclosion time points, with a respective increase in total gene expression for the categories of ?regulation? and ?other? for the 12 h time point (Fig. 6.2). Beyond the 12 h post-eclosion time point, the total cumulative gene expression profiles within each of the SCOP general function categories were similar up to, 72 h post-eclosion time point (Fig.6.2). These results suggested that the major global changes in gene expression for adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus (prior to the taking of a blood meal) occur during the initial 12 h post-eclosion. Figure 6.2. Total gene expression within the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) general function categories for adult sugar-fed female Culex quinquefasciatus, strain HAmCqG8, for the initial 72 h post-eclosion. Gene expression values expressed are summed within each SCOP category to provide an overall profile of the complete distribution of all gene expression within the mosquitoes. To further identify candidate genes that may be involved in preparing the female for the taking of 111 a blood meal, we investigated the genes that were differentially-expressed throughout the time course investigated. Overall, the majority of the genes that tested as differentially up- or down- regulated occurred between the 2 and 12 h post-eclosion time period, which peaked at 12 h, after which, the number of genes that were differentially-expressed decreased (Fig. 6.3). Roughly one- third of the differentially-expressed genes identified (101 genes from a total of 325) had no functional annotation in Vectorbase, while the remaining genes had predicted functions (Appendix 6.2). At 12 h post-eclosion, the greatest numbers of differentially-expressed genes was observed with 159 genes being up-regulated, and 74 down-regulated (Fig. 6.2). Figure 6.3. Distribution of genes tested as differentially-expressed for adult sugar-fed female Culex quinquefasciatus, strain HAmCqG8, for the initial 72 h post-eclosion period. Among the up-regulated genes were 32 salivary proteins and two apyrases, which may be 112 involved in the prevention of platelet clotting during blood feeding (Smith et al., 2002), 10 cytochrome P450s (CPIJ005952 , CPIJ011837 , CPIJ010225 , CPIJ010227 , CPIJ000294 , CPIJ019586 , CPIJ019587 , CPIJ020018 , CPIJ012470, CPIJ010546 ), which were distributed among families CYP4, CYP6, CYP9, and CYP325, 20 proteases, and also genes involved in embryogenesis including wnt inhibitors and oskar (Chang et al., 2011, Jaglarz et al., 2011). Among the genes down-regulated at 12 h post-eclosion were 27 hypothetical proteins, 11 cuticle proteins and five cytochrome P450 genes (CPIJ011841, CPIJ011840, CPIJ015954, CPIJ015961, and CPIJ015960), which were all in family CYP325. At 24 h post-eclosion, fewer genes were identified as differentially-expressed (27 up-regulated; 51 down-regulated). Among the up- regulated genes at 24 h post-eclosion were nine proteases and one olfactory receptor (CPIJ008023), which may be involved in preparation for the blood meal and host seeking, respectively. Among the down-regulated genes at 24 h post-eclosion were 32 hypothetical proteins, and six cuticle proteins, which may be involved in the transition from the pharate to the adult. While the majority of differential gene expression was observed in the earlier time points, there were a few genes that were up-regulated at 48 and 60 h with a total of 18, 12, 10, and five genes for the 36 h, 48 h, 60 h, and 72 h time points, respectively. Notably at 48 h post-eclosion, CPIJ006495, a hypothetical protein possessing a ChtBD2 chitin binding motif, which is found in insect peritrophin A (Letunic et al., 2012). In addition, at 60 h post-eclosion, multiple proteases were identified as up-regulated (CPIJ000990, CPIJ002595, CPIJ003539, and CPIJ007077) as well as ficolin-3, which has been linked to the humoral lectin immune defense response in mosquitoes (Dimopolous et al., 2002). In addition, with the exception of one hypothetical gene at the 48 h time point and the 10 113 genes up-regulated at the 60 h time point, all of the differentially-expressed genes beyond the 24 h time point were down-regulated. Furthermore, when the gene expression values (FPKM) were considered, there was a sharp decrease in the gene expression values of differentially-expressed genes beyond the 36 h time point, with the highest FPKM value of 60 being attributed to a hypothetical gene, CPIJ015506 (Table S2). Taken together, these results suggest that the majority of the genes that are up-regulated in preparation of the female Cx. quinquefasciatus for the taking of their first blood meal are up-regulated within the first 24 h post-eclosion, while a few additional genes involved in blood meal taking may be up-regulated at 48 ? 60 h post-eclosion. Recent work by Clifton and Noriega (2012) identified that nutritional status in the mosquito Aedes aegypti influences the expression of key vitellogenesis-related transcripts, these were: the ribosomal 60S protein rpL32, the lipophorin receptor AaLpRov, the vitellogenin receptor AaVgR, and heavy-chain clathrin (AaCHC). In our study, we identified a similar trend for these genes in Cx. quinquefasciatus and found that the lipophorin receptor (CPIJ018375), the 60S protein rpL32 (CPIJ001220), the pro-epidermal growth factor gene (putative vitellogenin receptor) (CPIJ020278), and heavy-chain clathrin (CPIJ014882) all gradually increased in expression over time, with the predicted genes heavy-chain clathrin and the putative vitellogenin receptor continuously increasing from 2 to 72 h post-eclosion (Table 6.2), which follows the data previously reported by Clifton and Noriega (2012). Table 6.2. Expression levels of genes in Culex quinquefasciatus, strain HAmCqG8 for genes previously identified as up-regulated in non-blood-fed female Aedes aegypti and linked to 114 nutritional status with regard to blood-feeding competency. Expression level (FPKM? at time point post- eclosion (h) Gene number Predicted function? 2 12 24 36 48 60 72 CPIJ001220 60S ribosomal protein L32 1100 1400 2200 3330 3600 4600 2900 CPIJ014882 clathrin heavy chain 100 126 154 160 200 150 210 CPIJ018375 lipophorin receptor 7 20 25 35 37 33 30 CPIJ020278* pro-epidermal growth factor 3 12 93 130 190 200 240 ?Fragments mapped Per Kilo bases of reference sequence for every Million fragments sequenced ?Predicted function from Vectorbase, v. 1.2. https://www.vectorbase.org/organisms/culex- quinquefasciatus *Putative vitellogenin receptor based on closest blastx match to Anopheles gambiae 6.4.3 Validation of selected RNA Seq genes using qPCR. In order to estimate the accuracy of our RNA Seq results, and to determine the expression of selected genes throughout the pre blood-feeding and into the post blood-feeding time periods of Cx. quinquefasciatus, we selected a total of 36 genes that were predicted by the RNA Seq data to show the differential expression during the 72 h post-eclosion time period (Fig. 6.4). Among the genes selected were genes putatively involved in host finding or blood feeding behavior (odorant-binding proteins, period circadian protein), genes putatively involved in the maturation of the pharate female to the adult (cuticular proteins), genes putatively involved in the taking of the blood meal (salivary proteins), genes putatively involved in the digestion of the blood meal (trypsins, collagenase, lipases, uricase), genes predicted to be involved in the provisioning of nutrients to the egg (vitellogenins, adipophilin/perilipin), genes involved in embryogenesis (wnt inhibitor, oskar) as well as genes for proteins with other functions including: cytochrome P450s, calbindin, and oxidoreductase. 115 Figure 6.4. Heat map displaying the relative increases in gene expression for selected genes for the initial 72 h post-eclosion for adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus, strain HAmCqG8, and for 72 h post blood meal. Females offered a blood meal were 6 days old at the time of the blood feeding. The expression of these 36 genes was investigated from 2 to 72 h post-eclosion using qPCR. In addition, we further investigated their gene expression after blood feeding from 2 h post blood- feeding until 72 h post blood-feeding. The results showed that among the genes that were predicted to decrease or to increase and then decrease were genes putatively involved in preparation for the blood meal, or possibly host seeking (Fig. 5 upper panels). The general odorant-binding proteins (CPIJ01716, CPIJ01719, CPIJ012721) had their highest expression at 2h post-eclosion and had a slight increase from the lowest expression values from 48h to 72h post blood-feeding. This indicated that females initially expressed the odorant-binding proteins to aid for food searching (sugar or blood) and also after the blood meal, possibly for aiding in the 116 identification of suitable oviposition sites. Other genes of interest were the salivary genes (CPIJ002046 and CPIJ019052) which reached maximal gene expression values at 24h and 48h, respectively, and then remained at low expression levels afterwards (Fig. 6.4). Among the genes that were predicted to be up-regulated throughout the post-eclosion and pre-blooding time period, the vitellogenin genes CPIJ001357/CPIJ001358 reached maximal gene expression at 60h post blood-feeding, while the vitellogenin genes CPIJ010190/CPIJ010191 and CPIJ005473 reached maximal expression at 20h post blood-feeding (Fig. 6.4). The major vitellogenin gene in Ae. aegypti has been shown to reach maximal expression at 24h post blood- feeding, which is consistent with our findings for CPIJ010190/CPIJ010191, but not for CPIJ001357/CPIJ001358, suggesting that vitellogenesis is a slower process in Cx. quniquefasciatus than in Ae. aegypti. Following the blood meal, two trypsins (CPIJ007079, CPIJ004660) and one chymotrypsin (CPIJ003915) were up-regulated (Fig. 6.4). Trypsin CPIJ007079 was up-regulated immediately following blood feeding, while trypsin CPIJ004660 and chymotrypsin CPIJ003915 were up-regulated at 48h and 60h post blood-feeding, respectively. These proteases are likely involved in the digestion of the blood meal, with the first gene representing early trypsin, and the later two representing late trypsins. The uricase gene CPIJ003456 reached a maximal expression at 20 h post blood-feeding and decreased by 60 h post blood-feeding, suggesting that uricase may be primarily involved in ammonia metabolism as related to the processing of the blood meal (Isoe and Scaraffia, 2013). We then further selected all of the predicted vitellogenin genes to identify the post-blood meal time point at which vitellogenin expression would reach a maximum. Since 10 genes were predicted to be vitellogenins by the Vectorbase functional annotation for the Johannesburg strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, with three sets of two each of the genes having nearly identical 117 sequence, we designed a total of seven qPCR primers to determine which vitellogenins were the most likely to be involved in egg provisioning in Cx. quinquefasciatus, and when they reached maximal expression. In addition, since we were interested in understanding if the genes identified as differentially-expressed in pre blood-fed Cx. quinquefasciatus were involed post blood-feeding, we first characterized when vitellogenin expression was at a maximum in blood- fed Cx. quinquefasciatus (Fig. 6.5). Figure 6.5. Temporal gene expression of vitellogenin genes in adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus for the 72 h time period immediately following eclosion and for the 72 h time period immediately following the blood meal. 118 To accomplish this, we selected six of the 10 predicted vitellogenin genes in Cx. quinquefasciatus. In order to identify which genes were involved in vitellogenesis, we initially investigated the expression profiles of the vitellogenins in female Cx. quinquefasciatus. Overall, we identified that the vitellogenins, CPIJ001357/CPIJ001358 were the highest expressed of the predicted vitellogenin genes, with more than two logs higher fold gene expression than the next highest expressed vitellogenin genes CPIJ010190/CPIJ010191 (Fig. 6.5). In addition, we found that these two pairs of vitellogenin genes were up-regulated 12 h post blood-feeding and continued to increase, reaching a maximal expression value at 36 h post blood-feeding. 6.5 Discussion Males of Cx. quinquefasciatus have been shown to need a minimum of 24 h of post- eclosion development in order to mate, with mating reaching a maximum by 72 h (Williams and Patterson, 1969). In our study, the 72 h post-eclosion time points indicated the mean age for females to become competent to take a blood meal, reaching a maximum by 96 h. This may indicate that a male accessory gland factor transferred from the male during mating is necessary in order to induce the female to take a blood meal (Craig, 1967). Recently, egg development in Anopheles gambiae has been demonstrated to be controlled, in part, by exogenous ecdysone transferred to the females from the male accessory gland secretions following mating (Baldini et al., 2013). The contribution of the ecdysone was found to be a strong inducer of the mating- induced stimulator of oogenesis (miso) gene (AGAP002620) (Holt et al., 2012; Baldini et al., 2013), however in Cx. quinquefasciatus, the two closest homologs of miso, CPIJ018252 and CPIJ006083 were found to have low expression throughout the first 72 h post-eclosion time period, having their highest expression at 2 h post-eclosion (FPKM = 2 and 3, respectively) 119 (GEO: #GSE51327). In addition, Baldini et al. (2013) found that ecdysone was not present in the male accessory glands of Ae. aegypti or Anopheles albimanus. Taken together, this suggested that the role of the male accessory gland factors with respect to mating, egg development, and female blood meal competency differ among the various mosquito species. Since mating would have occurred after 24 h post-eclosion (Williams and Patterson, 1969), any genes that might be up- regulated in response to mating should be up-regulated in the time points >24 h post-eclosion. Genes up-regulated at the 48 and 60 h time points were related to chitin binding, proteases, and a ficolin. These genes may be involved in the preparation of the peritrophic matrix for the taking of the blood meal and for providing immunity to pathogens that may be contained within the blood. The up-regulation of these genes at 48 - 60 h may be necessary to prepare the female for the taking of a blood meal, possibly up-regulated in response to mating. In addition to the genes up-regulated at 48 - 60 h, the differentially expressed genes from the 2 to 24 h time points are also likely involved in preparing the female for blood feeding since several of these genes could be attributed to genes that aid in the feeding and digestion of the blood meal, such as trypsins, apyrase, and salivary proteins (Barillas-Mury, 1995, Chamopagne et al., 1995, Sim et al., 2012), while genes having functions related to continued development after eclosion, such as cuticle structure were down-regulated (Riehle et al., 2002). The previously un-characterized genes that changed their expression levels over time in our study represent novel genes for the investigation of the genetic events that occur prior to blood- meal acquisition in Cx. quinquefasciatus. Our finding that heavy-chain clathrin in Cx. quinquefasciatus was expressed throughout the entire post-eclosion time period, is likely involved with aiding in the provisioning of the egg with vitellogenins. Clathrin is involved in multiple endocytotic processes, thus the expression of heavy-chain clathrin throughout the entire 120 post-eclosion time period was expected (Clifton and Noriega, 2012). In contrast, the putative vitellogenin receptor, CPIJ020278 had low expression until 24h post-eclosion, suggesting that the putative vitellogenin receptor gene is developmentally regulated during the adult stage and is switched on prior to the time period when the females freely take an offered blood meal. The increase in gene expression for the vitellogenin receptor at 24 h is consistent with observations of egg provisioning in an autogenous strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, where 1-day-old females have been shown to be capable of provisioning their eggs in the absence of a blood meal if they were exposed to the ecdysone agonist tebufenozide in the immature stages (Gelbi? and Rozsypalov?, 2012). This demonstrates that 24 h old Cx. quinquefasciatus females are capable of vitellogenesis if provided with the appropriate hormonal stimulation (Gelbi? and Rozsypalov?, 2012). Vitellogenesis and successful completion of egg formation in mosquitoes, however, requires not only ecdysone, but specific amino acids, juvenile hormone, and the activation of various signaling pathways and miRNAs as well (Hansen et al., 2004, Hansen et al, 2005, Shiao et al., 2008, Bryant et al., 2010, Gulia-Nuss et al., 2011). Vitellogenesis has also been shown to terminate, resulting in the re-absorption of vitellins, if the nutritional status of Ae. aegypti is not sufficient for complete egg maturation (Clifton and Noriega, 2012). Therefore since female Cx. quinquefasciatus are capable of vitellogenesis as early as 24 h post-eclosion (Gelbi? and Rozsypalov?, 2012), but do not freely take a blood meal until at least 48 - 96 h post-eclosion, the genes that were identified as up-regulated at 48 and 60 h may be essential for the taking and processing of the blood meal, but not vitellogenesis. Furthermore, the up-regulation of these genes may be in response to mating, which begins at 24 h post-eclosion in Cx. quinquefasciatus (Williams and Patterson, 1969). 121 Overall, our study found that the genes identified in the post-eclosion, but pre-blood- meal-taking time period represent genes that may be necessary for the female to freely take a blood meal. We further identified that it was possible to induce vitellogenesis and egg provisioning in Cx. quinquefasciatus prior to the age, at which, mosquitoes would freely take a blood meal, and further identified that the induction of vitellogenesis was independent of mating status, however none of the vitellogenesis-induced females were capable of laying eggs. Our study suggested that in Cx. quinquefasciatus, there is likely a complex of factors necessary to prepare the female for the taking of a blood meal that include not only the control of vitellogenesis, but the processing of the blood meal and preparation of the female for egg development and oviposition as well. 6.6 Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Drs. Peter W. Atkinson, Peter Arensburger and the Culex quinquefasciatus genome community for the efforts they have devoted to determining the genome sequence and making the information available in VectorBase. We would also like to thank the Hudson Alpha Institute of Biotechnology for their expertise in conducting the RNA sequencing work and for all of their help and support with this study. 122 Chapter 7: Research Summary and Future Studies 7.1 Research Summary In this project, we used RNA-Seq to investigate the transcriptome-wide gene expression profiles of the fourth instar stage of a highly permethrin-resistant strain of Culex quinquefasciatus HAmCqG8 and its parental low permethrin-resistant strain HAmCqG0. Overall, we identified 367 differentially up-regulated genes in the HAmCqG8 strain, namely cytochrome P450 genes and proteases. We further utilized qRT-PCR to validate the RNA-Seq results and confirmed the up-regulation of 14 cytochrome P450 genes in the HAmCqG8 strain as well as 14 proteases that had >2-fold up-regulation. Among the up-regulated proteases, one gene, nephrosin CPIJ009594, was more than 100 times over-expressed when tested using qRT-PCR validation. We proposed that the proteases that are differentially-expressed between the HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 strains may be involved in the signaling response that controls insecticide resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus. We then investigated the genes that were up-regulated in the fourth instar stage of the HAmCqG8 strain following a 24 h chronic exposure to permethrin at the LC50 and LC70 rates, and identified 224 and 146 genes that were up- and down-regulated solely in response to permethrin, respectively. Following Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment of the differentially-expressed genes, the GO terms that were statistically enriched among the up- regulated genes included those GO terms associated with cytochrome P450 activities and immune response. Further investigation among the up-regulated genes showed that the up- regulated immune genes were genes that are controlled by the Toll pathway. Among the GO terms that were functionally-enriched among the down-regulated genes, the majority related to protease activity and carbohydrate metabolic process. Among the down-regulated genes 123 associated with carbohydrate metabolic process were immune genes involved in the IMD pathway, suggesting that the immune pathways that were active in permethrin and control treated Cx. quinquefasciatus differed. We further investigated the larval serum storage proteins as well as selected proteases that had been previously identified as up-regulated in HAmCqG8 in our earlier study in order to 1) determine if exposure to permethrin resulted in a decrease in serum protein expression, which could represent a developmental delay, and 2) investigate the connection of proteases that are up-regulated in the HAmCqG8 strain to see if they may be involved in the signaling response in permethrin resistance. Our results showed that during exposure to permethrin all larval storage proteins decreased in expression, suggesting that larval Cx. quinquefasciatus delay development to the pupal form during chronic permethrin exposure, possibly due to a redirection of the insect's metabolic processes to detoxification as demonstrated by the functional enrichment of GO terms associated with cytochrome P450 activities. We also identified that nephrosin, CPIJ009594 was induced during permethrin exposure, and further identified that the induction of nephrosin was significantly higher in the HAmCqG8 strain than when compared to the insecticide-susceptible S-lab strain and also higher than in the HAmCqG0 strain (Chapter 3). We proposed that upon exposure to permethrin, insecticide resistant Cx. quinquefasciatus cease feeding to reduce oral exposure to the toxicant as a means of behavioral resistance. It is possible that insecticide resistant Cx. quinquefasciatus are capable of better- sensing the permethrin exposure and cease feeding to reduce the oral exposure to the insecticide, and that through the cessation of feeding, the TOR pathway is turned off, resulting in a loss of repression of the Toll pathway. The rapid response to cease feeding by the HAmCqG8 strain would represent an example of behavioral resistance to permethrin oral exposure. We then diverged from Cx. quinquefasciatus, to investigate the cytochrome P450s up-regulated in a 124 permethrin-resistant strain of Aedes aegypti in order to expand the knowledge-base of known cytochrome P450s involved in permethrin resistance in mosquitoes. Through a combination of qRT-PCR and transgenic Drosophila melanogaster enhancer-trap techniques, we confirmed the up-regulation of several cytochrome P450s identified in previous studies on insecticide resistance in Ae. aegypti, and further demonstrated that AAEL007815 (CYP4D24) and AAEL13556 (CYP4J15v1) were functionally capable of degrading permethrin. Finally, we investigated gene expression changes in Cx. quinquefasciatus using RNA-Seq throughout the period of time immediately post-eclosion up to the time when females freely took a blood meal. We found that while females would not freely take a blood meal prior to 48-72 h post-eclosion, the predominance of the changes in gene expression occurred within the first 24 h post-eclosion, which coincided with the onset of egg provisioning in autogenous Cx. quinquefasciatus. This suggested that the physiological requirements of the female for host seeking and blood meal acquisition are independent of vitellogenesis. We further identified that the VitA gene (CPIJ001357/CPIJ001358) is the predominant vitellogenin gene in Cx. quinquefasciatus. In conclusion, our project proposes a novel model of behavioral resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus, possibly mediated by the protease nephrosin, identified the functional capacity of two cytochrome P450s in Ae. aegypti to degrade pyrethroids, and elucidated the gene expression profiles of Cx. quinquefasciatus throughout the early part of the adult stage. 7.2 Edsysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase in Culex quinquefasciatus as a novel target for mosquito management 125 The predicted genome of Cx. quinquefasciatus possesses two genes that are predicted to be ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferases, CPIJ003694 and CPIJ016641. The latter gene, CPIJ016641 was found to have no expression in adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus during any pre-blooding or post-blooding stage, while CPIJ003694 was identified to be induced at 36 h post-blooding, which preceded the maximal expression of E74 by 24 h (Fig. 7.1). Figure 7.1 Temporal expression of the ecdysone-inducible gene E74 and the ecdysteroid glucosyltransferase gene CPIJ003694. The gene E74 is inducible by ecdysone and required for the initiation of vitellogenesis in mosquitoes (Guoqiang et al., 2002), thus the expression of E74 at 60 h post-blood meal suggests that there is a second burst of ecdysone, as is found in Ae. aegypti and other insects as well (Shirk et al., 1990), which has been proposed to be necessary for proper egg development. Thus, mosquitoes use ecdysone for both the initiation, and the maturation of eggs at different intervals. The observed increase in egt expression at 36 h (Fig. 7.1) suggests that there is a need for the mosquito to regulate the activity of ecdysone, likely through glucosylation, which has been 126 shown to inactivate the activity of 20-hydroxyecdysone in Mamestra brassicae (Clarke et al., 1996). Since ecdysone is likely necessary for proper egg maturation, it is also likely that egt is expressed in a tissue-specific fashion in order to protect specific mosquito tissues from the effects of ecdysone. Disruption of the role of egt could be a novel means of mosquito control. Future work to investigate the role of egt would be to conduct topical application of ecdysone agonists that cannot be glucosylated by egt. The maximal non-toxic rates for both tebufenozide, and methoxyfenozide have already been determined in Chapter 5, and along with application of 20-hydroxyecdysone as a control, the effect of egt could be estimated. That is, the activity of egt should be able to negate the effects of externally-applied 20-hydroxyecdysone, but not those of the ecdysone agonists. The measureable outcomes for this work would be adult survival, the numbers of eggs laid, the numbers of viable larvae, as well as the possible use of RNA-Seq to investigate unexpected changes in gene expression profiles. Further confirmation of the role of egt could be conducted using RNAi. 7.3 Use of VitA gene as a screening tool for bisacylhydrazines against mosquitoes Non-steroidal ecdysone agonists have been developed for the control of Lepidopteran and Coleopteran pests, leading to the potential of these chemicals for the effective control of disease- vectoring insects, including mosquitoes (Smagghe et al., 2001; Retnakaran et al., 2003; Beckage et al., 2004). In Chapter 6, we found that the expression of the vitA gene (CPIJ001357 / CPIJ001358) was highly up-regulated (>10,000-fold) following a blood meal compared to the vitA gene expression in females that were not given a blood meal. Similar up-regulation patterns of vitA expression occurred in non-blood-fed females when these mosquitoes were treated with the ecdysone agonists, tebufenozide and methoxyfenozide, and we further found that the dose 127 required for induction of vitA expression was lower for methoxyfenozide compared with tebufenozide, suggesting a more specific effect of methoxyfenozide in Cx. quinquefasciatus (Fig. 7.2). Figure 7.2. Dose-dependent effect of ecdysone agonists on the gene expression of the VitA gene (CPIJ001357 / CPIJ001358) against adult female Cx. quinquefasciatus. Beckage et al. (2004) found that among three mosquito species, methoxyfenozide was more active than tebufenozide, suggesting that there may be a correlation between the larvicidal activity of ecdysone agonists and their ability to induce VitA expression. In this case, the level of VitA gene expression could be used as an indicator of the biological activity of ecdysone agonists. Such a system would be advantageous in a large-scale chemical screening program because only a few nanomols of test material would initially be needed to determine biological activity. In addition, the finding that topical treatment with tebufenozide and methoxyfenozide resulted in egg provisioning in Cx. quinquefasciatus would provide an efficient initial screen whereby mosquitoes need only be dissected at 48 h post application to determine activity. 128 Subsequent studies, however, would need to be conducted to optimize a chemical screening system, including characterizing the percentage of false negatives due to insufficient chemical absorption or females possibly incapable of vitellogenesis. 7.4 Determination of gene copy number in the highly pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus In addition to testing the gene expression profiles in Chapter 3, we also investigated the SNPs that differed between the HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 strains. For this, we first mapped all of the RNA-Seq reads to the reference genome for Cx. quinquefasciatus, which is the Johannesberg strain (Arensburger et al., 2010). This was done so that the RNA-Seq reads could be overlapped to a reference genome, allowing for positions with different nucleotides to be determined and SNPs to be called (Neilsen et al., 2011). However since we were interested only in SNPs that differed between the HAmCqG0 and the HAmCqG8 strain, and not SNPs between the HAmCqG8 strain and the Johannesberg strain, we further sorted all of the identified SNPs, and retained only the SNPs that were different between the HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 strains. A minimum coverage of 20 reads for each SNP (Neilsen et al., 2011) was required for both the HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 strains in order to determine the SNPs in the HAmCqG8 strain,. which ensured that the SNPs called in the HAmCqG8 strain were different between the permethrin-selected HAmCqG8 strain and its parental HAmCqG0 strain. In total, >130,000 SNPs were determined between the HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 strains (Table 7.1). More than 85% of the SNPs identified (112,112 SNPs) were synonymous SNPs, suggesting that the majority of the SNPs between the HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 strains do not result in a change to the amino acid sequence of the proteins. Among all SNPs determined, ~58% (75,229 SNPs) of them were homozygous SNPs and ~42% 129 were heterozygous (Table 7.1), indicating the more than half of total SNPs had gone to fixation, that is, they were completely selected within the HAmCqG8 population (Barreiro et al., 2003). Table 7.1. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the pyrethroid-resistant strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus, HAmCqG8, compared to the parental reference strain HAmCqG0. Region? Total SNPs Homozygous Heterozygous synonymous SNPs 112112 64252 47860 non-synonymous SNPs 17732 10412 7320 splice site donor 273 234 39 splice site acceptor 305 245 60 synonymous stop 57 38 19 TOTAL 130479 75181 55298 ? As defined for the gene coding regions for the Cx. quinquefasciatus Johannesberg strain v1.3 Vectorbase, www.vectorbase.org Other SNPs within the HAmCqG8 strain included the addition of 273 predicted splice site donors and 305 splice site acceptors, suggesting that alternative splicing could also play a role in the regulation of the up-regulated genes in the HAmCqG8 (Table 7.1). In addition, a total of 57 synonymous stop SNPs were identified in the HAmCqG8 strain, which are not predicted to result in any change to protein function (Table 7.1). To pinpoint the possible importance of the SNPs in insecticide resistance, we investigated the SNPs that were present in the up-regulated genes of the pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain identified in Chapter 3. Among the up-regulated genes in HAmCqG8, 132 of them contained SNPs, with a total of 1010 SNPs among the genes (Table 7.2). The number of SNPs per gene were compared among their Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) functional categories, which showed that the genes containing SNPs were present in the categories of extracellular processes, general, intracellular processes, metabolism, regulation, and no annotation (Fig. 7.3). Table 7.2. List of genes containing SNPs/indels in the HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus when compared to the HAmCqG0 strain for genes shown to be up-regulated in the HAmCqG8 strain. Sequence SCOP? general SCOP? detailed 130 variant function function Gene function Gene number? Insertion General Small molecule binding glutathione S-transferase CPIJ006160 Metabolism Other enzymes AMP dependent CoA ligase CPIJ000791 fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase CPIJ017110 Intra-cellular processes Proteases serpin B6 CPIJ014719 Metabolism Redox short chain type dehydrogenase CPIJ005656 Deletion General Small molecule binding glutathione S-transferase CPIJ006160, CPIJ002663 General sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein CPIJ001560 SNP Extra-cellular processes Blood clotting ficolin-1 precursor CPIJ012830 Cell adhesion cadherin CPIJ014101 General General asporin precursor CPIJ017510 sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein CPIJ001560 troponin C, isoform CPIJ012250, CPIJ016821 Protein interaction TPR repeat-containing protein T20B12.1 CPIJ007346 Small molecule binding D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase CPIJ001318 glucose oxidase CPIJ007620 glutathione S-transferase CPIJ002663, CPIJ006160 multidrug resistance-associated protein CPIJ001520 myosin heavy chain, striated muscle CPIJ000853 NADP-dependent leukotriene B4 12- hydroxydehydrogenase CPIJ003802 Intra-cellular processes Phospholipid m/tr* alpha-tocopherol transfer protein CPIJ009746 cathepsin B precursor CPIJ001239, CPIJ001240 Proteases carboxypeptidase A1 precursor CPIJ010805 chymotrypsin-1 CPIJ006543, CPIJ002135, CPIJ002137 collagenase precursor CPIJ002142, CPIJ016012 fxna CPIJ009738, CPIJ014110 peptidase family CPIJ801477 prolylcarboxypeptidase CPIJ008873 serine proteases 1/2 precursor CPIJ002139 serpin B6 CPIJ014719 transmembrane protease, serine CPIJ001111 trypsin-3 precursor CPIJ019428 zinc carboxypeptidase CPIJ801679, CPIJ801680, CPIJ801685, CPIJ801686 Transport 5'-nucleotidase, C-terminal CPIJ800110 ammonium transporter CPIJ013531 blastula protease 10 precursor CPIJ002943 zinc metalloproteinase CPIJ002941, CPIJ002942, 131 CPIJ019029 Metabolism Carbohydrate m/tr 1, 4-alpha-glucan-branching enzyme CPIJ006166 alpha-amylase A precursor CPIJ005725, CPIJ005060 maltose phosphorylase CPIJ008853 Energy and E- transfer acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1, peroxisomal CPIJ003059 cytochrome b5 CPIJ004595 vacuolar ATP synthase subunit C CPIJ002067 Lipid m/tr lipoprotein amino region CPIJ801684 Other enzymes AMP dependent CoA ligase CPIJ000791, CPIJ006459 chitinase class CPIJ800112 esterase B1 CPIJ007824, CPIJ016336 fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase domain- containing protein CPIJ017110 luciferin 4-monooxygenase CPIJ010716, CPIJ015088 lysosomal pro-X carboxypeptidase CPIJ008876 phospholipase A1 member A precursor CPIJ004222 secreted chitinase CPIJ019598 selenium-binding protein 1-A CPIJ013577 WD-repeat protein CPIJ002052 Polysaccharide m/tr 2-hydroxyacylsphingosine 1-beta- galactosyltransferase CPIJ000226 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 precursor CPIJ006508 Redox basic juvenile hormone sensitive hemolymph protein CPIJ005187 cytochrome b561 domain-containing protein CPIJ010934 cytochrome P450 CPIJ800194 (CYP6AA7)**, CPIJ800196 (CYP6AA9), CPIJ800216 (CYP6BZ2), CPIJ800222 (CYP9J33), CPIJ800229 (CYP9J40), CPIJ800249 (CYP4D42v1), CPIJ800254 (CYP4H30), CPIJ800259 (CYP4H37v1), CPIJ015681 (CYP4H37v2), CPIJ020229 (CYP4D42v2) hexamerin 1.1 precursor CPIJ000056, CPIJ006537, CPIJ006538, CPIJ018824, CPIJ018825 larval serum protein 2 precursor CPIJ001820 NADH dehydrogenase CPIJ018667 short chain type dehydrogenase CPIJ005656 Secondary metabolism beta-1, 3-glucan-binding protein precursor CPIJ004320, CPIJ004323 venom allergen 3 precursor CPIJ004029 132 Transferases cystathionine gamma-lyase CPIJ006619 Regulation DNA-binding sterol regulatory element-binding protein CPIJ018167 Signal transduction Neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-2 CPIJ801870 NONA? not annotated acidic mammalian chitinase precursor CPIJ000008 actin, muscle A2 CPIJ012574 astacin precursor CPIJ013319 beta-galactosidase precursor CPIJ003338 cecropin-A precursor CPIJ010699 class VII unconventional myosin CPIJ000852 fibrinogen C domain-containing protein CPIJ005841 galactoside-binding lectin CPIJ802228 leucine-rich transmembrane protein CPIJ006150, CPIJ004947, CPIJ006515 liver carboxylesterase 1 precursor CPIJ018231 low choriolytic enzyme precursor CPIJ010224 peroxisomal membrane protein 11C CPIJ009744 sarcalumenin precursor CPIJ013085 SITS-binding protein CPIJ008904 translocator protein CPIJ009683 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002103, CPIJ002117, CPIJ003223, CPIJ003485, CPIJ007785, CPIJ010305, CPIJ012702, CPIJ014226, CPIJ014892, CPIJ017149, CPIJ017150, CPIJ018791, CPIJ001427, CPIJ002070, CPIJ002744, CPIJ009034, CPIJ010757, CPIJ012287, CPIJ012899, CPIJ013195, CPIJ013296, CPIJ013736, CPIJ017076, CPIJ018002, CPIJ020308 ?Cx. quinquefasciatus Johannesberg strain v1.3 Vectorbase, www.vectorbase.org ? SCOP general function categories annotated using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html *m/tr= metabolism and transport **Annotation of Cytochrome P450s taken from: http://drnelson.ut.mem.edu/CytochromeP450.html ?NONA= No Annotation Among the SCOP categories, the categories for no annotation, intracellular processes (including proteases) and metabolism (including detoxification enzymes such as cytochrome P450s) had the greatest numbers of genes that contained SNPs, with the majority of the SNPs in these 133 catergories being heterozygous (Fig. 7.3). The extracellular processes and regulation categories each contained two genes that had SNPs within their sequences (Table 7.2). A total of 12 genes in the general function category contained either heterozygous or homozygous SNPs, with one gene, CPIJ006160 - glutathione-S-transferase, containing both homozygous and heterozygous SNPs. Within the metabolism category genes including two esterases and 10 cytochrome P450 genes contained both homozygous and heterozygous SNPs (Table 7.2). The median number of heterozygous SNPs per gene in metabolism category was six, which was twice the number of homozygous SNPs (Fig. 7.3). In the remaining categories of intracellular processes and no annotation, a similar pattern of roughly twice as many heterozygous as homozygous SNPs per gene was identified, while the genes within the intracellular processes category were predominantly annotated as having proteolytic/peptiditic activities, which have been previously linked to insecticide resistance in insects as well as gene regulation and cell signaling (Pedra et al., 2004). Of particular interest was that among the up-regulated genes in the HAmCqG8 strain, one-third (132 of 367) contained SNPs, the majority of which were a combination of both heterozygous and homozygous SNPs. In addition, the majority of SNPs were synonymous, suggesting no change in function. As a result of the high correlation of both heterozygous and homozygous synonymous SNPs in the up- regulated genes of HAmCqG8, and since we mapped to the genome of the Johannesburg strain, and not to the genome of HAmCqG0 or HAmCqG8, we propose that the high occurrence of SNPs in the HAmCqG8 up-regulated genes is due to the cross-mapping of genes duplicated in the 134 HmCqG8 strain, but not the HAmCqG0 strain. Figure 7.3. Distribution of SNPs and indels identified within the up-regulated genes in the pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus within the general function categories of the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) datatbase. Individual points within category represent the actual number of SNPs/indels for a given gene, while the box-whisker plots represent the quartile values, where the internal black bar within each box represents the median value of SNPs/indels per gene within SCOP general function category. In order to test this, future work using copy number qRT-PCR (Solomon et al., 2008) on the DNA of the HAmCqG0, HAmCqG8, and insecticide susceptible S-lab strains would identify if gene duplication is responsible for the high occurrence of SNPs in the up-regulated genes of HAmCqG8 strain, and may, in part, explain their up-regulation. 135 7.4 References Abalis, I.M., Eldefrawi, M.E. and Eldefrawi, A.T. (1986) Effects of insecticides on GABA- induced chloride influx into rat brain microsacs. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 18:13-23. Ahmed, S., Wilkins, R.M. and Mantle, D. (1998) Comparison of proteolytic enzyme activities in adults of insecticide resistant and susceptible strains of the house fly M. domestica L. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28: 629-639. Allan, S. (2011) Susceptibility of adult mosquitoes to insecticides in aqueous sucrose baits. J. Vector Ecol. 36:59?67. Anders, S. and Huber, W. (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106. Andreev, D., Kreitman, M., Phillips, T.H., Beeman, R., ffrench-Constant, R.H. (1999) Multiple origins of cyclodiene insecticide resistance in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Mol. Evol. 48: 615-624. Andreeva, A., Howorth, D., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T.J., Chothia, C., et al. (2004) SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: D226-229. Andrews, M.C., Callaghan, A., Field, L.E., Williamson, M.S. and Moores, G.D. (2004) Identification of mutations conferring insecticide-insensitive AChE in the cotton-melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, Insect Mol. Biol. 13:555?561. Arensburger, P., Megy, K., Waterhouse, R.M., Abrudan, J., Amedeo, P., et al. (2010) Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus establishes a platform for mosquito comparative genomics. Science. 330: 86-88. Ashburner, M., Ball, C., Blake, J., Botstein, D., Butler, H., et al. (2009) Gene Ontology: tool for 136 the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25: 25-29. Ashburner, M., Golic, K.G. and Hawley, R.S. (2005) Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY. Bahia, A.C., Kubota, M.S., Tempone, A.J., Ara?jo, H.R.C., Guedes, B.M., et al. (2011). The JAK-STAT pathway controls Plasmodium vivax load in early stages of Anopheles aquasalis infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e1317. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001317. Baldini, F., Gabrieli, P., South, A., Valim, C., Mancini, F, et al. (2013) The interaction between a sexually transferred steroid hormone and a female protein regulates oogenesis in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biol. 11: e1001695. Bariami, V., Jones, C.M., Poupardin, R., Vontas, J. and Ranson, H. (2012) Gene Amplification, ABC Transporters and Cytochrome P450s: Unraveling the Molecular Basis of Pyrethroid Resistance in the Dengue Vector, Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6: e1692. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001692. Barillas-Mury, C.V., Noriega, F.G. and Wells, M.A. (1995) Early trypsin activity is part of the signal transduction system that activates transcription of the late trypsin gene in the midgut of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25:241-246. Barreiro, L.B., Laval, G., Quach, H., Patin, E., and Quintana-Murci, L. (2003) Natural selection has driven population differentiation in modern humans. Nat. Genet. 40(3) doi:10.1038/ng.78. Bateman, J. R., Lee, A. M. and Wu, C. (2006) Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via phiC31 integrase-mediated cassette exchange. Genetics. 173:769?77. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.056945. Beckage, N.E., Marion, K.M., Walton, W.E., Wirth, M.C. and Tan, F.F. (2004). Comparative 137 Larvicidal Toxicities of Three Ecdysone Agonists on the Mosquitoes Aedes aegypti , Culex quinquefasciatus, and Anopheles gambiae, Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 122:111?122. Benting, J. and Nauen, R. (2004) Biochemical evidence that an S431F mutation in acetylcholinesterase-1 of Aphis gossypii mediates resistance to pirimicarb and omethoate, Pest Manag. Sci. 60:1051?1055. Bentley, D.R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H.P., Smith, G.P., Milton, J. et al. (2008) Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature. 456, 53?59 Bischof, J., Maeda, R. K., Hediger, M., Karch, F. and Basler, K. (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:3312-3317. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611511104. Blalock, E.M., Geddes, J.W., Chen, K.C., Porter, N.M. and Markesbery, W.R. (2004) Incipient Alzheimer?s disease: microarray correlation analysis reveal major transcriptional and tumor suppressor responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 2173-2178. Boonsuepsakul, S., Luepromchai, E. and Rongnoparut, P. (2008) Characterization of Anopheles minimus CYP6AA3 expressed in a recombinant baculovirus system. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 69:13-21. doi:10.1002/arch.20248. Boublik, Y., Saint-Aguet, P., Lougarre, A., Arnaud, M., Villatte, F., et al. (2002) Acetylcholinesterase engineering for detection of insecticide residues. Protein Eng. 15:43? 50. Boutet, I., Long K., C.L., and Bonhomme, F. (2006). A transcriptomic approach of salinity response in the euryhaline teleost, Dicentrarchus labrax. Gene. 379: 40-50. Brand, A.H. and Perrimon, N. (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates 138 and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 118:401-15. Brattsten, L.B., Holyoke, C.W., Leeper, J.R. and Raffa, K.F. (1986) Insecticide resistance: challenge to pest-management and basic research. Science. 231: 1255-1260. Broderick, N.A., Raffa, K.F. and Handelsman, J. (2006) Midgut bacteria required for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:15196?15199. Bryant, B., Macdonald, W. and Raikhel, A.S. (2010) microRNA miR-275 is indispensable for blood digestion and egg development in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:22391-22398. Buckingham, S., Biggin, P., Sattelle, B., Brown, L. and Sattelle, D. (2005). Insect GABA receptors: splicing, editing, and targeting by antiparasitics and insecticides. Mol. Pharmacol. 68: 942-51. Bull, D.L. and Whitten, C.J. (1972) Factors influencing organophosphorus insecticide resistance in tobacco budworms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 20: 561?564. Burysek, L., Syrovets, T. and Simmet, T. (2002) The serine protease plasmin triggers expression of MCP-1 and CD40 in human primary monocytes via activation of p38 MAPK and janus kinase (JAK)/STAT signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 33509-33517. Campbell, P.M., Newcomb, R.D., Russell, R.J. and Oakeshott, J.G. (1998) Two different amino acid substitutions in the ali-esterase, E3, confer alternative types of organophosphorus insecticide resistance in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28:139- 50. Canard, B. and Sarfati, R. (1994) DNA polymerase fluorescent substrates with reversible 3?-tags. Gene 148, 1?6. Carino, F.A., Koener, J.F., Plapp, F.W. Jr. and Feyereisen, R. (1992) Expression of the 139 cytochrome P450 gene CYP6A1 in the housefly, Musca domestica. In Molecular Mechanisms of Insecticide Resistance: Diversity Among Insects. Edited by Mullin CA and Scott JG. ACS Symposium series 505. Washington DC: American Chemical Society pp. 31? 40. Casida, J.E. and Quistad, G.B. (1998) Golden age of insecticide research: past, present, or future? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43:1-16. Casida, J.E. and Durkin, K.A. (2013) Neuroactive insecticides: targets, selectivity, resistance, and secondary effects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58: 99-117. Castillo-Davis, C.I. and Hartl, D.L. (2002) GeneMerge-post-genomic analysis, data mining, and hypothesis testing. Bioinformatics. 19: 891-892. Cestele, S., and Catterall, W.A. (2000) Molecular mechanisms of neurotoxin action on voltage- gated sodium channels. Biochimie. 82:883?892. Chamopagne, D.E., Smart, C.T., Ribeiro, J.M.C. and James, A.A. (1995) The salivary gland- specific apyrase of the mosquito Aedes aegypti is a member of the 5?-nucleotidase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:694-698. Chandor-Proust, A., Bibby, J., Regent-Kloechner, M., Roux, J., Guittard-Crilat, E, et al. (2013) The central role of mosquito cytochrome P450 CYP6Za in insecticide detoxification revealed by functional expression and structural modelling. Biochem. J. 455: 75-85. Chandre, F., Darriet, F., Darder, M., Cuany, A., Doannio, J.M.C., et al. (1998) Pyrethroid resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus from West Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 12:359-366. Chang, C-W., Nashchekin, D., Wheatley, L., Irion, U., Dahlgaard, K., et al. (2011) Anterior- posterior axis specification in Drosophila oocytes: identification of novel bicoid and oskar mRNA localization factors. Genetics. 188:883-896. 140 Chareonviriyaphap, T., Bangs, M.J., Suwonkerd, W., Kongmee, M., Corbel, V., et al. (2013) Review of insecticide resistance and behavioral avoidance of vectors of human diseases in Thailand. Parasites and Vectors. 6:280-308. Chavez, V.M., Marques, G., Delbecque, J.P., Kobayashi, K., Hollingsworth, M., et al. (2000) The Drosophila disembodied gene controls late embryonic morphogenesis and codes for a cytochrome P450 enzyme that regulates embryonic ecdysone levels. Development 127: 4115?4126. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2010.01024.x. Chen, Z. Newcomb, R., Forbes, E., McKenzie, J. and Batterham, P. (2001) The acetylcholinesterase gene and organophosphorus resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31 805?816. Chen, L., Zhu, J., Sun, G. and Raikhel, A.S. (2004) The early gene Broad is involved in the ecdysteroid hierarchy governing vitellogenesis of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Mol Endocrinol. 33:743-761. Chomczynski, P. and Sacchi, N. (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Analytical Biochemistry, 162, 156- 159. Clark, G.G., Bernier, U.R., Allan, S.A., Kline, D. and Golden, F.V. (2011) Changes in Host- Seeking Behavior of Puerto Rican Aedes aegypti After Colonization. J. Med. Entomol. 48:533-37. doi:10.1603/ME10207. Clarke, J.D. and Zhu, T. (2006) Microarray analysis of the transcriptome as a stepping stone towards understanding biological systems: practical considerations and perspectives. The Plant J. 45: 630-650. Clarke, E.E., Tristem, M., Cory, J.S. and O'Reilly D.R. (1996) Characterization of the 141 ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase gene from Mamestra brassicae nucleopolyhedrovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 77:2865-2871. Claudianos, C., Russell, R.J. and Oakeshott, J.G. (1999) The same amino acid substitution in orthologous esterases confers organophosphate resistance on the house fly and a blowfly. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29:675?86. Clifton, M.E. and Noriega, F.G. (2012) The fate of follicles after a blood meal is dependent on previtellogenic nutrition and juvenile hormone in Aedes aegypti. J. Insect Physiol. 58:1007- 1019. Colombani, J., Raisin, S., Pantalacci, S., Radimerski, T., Montagne, J., et al. (2003). A nutrient sensor mechanism controls Drosophila growth. Cell. 114:739?749. Craig, G.B. (1967) Mosquitoes: females monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance. Science. 156:1499-1501. Cupp, E.W., Hassan, H.K., Yue, X., Oldland, W.K., Lilley, B.M., et al. (2011) West Nile Virus infection in mosquitoes in the mid-south USA, 2002?2005. J. Med. Entomol. 44: 117-125. Curtis, C.F., Miller, J.E., Hodjati, M.H., Kolaczinski, J.H. et al. (1998) Can anything be done to maintain the effectiveness of pyrethroid-impregnated bednets against malaria vectors? Phil. Trans. Roy Soc London B. 353:1769-1775. Darawiroj, D., Kondo, H., Hirono, I. and Aoki, T. (2008). Immune-related gene expression profiling of yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) kidney cells stimulated with ConA and LPS using microarray analysis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 24: 260-266. David, J.P., Strode, C., Vontas, J., Nikou, D., Vaughan, A., et al. (2005) The Anopheles gambiae detoxification chip: a highly specific microarray to study metabolic-based insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102: 4080-4084. 142 De Gregorio, E., Spellman, P.T., Tzou, P., Rubin, G.M. and Lemaitre, B. (2002). The Toll and Imd pathways are the major regulators of the immune response in Drosophila. The EMBO J. 21: 2568-2579. Dhadialla, T.S., Carlson, G.R. and Le, D.P. (1998) New insecticides with ecdysteroidal and juvenile hormone activity. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43:545-569. Dimopoulos, G., Casavant, T. L., Chang, S., Scheetz, T., Roberts, C., et al. (2000) Anopheles gambiae pilot gene discovery project: identification of mosquito innate immunity genes from expressed sequence tags generated from immune-competent cell lines. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 97: 6619 - 6624. Dong, K. (1997) A single amino acid change in the para sodium channel protein is associated with knockdown-resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides in German cockroach. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27: 93?100. Dong, K. (2007) Insect sodium channels and insecticide resistance. Invert. Neurosci. 7: 17?30. Dong, K., Valles, S.M., Scharf, M.E., Zeichner, B. and Bennett, G.W. (1998) The knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in pyrethroid-resistant German cockroaches. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 60: 195?204. Duron, O., Labb?, P., Berticat, C., Rousset, F., Guillot, S., et al. (2006) High Wolbachia density correlates with cost of infection for insecticide resistant Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Evolution. 60: 303-14. Farnham, A.W. (1977) Genetics of resistance of houseflies (Musca domestica) to pyrethroids 1. Knock-down resistance. Pesticide Sci. 8: 631?636. Feyereisen, R. (1995) Molecular biology of insecticide resistance. Toxicol. Letters. 82/83: 83-90. Feyereisen, R. (1999) Insect P450 enzymes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44: 507-533. 143 Feyereisen, R. (2011) Arthropod CYPomes illustrate the tempo and mode in P450 evolution. Biochem. Biophys. Arch. 1814: 19-28. ffrench-Constant R.H., Rocheleau T.A., Steichen J.C., and Chalmers A.E. (1993) A point mutation in a Drosophila GABA receptor confers insecticide resistance. Nature 363:449?451. ffrench-Constant, R.H., Daborn, P.J., and Le Goff, G. (2004) The genetics and genomics of insecticide resistance. Rev. TRENDS in Genet. 20:163-70. Field, L.M., and Devonshire, A.L. (1998) Evidence that the E4 and FE4 esterase genes responsible for insecticide resistance in the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) are part of a gene family. Biochem. J. 330:169?73 Fonseca, D.M., Keyghobadi, N., Malcolm, C.A., Mehmet, C., Schaffner, F., et al. (2004) Emerging vectors in the Culex pipiens complex. Science 303:1535-1538. Fonseca-Gonzalez, I., Quinones, M.L., Lenhart, A. and Brogdon, W.G. (2011) Insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti (L.) from Colombia. Pest Manag. Sci. 67:430-437. Fournier, D. and Mutero, A. 1994. Modification of acetylcholinesterase as a mechanism of resistance to insecticides. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 108C:19-31. Gan, Q., Schones, D.E., Eun, S.H., Wei, G., Cui, K., et al. (2010) Monovalent and unpoised status of most genes in undifferentiated cell-enriched Drosophila testis. Genome Biol. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-4-r42. Gant, D.B., Chalmers, A.E., Wolff, M.A., Hoffman, H.B., and Bushey, D.F. (1998) Fipronil: action at the GABA receptor. Rev. Toxicol. 2: 147-156. Gelbic, I. and Rozsypalova, P. (2012) Autogeny induced by a nonsteroidal ecdysone agonist tebufenozide in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus. Physiolog. Entomol. 37:119-126. Georghiou, G.P. (1972) The evolution of resistance to pesticides. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 3:133-168. 144 Georghiou, G.P. and Saito, T. (1983) Pest resistance to pesticides. Plenum Press, New York, NY. Gong, Y., Li, T., Zhang, L., Gao, X. and Liu, N. (2013). Permethrin Induction of Multiple Cytochrome P450 Genes in Insecticide Resistant Mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 863-871. Gough, J., Karplus, K., Hughey, R. and Chothia, C. (2001) Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J. Mol. Biol. 313: 903-919. Griffith, M., Griffith, O.L., Mwenifumbo, J., Goya, R., Morrissy, A.S., et al. (2010) Alternative expression analysis by RNA sequencing. Nat Meth 7:843-847. Gubler, D.J. (1988) Dengue, pp. 223-260. In T Monarth (ed.), The Arboviruses. Vol II. Epidemiology and ecology. CRC Press, Florida. Gubler, D.J. and Clark, G.G. (1995) Dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever: the emergence of a global health problem. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1:55-57. Guerrero, F.D., Jamroz, R.C., Kammlah, D., and Kunz, S.E. (1997) Toxicological and molecular characterization of pyrethroid-resistant horn flies, Haematobia irritans: identification of kdr and super-kdr point mutations. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27: 745?755. Guittard, E., Blais, C., Maria, A., Parvy, J.P., Parishna, S., et al. (2011) CYP18A1, a key enzyme of Drosophila steroid hormone inactivation, is essential for metamorphosis. Dev Biol 349: 35?45. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.09.023. Gulia-nuss, M., Robertson, A.E., Brown, M.R., and Strand, M.R. (2011) Insulin-Like Peptides and the Target of Rapamycin Pathway Coordinately Regulate Blood Digestion and Egg Maturation in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti. PLoS ONE. 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020401. Guoqiang, S., Jinsong, Z., Chao, L., Zhijian, T. and Raikhel, A.S. (2002) Two isoforms of the 145 early E74 gene, an Ets transcription factor homologue, are implicated in the ecdysteroid hierarchy governing vitellogenesis of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 190: 147-157. Hamdan, H., Sofian-Azirun, M., Ahmad, N.W., and Lim L.H. (2005) Insecticide resistance development in Culex quinquefasciatus (Say), Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) larvae against malathion, permethrin and temephos. Tropical Biomed. 22:45-52. Hansen, I.A, Attardo, G.M., Park, J.-H., Peng, Q., and Raikhel, A.S. (2004) Target of rapamycin- mediated amino acid signaling in mosquito anautogeny. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 101: 10626?10631. Hansen, I.A., Attardo, G.M., Roy, S.G. and Raikhel, A.S. (2005) Target of rapamycin-dependent activation of S6 kinase is a central step in the transduction of nutritional signals during egg development in a mosquito. J. Biol. Chem. 280:20565-20572. Hardstone, M.C., Komagata, O., Kasai, S., Tomita, T., and Scott, J.G. (2010) Use of isogenic strains indicates CYP9M10 is linked to permethrin resistance in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. Insect Mol. Biol. 19: 717-726. Hassall, K.A. (1990) The Biochemistry and Uses of Pesticides. 2nd Edition. VCH Publishers, NY, NY. Harris, T.D., Buzby, P.R., Babcock, H., Beer, E., Bowers, J. et al. (2008) Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome. Science 320:106-109. Hedengren-Olcott, M., Olcott, M.C., Mooney, D.T., Ekengren, S., Geller, B.L., et al. (2004). Differential activation of the NF-kappaB-like factors Relish and Dif in Drosophila melanogaster by fungi and Gram-positive bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 21121-21127. Hemingway J., Hawkes N.J., McCarroll, L. and Ranson, H. (2004) The molecular basis of 146 insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34:653-665. Hemingway, J., Field, L. and Vontas, J. (2002) An overview of insecticide resistance. Science 298: 96-97. Hemingway, J. and Ranson, H. (2000) Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Ann. Rev Entomol. 45:371-392. Holt, R.A., Subramanian, G.M., Halpern, A., Sutton, G.G., Charlab, R., (2002) The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science. 298:129-149. Hougard, J.M., Duchon, S., Zaim, M. and Guillet, P. (2002) Bifenthrin: a useful pyrethroid insecticide for treatment of mosquito nets. J. Med. Entomol. 39:526-533. Huang, H.S., Hu, N.T., Yao, Y.E., Wu, C.Y., Chiang, S.W., et al. (1998) Molecular cloning and heterologous expression of a glutathione S-transferase involved in insecticide resistance from the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28:651?58. Hubbard, T., Murzin, A., Brenner, S. and Chothia, C. (1997) SCOP. a structural classification of proteins database. Nucl. Acid Res. 25: 236-239. Isoe, J. and Scaraffia, P.Y. (2013) Urea synthesis and excretion in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are regulated by a unique cross-talk mechanism. PLoS ONE. 8:e65393. Itokawa, K., Komagata, O., Kasai, S., Okamura, Y., Masada, M., et al. (2010) Genomic structures of Cyp9m10 in pyrethroid resistant and susceptible strains of Culex quinquefasciatus. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40:631-640. Jaglarz, M.K., Kloc, M., Jankowska, W., Szymanska, B. and Bilinski, S.M. (2011) Nuage morphogenesis becomes more complex: two translocation pathways and two forms of nuage coexist in Drosophila germline syncytia. Cell Tissue Res. 344:169-181. Jawara, M., Pinder, M., Cham, B., Walraven, G. and Rowley, J. (2001) Comparison of 147 deltamethrin tablet formulation with liquid deltamethrin and permethrin for bednet treatment in The Gambia. Tropical Med. Int. Health. 6:309-316. Johnson, N.F and Triplehorn, C.A. (2004) Borror and DeLong's introduction to the study of insects 7th edition. Brooks Cole Publishing Company. Pacific Grove, CA. Joussen, N., Heckel, D.G., Haas, M., Schuphan, I. and Schmidt, B. (2008) Metabolism of imidacloprid and DDT by P450 CYP6G1 expressed in cell cultures of Nicotiana tabacum suggests detoxification of these insecticides in Cyp6g1 overexpressing strains of Drosophila melanogaster, leading to resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 64:65-73. Juntarajumnong, W., Pimnon, S., Bangs, M.J., Thanispong, K. and Chareonviriyaphap, T. (2012) Discriminating lethal concentrations and efficacy of six pyrethroids for control of Aedes aegypti in Thailand. J. Amer. Mosq. Contr. Assoc. 28:30-37. Kasai, S., Weerashinge, I.S. and Shono, T. (1998) P450 monooxygenases are an important mechanism of permethrin resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus Say larvae. Archiv. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 37:47-56. Kasper, D., Hansen, S.E. and Brenner, S.D. (2010) Biases in Illumina transcriptome sequencing caused by random hexamer priming. Nucl. Acid Res. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq224. Kikuchi, Y., Hayatsu, M., Hosokawa, T., Nagayama, A., Tao, K., et al. (2012) Symbiont- mediated insecticide resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109: 8618-8622. Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., et al. (2011) TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14:R36. Knipple, D.C., Doyle, K.E., Marsella-Herrick, P.A. and Soderlund, D.M. (1994) Tight genetic linkage between the kdr insecticide resistance trait and a voltage-sensitive sodium channel 148 gene in the house fly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 2483?2487. Krem, M.M., Rose, T. and Di Cera, E. (2000) Sequence determinants of function and evolution in serine proteases. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 10: 171?176. Lee, S.H., Dunn, J.B., Clark, J.M. and Soderlund, D.M. (1999) Molecular analysis of kdr-like resistance in a permethrin-resistant strain of Colorado potato beetle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 63: 63?75. Lee, S.H., Kang, J.S., Min, J.S., Yoon, K.S., Strycharz, J.P., et al. (2010) Decreased detoxification genes and genome size make the human body louse an efficient model to study xenobiotic metabolism. Insect Mol. Biol. 19: 599?615. Lemberg, M.K. (2011) Intramembrane proteolysis in regulated protein trafficking. Traffic 12:1109-1118. Letunic, I., Doerks, T. and Bork, P. (2012) SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation. Nucl. Acid Res. 40: D302-D305. Li, F. and Han, Z. (2004) Mutations in acetylcholinesterase associated with insecticide resistance in the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34:397?405. Li, X., Schuler, M.A. and Berenbaum, M.R. (2007) Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52: 231-253. Li, M., Reid, W.R., Zhang, L., Scott, J.G., Gao, X. et al. (2013). A whole transcriptomal linkage analysis of gene co-regulation in insecticide resistant house flies, Musca domestica. BMC Genomics 14: 803. Li, T., Lan, Q. and Liu, N. (2009) Larvicidal activity of mosquito sterol carrier protein-2 inhibitors to the insecticide resistant mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 46:1430-1435. 149 Li, T. and Liu, N. (2010) Genetics and inheritance of permethrin resistance in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus. J. Med. Entomol. 47: 1127-1134. Li, T., Zhang, L., Reid, W.R., Xu, Q., Dong, K., et al. (2012). Multiple mutations and mutation combinations in the sodium channel of permethrin resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. Sci. Rep. 2: 781. Lichtenegger, F.S., Mueller, K., Otte, B., Beck, B., Hiddemann, W., et al. (2012). CD86 and IL- 12p70 are key players for T helper 1 polarization and natural killer cell activation by Toll-like receptor-induced dendritic cells. PLoS ONE 7: e44266. Liu, N. (2008) Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: development and mechanisms. In Recent Advances in Insect Physiology, Toxicology and Molecular Biology. Edited by N. Liu. Kerala, India: Research Signpostpp. 75-91. Liu, N., Liu, H., Zhu, F. and Zhang, L. (2007) Differential expression of genes in pyrethroid resistant and susceptible mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus (S.). Gene 394: 61-68. Liu, N. and Scott, J.G. (1995) Genetics of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in the house fly, Musca domestica. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 52: 116-124. Liu, N. and Scott, J.G. (1997) Phenobarbital induction of CYP6D1 is due to a trans acting factor on autosome 2 in house flies, Musca domestica. Insect Mol. Biol. 6: 77-81. Liu, N. and Scott, J.G. (1998) Increased transcription of CYP6D1 causes cytochrome P450- mediated insecticide resistance in house fly. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28: 531-535. Liu, N., Xu, Q., Li, T., He, L. and Zhang, L. (2009) Permethrin resistance and target site insensitivity in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus in Alabama, U.S.A. J. Med. Entomol. 46: 1424-1429. Liu, N. and Yue, X. (2001) Genetics of pyrethroid resistance in the house fly (Diptera: 150 Muscidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 70: 151-158. Liu, H., Cupp, E.W., Micher, K.M., Guo, A. and Liu, N. (2004) Insecticide resistance and cross- resistance in Alabama and Florida strains of Culex quinquefasciatus (S.). J. Med. Entomol. 41:408-413. Liu, N, Xu, Q., Zhu, F. and Zhang, L. (2006) Pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Sci. 13:159-166. Liu, N. (2008) Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: development and mechanisms, pp. 75?91. In N. Liu (Ed.) Recent Advances in Insect Physiology, Toxicology and Molecular Biology. Research Signpost, Kerala, India. Liu, N., Li, T., Reid, W. R., Yang, T. and Zhang, L. (2011). Multiple Cytochrome P450 genes: their constitutive overexpression and permethrin induction in insecticide resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. PloS ONE 6: e23403. Liu, Z., Valles, S.M., and Dong, K. (2000). Novel point mutations in the German cockroach para sodium channel gene are associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 30: 991?997. Livak, K.J. and Schmittgen, T.D. (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2???CT method. Methods 25: 402-408. Lohse, M., Bolger, A.M., Nagel, A., Fernie, A.R., Lunn, J.E., et al. (2012) RobiNA: a user- friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucl. Acid Res. 40: W622-627. Lounibos, L.P. (2002) Invasions by insect vectors of human disease. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:233- 266. Mackay, A.J., Kramer, W.L., Meece, J.K., Brumfield, R.T. and Foil, L.D. (2010) Host feeding 151 patterns of Culex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in east Baton Rouge parish, Louisiana. J. Med. Entomol. 47: 238-248. Manda, H., Shah, P., Polsomboon, S., Chareonviriyaphap, T., Castro-Llanos, F., et al. (2013) Contact irritant responses of Aedes aegypti using sublethal concentration and focal application of pyrethroid chemicals. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7: e2074. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002074 Marcombe, S., Poupardin, R., Darriet, F., Reynaud, S., Bonnet, J., et al. (2009) Exploring the molecular basis of insecticide resistance in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti: a case study in Martinique Island (French West Indies). BMC Genomics. 10:494. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10- 494. Marinotti, O., Calvo, E., Nguyen, Q.K., Dissanayake, S., Ribeiro, J.M.C., et al. 2006. Genome- wide analysis of gene expression in adult Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol. 15:1-12. Marrs, W.R., Blankman, J.L., Horne, E.A., Thomazeau, A., Lin, Y.H., et al. (2012) The serine hydrolase ABHD6 controls the accumulation and efficacy of 2-AG at cannabinoid receptors. Nat. Neurosci. 13: 951-957. Martinez-Torres, D., Chandre, F., Williamson, M.S., Darriet, F., Berge, J.B., et al. (1998) Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol. Biol. 7: 179?184. Martinez-Torres, D., Foster, S.P., Field, L.M., Devonshire, A.L. and Williamson, M.S., (1999). A sodium channel point mutation is associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroid insecticides in the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Insect Mol. Biol. 8: 339?346. McAbee, R.D., Kang, K.D., Stanich, M.A., Christiansen, J.A., Wheelock, C.E., et al. (2003) 152 Pyrethroid tolerance in Culex pipiens pipiens var molestus from Marin County, California. Pest Manag. Sci. 60:359-368. McLaughlin, L.A., Niazi, U., Bibby, J., David, J.-P., Vontas, J., et al. (2008). Characterization of inhibitors and substrates of Anopheles gambiae CYP6Z2. Insect Mol. Biol. 17:125-135. Megy, K., Emrich, S.J., Lawson, D., Campbell, D., Dialynas, E., et al. (2012) VectorBase: improvements to a bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vector genomics. Nucl. Acid Res. 40: D729-734. Megy, K., Hammond, M., Lawson, D., Bruggner, R.V., Birney, E., et al. (2009) Genomic resources for invertebrate vectors of human pathogens, and the role of VectorBase. Infection Genet. Evol. 9:308-313. Melander, A.L. 1914. Can insects become resistant to sprays? J. Econ. Entomol. 7:167-173. Menozzi, P., Shi, M.A., Lougarre, A., Tang, Z.H., and Fournier, D. (2004) Mutations of acetylcholinesterase which confer insecticide resistance in Drosophila melanogaster populations, BMC Evol. Biol.4: 4. Metzker, M.L., Raghavachari, R., Richards, S., Jacutin, S.E., Civitello, A., et al. (1994) Termination of DNA synthesis by novel 3?-modified deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates. Nucl. Acid Res. 22: 4259?4267. Metzker, M.L. (2010) Sequencing technologies ? the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 31-46. Morgan, E.T. (1989) Suppression of constitutive cytochrome P-450 gene expression in livers of rats undergoing an acute phase response to endotoxin. Mol. Pharmacol. 36: 699-707. Morgan, E.T. (1997) Regulation of cytochrome P450 during inflammation and infection. Drug Metab. Rev. 29:1129-1188. Morgan. E.T. (2001) Regulation of cytochrome P450 by inflammatory mediators: why and how? 153 Drug Metab. Dispos. 29: 207?212. Morin, R.D., Bainbridge, M., Fejes, A., Hirst, M., Krzywinski, M., et al (2008). Profiling the HeLa S3 transcriptome using randomly primed cDNA and massively parallel short-read sequencing. BioTechniques 45: 81?94. M?ller, P., Warr, E., Stevenson, B.J., Pignatelli, P.M., Morgan, J.C., et al. (2008). Field-caught permethrin-resistant Anopheles gambiae overexpress CYP6P3, a P450 that metabolises pyrethroids. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000286. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000286. Mutero, A., Pralavorio, M., Bride, J. and Fournier, D. (1994) Resistance-associated point mutations in insecticide-insensitive Acetylcholinesterase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5922?5926. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. and Chothia, C. (1995). SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540. Najera, J.A. and Zaim, M. (2001) Malaria vector control: insecticides for indoor residual spraying. WHO document WHO/ CDS/WHOPES/2001.3 World Health Organization, Geneva. Namiki, T., Niwa, R., Sakudoh, T., Shirai, K., Takeuchi, H., et al. (2005) Cytochrome P450 CYP307A1/Spook: a regulator for ecdysone synthesis in insects. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 337: 367?374. Nasci, R. and Miller, B. (1996) Culicine mosquitoes and the agents they transmit. In The Biology of Disease Vectors. Edited by Beaty BJ and Marquardt WC. Niwot, Colorado: University Press of Colorado pp. 85-97. Nelson, D.R. (2009) The Cytochrome P450 homepage. Human Genomics. 4:59-65. 154 Nene, V., Wortman, J.R., Lawson, D., Haas, B., Kodira, C., et al. (2007) Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector. Science. 316:1718-23. Nielsen, R., Paul, J.S., Albrechtsen, A. and Song, Y.S. (2011) Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat. Rev. 12:443-451. Norris, L.C. and Norris, D.E. (2011) Insecticide resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes after the introduction of insecticide-treated bed nets in Macha, Zambia. J. Vector Ecol. 36:411-420. Ogawa, S., Lozach, J., Benner, C., Pascual, G., Tangirala, R.K., et al. (2005). Molecular determinants of crosstalk between nuclear receptors and toll-like receptors. Cell 122: 707- 721. Ono, H., Rewitz, K.F., Shinoda, T., Itoyama, K., Petryk, A., et al. (2006) Spook and Spookier code for stage-specific components of the ecdysone biosynthetic pathway in Diptera. Dev. Biol. 298: 555?570. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.023. Oppenoorth, F.J. and Van Asperen, K. (1960) Allelic genes in the housefly producing modified enzymes that cause organophosphate resistance. Science 132:298?99. Oshlack, A. and Wakeffeld, M.J. (2009) Transcript length bias in RNA-seq data confounds systems biology. Biol. Direct 4:14. Otsuka, M., Iversen, L.L., Hall, Z.W. and Kravitz E.A. 1966. Release of gamma-aminobutyric acid from inhibitory nerves of lobster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 56:1110?1115. Pan, X., Zhou, G., Wu, J., Bian, G., Lu, P., et al. (2012). Wolbachia induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent activation of the Toll pathway to control dengue virus in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109: 13-14. Patil, V.L. and Guthrie, F.E. (1979) Cuticular lipids of two resistant and a susceptible strain of 155 house flies. Pestic. Sci. 10:399-403. Park, Y. and Taylor, M.F.J. (1997) A novel mutation L1014H in sodium channel gene hscp associated with pyrethroid resistance for Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuididae). Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 27: 9?13. Park, Y., Taylor, M.F.J. and Feyereisen, R. (1999) Voltage-gated sodium channel genes hscp and hDSC1 of Heliothis virescens F. genomic organization. Insect Mol. Biol. 8: 161?170. Pavek, P. and Dvorak, Z. (2008) Xenobiotic-induced transcriptional regulation of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes of the cytochrome P450 superfamily in human extrahepatic tissues. Curr. Drug Metab. 9: 129-143. Pedra, J.H.F., McIntyre, L.M., Scharf, M.E., and Pittendrigh. BR. (2004) Genome-wide transcription profile of field- and laboratory-selected dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT)- resistant Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:7034-7039. Petryk, A., Warren, J.T., Marques, G., Jarcho, M.P., Gilbert, L.I., et al. (2003) Shade is the Drosophila P450 enzyme that mediates the hydroxylation of ecdysone to the steroid insect molting hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 13773?13778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2336088100. Phillips, R.S. (2001) Current status of malaria and potential for control. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14: 208-226. Picard tools [http://picard.sourceforge.net] Plapp, F.W.Jr. and Hoyer, R.F. (1968) Insecticide resistance in the house fly: Decreased rate of absorption as the mechanism of action of a gene that acts as an intensifier of resistance. J. Econ. Entomol. 61:1298-1303. Poupardin, R., Riaz, M., Vontas, J., David, J.P. and Reynaud, S. (2010) Transcription profiling of 156 eleven cytochrome P450s potentially involved in xenobiotic metabolism in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol. Biol. 19:185-193. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00967.x Price, D.P., Nagarajan, V., Churbanov, A., Houde, P., Milligan, B., et al. (2011) The fat body transcriptomes of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti, pre- and post-blood meal. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371. Pridgeon, J.W., Meepagala, K.M., Becnel, J.J., Clark, G.G., Pereira, R.M., et al. (2007) Structure-activity relationships of 33 piperidines as toxicants against female adults of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 44: 263-269. Pridgeon, J.W., Pereira, R.M., Becnel, J.J., Allan, S.A., Clark, G. G., et al. (2008). Susceptibility of Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus Say, and Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say to 19 pesticides with different modes of action. J. Med. Entomol. 45: 82?87. Pridgeon, J.W., Becnel, J.J., Clark, G.G. and Linthicum, K.J. (2009) Permethrin Induces Overexpression of Multiple Genes in Aedes aegypti. J. Med. Entomol. 46:580-587. Ptitsyn, A. Reyes-Solis, G., Saavedra-Rodriguez, K., Betz, J., Suchman, E. L., et al. (2011) Rhythms and synchronization patterns in gene expression in the Aedes aegypti mosquito. BMC Genomics. 12:153. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-153. Qui, Y, Tittiger, C., Wicker-Thomas, C., Le Goff, G., Young, S., et al. (2012) An insect-specifice P450 oxidative decarbonylase for cuticular hydrocarbon biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA doi/10.1073/pnas.1208650109. R Core Team. (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/. Ramsay, A.J., Dong, Y., Hunt, M.L., Linn, M.L., Samaratunga, H., et al. (2008) Kallikrein- related peptidase 4 (KLK4) initiates intracellular signaling via protease-activated receptors 157 (PARs) KLK4 and PAR-2 are co-expressed during prostate cancer progression. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 12293-12304. Ranson, H., Rossiter, L., Ortelli, F., Jesen, B., Wang, X., et al. (2001) Identification of a novel class of insect glutathione S-transferases involved in resistance to DDT in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Biochem. J. 359:295?304. Ranson, H., Jensen, B., Vulule, J.M., Wang, X., Hemingway, J., et al. (2000) Identification of a point mutation in the voltage gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol. Biol. 9: 491?497. Rapaport, F., Khanin, R., Liang, Y., Pirun, M., Krek, A. et al. (2013) Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 14: R95. Reid, W.R., Zhang, L., Liu, F. and Liu, N. (2012) The Transcriptome Profile of the Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus following Permethrin Selection. PLoS ONE 7: e47163. Reimand, J., Arak, T. and Vilo, J. (2011) g:Profiler - a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2011 update). Nucl. Acids Res. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr378. Reimand, J., Kull, M., Peterson, H., Hansen, J. and Vilo, J. (2007) g:Profiler - a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments. Nucl. Acid Res. 35: W193-W200. Reisen, W.K., Pfuntner, A.R., Milby, M.M., Tempelis, C.H. and Presser, S.B. (1990) Mosquito bionomics and the lack of arbovirus activity in the Chino area of San Bernardino County, California. J. Med. Entomol. 27: 811-818. Retnakaran, A., Krell, P., Feng, Q. and Arif, B. (2003) Ecdysone agoinists: mechanism and importance in controlling in- sect pests of agriculture and forestry. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 54:187?199. 158 Rettich, F. (1983) Residual toxicity of deltamethrin and permethrin on various surfaces for mosquito species Culex pipiens molestul Forskal. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immunol. 27:229-36. Rewitz, K.F. and Gilbert, L.I. (2008) Daphnia Halloween genes that encode cytochrome P450s mediating the synthesis of the arthropod molting hormone: evolutionary implications. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-60. Riehle, M.A., Garczynski, S.F., Crim, J.W., Hill, C.A. and Brown, M.A. (2002) Neuropeptides and peptide hormones in Anopheles gambiae. Science. 298:172-175. Roberts, D.R., Chareonviriyaphap, T., Harlan, H.H. and Hshieh, P. (1997) Methods of testing and analyzing excite-repellency responses of malaria vectors to insecticides. J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc. 13:13-17. Roberts, A., Trapnell, C., Donaghey, J., Rinn, J. and Pachter, L. (2011) Improving RNA-Seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias. Genome Biol. 12: doi:10.1186/gb-2011- 12-3-r22. Roush, R.T., Hoy, C.W., Ferro, D.N. and Tingey, W.M. (1990) Insecticide resistance in the Colorado beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): influence of crop rotation and insecticide use. J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 315-319. Russell, V. and Dunn, P.E. (1996) Antibacterial proteins in the midgut of Manduca sexta during metamorphosis. J. Insect Physiol. 42: 65-71. Saavedra-Rodriguez, K., Suarez, A.F., Salas, I.F., Strode, C., Ranson, H., et al. (2012) Transcription of detoxification genes after permethrin selection in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol. Biol. 21:61-77. Sawicki, R.M. and Denholm, I. (1984) Adaptation of insects to insecticides. Ciba Found. Symp. 159 102: 152-166. Schuler, T.H., Martinez-Torres, D., Thompson, A.J., Denholm, I., Devonshire, A.L., et al. (1998) Toxicological, electrophysiological, and molecular characterisation of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 59: 169?192. Scott, J.G. (1991) Investigating mechanisms of insecticide resistance: methods, strategies, and pitfalls. Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods (eds. R.T. Roush & B.E. Tabashnik), pp. 39-57. Chapman and Hall, New York. Scott, J.G., and Wen, Z. (2001). Cytochromes P450 of insects: the tip of the iceberg. Pest Manag. Sci. 57:958?67. Sebastian, A. and DeMeillon, B. (1967) Experiments on the mating of Culex pipiens fatigans in the laboratory. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 36:47-52. Shiao, S-H., Hansen, I.A., Zhu, J., Sieglaff, D.H. and Raikhel A.S. (2008) Juvenile hormone connects larval nutrition with target of rapamycin signaling in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J. Insect Physiol. 54: 231?239. Shirk, P.D., Bean, D.W. and Brookes V.J. (1990) Ecdysteroids control vitellogenesis and egg maturation in pharate adult females of the Indianmeal moth, Plodila interpunctella. Arch. Insect. Biochem. Physiol. 15: 183-199. Silverman, J. and Bieman, D.N. (1993). Glucose aversion in the German cockroach Blattella germanica. J. Insect Physiol. 39: 925-933. Sim, S., Ramirez, J.L. and Dimopoulos, G. (2012) Dengue virus infection of the Aedes aegypti salivary gland and chemosensory apparatus induces genes that modulate infection and blood- feeding behavior. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002631. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002631. 160 Smagghe, G., Carton, B., Lecombel, L. and Tirry, L. (2001) Significance of absorption, oxidation, and binding to toxicity of four ecdysone agonists in multi-resistant cotton leafworm. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 46:127?239. Smith, T.M., Hicks-Berger, C.A., Kim, S. and Kirley, T.L. (2002) Cloning, expression, and characterization of a soluble calcium-activated nucleotidase, a human enzyme belonging to a new family of extracellular nucleotides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 406:105-115. Solomon, P.S., Ipcho, S.V.S., Hane, J.K., Tan, K.-C. and Oliver, R.P. (2008) A quantitative PCR approach to determine gene copy number. Fungal Genet. Rep. 55:5-8. Stevenson, B.J., Bibby, J., Pignatelli, P., Muangnoicharoen, S., O?Neill, P.M., Lian, L.Y., et al. (2011) Cytochrome P450 6M2 from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae metabolizes pyrethroids: sequential metabolism of deltamethrin revealed. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 41:492-502. Stevenson, B.J., Pignatelli, P., Nikou, D. and Paine, M.J. (2012) Pinpointing P450s associated with pyrethroid metabolism in the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti: developing new tools to combat insecticide resistance. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6:e1595. Strode, C., Steen, K., Ortelli, F. and Ranson, H. (2006) Differential expression of the detoxification genes in the different life stages of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol. Biol. 15: 523-30. Strode, C., Wondji, C.S., David, J.-P., Hawkes, N.J., Lumjuan, N., et al. (2008) Genomic analysis of detoxification genes in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38:113- 123. Strode, C., de Melo-Santos, M., Magalh?es, T., Ara?jo, A. and Ayres, C. (2012) Expression profile of genes during resistance reversal in a temephos selected strain of the dengue vector, 161 Aedes aegypti. PloS ONE. 7:e39439. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039439. Syvanen, M., Zhou, Z., Wharton, J., Goldsbury, C., and Clark, A. (1996) Heterogeneity of the glutathione transferase genes encoding enzymes responsible for insecticide degradation in the housefly. J. Mol. Evol. 43:236?40. Syvanen, M., Zhou, Z.H. and Wang, J.Y. (1994) Glutathione transferase gene family from the Musca domestica. Mol. Gen. Genet. 245P:25?31. Tan, J., Liu, Z., Wang, R., Huang, Z.Y., Chen, A.C., et al. (2005) Identification of amino acid residues in the insect sodium channel critical for pyrethroid binding. Mol. Pharmacol. 67: 513?522. Terriere, L.C. (1982). The Biochemistry and Toxicology of Insecticides. Corvallis. Oregon State University. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. and Salzberg, S.L. (2009) TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25: 1105-1111. Trejo, J. (2003) Protease-activated receptors: new concepts in regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling and trafficking. Perspect. Pharmacol. 307:437-442. Turnquist, H.R., Cardinal, J., Macedo, C., Rosborough, B.R., Sumpter, T. L., et al. (2010). mTOR and GSK-3 shape the CD4+ T-cell stimulatory and differentiation capacity of myeloid DCs after exposure to LPS. Blood 115: 4758?4769. Unlu, I., Kramer, W.L., Roy, A.F. and Foil, L.D. (2010) Detection of West Nile virus RNA in mosquitoes and identification of mosquito blood meals collected at alligator farms in Louisiana. J. Med. Entomol. 47: 625-633. Vaughan, A.,Rocheleau, T. and ffrench-Constant, R. (1997) Site-directed mutagenesis of an acetylcholinesterase gene from the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti confers insecticide 162 insensitivity, Exp. Parasitol. 87:237?244. Vinson, S.B. and Law, P.K. (1971) Cuticular composition and DDT resistance in the tobacco budworm. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 1387-1392. Vogel, C., Berzuini, C., Bashton, M., Gough, J. and Teichmann, S.A. (2004) Supra-domains - evolutionary units larger than single protein domains. J. Mol.Biol. 336: 809-823. Vogel, C., Teichmann, S.A., and Pereira-Leal, J.B. (2005) The relationship between domain duplication and recombination. J Mol Biol. 346:355-365. Vontas J.G., Small G.J., Nikou D.C., Ranson H. and Hemingway J. (2002) Purification, molecular cloning and heterologous expression of a glutathione-S-transferase involved in insecticide resistance from the rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Biochem. J. 362:329?37 Vontas, J., Blass, C., Koutsos, J.A.C., David, P., Kafatos, F.C., et al. (2005) Gene expression in insecticide resistant and susceptible Anopheles gambiae strains constitutively or after insecticide exposure. Insect Mol Biol 14: 509-521. Vontas, J., Ranson, H. and Alphey, L. (2010) Transcriptomics and disease vector control. BMC Biol. 8: 52. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-52. Vulule, J.M., Beach, R.F., Atieli, F.K., Roberts, J.M., Mount, D.L., et al. (1994) Reduced susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae to permethrin associated with the use of permethrin- impregnated bednets and curtains in Kenya. Med. Vet. Entomol. 8:71-75. Wada-Katsumata, A., Silverman, J. and Schal, C. (2013). Changes in taste neurons support the emergence of an adaptive behavior in cockroaches. Science 340: 972?975. Wang, S.Y. and Wang, G.K. (2003) Voltage-gated sodium channels as primary targets of diverse lipid-soluble neurotoxins. Cell Signal 15:151?159. 163 Warren, J.T., Petryk, A., Marques, G., Jarcho, M., Parvy, J.P., et al. (2002) Molecular and biochemical characterization of two P450 enzymes in the ecdysteroidogenic pathway of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 11043?11048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162375799. Warren, J.T., Petryk, A., Marques, G., Parvy, J.P., Shinoda, T., et al. (2004) Phantom encodes the 25-hydroxylase of Drosophila melanogaster and Bombyx mori: a P450 enzyme critical in ecdysone biosynthesis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34: 991?1010. Warren, K.S. and Mahmoud, A.A.F. (1990) Tropical and Geographical Medicine, (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Weill, M., Lutfalla, G., Mogensen, K., Chandre, F., Berthomieu, A., et al. (2003) Comparative genomics: insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors. Nature 423:136?137. Weill, M., Malcolm, C., Chandre, F. Mogensen, K., Berthomieu, A., et al. (2004) The unique mutation in ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors, Insect Mol. Biol. 13: 1?7. Wheelock, G.D. and Hagedorn, H.H. (1985) Egg maturation and ecdysiotropic activity in extracts of mosquito (Aedes aegypti) heads. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 60:196-203. White, R.E. and Coon, M.J. (1980) Oxygen activation by cytochrome P-450. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49: 315?356. Wilkins, R.M., Ahmed, S. and Mantle, D. (1999) Comparative effect of fenitrothion treatment on intracellular protease activities in insecticide-resistant and susceptible strains of Musca domestica L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endrocrinol. 124: 337-343. Williams, F.M. and Patterson, R.S. (1969). Effect of age on mating of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. Florida Entomol. 52:259-261. 164 Williamson, M.S., Denholm, I., Bell, C.A. and Devonshire, A.L. (1993) Knockdown resistance (kdr) to DDT and pyrethroid insecticides maps to a sodium channel gene locus in the housefly (Musca domestica). Molec. Gen. Genet. 240: 17?22. Wood, O.R., Hanrahan, S., Coetzee, M., Koekmoer, L.L. and Brooke, B.D. (2010) Cuticle thickening associated with pyrethroid resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Parasit. Vect. 3: 1?7. World Health Organization (1957) Expert committee on insecticides. WHO Tech Rpt Ser 7th Rpt. Wu, H.-W., Tian, H.-S., Wu, G.-L., Langdon, G., Kurtis, J., et al. (2004) Culex pipiens pallens: identification of genes differentially expressed in deltamethrin-resistant and -susceptible strains. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol. 79: 75-83. Xu, Q., Liu, H., Zhang, L. and Liu, N. (2005) Resistance in the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, and possible mechanisms for resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 61: 1096-1102. Xu, Q., Wang, H., Zhang, L., Liu, N. (2006a) Sodium channel gene expression associated with pyrethroid resistant house flies and German cockroaches. Gene 379: 62?67. Xu, Q., Wang, H., Zhang, L. and Liu, N. (2006b) Kdr allelic variation in pyrethroid resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus (S.). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 345: 774-780. Xu, Q., Zhang, L., Li, T., Zhang, L., He, L., et al. (2012a). Evolutionary adaptation of the amino acid and codon usage of the mosquito sodium channel following insecticide selection in the field mosquitoes. PloS ONE, 7: e47609. Xu, Q., Lu, A., Xiao, G., Yang, B., Zhang, J., et al. (2012b). Transcriptional profiling of midgut immunity response and degeneration in the wandering silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS ONE 7: e43769. 165 Yu, S.J. and Nguyen, S.N. (1996) Insecticide susceptibility and detoxification enzyme activities in permethrin-selected diamondback moths. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 56:69-74. Yang, T. and Liu, N. (2011). Genome analysis of cytochrome P450s and their expression profiles in insecticide resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. PloS ONE 6: e29418. Yu, S.J. (2002) Biochemical characteristics of microsomal and cytosolic glutathione S-transferases in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 72:100- 110. Yu, S.J. (2008) The toxicology and biochemistry of insecticides. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL. Zhang, H.G., ffrench-Constant, R.H. and Jackson, M.B. (1994) A unique amino acid of the Drosophila GABA receptor with influence on drug sensitivity by two mechanisms. J. Physiol. 479:65-75. Zhang, J., Goyer, C. and Pelletier, Y. (2008) Environmental stresses induce the expression of putative glycine-rich insect cuticular protein genes in adult Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Insect Mol. Biol. 17: 209?216. Zhu, F., Feng, J., Zhang, L., Liu, N. (2008a) Characterization of two novel cytochrome P450 genes in insecticide resistant house flies. Insect Mol. Biol. 20: 1365-1583. Zhu, F., Li, T., Zhang, L., Liu, N. (2008b) Co-up-regulation of three P450 genes in response to permethrin exposure in permethrin resistant house flies, Musca domestica. BMC Physiol. doi:10.1186/1472-6793-8-18. Zhu, F. and Liu, N. (2008) Differential expression of CYP6A5 and CYP6A5v2 in pyrethroid- resistant house flies, Musca domestica. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 34: 147-161. Zhu, F., Parthasarathy, R., Bai, H., Woithe, K., Kaussmann, M., et al. (2010) A brain specific cytochrome P450 responsible for the majority of deltamethrin resistance in the QTC279 166 strain of Tribolium castaneum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:8557-8562. Zhu, F., Gujar, H., Gordon, J.R., Haynes, K.F., Potter, M.F. et al. (2013) Bed bugs evolved unique adaptive strategy to resisit pyrethroid insecticides. Sci. Rep. 3:1456. doi:10.1038. Zinser, M., Ramberg, F. and Willott, E. (2004) Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) as a potential West Nile virus vector in Tucson, Arizona: blood meal analysis indicates feeding on both humans and birds. J. Insect Sci. 4: 20. 167 Appendix 3.1. List and sequences of the qRT-PCR primers used. Gene* Sense primer (5' to 3') Antisense primer (5' to 3') 18S rRNA CGCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCACTA GCATCAAGCGCCACCATATAGG CPIJ002802 CTGCATGAAGCTCCGTTGT AGGTGCTCTCGTGGGTAGC CPIJ002795 ACGCTCCAGCTCTGTCGTA GTGTAGCTGGTGGCGTGAG CPIJ011785 AGCTGGTGTTCCAGGTGTTC AGCTTTTGTTGGGGATTGTG CPIJ002943 ATGAGTAACGAGTTCCAGGAGTTG TTCTCGAACAAAATATCGACAAAC CPIJ001979 CGAGTCTACCTACACTGGGAAGAT TAATTCCAGCTTGATGGTTCACTA CPIJ014110 CAACGGTACTACATCTTTCACCAA ATGTTTGTTTCCAAATGGGTACTT CPIJ004594 GGATTTCGGTAAATTTGAAGATGT TTTTCGTACGTCATTTTAAACAGC CPIJ014719 TTCAAGGGAACCTGGAAGC ACGCGTTGAGCTCTTCAAA CPIJ004323 AAAAGTTCCGACCGGTGAC CGAGGTGTGTCCCATTGAC CPIJ002139 TAATCTGTCGTGTCAATTGTCGTA GGAAGCTATGTATTCCGATGAGAT CPIJ002942 GACTATGGCAGTGTGATGCACTA CAAGCACCCATACATCAAGTTTAG CPIJ001111 ACTGGTTATTCAGCGGTGTACTTT TTTGATCCAAGGAAGATACGTTTT CPIJ018037 GGATGTGGTCAGACTGGGTAGTAT AAACGCTACATCTCTCTCCAACTT CPIJ006543 AGGTTGATGAGGAGGAGAATACAG GGATAGATATGCTCATCGTGGAAC CPIJ002130 GTGGAGGTTCTAAAATTTCCAGTG TCAGGACAAACGTAGACGAAATTA CPIJ013319 CTACTACGGTAGCGTGATGCACTA ACATGTAGTTGACTGCAAGGATGT CPIJ009106 CAAACCAGAAGAGTACAACTGTCG GTAGGACACAAAGTAGCGCAGATA CPIJ001240 AGGACGTGAATATCGTTCTGAAAT GTTCTGATAGATCTCGGCTTTCAT CPIJ019428 GGTTCAATAATATCCGAACGATG GGATGCACGAAGATACTACGAAC CPIJ004086 TTGAGACGTACAATCAGCAATTTT TTGTTGTAATTCTCCTGCACAAAT CPIJ008873 CAGTGAGCTGTTCAATACCTGTTC GAGTTTGACAGAGCCTATCGGTAT CPIJ002135 TTCAACGACTATGTTCAACCAATC CGTATACCTCACCATGTCAGATTC CPIJ016012 GGGAGTTATGTTGAGGACTTGAAA GAAGGGTGGCACAGTTATTTATTC CPIJ002142 TGAAATCCTTAGTAGTGCTTGCAG TGACCAGAGAGAAGGATGTTGATA CPIJ006803 GGTAATCTGGTGGAGAGTGACAT AATGAAGTGACGTTCGGTTTTATT CPIJ007383 TTTGGTTGACATTGAAAACACTCT AGCTCTCGTTTCATCTTCTTGATT CPIJ010224 GAACTATTCGAGACCGGTAGTGAT GTGAAATTTGCTCCTCAAACACTT CPIJ014523 TTTTAACGATTACGTTCAACCTGT AATCTCTGGCGCCATAATAGTAAC CPIJ019029 CTACACCAACAACAAGTGGAACA GGTTCACGTAGATGTACTCGTCAC CPIJ002128 TTGTTATTCTTCTCACAGCAGCTC CATAGTCATACCATTGGTCCAGTC CPIJ006542 TGTCGACGAATCAGTTCACTTTAT CACTTCAAAGTGGGTAGCTGAAC CPIJ010805 ATTGGAACTACTCATGAGGGAAGA AGATGCATAATGGTCATAATGGTG CPIJ006076 CTGAAAACAACACAACCTATGGTC ATTCTCGGAAACCTCTCCACTAAC CPIJ001743 GCCTTTGGATGGACTGACTACTAC CTTGTGGGATAGTTTTACCACCTT CPIJ003623 CAGTCGAGTAAACATCACCGATAG GACCAAATGAAGTTATGCCGTACT CPIJ001742 TGATTTTGAGGAACTTACAACGAA AGATTTCAGCCGTGGAGTAGTAGT CPIJ009594 GAAGTATCAGACAACCGCATTCTA TTTCAAGTTGTTCATCACTGGTCT CPIJ018233 GTCTGCTTGGGTTCTTCAGC CGTCACATTGTTCGGATCAC CPIJ006166 AAGGGAACGTCGGATGAAG CCTTGTCCATCAGCCAGAA CPIJ001820 GTTGAATTCTACAAGCACGGTATG CGTAGTAGAAAACGTGGAACAGAG CPIJ000056 GAGCTACCTGCCATACTACACCTT GAAGAAGTCAAAGTACGTGAGCAG CPIJ009033 ATCGACTTCAGCTATTTCTTCACC GTCGGTAGTGTTTAGTACGACGTG CPIJ009032 AGTTGAGATCAAGGAGTTTTCCAG GGGAGTTCTTGTAGTTGAAGGGTA CPIJ007783 ACTACCAATTCAAGGATCACCTTC AGTATGTGACCAACTTGTCAATGG *Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.2, June 2008; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ 168 169 Appendix 3.2. Lognormal distributions for expressed genes in HAmCqG0 and HAmCqG8 by superfamily. Superfamily? Strain N? median mean modality kurtosis skewness (Trans)glycosidases HAmCqG0 46 1.64 1.60 bimodal -0.51 0.14 HAmCqG8 45 1.53 1.55 bimodal -0.42 0.29 Acetyl-CoA synthetase-like HAmCqG0 38 1.17 1.17 unimodal* -0.86 -0.31 HAmCqG8 34 1.16 1.19 unimodal -0.50 -0.17 Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase C- HAmCqG0 5 1.54 1.46 unimodal* -2.96 -0.32 terminal domain-like HAmCqG8 5 1.67 1.50 unimodal 4.06 -2.01 Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferases HAmCqG0 41 1.17 1.18 unimodal* -0.70 -0.05 HAmCqG8 43 1.04 0.95 unimodal* -1.04 0.02 ALDH-like HAmCqG0 12 1.81 1.90 bimodal -0.17 0.70 HAmCqG8 14 1.82 1.85 unimodal* -0.71 0.29 Alkaline phosphatase-like HAmCqG0 21 1.04 1.13 bimodal -0.07 0.60 HAmCqG8 21 0.86 0.99 bimodal 0.30 1.07 alpha/beta-Hydrolases HAmCqG0 109 1.17 1.26 unimodal -0.07 0.54 HAmCqG8 98 1.17 1.20 unimodal* 0.41 0.70 Ankyrin repeat HAmCqG0 85 0.79 0.82 unimodal -0.53 0.29 HAmCqG8 78 0.70 0.73 unimodal -0.38 0.44 Arginase/deacetylase HAmCqG0 9 0.69 0.88 unimodal* -0.78 0.25 HAmCqG8 7 1.02 0.85 bimodal -0.60 -0.90 ARID-like HAmCqG0 6 1.12 1.09 unimodal 1.77 -1.05 HAmCqG8 6 0.82 0.74 unimodal 0.04 -1.04 ARM repeat HAmCqG0 136 1.22 1.25 unimodal 0.07 0.14 HAmCqG8 133 1.03 1.10 unimodal 0.57 0.71 C-type lectin-like HAmCqG0 33 1.17 1.39 multimodal -1.06 0.40 HAmCqG8 28 1.50 1.41 multimodal -0.72 0.20 C2H2 and C2HC zinc fingers HAmCqG0 515 0.71 0.73 unimodal 0.06 0.46 HAmCqG8 495 0.50 0.56 unimodal 0.55 0.71 Cadherin-like HAmCqG0 14 1.07 1.00 unimodal* -1.05 -0.10 HAmCqG8 14 0.80 0.86 bimodal -0.91 0.49 Calcium ATPase, HAmCqG0 14 1.36 1.48 bimodal -0.81 0.33 transmembrane domain M HAmCqG8 12 1.20 1.47 bimodal 0.75 1.18 cAMP-binding domain-like HAmCqG0 15 0.69 0.81 bimodal -1.49 0.28 HAmCqG8 14 0.49 0.48 unimodal* -1.30 0.35 Chaperone J-domain HAmCqG0 20 1.20 1.29 unimodal* -0.97 0.12 HAmCqG8 21 1.07 1.02 unimodal* 0.10 0.54 Chemosensory protein Csp2 HAmCqG0 28 1.81 1.71 bimodal -0.94 -0.20 HAmCqG8 23 1.66 1.64 bimodal -1.52 -0.04 Concanavalin A-like HAmCqG0 45 0.85 0.95 unimodal* 0.58 0.77 lectins/glucanases HAmCqG8 39 0.73 0.92 unimodal 0.04 0.89 CRAL/TRIO domain HAmCqG0 48 1.17 1.18 unimodal 0.56 0.54 HAmCqG8 43 1.08 1.04 unimodal* 1.11 0.73 Cysteine proteinases HAmCqG0 62 1.27 1.31 unimodal 0.37 0.65 HAmCqG8 60 1.08 1.17 unimodal 0.57 0.76 Cytochrome b5-like HAmCqG0 11 1.50 1.42 unimodal -0.60 -0.35 heme/steroid binding domain HAmCqG8 12 1.17 1.15 bimodal -0.18 -0.51 Cytochrome P450 HAmCqG0 143 1.10 1.11 unimodal -0.68 0.08 HAmCqG8 136 1.21 1.22 unimodal -0.70 0.20 Di-copper center-containing HAmCqG0 14 2.13 2.41 multimodal 1.25 -0.22 domain HAmCqG8 13 3.01 3.06 multimodal -0.91 0.19 DNA/RNA polymerases HAmCqG0 11 0.81 0.89 unimodal 1.07 -0.10 170 HAmCqG8 10 0.69 0.80 unimodal -0.25 0.84 E set domains HAmCqG0 51 1.56 1.74 unimodal -0.26 0.62 HAmCqG8 49 1.39 1.69 unimodal -0.40 0.65 EF-hand HAmCqG0 51 1.19 1.30 unimodal -0.40 0.60 HAmCqG8 48 0.88 1.24 unimodal -0.14 0.94 EGF/Laminin HAmCqG0 15 0.96 1.00 unimodal 1.73 0.97 HAmCqG8 14 0.49 0.62 unimodal* -1.10 0.58 F-box domain HAmCqG0 19 0.72 0.76 unimodal* -0.78 0.45 HAmCqG8 18 0.57 0.66 unimodal 1.10 1.00 FAD-binding domain HAmCqG0 7 0.36 0.65 bimodal 0.93 1.32 HAmCqG8 7 0.59 0.90 bimodal 0.63 1.24 FAD/NAD(P)-binding domain HAmCqG0 51 1.28 1.27 unimodal -0.20 -0.03 HAmCqG8 48 1.15 1.18 unimodal* -0.13 0.53 Family A G protein-coupled HAmCqG0 31 0.59 0.56 unimodal* 0.96 0.86 receptor-like HAmCqG8 21 0.27 0.47 unimodal 2.06 1.50 Ferritin-like HAmCqG0 14 1.69 1.67 bimodal -0.02 0.54 HAmCqG8 14 1.69 1.79 unimodal* -1.02 0.45 Fibrinogen C-terminal domain- HAmCqG0 42 0.99 1.03 unimodal* -0.66 0.41 like HAmCqG8 38 0.94 0.94 unimodal* -0.65 0.27 Fibronectin type III HAmCqG0 32 0.55 0.64 unimodal* -0.30 0.54 HAmCqG8 26 0.53 0.51 unimodal* -0.51 0.46 FnI-like domain HAmCqG0 9 0.95 0.93 unimodal 0.70 0.41 HAmCqG8 7 0.57 0.80 unimodal* 1.47 1.46 FYVE/PHD zinc finger HAmCqG0 32 1.09 0.95 unimodal* -0.55 -0.64 HAmCqG8 32 0.76 0.74 unimodal 1.24 0.44 Galactose mutarotase-like HAmCqG0 7 1.68 1.36 multimodal -0.57 -0.71 HAmCqG8 7 1.38 1.31 multimodal -0.04 0.72 Glucocorticoid receptor-like HAmCqG0 154 0.85 0.87 unimodal 0.99 0.63 (DNA-binding domain) HAmCqG8 147 0.66 0.72 unimodal 1.54 1.02 Glutamine synthetase/guanido HAmCqG0 5 1.75 1.92 bimodal 1.20 1.04 kinase HAmCqG8 5 1.56 1.99 bimodal 2.73 1.69 Glutathione S-transferase HAmCqG0 29 1.66 1.57 unimodal -0.20 -0.59 (GST), C-terminal domain HAmCqG8 27 1.54 1.52 unimodal* -0.96 -0.07 Growth factor receptor domain HAmCqG0 11 1.18 1.09 unimodal 0.14 0.30 HAmCqG8 11 0.77 0.92 unimodal* -0.35 0.88 HAD-like HAmCqG0 21 1.23 1.26 unimodal 1.37 0.59 HAmCqG8 22 0.97 1.01 unimodal 1.76 0.90 Histone-fold HAmCqG0 43 0.74 0.80 unimodal* 1.28 1.01 HAmCqG8 32 0.64 0.70 unimodal 1.86 1.16 HLH, helix-loop-helix DNA- HAmCqG0 32 1.19 1.08 unimodal* -0.64 0.06 binding domain HAmCqG8 28 0.81 0.90 unimodal* -0.88 0.33 HMG-box HAmCqG0 23 0.98 1.06 unimodal 1.80 0.63 HAmCqG8 23 0.60 0.74 unimodal* 1.52 0.99 Homeodomain-like HAmCqG0 85 0.66 0.66 unimodal -0.52 0.35 HAmCqG8 57 0.54 0.57 unimodal 0.12 0.69 Immunoglobulin HAmCqG0 61 0.54 0.64 unimodal* -0.53 0.69 HAmCqG8 30 0.65 0.68 unimodal -0.90 0.32 Insect pheromone/odorant- HAmCqG0 47 0.97 1.14 unimodal 0.01 0.76 binding proteins HAmCqG8 39 1.00 1.14 unimodal* 1.31 1.06 Invertebrate chitin-binding HAmCqG0 103 2.19 2.03 unimodal* -0.44 -0.40 HAmCqG8 102 2.05 1.87 unimodal* -0.63 -0.38 L domain-like HAmCqG0 102 0.97 0.99 unimodal -0.68 0.27 HAmCqG8 87 0.99 1.01 unimodal 0.55 0.62 Ligand-binding domain in NO HAmCqG0 6 1.12 0.99 bimodal -2.30 -0.34 signaling and Golgi transport HAmCqG8 6 0.70 0.72 unimodal* -1.82 0.24 Lipocalins HAmCqG0 15 1.30 1.42 unimodal* -0.60 0.25 171 HAmCqG8 15 1.36 1.36 multimodal 0.55 -0.05 Lysozyme-like HAmCqG0 4 1.40 1.48 unimodal 3.22 1.70 HAmCqG8 5 1.58 1.49 bimodal 2.67 -1.43 Metallo-dependent hydrolases HAmCqG0 11 1.41 1.44 unimodal -0.59 -0.09 HAmCqG8 11 1.21 1.20 unimodal* 0.02 -0.60 Metallo-dependent HAmCqG0 23 1.28 1.34 unimodal 0.38 0.51 phosphatases HAmCqG8 22 1.16 1.26 unimodal* 0.09 0.63 Metalloproteases ("zincins") HAmCqG0 49 1.40 1.33 unimodal* -0.91 0.11 HAmCqG8 47 1.35 1.38 unimodal* -1.01 0.25 MFS general transporter HAmCqG0 148 1.08 1.05 unimodal 0.41 0.42 HAmCqG8 140 0.87 0.96 unimodal 0.94 0.66 Myosin rod fragments HAmCqG0 5 1.31 1.26 multimodal 0.88 -0.20 HAmCqG8 5 1.12 1.16 bimodal 1.51 0.95 N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine HAmCqG0 9 1.56 1.70 multimodal -0.05 1.18 amidase-like HAmCqG8 10 0.90 1.42 bimodal 0.56 1.33 NAD(P)-binding Rossmann HAmCqG0 119 1.45 1.39 unimodal* -0.16 -0.11 HAmCqG8 115 1.23 1.25 unimodal 0.51 0.22 NAD(P)-linked oxidoreductase HAmCqG0 15 1.47 1.45 unimodal* -0.22 -0.55 HAmCqG8 14 1.28 1.29 unimodal 0.22 -0.30 NAP-like HAmCqG0 8 0.73 0.95 multimodal 0.22 0.96 HAmCqG8 8 0.85 0.94 bimodal 2.98 1.36 Neurotransmitter-gated ion- HAmCqG0 10 0.34 0.50 unimodal 0.17 0.99 channel transmembrane pore HAmCqG8 3 0.32 0.53 bimodal 0.00 1.38 Nicotinic receptor ligand HAmCqG0 11 0.62 0.69 unimodal* -0.93 0.66 binding domain-like HAmCqG8 7 0.94 0.90 unimodal* -0.53 0.09 Nuclear receptor ligand-bind HAmCqG0 18 0.94 0.81 bimodal -1.57 -0.21 HAmCqG8 12 0.83 0.74 unimodal* -0.56 -0.36 Nucleotide-diPO4-sugar transf HAmCqG0 38 0.96 1.03 unimodal -0.38 0.50 HAmCqG8 39 0.81 0.84 unimodal -0.01 0.61 Outer arm dynein light chain 1 HAmCqG0 7 0.96 0.86 unimodal* -0.83 -0.18 HAmCqG8 8 0.62 0.61 unimodal -1.21 0.20 P-loop nucleotide hydrolases HAmCqG0 427 1.09 1.14 unimodal 1.89 0.89 HAmCqG8 407 0.90 0.99 unimodal 3.57 1.41 PDZ domain-like HAmCqG0 44 0.92 0.97 unimodal -0.50 0.07 HAmCqG8 36 0.74 0.79 unimodal -0.41 0.48 Phosphoglycerate mutase-like HAmCqG0 15 1.32 1.29 multimodal 0.08 -0.35 HAmCqG8 14 1.14 1.24 unimodal 2.17 1.23 Phospholipase A2, PLA2 HAmCqG0 6 0.85 0.87 unimodal 1.33 0.29 HAmCqG8 7 0.34 0.31 unimodal 4.53 -1.96 PLC-like phosphodiesterases HAmCqG0 9 0.79 0.87 unimodal* -0.94 0.10 HAmCqG8 8 0.67 0.86 bimodal 1.14 1.18 PLP-binding barrel HAmCqG0 7 0.92 1.20 bimodal 4.16 2.04 HAmCqG8 6 1.14 1.33 bimodal 3.56 1.86 PLP-dependent transferases HAmCqG0 36 1.74 1.65 bimodal -0.52 -0.40 HAmCqG8 38 1.61 1.49 bimodal -0.76 -0.39 PR-1-like HAmCqG0 7 0.80 0.86 multimodal -1.39 0.29 HAmCqG8 8 0.70 0.95 bimodal -1.91 0.32 Protein kinase-like (PK-like) HAmCqG0 254 0.97 0.98 bimodal 0.52 0.53 HAmCqG8 247 0.79 0.84 bimodal 0.27 0.58 Proton glutamate symporter HAmCqG0 5 0.95 0.84 unimodal 0.51 -0.85 HAmCqG8 4 0.92 1.00 unimodal 2.51 1.59 Quinoprotein ADH-like HAmCqG0 14 1.10 1.02 bimodal 0.20 -0.93 HAmCqG8 13 0.82 0.91 unimodal* 0.12 -0.53 Retrovirus zinc finger-like HAmCqG0 10 1.06 1.08 bimodal 4.49 1.83 HAmCqG8 10 0.99 1.00 bimodal 3.18 0.86 Ribonuclease H-like HAmCqG0 27 1.12 1.13 unimodal -0.71 -0.26 172 HAmCqG8 27 0.89 0.98 unimodal -0.39 -0.37 RING/U-box HAmCqG0 90 1.12 1.08 unimodal 1.17 0.41 HAmCqG8 92 0.82 0.83 unimodal 0.97 0.52 RNA-binding domain HAmCqG0 131 1.25 1.23 unimodal -0.02 -0.06 HAmCqG8 120 1.01 1.04 unimodal 0.46 0.30 RNI-like HAmCqG0 83 0.71 0.73 unimodal -0.80 0.18 HAmCqG8 80 0.63 0.68 unimodal -0.78 0.21 SAM-methyltransferases HAmCqG0 68 1.14 1.13 unimodal -0.16 -0.18 HAmCqG8 67 0.93 0.93 unimodal 0.26 0.26 Serine protease inhibitors HAmCqG0 5 2.39 1.97 bimodal -2.70 -0.59 HAmCqG8 5 2.55 2.03 bimodal 3.08 -1.77 SET domain HAmCqG0 40 0.91 0.82 unimodal* -1.05 -0.13 HAmCqG8 43 0.71 0.63 unimodal -0.92 0.16 Six-hairpin glycosidases HAmCqG0 11 1.46 1.48 unimodal* -0.06 -0.56 HAmCqG8 10 1.71 1.64 unimodal* -0.99 -0.01 Sterol carrier protein HAmCqG0 7 3.32 2.65 bimodal -1.04 -0.97 HAmCqG8 7 3.40 2.70 multimodal -1.12 -0.82 Terpenoid cyclases HAmCqG0 6 1.30 1.13 unimodal* -1.69 -0.86 HAmCqG8 6 1.10 1.07 unimodal* -0.53 0.27 Thiolase-like HAmCqG0 12 1.73 1.70 unimodal -1.03 -0.14 HAmCqG8 12 1.58 1.58 unimodal -1.11 0.22 Thioredoxin-like HAmCqG0 58 1.64 1.69 unimodal 0.62 -0.40 HAmCqG8 58 1.52 1.50 unimodal -0.50 -0.20 TPR-like HAmCqG0 74 1.17 1.17 unimodal 0.17 -0.14 HAmCqG8 67 1.07 1.10 unimodal 0.75 0.37 TRAF domain-like HAmCqG0 16 1.00 0.88 unimodal -0.17 -0.73 HAmCqG8 15 0.87 0.86 unimodal -1.04 0.20 Translation proteins HAmCqG0 13 0.51 1.19 bimodal 0.03 1.15 HAmCqG8 9 0.92 1.54 bimodal -1.02 0.87 Tropomyosin HAmCqG0 9 0.93 1.12 bimodal 2.29 1.40 HAmCqG8 11 0.68 0.92 bimodal 5.73 2.21 Trypsin-like serine proteases HAmCqG0 217 1.22 1.27 unimodal 0.06 0.66 HAmCqG8 205 1.07 1.20 unimodal 0.18 0.85 Tubulin nucleotide-binding HAmCqG0 10 1.97 1.90 multimodal -1.00 -0.51 HAmCqG8 11 1.80 1.63 unimodal* -1.07 -0.12 UBA-like HAmCqG0 11 1.03 1.09 unimodal 2.27 0.17 HAmCqG8 10 1.05 1.01 unimodal -0.08 0.42 Ubiquitin-like HAmCqG0 33 1.42 1.60 unimodal -0.22 0.47 HAmCqG8 32 1.36 1.48 unimodal 0.11 0.66 UDP-Glycosyltransferase HAmCqG0 29 1.38 1.29 unimodal 0.32 -0.52 HAmCqG8 33 1.08 1.08 unimodal* -1.08 -0.09 vWA-like HAmCqG0 13 1.02 1.11 unimodal* -0.86 0.10 HAmCqG8 14 0.92 0.96 unimodal* -0.94 -0.15 WD40 repeat-like HAmCqG0 183 1.06 1.06 unimodal 1.91 0.65 HAmCqG8 173 0.89 0.91 unimodal 3.28 1.06 Winged helix DNA-binding HAmCqG0 57 1.20 1.26 unimodal* 0.89 0.55 HAmCqG8 56 0.92 1.07 unimodal* 1.41 0.96 WW domain HAmCqG0 10 0.86 0.99 unimodal* -0.28 0.62 HAmCqG8 11 0.67 0.64 unimodal 1.01 1.11 Zn-dependent exopeptidases HAmCqG0 40 1.54 1.58 unimodal 0.86 -0.01 HAmCqG8 41 1.54 1.54 unimodal 0.15 -0.38 **Carboxylesterases HAmCqG0 17 1 1.12 unimodal* 1.19 0.94 HAmCqG8 16 0.71 1.03 bimodal 3.22 1.51 ?Superfamilies from Structural Classification of Proteins (v1.73) ?Total number of genes detected within the superfamily *unimodal, but shouldered distribution 173 **Not a SCOP superfamily classification. Genes were grouped based on Vectorbase annotation as carboxylesterases. 174 Appendix 3.3. Complete list of all differentially upregulated genes? in HAmCqG8. General function* Detailed function Superfamily Gene accession** CpipJ_1.2 annotation HAmCqG8 FPKM Fold FPKM relative to HAmCqG0 ? Extra-cellular processes Cell adhesion C-type lectin-like CPIJ000449 galactose-specific C-type lectin 52.0 38.6 CPIJ015401 galactose-specific C-type lectin 54.1 42.6 CPIJ017075 galactose-specific C-type lectin 2.2 - CPIJ019507 salivary C-type lectin 23.8 5.2 Cadherin-like CPIJ014101 conserved hypothetical protein 56.6 2.7 EGF/Laminin CPIJ014886 conserved hypothetical protein 5.2 4.4 Blood clotting Fibrinogen C-terminal domain- like CPIJ010089 microfibril-associated glycoprotein 4 28.8 2.9 CPIJ012830 fibrinogen and fibronectin 121.8 6.7 CPIJ013294 fibrinogen and fibronectin 11.1 - CPIJ015014 conserved hypothetical protein 9.4 8.3 CPIJ018159 fibrinogen and fibronectin 15.1 3.8 Cell adhesion Fibronectin type III CPIJ000838 conserved hypothetical protein 2.7 7.6 FnI-like domain CPIJ013195 conserved hypothetical protein 53.0 2.4 RNI-like CPIJ002173 conserved hypothetical protein 16.0 3.2 CPIJ004947 leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 1 58.7 3.5 CPIJ011874 predicted protein 1.3 - CPIJ014115 conserved hypothetical protein 10.7 4.0 CPIJ014953 membrane glycoprotein LIG-1 10.5 4.0 CPIJ016528 conserved hypothetical protein 1.0 - CPIJ019556 predicted protein 8.9 - General Protein interaction Ankyrin repeat CPIJ003373 predicted protein 15.5 12.0 CPIJ008490 ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 44 1.3 - CPIJ009398 conserved hypothetical protein 4.6 3.4 General ARM repeat CPIJ005388 conserved hypothetical protein 4.0 2.8 EF-hand CPIJ001560 calcium-binding protein 1097.9 4.4 CPIJ012250 troponin C 567.7 6.3 CPIJ016821 troponin C 497.5 4.5 CPIJ019636 EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 1 1.5 - Protein interaction F-box domain CPIJ019555 predicted protein 11.4 34.5 Small molecule binding FAD-binding domain CPIJ001318 d-lactate dehydrognease 2 40.5 2.2 CPIJ013647 alkyldihydroxyacetonephosphate synthase 4.3 3.3 175 CPIJ016321 alkyldihydroxyacetonephosphate synthase 3.7 3.1 CPIJ016322 alkyldihydroxyacetonephosphate synthase 3.9 3.3 FAD/NAD(P)-binding domain CPIJ007620 choline dehydrogenase 132.3 2.9 CPIJ008048 peroxisomal N1-acetyl-spermine/spermidine oxidase 14.5 2.6 CPIJ008445 amine oxidase 21.4 2.8 CPIJ017813 spermine oxidase 8.8 2.7 Glutathione S-transferase (GST), C-terminal domain CPIJ002663 glutathione S-transferase 1-1 354.4 2.2 CPIJ006160 glutathione s-transferase 173.7 2.4 CPIJ018631 glutathione-s-transferase theta, gst 8.3 3.7 General L domain-like CPIJ000315 conserved hypothetical protein 1.0 - CPIJ003143 conserved hypothetical protein 14.0 2.9 CPIJ004946 leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 15 11.0 2.5 CPIJ017510 conserved hypothetical protein 914.6 7.3 Small molecule binding NAD(P)-binding Rossmann- fold domains CPIJ003802 NADP-dependent leukotriene B4 12- hydroxydehydrogenase 169.2 4.0 CPIJ004379 steroid dehydrogenase 10.5 12.7 P-loop containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases CPIJ000853 myosin heavy chain 1750.5 3.8 CPIJ001520 multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 34.6 2.7 CPIJ003262 zinc finger protein 1.2 - CPIJ004695 dynein-1-beta heavy chain 1.9 2.3 CPIJ009034 conserved hypothetical protein 27.0 2.3 CPIJ009593 conserved hypothetical protein 8.0 2.9 CPIJ015649 DNA-binding protein smubp-2 1.8 4.0 CPIJ019948 myosin vii 5.9 2.5 Protein interaction TPR-like CPIJ007346 TTC27 protein 37.5 2.7 UBA-like CPIJ011358 conserved hypothetical protein 27.9 2.8 General Ubiquitin-like CPIJ014273 conserved hypothetical protein 1.1 - WD40 repeat-like CPIJ006339 receptor of activated protein kinase C 1 6.9 5.3 CPIJ012294 conserved hypothetical protein 2.0 3.5 Information DNA replication/repair FYVE/PHD zinc finger CPIJ002070 conserved hypothetical protein 66.0 4.0 CPIJ011117 conserved hypothetical protein 4.3 19.5 Chromatin structure NAP-like CPIJ007782 nucleosome assembly protein 7.5 3.2 DNA replication/repair RING/U-box CPIJ000388 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme 7 interacting protein 17.4 2.9 Chromatin structure Smc hinge domain CPIJ018617 structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 3 10.4 2.8 176 Intra-cellular processes Transport Ammonium transporter CPIJ013531 ammonium transporter 31.9 3.0 Phospholipid m/tr CRAL/TRIO domain CPIJ001321 conserved hypothetical protein 1.7 - CPIJ003223 conserved hypothetical protein 43.4 2.2 CPIJ009746 conserved hypothetical protein 54.3 2.6 CPIJ014226 cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein 838.3 2.9 Proteases Cysteine proteinases CPIJ001239 cathepsin B 190.2 9.7 CPIJ001240 cathepsin B-like thiol protease 99.7 5.3 Ion m/tr Ferritin-like CPIJ014287 ferritin heavy chain 202.2 4.0 Transport Glycolipid transfer protein, GLTP CPIJ003328 conserved hypothetical protein 29.9 2.5 Lipocalins CPIJ013296 conserved hypothetical protein 29.2 2.7 CPIJ015725 apolipoprotein D 457.6 4.6 Proteases Metallo-dependent phosphatases CPIJ018314 5' nucleotidase 43.6 2.8 Metalloproteases ("zincins"), catalytic domain CPIJ001050 protease m1 zinc metalloprotease 266.9 3.6 CPIJ002941 high choriolytic enzyme 1 273.8 3.5 CPIJ002942 zinc metalloproteinase nas-12 1025.0 2.9 CPIJ002943 conserved hypothetical protein 202.6 4.3 CPIJ002945 zinc metalloproteinase dpy-31 101.1 3.8 CPIJ004086 angiotensin-converting enzyme 292.0 5.7 CPIJ006803 zinc metalloproteinase nas-7 22.5 4.5 CPIJ007383 endothelin-converting enzyme 1 20.1 2.5 CPIJ009106 angiotensin-converting enzyme 209.4 2.7 CPIJ012036 aminopeptidase N 30.6 3.1 Ion m/tr MFS general substrate transporter CPIJ001774 synaptic vesicle protein 4.9 3.4 CPIJ001812 sugar transporter 3.3 4.8 CPIJ005300 sugar transporter 2.9 9.3 CPIJ005372 endogenous retrovirus A receptor 3.1 4.4 CPIJ008813 sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 4.6 2.8 CPIJ014925 solute carrier family 2 20.7 2.3 Phospholipid m/tr PLC-like phosphodiesterases CPIJ002103 conserved hypothetical protein 78.7 2.4 Transport Proton glutamate symport protein CPIJ000673 glutamate transporter 22.5 2.4 Proteases Serine protease inhibitors CPIJ012287 hypothetical protein 89.0 4.8 Cell motility Tropomyosin CPIJ008188 conserved hypothetical protein 3.3 5.4 Proteases Trypsin-like serine proteases CPIJ000616 clip-domain serine protease 23.8 3.4 CPIJ000617 clip-domain serine protease 18.1 3.6 177 CPIJ001979 conserved hypothetical protein 22.0 3.0 CPIJ002128 mast cell protease 2 94.1 16.1 CPIJ002133 trypsin epsilon 47.8 7.9 CPIJ002135 trypsin alpha-4 61.8 5.9 CPIJ002137 serine protease1/2 122.4 3.4 CPIJ002139 HzC4 chymotrypsinogen 559.8 4.3 CPIJ002140 chymotrypsin BI 205.9 3.5 CPIJ002142 chymotrypsin BI 5763.6 2.8 CPIJ002156 chymotrypsin BI 194.8 2.8 CPIJ003623 coagulation factor XII 15.0 7.1 CPIJ004594 conserved hypothetical protein 11.0 5.9 CPIJ005272 trypsin 3A1 2.4 - CPIJ006543 urokinase-type plasminogen activator 84.5 8.2 CPIJ014656 coagulation factor XII 5.8 3.3 CPIJ016102 transmembrane protease 29.2 2.7 CPIJ018037 serine protease 15.7 3.9 CPIJ019428 trypsin 2 36.9 3.4 Zn-dependent exopeptidases CPIJ001742 zinc carboxypeptidase 175.1 3.0 CPIJ001743 carboxypeptidase A2 91.2 5.4 CPIJ001744 zinc carboxypeptidase 195.5 3.5 CPIJ001745 zinc carboxypeptidase 80.8 7.4 CPIJ009738 conserved hypothetical protein 73.2 2.3 CPIJ010805 carboxypeptidase A1 180.8 4.4 CPIJ014110 conserved hypothetical protein 35.1 2.4 Metabolism Carbohydrate m/tr (Trans)glycosidases CPIJ002104 plasma alpha-L-fucosidase 25.6 3.4 CPIJ005060 alpha-amylase B 3837.1 2.3 CPIJ005725 alpha-amylase A 171.1 3.1 CPIJ006166 deltamethrin resistance-associated NYD-GBE 98.8 2.5 CPIJ008528 glycoside hydrolase 7.6 3.9 CPIJ009306 neutral alpha-glucosidase ab 10.0 3.7 Other enzymes 3-carboxy-cis,cis-mucoante lactonizing enzyme CPIJ013577 selenium-binding protein 2 164.4 2.7 Acetyl-CoA synthetase-like CPIJ000791 conserved hypothetical protein 124.8 2.8 CPIJ006459 long-chain-fatty-acid-CoA ligase 114.8 3.5 CPIJ010716 luciferin 4-monooxygenase 31.1 2.2 CPIJ015088 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 34.2 2.2 E- transfer Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase C- terminal domain-like CPIJ003059 acyl-CoA oxidase 47.2 4.0 Transferases Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferases (Nat) CPIJ011827 conserved hypothetical protein 1.8 - 178 Redox ALDH-like CPIJ009438 aldehyde dehydrogenase 95.0 2.6 Other enzymes alpha/beta-Hydrolases CPIJ002715 lipase 3 10.4 3.2 CPIJ004222 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase 1790.9 4.7 CPIJ007461 epoxide hydrolase 18.3 2.5 CPIJ007824 esterase B1 34.4 2.2 CPIJ008876 lysosomal pro-X carboxypeptidase 901.2 3.4 CPIJ016336 esterase B1 32.3 2.2 CPIJ019917 triacylglycerol lipase 23.0 2.8 Secondary metabolism Concanavalin A-like lectins/glucanases CPIJ004320 gram-negative bacteria-binding protein 1 221.8 5.6 CPIJ004323 gram-negative bacteria binding protein 293.4 4.1 CPIJ006421 conserved hypothetical protein 8.8 2.5 CPIJ013048 conserved hypothetical protein 2.3 - E- transfer Cytochrome b5-like heme/steroid binding domain CPIJ004595 cytochrome b5 91.7 2.3 CPIJ005308 conserved hypothetical protein 1.4 - Redox Cytochrome P450 CPIJ002538 CYP6AG12 ? 575.0 3.7 CPIJ005952 CYP6BB4 ? 4.0 2.8 CPIJ005953 CYP6BB3 ? 74.9 2.6 CPIJ005955 CYP6P14 ? 126.6 8.2 CPIJ005956 CYP6BZ2 ? 460.1 3.3 CPIJ005957 CYP6AA9 ? 84.9 6.6 CPIJ005959 CYP6AA7 ? 98.3 7.3 CPIJ006721 CYP4H37v ?1 56.7 2.3 CPIJ007188 CYP4H30 ? 27.9 2.3 CPIJ008566 CYP6Z15 ? 5.4 3.3 CPIJ009085 CYP6AG13 ? 5.9 3.4 CPIJ009478 CYP4D42v1 ? 59.5 2.4 CPIJ010225 CYP12F14 ? 30.8 3.9 CPIJ010227 CYP12F13 ? 67.8 7.1 CPIJ010537 CYP9J45 ? 109.4 4.8 CPIJ010538 CYP9J46 ? 35.3 7.5 CPIJ010542 CYP9J38 ? 19.6 8.3 CPIJ010543 CYP9J40 ? 297.6 7.2 CPIJ010544 CYP9J33 ? 58.9 3.1 CPIJ010546 CYP9J34 ? 50.9 13.4 CPIJ011127 CYP4H34 ? 9.9 2.7 CPIJ012470 CYP9AL1 ? 86.2 9.2 CPIJ014218 CYP9M10 ? 771.2 3.7 CPIJ015681 CYP4H37v2 ? 42.8 2.6 179 CPIJ015958 CYP325BC1 ? 2.6 8.1 CPIJ017243 CYP304B4 ? 73.4 3.8 CPIJ017244 CYP304B5 ? 2.7 18.9 CPIJ020229 CYP4D42v2 ? 38.1 2.4 Di-copper centre-containing domain CPIJ000056 larval serum protein 1 beta chain 5111.7 4.9 CPIJ001820 larval serum protein 2 9964.0 4.3 CPIJ005187 phenoloxidase subunit 1 147.6 2.6 CPIJ006537 larval serum protein 1 beta chain 986.8 9.7 CPIJ006538 larval serum protein 1 beta chain 1170.3 10.3 CPIJ007783 arylphorin subunit alpha 3379.4 2.8 CPIJ009032 larval serum protein 2 574.1 3.3 CPIJ009033 arylphorin subunit C223 47162.3 2.4 CPIJ018824 larval serum protein 1 beta chain 1024.6 7.6 Coenzyme m/tr Dihydropteroate synthetase-like CPIJ003752 ficolin-2 14.8 4.1 Other enzymes FAH CPIJ017110 fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase 46.7 2.6 Fumarate reductase respiratory complex transmembrane subunits CPIJ004125 succinate dehydrogenase 10.6 13.5 Galactose mutarotase-like CPIJ004867 conserved hypothetical protein 4.7 3.2 Amino acids m/tr Glutamine synthetase/guanido kinase CPIJ007538 arginine kinase 4762.7 3.5 Other enzymes HydA/Nqo6-like CPIJ018869 NADH dehydrogenase iron-sulfur protein 7, mitochondrial 206.2 2.7 Carbohydrate m/tr Invertebrate chitin-binding proteins CPIJ014999 conserved hypothetical protein 36.4 4.9 Lipid m/tr Lipovitellin-phosvitin complex, superhelical domain CPIJ001746 conserved hypothetical protein 1918.0 4.6 Other enzymes Lysozyme-like CPIJ018802 endochitinase A 177.0 2.6 CPIJ019598 basic endochitinase CHB4 77.3 4.0 N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase-like CPIJ006560 peptidoglycan recognition protein-lc 4.6 - Transferases Nucleotide-diphospho-sugar transferases CPIJ001091 lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase 1.1 - Other enzymes Phosphoglycerate mutase-like CPIJ014577 phosphoglycerate mutase 2 330.2 2.7 Amino acids m/tr PLP-binding barrel CPIJ009094 ornithine decarboxylase 1 16.0 3.0 Transferases PLP-dependent transferases CPIJ006619 cystathionine gamma-lyase 120.6 3.4 Secondary metabolism PR-1-like CPIJ000211 cysteine-rich secretory protein-2 2.5 - CPIJ004029 venom allergen 5 72.0 6.1 180 Other enzymes Quinoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase-like CPIJ002052 WD repeat protein 61 28.2 2.3 Carbohydrate m/tr Six-hairpin glycosidases CPIJ008853 maltose phosphorylase 53.8 2.2 Coenzyme m/tr Sterol carrier protein, SCP CPIJ012490 sterol carrier protein 2 12774.9 3.1 Other enzymes Thiolase-like CPIJ003495 fatty acid synthase S-acetyltransferase 7.3 2.7 Redox Thioredoxin-like CPIJ018667 NADH dehydrogenase flavoprotein 2, mitochondrial 116.0 2.8 Polysaccharide m/tr UDP- Glycosyltransferase/glycogen phosphorylase CPIJ000226 glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferase 45.1 2.3 CPIJ003692 glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferase 9.3 4.7 CPIJ006508 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4 58.0 3.5 CPIJ015996 ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase 3.2 7.5 Energy Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit C CPIJ002067 vacuolar ATP synthase subunit C 147.7 2.4 NONA? not annotated NONA CPIJ000008 chitotriosidase-1 64.4 3.7 CPIJ000448 conserved hypothetical protein 5.4 6.9 CPIJ000494 conserved hypothetical protein 1406.6 3.4 CPIJ000665 galectin 223.6 3.6 CPIJ000852 myosin-Id 810.6 3.9 CPIJ000905 tetraspanin 58.7 2.4 CPIJ001111 proacrosin 51.7 3.3 CPIJ002056 adenylate cyclase type 2 3.5 2.9 CPIJ002117 conserved hypothetical protein 71.4 2.3 CPIJ002130 kallikrein-7 23.1 2.4 CPIJ002138 chymotrypsinogen 242.3 824.5 CPIJ002168 conserved hypothetical protein 43.2 2.7 CPIJ002247 elongation factor-1 alpha 2.3 - CPIJ002359 myomesin 30.9 3.2 CPIJ002361 sodium/solute symporter 26.5 5.3 CPIJ002406 conserved hypothetical protein 2.0 - CPIJ002882 conserved hypothetical protein 7.8 2.5 CPIJ003306 conserved hypothetical protein 1.8 12.6 CPIJ003317 conserved hypothetical protein 15.2 3.7 CPIJ003338 beta-galactosidase 101.7 3.8 CPIJ003485 cuticle protein 158.6 2.6 CPIJ004394 hypothetical protein 677.2 2.5 CPIJ004558 conserved hypothetical protein 6.2 22.0 CPIJ004600 oxidoreductase 1.5 - CPIJ004927 potassium channel kcnq 2.0 - 181 CPIJ004976 conserved hypothetical protein 5.4 5.1 CPIJ005090 conserved hypothetical protein 12.7 3.5 CPIJ005451 lysozyme 141.8 2.2 CPIJ005479 hypothetical protein 10.1 13.7 CPIJ005495 hypothetical protein 806.7 2.5 CPIJ005656 oxidoreductase 58.5 2.8 CPIJ005841 angiopoietin-1 118.2 8.2 CPIJ006076 hypodermin-B 11.5 17.0 CPIJ006150 Toll9 30.5 3.0 CPIJ006293 conserved hypothetical protein 16.5 2.3 CPIJ006294 conserved hypothetical protein 7.7 2.8 CPIJ006393 conserved hypothetical protein 6.4 - CPIJ006515 Toll9 25.6 2.5 CPIJ006516 conserved hypothetical protein 17.3 9.7 CPIJ006542 chymotrypsin-2 64.8 19.7 CPIJ006585 glycoprotein 27.6 3.5 CPIJ006588 NADH dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 6 6.5 - CPIJ007033 lipase 112.0 2.7 CPIJ007035 lipase 574.2 3.9 CPIJ007382 hypothetical protein 7.7 - CPIJ007432 sialin 6.2 2.6 CPIJ007683 adam 2.5 - CPIJ007721 hypothetical protein 995.1 2.9 CPIJ007785 conserved hypothetical protein 143.6 2.3 CPIJ007966 conserved hypothetical protein 19.0 2.3 CPIJ008031 conserved hypothetical protein 17.7 2.5 CPIJ008110 conserved hypothetical protein 15.8 2.6 CPIJ008379 conserved hypothetical protein 583.6 2.7 CPIJ008651 solute carrier family 41 23.4 2.7 CPIJ008662 conserved hypothetical protein 7.0 8.6 CPIJ008663 conserved hypothetical protein 243.3 2.8 CPIJ008807 ficolin-1 3.7 - CPIJ008858 conserved hypothetical protein 38.1 3.2 CPIJ008873 prolylcarboxypeptidase 83.0 3.5 CPIJ008904 alpha-glucosidase 24.3 2.1 CPIJ009556 serine threonine-protein kinase 4.7 - CPIJ009594 nephrosin 26.2 21.7 CPIJ009609 conserved hypothetical protein 20.7 2.6 CPIJ009683 translocator protein 106.8 2.6 182 CPIJ009726 conserved hypothetical protein 29.9 3.1 CPIJ009744 conserved hypothetical protein 38.3 2.6 CPIJ009902 predicted protein 14.3 4.8 CPIJ009929 conserved hypothetical protein 14.9 2.4 CPIJ010224 metalloproteinase 29.4 2.9 CPIJ010247 raw 14.9 2.7 CPIJ010305 CHKov1 60.2 4.4 CPIJ010426 nucleoporin 2.4 12.7 CPIJ010563 conserved hypothetical protein 2.3 - CPIJ010641 prostasin 104.0 24.2 CPIJ010699 cecropin A 374.4 2.7 CPIJ010757 conserved hypothetical protein 325.2 3.0 CPIJ010759 conserved hypothetical protein 1.4 - CPIJ010761 conserved hypothetical protein 738.5 2.8 CPIJ010934 conserved hypothetical protein 252.5 2.4 CPIJ010987 conserved hypothetical protein 2.5 3.5 CPIJ011523 conserved hypothetical protein 16.0 2.8 CPIJ012458 chromatin assembly factor 1, p180-subunit 8.8 2.6 CPIJ012571 actin 1474.9 4.4 CPIJ012573 actin 4309.3 4.8 CPIJ012574 actin 97.7 2.1 CPIJ012700 CHKov1 5.8 5.8 CPIJ012899 secreted protein 91.7 2.3 CPIJ013085 sarcalumenin 167.6 2.5 CPIJ013319 metalloproteinase 132.2 3.5 CPIJ013351 hypothetical protein 2.0 - CPIJ013355 conserved hypothetical protein 55.0 2.4 CPIJ013736 hypothetical protein 1306.7 3.1 CPIJ014184 conserved hypothetical protein 270.6 - CPIJ014236 conserved hypothetical protein 1.1 - CPIJ014523 elastase-3A 18.3 3.0 CPIJ014719 alaserpin 202.3 2.3 CPIJ014892 conserved hypothetical protein 29.5 2.4 CPIJ015171 hypothetical protein 1.5 - CPIJ015328 nesprin 30.5 3.0 CPIJ015823 conserved hypothetical protein 1.3 - CPIJ015857 NADH dehydrogenase 489.7 2.4 CPIJ016012 tryptase-2 190.8 2.2 CPIJ016374 conserved hypothetical protein 32.9 3.6 CPIJ016375 conserved hypothetical protein 3.7 - 183 CPIJ016440 dihydroceramide delta (4)-desaturase 18.9 4.1 CPIJ016762 conserved hypothetical protein 1.0 - CPIJ016914 hypothetical protein 1.6 - CPIJ017076 conserved hypothetical protein 34.4 3.0 CPIJ017149 l(2) long form 57.7 2.9 CPIJ017150 l(2) long form 30.0 2.6 CPIJ017621 conserved hypothetical protein 1.1 - CPIJ017717 conserved hypothetical protein 27.3 4.1 CPIJ017730 hypothetical protein 39.8 9.2 CPIJ018002 conserved hypothetical protein 33.5 2.1 CPIJ018092 ryanodine receptor 3, brain 9.5 2.5 CPIJ018231 carboxylesterase 81.7 3.2 CPIJ018233 carboxylesterase 5766.3 3.5 CPIJ018544 conserved hypothetical protein 5.8 20.3 CPIJ018724 conserved hypothetical protein 70.8 2.5 CPIJ018791 conserved hypothetical protein 60.3 2.9 CPIJ018967 conserved hypothetical protein 6.6 3.5 CPIJ018988 phosphatidylinositol glycan, class c 1.5 - CPIJ019007 polyserase-2 10.4 2.9 CPIJ019029 metalloproteinase 181.5 2.6 CPIJ019577 alpha-actinin 361.7 2.9 Other Unknown function Bactericidal permeability- increasing protein, BPI CPIJ020308 conserved hypothetical protein 1742.1 3.1 E set domains CPIJ002744 conserved hypothetical protein 944.9 51.0 CPIJ018825 larval serum protein 1 beta chain 1061.3 9.4 Ligand-binding domain in the NO signalling and Golgi transport CPIJ004088 guanylyl cyclase receptor 7.5 3.2 Viral proteins Retrovirus zinc finger-like domains CPIJ006202 conserved hypothetical protein 10.0 3.4 Regulation DNA-binding C2H2 and C2HC zinc fingers CPIJ004716 zinc finger protein 266 3.8 5.5 CPIJ009633 conserved hypothetical protein 7.6 3.2 CPIJ011598 zinc finger protein 2.1 3.5 CPIJ015936 hypothetical protein 2.4 - Receptor activity Chemosensory protein Csp2 CPIJ002617 chemosensory protein 1 865.9 2.3 Signal transduction Growth factor receptor domain CPIJ005087 cell wall cysteine-rich protein 16.2 2.8 DNA-binding HLH, helix-loop-helix DNA- binding domain CPIJ018167 sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 39.1 2.1 Homeodomain-like CPIJ002050 homeobox protein 21.7 2.9 184 Signal transduction Insect pheromone/odorant- binding proteins CPIJ001872 Odorant-binding protein 56a 24.7 5.0 CPIJ002108 odorant-binding protein 17.2 2.7 CPIJ002111 Odorant-binding protein 50d 28.8 4.0 CPIJ004145 predicted protein 1.9 - CPIJ009038 odorant binding protein 1 1.8 - Nicotinic receptor ligand binding domain-like CPIJ002436 neuronal acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha-2 30.1 2.5 Nuclear receptor ligand- binding domain CPIJ010249 retinoid X receptor alpha 24.6 2.5 PDZ domain-like CPIJ015336 Dlg5 protein 4.0 2.6 Kinases/phos- phatases Protein kinase-like (PK-like) CPIJ010307 conserved hypothetical protein 31.9 20.3 CPIJ010319 Juvenile hormone-inducible protein 12.6 2.7 CPIJ010324 conserved hypothetical protein 19.5 4.2 CPIJ012702 conserved hypothetical protein 32.8 2.3 CPIJ012763 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 6.3 2.7 RNA binding, m/tr RNA-binding domain, RBD CPIJ001827 conserved hypothetical protein 1.5 7.8 Signal transduction TRAF domain-like CPIJ001427 conserved hypothetical protein 28.3 2.3 CPIJ006152 conserved hypothetical protein 25.9 2.7 ?Differentially expressed genes represent those genes that differed in their expression level (FPKM) in HAmCqG8 by more than two fold when compared to the parental strain HAmCqG0. *SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html **Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.2, June 2008; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ ? Annotations for cytochrome P450 genes were taken from the most current annotation based on: Nelson, DR (2009) The Cytochrome P450 Homepage. Human Genomics 4, 59-65: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html ?NONA: Not annotated ?Fold FPKM relative to HAmCqG0 indicates the ratio of the FPKM value in HAmCqG8 divided by the FPKM value of HAmCqG0. 185 Appendix 3.4. List of genes downregulated by at least two-fold in HAmCqG8 when compared to HAmCqG0. Level of SCOP* classification Downregulated genes General function Detailed function Superfamily Gene Accession** Vectorbase annotation ? Extra-cellular processes Blood clotting Fibrinogen C-terminal domain-like CPIJ000868 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001260 fibrinogen and fibronectin CPIJ001908 fibrinogen and fibronectin CPIJ006392 fibrinogen and fibronectin CPIJ012891 scabrous protein CPIJ013288 fibrinogen and fibronectin CPIJ014543 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014544 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017657 salivary secreted angiopoietin CPIJ017837 angiopoietin 2 CPIJ017877 fibrinogen and fibronectin CPIJ018745 zinc finger protein CPIJ018858 fibrinogen and fibronectin Cell adhesion alpha-catenin/vinculin-like CPIJ005773 actin binding protein C-type lectin-like CPIJ000443 galactose-specific C-type lectin CPIJ001323 galactose-specific C-type lectin CPIJ004607 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005619 collagen alpha 1 CPIJ005984 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005987 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006092 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012139 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015742 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018154 conserved hypothetical protein Cadherin-like CPIJ017350 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018739 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018999 conserved hypothetical protein EGF/Laminin CPIJ017322 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004682 laminin subunit beta-1 CPIJ005569 neurogenic locus notch CPIJ005673 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009613 serrate protein CPIJ009614 serrate protein 186 CPIJ009802 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011761 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015361 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019124 conserved hypothetical protein FAS1 domain CPIJ003831 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004689 conserved hypothetical protein Fibronectin type III CPIJ002017 cell adhesion molecule CPIJ003912 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004128 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005092 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006893 myosin light chain kinase CPIJ008112 cell adhesion molecule CPIJ009217 roundabout 1 CPIJ014383 factor for adipocyte differentiation CPIJ014908 host cell factor C1 CPIJ018836 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020251 conserved hypothetical protein FnI-like domain CPIJ005093 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013285 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015976 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020078 conserved hypothetical protein Immunoglobulin CPIJ003910 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004966 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007299 beat protein CPIJ009084 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009950 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012166 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012499 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014508 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015510 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017558 defective proboscis extension response CPIJ018083 conserved hypothetical protein Integrin alpha N-terminal domain CPIJ005252 T-cell immunomodulatory protein CPIJ017320 integrin alpha-PS2 RNI-like CPIJ002568 f-box/leucine rich repeat protein CPIJ003404 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004460 tubulin-specific chaperone CPIJ014282 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015037 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015883 f-box/lrr protein, drome 187 CPIJ016145 predicted protein CPIJ016147 predicted protein CPIJ016518 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017031 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017284 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019360 predicted protein SEA domain CPIJ011474 conserved hypothetical protein Somatomedin B domain CPIJ000705 conserved hypothetical protein Spectrin repeat CPIJ003238 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006907 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011432 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013591 conserved hypothetical protein TSP-1 type 1 repeat CPIJ000706 conserved hypothetical protein vWA-like CPIJ004522 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4 CPIJ005333 transport protein sec23 CPIJ006690 integrin beta-PS Immune response Complement control module/SCR domain CPIJ005492 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007796 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008865 conserved hypothetical protein Tetraspanin CPIJ013906 platelet endothelial tetraspan antigen 3 CPIJ017253 conserved hypothetical protein TNF-like CPIJ011491 conserved hypothetical protein Toxins/defense AhpD-like CPIJ010665 P53 regulated pa26 nuclear protein sestrin omega toxin-like CPIJ000956 conserved hypothetical protein Scorpion toxin-like CPIJ011918 conserved hypothetical protein Snake toxin-like CPIJ011561 14.5 kDa salivary peptide CPIJ011853 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017088 activin receptor type I General General ARM repeat CPIJ006701 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1 CPIJ000004 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000739 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001288 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001478 pre-mRNA-splicing factor cwc22 CPIJ004189 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004193 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004613 importin subunit beta CPIJ004649 cell differentiation protein rcd1 CPIJ004747 smaug protein 188 CPIJ004787 FKBP12-rapamycin complex-associated protein CPIJ004900 armadillo repeat-containing protein 6 CPIJ006132 importin alpha CPIJ006316 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006702 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1 CPIJ007322 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009961 stromal antigen CPIJ010395 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012523 coatomer subunit gamma CPIJ012812 thyroid hormone receptor interactor 12 CPIJ013105 sorting nexin CPIJ013982 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014675 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018110 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018379 adaptin, alpha/gamma/epsilon CPIJ018684 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019706 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2 BRCT domain CPIJ011710 conserved hypothetical protein Calponin-homology domain, CH-domain CPIJ003234 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004533 microtubule binding protein CPIJ008540 muscle-specific protein 20 Cryptochrome/photolyase FAD-binding domain CPIJ003975 deoxyribodipyrimidine photo-lyase CPIJ009455 DNA photolyase CPIJ018859 cryptochrome 2 EF-hand CPIJ001307 predicted protein CPIJ001896 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002594 nadph oxidase CPIJ004307 supercoiling factor CPIJ005099 voltage-dependent p/q type calcium channel CPIJ008225 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009356 dynamin-associated protein CPIJ010178 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012251 troponin C CPIJ015810 calcium-binding protein E63-1 CPIJ015812 calcium-binding protein E63-1 Kelch motif CPIJ000983 actin binding protein CPIJ011586 actin binding protein CPIJ011613 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014909 host cell factor L domain-like CPIJ001272 leucine-rich transmembrane protein 189 CPIJ001895 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003386 predicted protein CPIJ003844 leucine-rich transmembrane protein CPIJ004868 leucine-rich transmembrane protein CPIJ005354 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006822 leucine-rich transmembrane protein CPIJ011783 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012832 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013310 adenylate cyclase CPIJ013854 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015804 reticulon/nogo receptor CPIJ016693 ras suppressor protein 1 CPIJ016806 leucine rich repeat protein CPIJ017602 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018453 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018876 leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 24 CPIJ019625 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019816 conserved hypothetical protein Spermadhesin, CUB domain CPIJ003741 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015617 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018283 conserved hypothetical protein Transthyretin (synonym: prealbumin) CPIJ014057 conserved hypothetical protein Ubiquitin-like CPIJ002389 transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 2 CPIJ003604 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007098 ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 CPIJ011014 peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase COOH-terminal interactor protein-1 CPIJ011765 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014686 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019167 peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase COOH-terminal interactor protein-1 WD40 repeat-like CPIJ000633 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001314 WD repeat protein 46 CPIJ001915 WD repeat domain 50 CPIJ002199 vesicle associated protein CPIJ002451 WD repeat protein 57 CPIJ003096 WD repeat protein 7 CPIJ003211 WD repeat protein 51B CPIJ003605 vacuolar membrane protein pep11 CPIJ004561 pleiotropic regulator 1 190 CPIJ005067 G protein beta subunit CPIJ005486 autophagy-specific gene 18 CPIJ006095 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006523 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007014 splicing factor 3B subunit 3 CPIJ007402 guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta 1 CPIJ009226 groucho protein CPIJ009392 nucleoporin Nup43 CPIJ009985 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010477 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010919 will die slowly CPIJ011032 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011061 WD repeat protein 51A CPIJ011261 cell cycle control protein cwf8 CPIJ011322 mediator complex, 95kD-subunit CPIJ011395 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013687 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013831 WD repeat-containing protein srw1 CPIJ014207 elongator complex protein 2 CPIJ014657 vesicle associated protein CPIJ015003 predicted protein CPIJ015347 receptor for activated protein kinase C CPIJ015352 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015911 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017007 vesicle associated protein CPIJ017534 serine-threonine kinase receptor-associated protein CPIJ017825 wd-repeat protein CPIJ018264 will die slowly CPIJ018766 WD repeat domain phosphoinositide-interacting protein 2 CPIJ019808 receptor for activated protein kinase C CPIJ020009 wd-repeat protein Ion binding Amyloid beta a4 protein copper binding domain (domain 2) CPIJ008559 conserved hypothetical protein ArfGap/RecO-like zinc finger CPIJ002305 arf GTPase-activating protein CPIJ008955 arf GTPase-activating protein CPIJ010923 conserved hypothetical protein B-box zinc-binding domain CPIJ015175 predicted protein Ligand binding GYF domain CPIJ001658 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010290 CD2 antigen cytoplasmic tail-binding protein 2 191 Protein interaction Ankyrin repeat CPIJ000121 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000884 DNA-binding protein rfxank CPIJ001854 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002709 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004774 developmental protein cactus CPIJ004983 ga binding protein beta chain CPIJ006925 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006926 phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12b CPIJ009794 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010734 sex-determining protein fem-1 CPIJ013520 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014438 sex-determining protein fem-1 CPIJ015938 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017182 forked protein CPIJ018599 transient receptor potential channel CPIJ018744 ankyrin 2,3/unc44 BAG domain CPIJ002809 conserved hypothetical protein BAR/IMD domain-like CPIJ002500 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007107 insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate CPIJ011282 islet cell autoantigen 1 CPIJ017697 endophilin b Dimerization-anchoring domain of cAMP-dependent PK regulatory subunit CPIJ004553 predicted protein CPIJ015945 conserved hypothetical protein F-box domain CPIJ000909 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006380 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017453 transmembrane protein 183 Hemopexin-like domain CPIJ001428 matrix metalloproteinase CPIJ010856 matrix metalloproteinase HIV integrase-binding domain CPIJ003093 hepatoma-derived GF IP3 receptor type 1 binding core, domain 2 CPIJ012217 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor POZ domain CPIJ001236 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001455 ankyrin repeat and BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 2 CPIJ001669 BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 7 CPIJ003990 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005014 BTB/POZ and Kelch domain-containing protein CPIJ005696 serine-enriched protein CPIJ007217 speckle-type poz protein CPIJ007547 conserved hypothetical protein 192 CPIJ008271 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009395 speckle-type poz protein CPIJ009648 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012486 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012629 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013200 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013368 microtubule binding protein CPIJ013627 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016082 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017663 leucine-zipper-like transcriptional regulator 1 CPIJ018109 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018129 conserved hypothetical protein SNARE-like CPIJ009504 clathrin coat assembly protein AP17 CPIJ013281 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017540 coatomer subunit delta SWIB/MDM2 domain CPIJ019141 brg-1 associated factor CPIJ019147 brg-1 associated factor TPR-like CPIJ001441 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit CPIJ002036 transmembrane and TPR repeat-containing protein CPIJ003799 suppressor of forked CPIJ004405 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005156 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008245 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008355 transmembrane protein 1/tmem1b CPIJ010925 heat shock protein 70 CPIJ011544 tetratricopeptide repeat domain 21B CPIJ017131 prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunit alpha-1 CPIJ019076 tetratricopeptide repeat protein 15 UBA-like CPIJ006055 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011493 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012192 conserved hypothetical protein Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, VASP, tetramerisation domain CPIJ004707 vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein WW domain CPIJ000289 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000291 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004712 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013704 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014839 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019077 conserved hypothetical protein FAD/NAD(P)-binding domain CPIJ001215 alcohol dehydrogenase 193 CPIJ001367 glucose dehydrogenase CPIJ002196 lysine-specific histone demethylase CPIJ002643 CDNA sequence CPIJ005552 thioredoxin reductase 1, mitochondrial CPIJ007619 glucose dehydrogenase CPIJ007625 alcohol dehydrogenase CPIJ009583 glucose dehydrogenase CPIJ010620 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010669 rab protein geranylgeranyltransferase component A 1 CPIJ013724 dimethylaniline monooxygenase CPIJ013725 dimethylaniline monooxygenase CPIJ017482 choline dehydrogenase CPIJ017488 glucose dehydrogenase CPIJ017490 glucose dehydrogenase CPIJ017491 glucose dehydrogenase Glutathione S-transferase (GST), C-terminal domain CPIJ002660 glutathione-s-transferase theta, gst CPIJ002680 glutathione S-transferase CPIJ003988 prostaglandin E synthase 2 CPIJ014051 glutathione-s-transferase theta, gst CPIJ014053 glutathione-s-transferase theta, gst CPIJ018524 prostaglandin E synthase 2 CPIJ018633 glutathione-s-transferase theta NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold domains CPIJ016763 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ000400 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase CPIJ000841 dimeric dihydrodiol dehydrogenase CPIJ003056 hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase CPIJ003801 NADP-dependent leukotriene B4 12-hydroxydehydrogenase CPIJ003837 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ004391 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 CPIJ004392 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 2 CPIJ005892 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006479 3-hydroxyacyl-coa dehyrogenase CPIJ007225 3-ketodihydrosphingosine reductase CPIJ007244 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 CPIJ007245 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 CPIJ011767 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ013219 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase type 2 CPIJ014059 NADP-dependent leukotriene B4 12-hydroxydehydrogenase CPIJ014121 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ014122 dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 8 194 CPIJ014580 dimeric dihydrodiol dehydrogenase CPIJ015671 glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase CPIJ015685 3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase CPIJ016656 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ016657 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ016719 alcohol dehydrogenase 1 CPIJ016777 hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial CPIJ017297 quinone oxidoreductase CPIJ017713 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ018318 short-chain dehydrogenase CPIJ019137 dihydropteridine reductase CPIJ019281 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019362 dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 8 CPIJ019941 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019942 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020005 UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase 1 Nucleotide-binding domain CPIJ002817 d-amino acid oxidase CPIJ007272 d-amino acid oxidase CPIJ007273 d-amino acid oxidase Obg GTP-binding protein N-terminal domain CPIJ005917 Spo0B-associated GTP-binding protein P-loop containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases CPIJ014210 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000310 heparan sulfate 2-o-sulfotransferase CPIJ000320 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000874 carbohydrate sulfotransferase CPIJ000964 chromosome-associated kinesin KIF4A CPIJ001058 ADP-ribosylation factor CPIJ001311 multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 CPIJ001383 kinesin-like protein KIF3A CPIJ001540 abc transporter CPIJ001695 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001702 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001756 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001842 translation initiation factor IF-2, mitochondrial CPIJ001988 ATP-dependent RNA helicase A CPIJ002335 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX51 CPIJ003150 vesicular-fusion protein Nsf1 CPIJ003814 cell cycle checkpoint protein rad17 CPIJ003934 RNA helicase CPIJ003935 ATP-dependent RNA helicase p62 CPIJ004665 chromodomain helicase-DNA-binding protein 3 195 CPIJ004980 ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 3 CPIJ005169 ras-related protein Rab-10 CPIJ005172 GTP-binding protein CPIJ005340 ATP-binding cassette transporter CPIJ005341 abc transporter CPIJ005366 GTP-binding protein yptV1 CPIJ005545 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007064 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007231 translation elongation factor CPIJ007588 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007795 guanylate kinase CPIJ007814 myosin iii CPIJ007889 abc transporter CPIJ008104 ras-related protein Rab-39B CPIJ008284 canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1 CPIJ008677 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008800 ATP-dependent protease La CPIJ008893 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008983 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DBP8 CPIJ009005 ATP-dependent DNA helicase MER3 CPIJ009065 ras-related protein Rab-9 CPIJ009089 ras-related protein Rab-7 CPIJ009531 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009998 transcriptional regulator ATRX CPIJ010194 ras-related protein CPIJ010818 GTP-binding protein alpha subunit, gna CPIJ010888 origin recognition complex subunit 1 CPIJ010998 werner helicase interacting protein CPIJ011002 bile salt sulfotransferase 1 CPIJ011328 GTP:AMP phosphotransferase mitochondrial CPIJ011521 mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S29 CPIJ011567 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011830 serine protease CPIJ012284 abc transporter CPIJ012364 abc transporter CPIJ012365 ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 4 CPIJ012510 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX24 CPIJ012512 ATP-dependent RNA helicase p62 CPIJ012614 sulfotransferase 1A1 CPIJ012621 ATP-dependent RNA helicase Ddx1 196 CPIJ013250 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013393 mitochondrial chaperone BCS1 CPIJ013525 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013876 DNA polymerase theta CPIJ014038 DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 57 CPIJ014142 nucleotide-binding protein 1 CPIJ014150 ATP-binding cassette sub-family F member 3 CPIJ014305 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014361 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014443 ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 4 CPIJ014693 transcriptional regulator ATRX CPIJ014902 CDC42 CPIJ015682 translation initiation factor if-2 CPIJ015769 myosin vi CPIJ015845 elongation factor tu CPIJ015898 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016097 peroxisomal membrane protein 70 abcd3 CPIJ016664 CTP synthase CPIJ016808 ribosome biogenesis protein CPIJ017203 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017338 DEAD box ATP-dependent RNA helicase CPIJ017393 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017570 myosin IB heavy chain CPIJ017886 ATP-dependent RNA helicase CPIJ018454 chromosome-associated kinesin KIF4A CPIJ018540 hypothetical protein CPIJ019196 DEAD box ATP-dependent RNA helicase CPIJ019594 chromosome transmission fidelity protein 18 CPIJ019631 kinesin heavy chain CPIJ019640 conserved hypothetical protein PEBP-like CPIJ003429 brother of ft and tfl1 CPIJ008654 phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein Information Chromatin structure NAP-like CPIJ015455 nucleosome assembly protein CPIJ015773 nucleosome assembly protein DNA replication/rep air Chromo domain-like CPIJ007340 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014352 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019929 conserved hypothetical protein 197 DNA polymerase III clamp loader subunits, C-terminal domain CPIJ017857 ATPase WRNIP1 DNA/RNA polymerases CPIJ007351 terminal deoxycytidyl transferase rev1 CPIJ012266 DNA polymerase subunit gamma 1, mitochondrial CPIJ015260 DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit DNase I-like CPIJ006698 type I inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate 5-phosphatase CPIJ008163 skeletal muscle/kidney enriched inositol 5-phosphatase CPIJ012006 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019984 sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2 FYVE/PHD zinc finger CPIJ001881 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002025 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004116 zinc finger FYVE domain-containing protein 28 CPIJ006170 CpG-binding protein CPIJ009232 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009396 inhibitor of growth protein 3 CPIJ011285 fetal alzheimer antigen, falz CPIJ013376 phd finger protein CPIJ013847 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014289 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015635 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016701 inhibitor of growth protein 1 His-Me finger endonucleases CPIJ002289 deoxyribonuclease I CPIJ006433 caspase-activated nuclease HRDC-like CPIJ009943 conserved hypothetical protein Nucleic acid-binding proteins CPIJ003130 replication factor A, 14kD-subunit CPIJ004582 mitochondrial ribosomal protein S17 CPIJ005206 DNA-directed RNA polymeraseI CPIJ005868 multisynthetase complex auxiliary component p43 CPIJ006691 insect replication protein a CPIJ008535 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019290 DNA ligase 4 Nudix CPIJ014785 mitochondrial ribosomal protein, L46 Restriction endonuclease-like CPIJ019123 conserved hypothetical protein RING/U-box CPIJ015192 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001165 ubiquitin conjugation factor E4 A CPIJ001468 RING-box protein 1a CPIJ003711 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCH6 CPIJ004515 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004519 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005021 vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 18 198 CPIJ005056 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005135 peroxisome assembly factor 1 CPIJ006036 ring finger protein CPIJ006232 rolling pebbles CPIJ007831 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010005 RING finger protein 126-B CPIJ010511 hypothetical protein CPIJ010577 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010613 zinc finger protein CPIJ011856 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCH5 CPIJ012808 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014265 zinc and ring finger 2 CPIJ015415 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016043 autocrine motility factor receptor CPIJ016186 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016790 zinc finger protein CPIJ017375 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017992 conserved hypothetical protein Tudor/PWWP/MBT CPIJ003208 predicted protein CPIJ005604 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012664 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014035 conserved hypothetical protein RNA processing EPT/RTPC-like CPIJ009234 RNA 3'-terminal phosphate cyclase Eukaryotic type KH-domain (KH-domain type I) CPIJ002909 far upstream binding protein CPIJ010419 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010634 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011349 igf2 mRNA binding protein CPIJ014324 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015571 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein CPIJ018107 zinc finger protein PAP/OAS1 substrate-binding domain CPIJ011744 poly a polymerase CPIJ015488 sigma DNA polymerase RNase III domain-like CPIJ007416 ribonuclease iii CPIJ008368 39S ribosomal protein L44 CPIJ013579 ribonuclease iii Translin CPIJ011089 translin associated factor x CPIJ011091 translin associated factor x Transcription beta and beta-prime subunits of DNA dependent RNA-polymerase CPIJ002457 DNA-directed RNA polymerase I 135 kDa polypeptide 199 CPIJ018338 DNA-directed RNA polymerase I largest subunit CYTH-like phosphatases CPIJ009805 conserved hypothetical protein occludin/ELL-like CPIJ004404 conserved hypothetical protein RBP11-like subunits of RNA polymerase CPIJ005304 DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit J TATA-box binding protein-like CPIJ007600 TATA-box-binding protein Translation Anticodon-binding domain of a subclass of class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases CPIJ019163 conserved hypothetical protein Class II aaRS ABD-related CPIJ007439 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011030 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017958 conserved hypothetical protein EF-Tu/eEF-1alpha/eIF2-gamma C-terminal domain CPIJ000412 elongation factor-1 alpha CPIJ005761 elongation factor 1-alpha CPIJ006444 elongation factor 1-alpha CPIJ009508 elongation factor 1 alpha eIF1-like CPIJ009942 density-regulated protein CPIJ013497 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1b eIF4e-like CPIJ012031 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4e type Elongation factor TFIIS domain 2 CPIJ013846 conserved hypothetical protein Elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts), dimerisation domain CPIJ004698 elongation factor ts L21p-like CPIJ015639 39S ribosomal protein L21, mitochondrial L27 domain CPIJ009529 membrane-associated guanylate kinase L30e-like CPIJ005818 13 kDa ribonucleoprotein-associated protein L35p-like CPIJ019136 39S ribosomal protein L35, mitochondrial L9 N-domain-like CPIJ013282 39S ribosomal protein L9, mitochondrial Prokaryotic ribosomal protein L17 CPIJ008935 39S ribosomal protein L17, mitochondrial Prokaryotic type KH domain (KH-domain type II) CPIJ013400 ribosomal protein S3 CPIJ016018 ribosomal protein S3 Release factor CPIJ019188 peptide chain release factor 1 Ribosomal L11/L12e N-terminal domain CPIJ013673 39S ribosomal protein L11, mitochondrial Ribosomal protein L16p/L10e CPIJ012999 serrate protein CPIJ009291 60S ribosomal protein L10 CPIJ017073 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018417 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018847 60S ribosomal protein L10 Ribosomal protein L20 CPIJ010000 39S ribosomal protein L20, mitochondrial Ribosomal protein L29 (L29p) CPIJ010482 hypothetical protein Ribosomal protein L30p/L7e CPIJ011578 mitochondrial ribosomal protein L30 CPIJ012743 60S ribosomal protein L7 CPIJ017899 tetratricopeptide repeat protein, tpr Ribosomal protein L36 CPIJ009257 mitochondrial ribosomal protein L36 200 Ribosomal protein S10 CPIJ011818 Ded1-like DEAD-box RNA helicase CPIJ017617 40S ribosomal protein S20 CPIJ018278 40S ribosomal protein S20 CPIJ018511 40S ribosomal protein S20 Ribosomal protein S16 CPIJ009237 28S ribosomal protein S16 Ribosomal protein S18 CPIJ002644 28S ribosomal protein S18b, mitochondrial Ribosomal protein S3 C-terminal domain CPIJ015427 40S ribosomal protein S3 Ribosomal protein S5 domain 2-like CPIJ008237 40S ribosomal protein S2 CPIJ013104 40S ribosomal protein S2 CPIJ016812 40S ribosomal protein S2 CPIJ018157 exosome complex exonuclease RRP46 CPIJ018280 conserved hypothetical protein Ribosomal protein S6 CPIJ007632 mitochondrial 28S ribosomal protein S6 Ribosomal proteins L15p and L18e CPIJ012021 60S ribosomal protein L18 Ribosome inactivating proteins (RIP) CPIJ009211 conserved hypothetical protein Second domain of FERM CPIJ017573 focal adhesion kinase Sm-like ribonucleoproteins CPIJ005588 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein SM D3 CPIJ006616 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated protein B CPIJ017424 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein E ThrRS/AlaRS common domain CPIJ015553 alanyl-tRNA synthetase domain-containing protein 1 Translation initiation factor 2 beta, aIF2beta, N-terminal domain CPIJ013860 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit beta Translation proteins CPIJ007631 elongation factor-1 alpha CPIJ009557 elongation factor 1 alpha CPIJ015678 conserved hypothetical protein Translation proteins SH3-like domain CPIJ008796 39S ribosomal protein L2, mitochondrial CPIJ019257 39S ribosomal protein L19, mitochondrial Translational machinery components CPIJ000042 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ000487 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000875 40S ribosomal protein S14-A CPIJ002488 40S ribosomal protein S14-B CPIJ002871 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ003216 40S ribosomal protein S14-B CPIJ003943 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ006101 40S ribosomal protein S14-A CPIJ007174 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ008067 40S ribosomal protein S14-A CPIJ009287 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010252 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ010640 predicted protein 201 CPIJ011289 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ011697 40S ribosomal protein S141 CPIJ012110 40S ribosomal protein S14-A CPIJ013076 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ013802 40S ribosomal protein S14-2 CPIJ014959 40S ribosomal protein S14-A CPIJ015991 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016597 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ017293 40S ribosomal protein S14 CPIJ018446 40S ribosomal protein S14-B Zn-binding ribosomal proteins CPIJ014045 39S ribosomal protein L32, mitochondrial Intra-cellular processes Cell cycle, Apoptosis CAD & PB1 domains CPIJ008787 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020175 conserved hypothetical protein Cell cycle regulatory proteins CPIJ006105 cyclin-dependent kinaseregulatory subunit 1 Cullin homology domain CPIJ003980 anaphase-promoting complex subunit 2 Cystine-knot cytokines CPIJ000272 Sptzle 2 CPIJ000273 sptzle 2 CPIJ001752 sptzle 3A CPIJ002281 sptzle 6 CPIJ012748 conserved hypothetical protein DEATH domain CPIJ010093 netrin receptor unc5 CPIJ010503 ankyrin 2,3/unc44 Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) repeat CPIJ006918 conserved hypothetical protein RCC1/BLIP-II CPIJ011645 hyperplastic discs protein CPIJ015298 regulator of chromosome condensation Rhodanese/Cell cycle control phosphatase CPIJ001662 M-phase inducer phosphatase 2 CPIJ013880 heat shock protein 67B2 Cell motility Actin depolymerizing proteins CPIJ007823 glial maturation factor CPIJ015839 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019500 conserved hypothetical protein Actin-crosslinking proteins CPIJ013211 conserved hypothetical protein DLC CPIJ015622 dynein light chain 1, cytoplasmic-like protein CPIJ015623 predicted protein Formin homology 2 domain (FH2 domain) CPIJ003134 formin 1,2/cappuccino CPIJ006609 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007323 formin 3 I/LWEQ domain CPIJ004416 huntingtin interacting protein Myosin rod fragments CPIJ014522 lava lamp protein CPIJ017450 mushroom body defect protein 202 Outer arm dynein light chain 1 CPIJ012834 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015679 conserved hypothetical protein Tropomyosin CPIJ001763 Ofd1 protein CPIJ005452 M-type 9 protein Tubulin nucleotide-binding domain-like CPIJ003263 tubulin beta chain CPIJ011550 tubulin alpha-2 chain CPIJ017383 tubulin alpha-1 chain Ion m/tr Band 7/SPFH domain CPIJ001131 erythrocyte band 7 integral membrane protein Calcium ATPase, transmembrane domain M CPIJ001884 cation-transporting ATPase 13a1 CPIJ005964 Na+/K+ ATPase alpha subunit CPIJ005965 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013541 conserved hypothetical protein Clc chloride channel CPIJ004937 chloride channel protein 3 Cupredoxins CPIJ010466 laccase-like multicopper oxidase 1 CPIJ012244 multicopper oxidase CPIJ012357 multicopper oxidase CPIJ016802 laccase-like multicopper oxidase 1 CPIJ020002 multicopper oxidase Ferritin-like CPIJ003762 coenzyme q10 biosynthesis protein HMA, heavy metal-associated domain CPIJ015637 antioxidant enzyme MFS general substrate transporter CPIJ000765 monocarboxylate transporter CPIJ000988 sugar transporter CPIJ001970 organic anion transporter CPIJ001971 solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 3A1 CPIJ001972 organic anion transporter CPIJ002124 hippocampus abundant 1 protein CPIJ002172 oligopeptide transporter CPIJ003413 UNC93A protein CPIJ003611 sugar transporter CPIJ004177 sodium-dependent phosphate transporter CPIJ005445 glucose transporter CPIJ006419 monocarboxylate transporter CPIJ007434 sodium/phosphate cotransporter CPIJ008117 monocarboxylate transporter CPIJ008119 monocarboxylate transporter CPIJ008274 monocarboxylate transporter 3 CPIJ008344 sugar transporter CPIJ008424 integral membrane protein efflux protein efpA CPIJ008947 sugar transporter CPIJ008948 sugar transporter 203 CPIJ011542 synaptic vesicle protein CPIJ011543 proton-associated sugar transporter A CPIJ012022 organic cation/carnitine transporter 1 CPIJ014358 organic cation transporter CPIJ015155 adenylate cyclase CPIJ015621 cis,cis-muconate transport protein MucK CPIJ015630 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017354 adenylate cyclase CPIJ017478 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018460 mfs transporter CPIJ018461 mfs transporter CPIJ019487 organic cation transporter CPIJ019488 organic cation transporter CPIJ019562 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019820 sugar transporter Multidrug resistance efflux transporter EmrE CPIJ009014 UDP-N-acetylglucosamine transporter CPIJ010400 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017962 conserved hypothetical protein Neurotransmitter-gated ion-channel transmembrane pore CPIJ006949 histamine-gated chloride channel subunit CPIJ007636 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010616 conserved hypothetical protein Periplasmic binding protein-like II CPIJ006667 glutamate receptor CPIJ007989 porphobilinogen deaminase CPIJ010822 conserved hypothetical protein SET domain CPIJ008357 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010143 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013516 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013517 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013971 Mll1 protein CPIJ015254 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016652 histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETDB1 CPIJ018501 conserved hypothetical protein Voltage-gated potassium channels CPIJ000215 sodium-and chloride-activated ATP-sensitive potassium channel CPIJ000749 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001990 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005769 calcium-activated potassium channel alpha chain CPIJ010846 potassium channel subfamily K member 9 CPIJ017948 voltage and ligand gated potassium channel Phospholipid CRAL/TRIO domain CPIJ001389 conserved hypothetical protein 204 m/tr CPIJ005816 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein CPIJ008515 cellular retinaldehyde binding protein CPIJ008920 tyrosine phosphatase n9 CPIJ009578 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein CPIJ013463 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013464 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013472 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013592 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013676 cellular retinaldehyde binding protein CPIJ014217 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein CPIJ014225 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein CPIJ016765 ganglioside induced differentiation associated protein CPIJ018183 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018213 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein CRAL/TRIO N-terminal domain CPIJ013466 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014222 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein CPIJ018181 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018184 conserved hypothetical protein Phospholipase A2, PLA2 CPIJ001437 phospholipase A2 CPIJ011154 secretory Phospholipase A2 CPIJ011155 secretory Phospholipase A2 CPIJ019557 conserved hypothetical protein PLC-like phosphodiesterases CPIJ008722 conserved hypothetical protein Proteases BPTI-like CPIJ004215 conserved hypothetical protein ClpP/crotonase CPIJ002685 enoyl-CoA hydratase ECHA12 CPIJ005435 peroxisomal 3,2-trans-enoyl-CoA isomerase CPIJ009999 methylcrotonoyl-CoA carboxylase beta chain, mitochondrial CPIJ013793 cuticle protein 8 CPIJ020263 fatty acid oxidation complex subunit alpha Creatinase/aminopeptidase CPIJ011945 methionine aminopeptidase 2 CPIJ020069 methionine aminopeptidase 2 CPIJ006323 xaa-Pro aminopeptidase 1 CPIJ014907 xaa-pro dipeptidase Cystatin/monellin CPIJ002770 cystatin-like protein CPIJ002771 cystatin-like protein Cysteine proteinases CPIJ000133 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000575 oryzain gamma chain CPIJ003218 ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 22 CPIJ004347 Autophagy-specific protein 205 CPIJ005164 ubiquitin specific proteinase CPIJ005165 ubiquitin specific proteinase CPIJ005440 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007009 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010867 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013438 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014293 ubiquitin specific protease 2 CPIJ014687 ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 14 CPIJ014690 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015776 OTU domain-containing protein 6B CPIJ016134 ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 64E DPP6 N-terminal domain-like CPIJ008362 DET1 protein Elafin-like CPIJ006214 salivary cysteine-rich peptide CPIJ019874 salivary cysteine-rich peptide HSP40/DnaJ peptide-binding domain CPIJ006891 tumorous imaginal discs, mitochondrial Kazal-type serine protease inhibitors CPIJ011189 predicted protein LuxS/MPP-like metallohydrolase CPIJ001880 mitochondrial-processing peptidase alpha subunit CPIJ019576 mitochondrial-processing peptidase subunit beta Metallo-dependent phosphatases CPIJ000169 sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase CPIJ001371 serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit CPIJ004547 lariat debranching enzyme CPIJ009664 purple acid phosphatase Metalloproteases ("zincins"), catalytic domain CPIJ001052 aminopeptidase 2, mitochondrial CPIJ001462 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001808 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005931 ADAM 17 CPIJ006295 protease m1 zinc metalloprotease CPIJ011458 aminopeptidase N CPIJ012680 ADAM 12 CPIJ013386 zinc metalloproteinase nas-14 CPIJ014660 protease m1 zinc metalloprotease CPIJ017830 conserved hypothetical protein PMP inhibitors CPIJ010990 pacifastin light chain Protease propeptides/inhibitors CPIJ016547 proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 4, furin Rhomboid-like CPIJ003969 stem cell tumor CPIJ014344 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014350 transmembrane protein 115 CPIJ015372 rhomboid protein 1, mitochondrial Serpins CPIJ000915 serpin B3 CPIJ005227 serine protease inhibitor 206 CPIJ010186 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012016 serine protease inhibitor, serpin CPIJ016299 serine protease inhibitor, serpin CPIJ017784 serpin B8 Subtilisin-like CPIJ013852 tripeptidyl-peptidase 2 CPIJ015180 proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 4, furin CPIJ015181 proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 4, furin Thyroglobulin type-1 domain CPIJ001687 conserved hypothetical protein Trypsin-like serine proteases CPIJ000593 coagulation factor XI CPIJ001059 serine protease CPIJ001060 coagulation factor XI CPIJ001099 serine protease CPIJ001107 serine protease 27 CPIJ001109 serine protease CPIJ001983 trypsin 5G1 CPIJ002490 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002491 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002531 serine protease CPIJ004037 serine protease CPIJ004038 clip-domain serine protease CPIJ004091 trypsin eta CPIJ004093 coagulation factor XI CPIJ004094 serine protease CPIJ004095 serine protease CPIJ004304 serine protease CPIJ004990 serine protease1/2 CPIJ005480 serine protease CPIJ005904 anionic trypsin-2 CPIJ006226 serine protease CPIJ006544 chymotrypsinogen 2 CPIJ006568 chymotrypsin 1 CPIJ006869 mast cell protease 3 CPIJ008062 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008523 serine-type enodpeptidase CPIJ008567 serine protease CPIJ008568 serine protease CPIJ009113 chymotrypsin BI CPIJ009142 coagulation factor VII CPIJ009480 tryptase gamma CPIJ009592 serine-type enodpeptidase 207 CPIJ009624 serine protease CPIJ009792 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009890 serine proteinase stubble CPIJ009891 serine protease CPIJ009893 serine protease CPIJ009894 serine protease CPIJ010297 coagulation factor X CPIJ010615 proclotting enzyme CPIJ011477 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012017 serine protease CPIJ013043 chymotrypsin A CPIJ013044 anionic trypsin CPIJ013362 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013396 urokinase-type plasminogen activator CPIJ013616 trypsin 5 CPIJ015405 serine protease CPIJ016103 serine protease CPIJ016220 serine protease CPIJ017794 220 kDa silk protein CPIJ017797 neurohypophysial hormones CPIJ017798 serine protease CPIJ017990 serine protease1/2 CPIJ018529 trypsin 1 CPIJ019031 chymotrypsin BII CPIJ019291 serine protease htra2 CPIJ019781 trypsin 1 CPIJ019952 serine protease CPIJ020116 conserved hypothetical protein Zn-dependent exopeptidases CPIJ001174 plasma glutamate carboxypeptidase CPIJ009394 zinc carboxypeptidase CPIJ009466 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010806 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012908 glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase CPIJ015253 zinc carboxypeptidase A 1 CPIJ019695 plasma glutamate carboxypeptidase CPIJ019890 carboxypeptidase D Protein modification ATPase domain of HSP90 chaperone/DNA topoisomerase II/histidine kinase CPIJ011247 heat shock protein 82 Chaperone J-domain CPIJ007923 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008583 DnaJ domain containing protein 208 CPIJ011412 M-phase phosphoprotein 11 CPIJ017724 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018848 mitochondrial protein import protein MAS5 Cyclophilin-like CPIJ004991 peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase CPIJ011947 peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 10 CPIJ016592 peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase CPIJ020068 peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase cyp8 FKBP-like CPIJ011777 FK506-binding protein 2 CPIJ014691 FK506-binding protein 59 CPIJ014950 FK506-binding protein CPIJ014951 conserved hypothetical protein GroEL equatorial domain-like CPIJ008889 60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial CPIJ018780 ribosomal protein S6 GroES-like CPIJ000840 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007228 heat shock protein CPIJ017296 conserved hypothetical protein Hect, E3 ligase catalytic domain CPIJ004914 ubiquitin-protein ligase CPIJ011644 ubiquitin-protein ligase CPIJ012813 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017821 hect type E3 ubiquitin ligase HSP20-like chaperones CPIJ005642 heat shock protein 27 CPIJ005645 heat shock protein 22 CPIJ007348 nuclear movement protein nudC CPIJ013743 integrin beta-1-binding protein 2 CPIJ019282 NudC domain containing 1 CPIJ019713 chaperone binding protein Peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase CPIJ005204 peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase msrA CPIJ018565 peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase Prefoldin CPIJ004062 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008888 conserved hypothetical protein Tubulin chaperone cofactor A CPIJ003559 tubulin-specific chaperone A UBC-like CPIJ004186 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme morgue CPIJ005149 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 i CPIJ005316 RWD domain-containing protein 4A CPIJ006567 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-17 kDa CPIJ007408 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme m CPIJ007726 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 Q2 CPIJ009955 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 CPIJ011320 Ufm1-conjugating enzyme 1 CPIJ013524 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 g 209 CPIJ014766 nedd8-conjugating enzyme nce2 Transport ABC transporter transmembrane region CPIJ011959 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011961 multidrug resistance protein 2 Aquaporin-like CPIJ016447 aquaporin transporter Cap-Gly domain CPIJ003549 150 kDa dynein-associated polypeptide CBS-domain CPIJ006251 AMPK-gamma subunit ENTH/VHS domain CPIJ000451 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001186 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001538 hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate CPIJ002094 liquid facets CPIJ010606 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012987 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014748 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019897 phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein Glycolipid transfer protein, GLTP CPIJ010828 conserved hypothetical protein LDL receptor-like module CPIJ004357 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014258 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016346 conserved hypothetical protein Lipocalins CPIJ015727 apolipoprotein D CPIJ015728 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017615 apolipoprotein D Mitochondrial carrier CPIJ002253 mitochondrial carnitine/acylcarnitine carrier protein CPIJ006475 mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate/malate carrier protein CPIJ001256 mitochondrial uncoupling protein CPIJ001257 mitochondrial uncoupling protein CPIJ005941 ADP,ATP carrier protein 2 CPIJ007010 peroxisomal membrane protein pmp34 CPIJ007454 small calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier CPIJ008580 mitochondrial carrier protein CPIJ011555 mitochondrial carrier protein CPIJ012095 mitochondrial carrier protein CPIJ012803 folate carrier protein CPIJ013684 Mitochondrial glutamate carrier CPIJ013697 tricarboxylate transport protein, mitochondrial CPIJ016473 mitochondrial solute carrier protein CPIJ016474 mitochondrial solute carrier protein CPIJ019834 mitochondrial carnitine/acylcarnitine carrier protein CPIJ020183 folate carrier protein Multidrug efflux transporter AcrB transmembrane domain CPIJ002969 conserved hypothetical protein 210 CPIJ011712 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019195 conserved hypothetical protein NTF2-like CPIJ001995 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005154 nuclear transport factor 2 Nucleoporin domain CPIJ009141 nuclear pore complex protein nup214 Phoshotransferase/anion transport protein CPIJ005835 sodium bicarbonate cotransporter Preprotein translocase SecY subunit CPIJ002966 transport protein Sec61 subunit alpha 2 Sec1/munc18-like (SM) proteins CPIJ007221 vacuolar protein sorting-associated Second domain of Mu2 adaptin subunit (ap50) of ap2 adaptor CPIJ003697 clathrin coat assembly protein AP50 CPIJ009776 AP-2 complex subunit mu SNARE fusion complex CPIJ007395 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009959 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010472 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011681 synaptosomal-associated protein 29 Metabolism Amino acids m/tr SRP19 CPIJ012130 conserved hypothetical protein Alanine racemase C-terminal domain-like CPIJ010687 ornithine decarboxylase Arginase/deacetylase CPIJ011847 histone deacetylase CPIJ019172 histone deacetylase Glutaminase/Asparaginase CPIJ008684 l-asparaginase i L-aspartase-like CPIJ002702 adenylosuccinate lyase PLP-binding barrel CPIJ008556 ornithine decarboxylase CPIJ010688 ornithine decarboxylase Carbohydrate m/tr Tryptophan synthase beta subunit-like PLP-dependent enzymes CPIJ011197 threonine dehydratase/deaminase (Trans)glycosidases CPIJ002066 alpha-galactosidase A CPIJ003944 brain chitinase and chia CPIJ004564 brain chitinase and chia CPIJ008532 glycoside hydrolase CPIJ011854 CD98hc amino acid transporter protein CPIJ012134 brain chitinase and chia CPIJ013476 chitooligosaccharidolytic beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase CPIJ014063 glycoside hydrolase CPIJ015627 alpha-N-acetyl glucosaminidase CPIJ018222 alpha-amylase B Aldolase CPIJ006003 delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase Carbohydrate phosphatase CPIJ016359 myo inositol monophosphatase Galactose-binding domain-like CPIJ003832 thioredoxin family Trp26 CPIJ008825 conserved hypothetical protein 211 CPIJ011079 discoidin domain receptor CPIJ014812 eph receptor tyrosine kinase HIT-like CPIJ005586 histidine triad protein member Invertebrate chitin-binding proteins CPIJ016342 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000248 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000681 obstractor B CPIJ003955 predicted protein CPIJ004334 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004728 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006133 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007317 chitin binding protein CPIJ007603 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007661 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007662 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008466 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008502 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008558 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009078 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009407 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009969 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011482 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012138 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012316 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012665 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013980 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014180 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014194 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014195 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014197 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014267 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015173 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015174 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015734 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016344 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018321 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018323 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018465 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020138 conserved hypothetical protein Seven-hairpin glycosidases CPIJ006601 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009935 mannosyl-oligosaccharide alpha-1,2-mannosidase 212 Coenzyme m/tr Six-hairpin glycosidases CPIJ008855 maltose phosphorylase Activating enzymes of the ubiquitin-like proteins CPIJ013962 sumo-1-activating enzyme E1a CPIJ016556 ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase NM domain-like CPIJ008217 acyl-coa dehydrogenase CPIJ014783 isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial CPIJ016451 crotonobetainyl-CoA dehydrogenase CPIJ016453 acyl-coa dehydrogenase CPIJ016454 acyl-coa dehydrogenase Class II aaRS and biotin synthetases CPIJ019538 aspartyl-tRNA synthetase CPIJ001182 asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase CPIJ013145 prolyl-tRNA synthetase CPIJ016067 phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase beta chain Glutathione synthetase ATP-binding domain-like CPIJ003283 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009145 phosphoribosylamine-glycine ligase CPIJ013436 conserved hypothetical protein PCD-like CPIJ006712 conserved hypothetical protein Peptide deformylase CPIJ011016 peptide deformylase, mitochondrial S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase CPIJ005587 s-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase Substrate-binding domain of HMG-CoA reductase CPIJ004077 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase UROD/MetE-like CPIJ010693 uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase Cytochrome b5-like heme/steroid binding domain CPIJ000318 cytochrome b5 CPIJ010629 membrane associated progesterone receptor CPIJ013832 cytochrome b5 CPIJ018120 flavohemoprotein B5/b5r Cytochrome c oxidase subunit h CPIJ012223 cytochrome c oxidase,-subunit VIb FMN-dependent nitroreductase-like CPIJ012177 iodotyrosine dehalogenase 1 Molybdenum cofactor-binding domain CPIJ013919 xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase CPIJ013920 aldehyde oxidase CPIJ013921 aldehyde oxidase CPIJ013934 xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase Energy 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase C-terminal domain-like CPIJ008427 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012165 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013021 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase Citrate synthase CPIJ019860 citrate synthase Enolase C-terminal domain-like CPIJ013600 mandelate racemase Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIa CPIJ014384 conserved hypothetical protein PEP carboxykinase-like CPIJ010515 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase Vacuolar ATP synthase subunit C 213 Lipid m/tr Acyl-CoA binding protein CPIJ019707 conserved hypothetical protein Creatinase/prolidase N-terminal domain CPIJ016993 xaa-pro dipeptidase Lipovitellin-phosvitin complex, superhelical domain CPIJ002028 conserved hypothetical protein Thioesterase/thiol ester dehydrase-isomerase CPIJ009653 conserved hypothetical protein YWTD domain CPIJ000808 low-density lipoprotein receptor CPIJ017507 low-density lipoprotein receptor Nitrogen m/tr RmlC-like cupins CPIJ003551 conserved hypothetical protein Nucleotide m/tr dUTPase-like CPIJ005616 deoxyuridine 5'-triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase Nucleoside hydrolase CPIJ008181 inosine-uridine preferring nucleoside hydrolase CPIJ014047 inosine-uridine preferring nucleoside hydrolase Nucleotidyltransferase CPIJ010886 conserved hypothetical protein Nucleotidylyl transferase CPIJ010393 cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase CPIJ010526 cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase PRTase-like CPIJ004528 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004967 uracil phosphoribosyltransferase CPIJ012747 uridine cytidine kinase i Pseudouridine synthase CPIJ002499 ribosomal pseudouridine synthase CPIJ014146 conserved hypothetical protein Ribonuclease H-like CPIJ002928 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005339 ATP-binding cassette transporter CPIJ008015 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010267 3'-5' exonuclease Ribulose-phoshate binding barrel CPIJ008100 conserved hypothetical protein SAICAR synthase-like CPIJ001991 inositol triphosphate 3-kinase c CPIJ001992 inositol triphosphate 3-kinase c Tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis enzymes-like CPIJ000863 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydrobiopterin synthase CPIJ014857 GTP cyclohydrolase i CPIJ018483 GTP cyclohydrolase i Acetyl-CoA synthetase-like CPIJ000424 AMP dependent coa ligase CPIJ000425 short-chain-fatty-acid-CoA ligase CPIJ002867 AMP dependent coa ligase CPIJ007302 long-chain fatty acid transport protein 4 CPIJ009978 AMP dependent coa ligase CPIJ009981 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011600 long-chain-fatty-acid coa ligase CPIJ015670 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 3 CPIJ015716 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 CPIJ017396 AMP dependent ligase CPIJ018155 luciferin 4-monooxygenase 214 Actin-like ATPase domain CPIJ004484 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006534 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011081 heat shock protein 70 B2 CPIJ011082 heat shock protein 70 B2 CPIJ011083 heat shock protein 70 B2 CPIJ019868 heat shock 70 kDa protein 4 Alkaline phosphatase-like CPIJ001263 membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase CPIJ002095 alkaline phosphatase CPIJ006774 arylsulfatase B CPIJ010201 heparan n-sulfatase CPIJ010661 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011047 arylsulfatase b CPIJ015241 alkaline phosphatase CPIJ017042 conserved hypothetical protein alpha/beta-Hydrolases CPIJ000367 lysosomal acid lipase CPIJ001035 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001352 N-myc downstream regulated CPIJ002719 lipase 1 CPIJ002720 lysosomal acid lipase CPIJ002721 lysosomal acid lipase CPIJ002722 lipase 1 CPIJ002723 lysosomal acid lipase CPIJ002726 lipase 3 CPIJ004066 juvenile hormone esterase CPIJ004226 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase CPIJ004636 para-nitrobenzyl esterase CPIJ004802 endothelial lipase CPIJ006220 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007141 esterase FE4 CPIJ007424 juvenile hormone esterase CPIJ007825 para-nitrobenzyl esterase CPIJ010991 neural stem cell-derived dendrite regulator CPIJ013280 lysosomal Pro-X carboxypeptidase CPIJ013720 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013838 lipase 1 CPIJ013918 esterase B1 CPIJ014154 esterase FE4 CPIJ015386 hepatic triacylglycerol lipase CPIJ015557 Sn1-specific diacylglycerol lipase alpha CPIJ018753 juvenile hormone esterase 215 CPIJ019227 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase CPIJ019228 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase CPIJ019996 conserved hypothetical protein Amidase signature (AS) enzymes CPIJ005591 indoleacetamide hydrolase Calcium-dependent phosphotriesterase CPIJ003362 odd Oz protein Carbonic anhydrase CPIJ001807 carbonic anhydrase CPIJ011424 carbonic anhydrase CPIJ011533 carbonic anhydrase CPIJ014280 carbonic anhydrase Casein kinase II beta subunit CPIJ014996 casein kinase II subunit beta DHH phosphoesterases CPIJ005338 PRUNE protein DHS-like NAD/FAD-binding domain CPIJ002993 deoxyhypusine synthase F1 ATPase inhibitor, IF1, C-terminal domain CPIJ000503 mitochondrial ATPase inhibitor Folate-binding domain CPIJ014981 aminomethyltransferase, mitochondrial Galactose mutarotase-like CPIJ015655 lysosomal alpha-mannosidase CPIJ015656 lysosomal alpha-mannosidase Glycoside hydrolase/deacetylase CPIJ006311 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008266 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008267 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018088 conserved hypothetical protein HAD-like CPIJ010121 copper-transporting ATPase 1 CPIJ008694 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010605 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010899 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013914 dullard protein HD-domain/PDEase-like CPIJ000309 sam/hd domain protein Kinase associated domain 1, KA1 CPIJ006188 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015835 conserved hypothetical protein LysM domain CPIJ013415 nucleolar protein c7b Metallo-dependent hydrolases CPIJ002583 Ampd2 protein CPIJ009741 N-acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase-like CPIJ006558 peptidoglycan recognition protein la CPIJ008514 peptidoglycan recognition protein-1 N-terminal nucleophile aminohydrolases (Ntn hydrolases) CPIJ000897 proteasome subunit alpha type 1 CPIJ001361 proteasome subunit beta type 3 CPIJ003586 proteasome subunit alpha type 3 CPIJ006946 proteasome subunit alpha type 2 CPIJ008264 proteasome subunit beta type 7 CPIJ009861 proteasome component PRE2 216 CPIJ016242 proteasome subunit beta type 5,8 CPIJ016997 proteasome subunit beta type 5,8 CPIJ017386 proteasome subunit beta type 8 CPIJ017722 gamma glutamyl transpeptidase CPIJ019606 asparagine synthetase NAD kinase CPIJ009966 sphingosine kinase a, b NHL repeat CPIJ003685 tripartite motif protein trim2,3 CPIJ003686 conserved hypothetical protein Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase domain-like CPIJ007051 immature colon carcinoma PFL-like glycyl radical enzymes CPIJ005992 ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase large subunit Phosphoglycerate mutase-like CPIJ016005 acid phosphatase-1 CPIJ002955 multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase CPIJ009604 phosphoglycerate mutase family member 5 CPIJ011248 multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase 1 CPIJ016006 conserved hypothetical protein Phospholipase D/nuclease CPIJ006211 tyrosyl-dna phosphodiesterase CPIJ009798 conserved hypothetical protein PurM C-terminal domain-like CPIJ009144 phosphoribosylamine-glycine ligase Quinoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase-like CPIJ000465 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000963 kinesin family member 21A CPIJ007852 receptor for activated protein kinase C CPIJ011019 wd-repeat protein CPIJ014368 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019807 proliferation-inducing gene 21 Ribokinase-like CPIJ011108 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011111 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016881 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020058 pyridoxal kinase SGNH hydrolase CPIJ011741 platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase IB subunit beta CPIJ012575 phospholipase b CPIJ012576 phospholipase b CPIJ012577 phospholipase b, plb1 CPIJ016880 phospholipase b, plb1 Thiolase-like CPIJ002342 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase CPIJ018065 trifunctional enzyme beta subunit Trimeric LpxA-like enzymes CPIJ003121 dynactin subunit 5 Photosynthesis PRC-barrel domain CPIJ005871 conserved hypothetical protein Polysaccharide m/tr DAK1/DegV-like CPIJ014451 conserved hypothetical protein 217 CPIJ016133 dihydroxyacetone kinase Ricin B-like lectins CPIJ005695 polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 5 CPIJ014647 N-acetyl galactosaminyl transferase 7 CPIJ017873 16.7 kDa salivary peptide RuBisCo LSMT C-terminal, substrate-binding domain CPIJ018263 conserved hypothetical protein Starch-binding domain-like CPIJ011486 NOMO3 protein UDP-Glycosyltransferase/glycogen phosphorylase CPIJ000038 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-3 CPIJ004369 glucosyl transferase CPIJ010412 fucosyltransferase 11 CPIJ013202 glycoprotein 3-alpha-L-fucosyltransferase A CPIJ014333 glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferase Redox 2Fe-2S ferredoxin-like CPIJ020265 aldehyde oxidase Acid phosphatase/Vanadium-dependent haloperoxidase CPIJ003606 dolichyldiphosphatase 1 ALDH-like CPIJ013217 glutamate semialdehyde dehydrogenase Aromatic aminoacid monoxygenases, catalytic and oligomerization domains CPIJ014156 conserved hypothetical protein Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase-like CPIJ000146 superoxide dismutase 2 Cytochrome P450? CPIJ018854 CYP4C50v2 CPIJ001754 CYP4J6 CPIJ001757 CYP4H39 CPIJ001810 CPY4C38 CPIJ003361 CPY6BY2 CPIJ003375 CYP6BY3 CPIJ005899 CYP6N26P CPIJ006321 *SCOP predicted cytochrome P450 CPIJ006322 CYP307A1 CPIJ008972 CYP6F5P CPIJ010810 CYP325BC2 CPIJ016355 CYP6AK1-de1b CPIJ016846 CYP6M13 CPIJ016847 CYP6CQ2 CPIJ016849 CYP6M12 CPIJ016850 CYP6Y4 CPIJ016853 CYP6N21P CPIJ016854 CYP6N22 CPIJ016856 CYP6N18 CPIJ017245 CYP304B6 CPIJ017351 CYP4C50v1 CPIJ018716 CYP4C38 CPIJ019704 CYP6N24 218 FAD-dependent thiol oxidase CPIJ012226 augmenter of liver regeneration FAD/NAD-linked reductases, dimerisation (C-terminal) domain CPIJ002642 apoptosis-inducing factor 1, mitochondrial Ferredoxin reductase-like, C-terminal NADP-linked domain CPIJ003578 conserved hypothetical protein Formate/glycerate dehydrogenase catalytic domain-like CPIJ006365 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011531 adenosyl homocysteinase Heme-dependent peroxidases CPIJ003117 dual oxidase 1 CPIJ016742 thyroid peroxidase CPIJ018105 chorion peroxidase Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) CPIJ011687 inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase Metallo-hydrolase/oxidoreductase CPIJ011621 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011625 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019501 hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase CPIJ019503 DNA cross-link repair 1A protein NAD(P)-linked oxidoreductase CPIJ003374 aldo-keto reductase CPIJ003393 aldose reductase CPIJ003722 aldo-keto reductase CPIJ017461 aldo-keto reductase PHM/PNGase F CPIJ014202 dopamine beta hydroxylase Thioredoxin-like CPIJ001856 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003089 SCO1, mitochondrial CPIJ003399 peroxiredoxins, prx-1, prx-2, prx-3 CPIJ003709 thioredoxin, mitochondrial CPIJ003981 15 kDa selenoprotein CPIJ007327 disulfide-isomerase A6 CPIJ008802 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009940 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010610 NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase B8 subunit CPIJ011296 peroxiredoxin 6 CPIJ012568 phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase 1 CPIJ015346 glutaredoxin, grx CPIJ016175 glutaredoxin, grx CPIJ017364 endoplasmic reticulum resident protein CPIJ017625 conserved hypothetical protein Secondary metabolism Clavaminate synthase-like CPIJ014046 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014507 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017090 gamma-butyrobetaine dioxygenase CPIJ017091 gamma-butyrobetaine dioxygenase 219 CPIJ018084 uty-prov protein Concanavalin A-like lectins/glucanases CPIJ001299 keratinocyte lectin CPIJ004321 gram-negative bacteria binding protein CPIJ004683 laminin alpha-1, 2 chain CPIJ004919 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005988 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006598 tripartite motif protein trim9 CPIJ012172 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012874 kinase c-binding protein nell1 CPIJ013642 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016123 conserved hypothetical protein Homo-oligomeric flavin-containing Cys decarboxylases, HFCD CPIJ019818 phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase Terpenoid synthases CPIJ008089 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016309 candidate tumor suppressor protein CPIJ016310 candidate tumor suppressor protein CPIJ016311 decaprenyl-diphosphate synthase subunit 2 Transferases 4'-phosphopantetheinyl transferase CPIJ011416 aminoadipate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferases (Nat) CPIJ000413 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001343 histone acetyltransferase type B catalytic subunit CPIJ008392 N-acetyltransferase 5 CPIJ010396 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012930 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015282 dopamine N acetyltransferase CPIJ015982 N-acetyl transferase separation anxiety Class I glutamine amidotransferase-like CPIJ006930 gamma-glutamyl hydrolase CoA-dependent acyltransferases CPIJ001609 choline O-acetyltransferase CPIJ005612 carnitine o-acyltransferase Formyltransferase CPIJ009143 phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase Glycerol-3-phosphate (1)-acyltransferase CPIJ004138 1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase CPIJ004141 1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase beta CPIJ013939 glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase CPIJ015965 transmembrane protein 68 Homocysteine S-methyltransferase CPIJ008869 homocysteine S-methyltransferase MIR domain CPIJ016258 probable ER retained protein NagB/RpiA/CoA transferase-like CPIJ004258 ribose-5-phosphate isomerase CPIJ005163 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006915 translation initiation factor 2b, delta subunit CPIJ008074 glucosamine-6-phosphate isomerase CPIJ011933 conserved hypothetical protein 220 Nucleotide-diphospho-sugar transferases CPIJ003171 UDP-n-acteylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase CPIJ000257 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002650 dolichol-phosphate mannosyltransferase CPIJ004318 galactosylgalactosylxylosylprotein 3-beta-glucuronosyltransferase I CPIJ005229 N-acetyl galactosaminyl transferase 6 CPIJ012815 mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase CPIJ016255 chitin synthase CPIJ018702 beta-1,3-galactosyltransferase brn PLP-dependent transferases CPIJ003522 cysteine desulfurase, mitochondrial CPIJ010034 glutamate decarboxylase CPIJ013307 aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase Protein prenylyltransferase CPIJ005820 geranylgeranyl transferase type-2 alpha subunit CPIJ017557 smile protein S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferases CPIJ001152 HemK methyltransferase family member 2 CPIJ001336 ribosomal RNA large subunit methyltransferase J CPIJ001402 histone-arginine methyltransferase CARM1 CPIJ001578 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005043 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006933 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007234 AdoMet-dependent rRNA methyltransferase spb1 CPIJ008978 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010001 tRNA methyltransferase CPIJ010915 arginine n-methyltransferase CPIJ013558 23S rRNA methyltransferase CPIJ016651 HemK methyltransferase family member 1 CPIJ018143 conserved hypothetical protein Regulation CPIJ009244 conserved hypothetical protein DNA-binding AlbA-like CPIJ010569 conserved hypothetical protein AN1-like Zinc finger CPIJ002707 zinc finger protein CPIJ002783 AN1-type zinc finger protein 2B ARID-like CPIJ008131 receptor for activated protein kinase C ATP-dependent DNA ligase DNA-binding domain CPIJ017286 conserved hypothetical protein Bromodomain CPIJ007940 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012613 conserved hypothetical protein C2H2 and C2HC zinc fingers CPIJ018818 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000409 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000911 zinc finger protein 383 CPIJ001029 serendipity locus protein delta CPIJ001300 zinc finger protein 780B 221 CPIJ001471 transcription factor hamlet CPIJ001473 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001552 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ001985 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002705 zinc finger protein 90 CPIJ002824 predicted protein CPIJ002932 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003270 broad-complex core-protein CPIJ003609 Sp5 transcription factor CPIJ003667 zinc finger protein 141 CPIJ003749 tRNA delta CPIJ003796 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004257 zinc finger-containing protein CPIJ004351 zinc finger protein 92 CPIJ004384 zinc finger protein CPIJ004667 zinc finger protein CPIJ004785 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004963 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005175 transcription factor sp8,sp9 CPIJ005503 zinc finger protein 36 CPIJ005812 zinc finger protein CPIJ005813 zinc finger protein CPIJ006385 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006765 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006854 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006855 zinc finger protein CPIJ007837 zinc finger protein CPIJ007858 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008060 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008297 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008361 double-stranded RNA-binding protein zn72d CPIJ008549 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008696 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009409 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009502 zinc finger protein CPIJ009503 zinc finger protein 583 CPIJ009524 forkhead box protein CPIJ009647 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009780 zinc finger protein 75A CPIJ009786 zinc finger protein 222 CPIJ009787 zinc finger protein 582 CPIJ009989 zinc finger protein CPIJ009990 zinc finger protein CPIJ010551 predicted protein CPIJ010652 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010850 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011015 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011166 zinc finger protein CPIJ011789 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012039 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012535 zinc finger protein CPIJ012594 predicted protein CPIJ012610 zinc finger protein 38 CPIJ013068 zinc finger protein CPIJ013118 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013246 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013653 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014029 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014036 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014135 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014711 zinc finger protein CPIJ014712 krueppel protein CPIJ014714 zinc finger protein CPIJ014715 zinc finger protein CPIJ015000 zinc finger protein 250 CPIJ015265 zinc finger protein 345 CPIJ015267 zinc finger protein ZNF780A CPIJ015425 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015578 hypothetical protein CPIJ015579 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015582 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016725 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016726 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016862 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016943 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016944 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017035 zinc finger protein 141 CPIJ017141 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017142 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017259 predicted protein 223 CPIJ017278 zinc finger protein 436 CPIJ017355 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017654 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017756 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018074 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018336 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018423 zinc finger protein CPIJ018448 transcription factor btd CPIJ018505 zinc finger transcription factor CPIJ019181 U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein C CPIJ019417 zinc finger protein 322A CPIJ019621 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019710 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019775 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020207 zinc finger protein 36 CCCH zinc finger CPIJ018734 conserved hypothetical protein CSL zinc finger CPIJ001284 conserved hypothetical protein Cyclin-like CPIJ006843 transcription initiation factor TFIIB CPIJ010939 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012914 cyclin T CPIJ013566 cyclin a CPIJ013567 cyclin a Cysteine-rich DNA binding domain, (DM domain) CPIJ004057 male-specific doublesex protein DNA-binding domain CPIJ004606 phd finger domain Glucocorticoid receptor-like (DNA-binding domain) CPIJ002376 elongation factor 1-alpha CPIJ002547 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002808 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002811 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005912 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006674 malate dehydrogenase CPIJ006684 predicted protein CPIJ006830 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007349 zinc finger protein 225 CPIJ007701 predicted protein CPIJ008216 nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 CPIJ008348 GATA transcription factor GATAd CPIJ008682 hypothetical protein CPIJ009297 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009298 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009299 four and a half lim domains 224 CPIJ010100 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010408 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010866 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011684 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011743 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012188 epsilon-trimethyllysine 2-oxoglutarate dioxygenase CPIJ012588 predicted protein CPIJ013614 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014027 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014086 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014594 predicted protein CPIJ016033 GATA-binding factor-C CPIJ016621 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017547 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018862 retinoic acid receptor beta Histone-fold CPIJ001398 transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 9 CPIJ008494 histone h2a CPIJ010882 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011778 transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 12 CPIJ014768 histone 1 CPIJ017187 histone H3.3 type 2 CPIJ017276 suppressor of ty3 CPIJ018900 conserved hypothetical protein HIT/MYND zinc finger-like CPIJ014434 predicted protein CPIJ017587 conserved hypothetical protein HLH, helix-loop-helix DNA-binding domain CPIJ002332 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003409 enhancer of split mgamma protein CPIJ007015 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008120 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012827 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015080 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015473 max binding protein HMG-box CPIJ001997 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005084 coiled-coil domain-containing protein 124 CPIJ006395 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012202 capicua protein CPIJ014423 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014424 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017659 conserved hypothetical protein Homeodomain-like CPIJ001021 homeobox protein abdominal-B 225 CPIJ002815 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005379 metastasis-associated protein 3 CPIJ005827 predicted protein CPIJ006382 paired box protein pax-6 CPIJ006390 paired box protein Pax-6 CPIJ008039 homeobox protein extradenticle CPIJ009982 rest corepressor protein CPIJ010220 segmentation polarity homeobox protein engrailed CPIJ012080 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012784 zinc finger protein 1 CPIJ014669 predicted protein CPIJ015889 homeobox protein CPIJ017153 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017214 mesoderm induction early response protein 1 CPIJ019460 hypothetical protein Insert subdomain of RNA polymerase alpha subunit CPIJ003123 DNA-directed RNA polymerase I 40 kDa polypeptide Kix domain of CBP (creb binding protein) CPIJ005540 conserved hypothetical protein lambda repressor-like DNA-binding domains CPIJ003986 multiprotein bridging factor CPIJ014526 conserved hypothetical protein Leucine zipper domain CPIJ003266 CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein CPIJ003767 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003805 cyclic-AMP response element binding protein CPIJ012178 ovary C/EBPg transcription factor CPIJ014920 par domain protein CPIJ016941 conserved hypothetical protein p53-like transcription factors CPIJ000431 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000433 T-box protein H15 CPIJ000721 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002764 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007738 T-box protein H15 CPIJ016469 signal transducer and activator of transcription Periplasmic binding protein-like I CPIJ010082 atrial natriuretic peptide receptor CPIJ019599 glutamate receptor, ionotropic kainate 1, 2, 3 CPIJ020040 conserved hypothetical protein Putative DNA-binding domain CPIJ000580 ladybird homeobox corepressor CPIJ000978 transforming protein Ski RPB6/omega subunit-like CPIJ018444 DNA-directed RNA polymeraseI SAM/Pointed domain CPIJ000845 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000860 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009010 conserved hypothetical protein 226 CPIJ017757 conserved hypothetical protein SAP domain CPIJ007511 conserved hypothetical protein SMAD MH1 domain CPIJ009526 nuclear factor i SMAD/FHA domain CPIJ000274 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006464 nuclear inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1 CPIJ006834 kinesin-like protein KIF1B CPIJ009516 conserved hypothetical protein SRF-like CPIJ008335 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016459 conserved hypothetical protein Tim10-like CPIJ018054 mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim8 A CPIJ010382 mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim10 CPIJ010840 mitochondrial inner membrane protein translocase, 9kD-subunit CPIJ018053 mitochondrial inner membrane protein translocase, 8kD-subunit CPIJ018211 mitochondrial inner membrane protein translocase, 13kD-subunit Winged helix DNA-binding domain CPIJ001680 DNA-binding protein D-ELG CPIJ001711 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003068 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003923 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004011 rfx transcription factor CPIJ009522 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010292 vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 25 CPIJ013475 transcription initiation factor IIE subunit beta CPIJ014720 ets DNA-binding protein pokkuri CPIJ015971 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11 Kinases/phosphatases (Phosphotyrosine protein) phosphatases II CPIJ018450 slingshot dual specificity phosphatase CPIJ019559 phosphatase Slingshot CPIJ001969 tyrosine phosphatase prl CPIJ003757 tyrosine phosphatase mitochondrial 1 CPIJ008018 dual specificity protein phosphatase CPIJ008808 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009405 testis/ seletal muscle dual specificty phosphatase CPIJ011976 tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type nt1 CPIJ013410 tyrosine-protein phosphatase Lar CPIJ014898 tyrosine phosphatase n11 227 CPIJ018298 tryrosine phosphatase FAT domain of focal adhesion kinase CPIJ017572 focal adhesion kinase GHMP Kinase, C-terminal domain CPIJ015185 conserved hypothetical protein Myosin phosphatase inhibitor 17kDa protein, CPI-17 CPIJ004356 conserved hypothetical protein Phosphotyrosine protein phosphatases I CPIJ008291 low molecular weight phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase 1 PP2C-like CPIJ012255 pyruvate dehydrogenase Protein kinase-like (PK-like) CPIJ010275 map/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2,4 CPIJ000270 tyrosine kinase CPIJ000288 serine/threonine-protein kinase 3 CPIJ000816 kinase protein CPIJ000833 tyrosine-protein kinase btk29a CPIJ000891 cell division protein kinase 8 CPIJ001155 cell division protein kinase 2 CPIJ001273 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003568 mitosis inhibitor protein kinase CPIJ003599 serine/threonine protein kinase CPIJ003985 tyrosine-protein kinase Abl CPIJ003996 calcium-dependent protein kinase CPIJ004173 Juvenile hormone-inducible protein CPIJ004685 Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase CPIJ004687 Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase CPIJ004799 activin receptor type I CPIJ004910 serine/threonine kinase NLK CPIJ005276 cGMP-protein kinase CPIJ005290 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005449 nuclear body associated kinase CPIJ006283 ser/thr protein kinase-trb3 CPIJ006284 ser/thr protein kinase-trb3 CPIJ006704 serine/threonine-protein kinase D3 CPIJ007227 tyrosine-protein kinase CPIJ007458 tyrosine-protein kinase src64b CPIJ008931 dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase hemipterous CPIJ008953 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase CPIJ009012 mixed lineage protein kinase CPIJ009223 serine/threonine-protein kinase CPIJ010322 cell division control protein CPIJ011073 discoidin domain receptor CPIJ011673 cell division control protein CPIJ011936 S6 kinase II beta 228 CPIJ012176 ribosomal protein S6 kinase, 90kD, polypeptide CPIJ012534 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 1 CPIJ012560 leucine-rich repeat serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 CPIJ013693 serine/threonine-protein kinase rio2 CPIJ013835 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013942 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014803 Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase CPIJ015689 serine/threonine-protein kinase rio2 CPIJ015690 serine/threonine-protein kinase RIO2 CPIJ015801 mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 2 CPIJ015833 map/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2,4 CPIJ015918 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015922 Juvenile hormone-inducible protein CPIJ016475 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016644 integrin-linked protein kinase CPIJ016729 serine/threonine-protein kinase vrk CPIJ016868 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018008 fibroblast growth factor receptor CPIJ018201 serine/threonine protein kinase lats CPIJ019408 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019493 fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 CPIJ019683 conserved hypothetical protein Other regulatory function GCM domain CPIJ006640 conserved hypothetical protein Mago nashi protein CPIJ002949 mago nashi Mob1/phocein CPIJ002914 conserved hypothetical protein N-terminal domain of adenylylcyclase associated protein, CAP CPIJ003125 adenylyl cyclase-associated protein Ran BP2/NZF zinc finger-like CPIJ003010 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007177 nucleoporin, Nup153 Sec7 domain CPIJ002812 guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor CPIJ015585 arf6 guanine nucleotide exchange factor Receptor activity Chemosensory protein Csp2 CPIJ019986 serine/threonine kinase CPIJ002601 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002605 serine/threonine kinase CPIJ002607 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002608 chemosensory protein CPIJ002609 serine/threonine kinase 229 CPIJ002616 serine/threonine kinase CPIJ002625 chemosensory protein 1 CPIJ002629 sensory appendage protein CPIJ017094 serine/threonine kinase CPIJ019985 sensory appendage protein RNA binding, m/tr Alpha-L RNA-binding motif CPIJ016140 tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase dsRNA-binding domain-like CPIJ003264 40S ribosomal protein S2 CPIJ004832 tar RNA binding protein CPIJ006845 40S ribosomal protein S2 CPIJ008332 40S ribosomal protein S2 CPIJ009774 40S ribosomal protein S2 CPIJ011850 double-stranded RNA-specific editase Adar CPIJ013506 ATP-dependent RNA helicase CPIJ014041 conserved hypothetical protein Nop domain CPIJ002179 U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Prp31 Nop10-like SnoRNP CPIJ018833 H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit 3 PUA domain-like CPIJ006069 adenylsulfate kinase CPIJ008799 ATP-dependent Lon protease CPIJ012137 conserved hypothetical protein RNA-binding domain, RBD CPIJ014704 splicing factor CPIJ019416 splicing factor CPIJ000025 negative elongation factor E CPIJ000485 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ000588 polypyrimidine tract binding protein CPIJ000880 RNA-binding post-transcriptional regulator csx1 CPIJ001612 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein CPIJ003074 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003555 nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 2 CPIJ003738 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein r CPIJ003854 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003881 G-rich sequence factor-1 CPIJ004538 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004892 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005653 developmentally regulated RNA-binding protein CPIJ006107 NONA protein CPIJ006979 polypyrimidine tract binding protein CPIJ007047 serine/arginine rich splicing factor CPIJ007295 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007629 splicing factor 230 CPIJ007834 RNA and export factor binding protein CPIJ008248 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008476 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008628 predicted protein CPIJ008634 52K active chromatin boundary protein CPIJ008698 rbm25 protein CPIJ008786 arginine/serine-rich splicing factor CPIJ009773 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012174 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012515 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012662 cleavage stimulation factor 64 kDa subunit CPIJ012814 scaffold attachment factor b CPIJ012850 splicing factor u2af large subunit CPIJ013237 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014506 fuse-binding protein-interacting repressor siahbp1 CPIJ015052 RNA binding motif protein 18 CPIJ015262 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein 27C CPIJ015350 eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit 4 CPIJ015549 ribosomal biogenesis protein Gar2 CPIJ016143 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016329 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016517 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017755 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018451 conserved hypothetical protein Surp module (SWAP domain) CPIJ017179 scaffold attachment factor B Signal transduction C2 domain (Calcium/lipid-binding domain, CaLB) CPIJ005008 E3 ubiquitin ligase CPIJ005701 kinase C alpha-polypeptide CPIJ011785 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase nedd-4 CPIJ015045 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015112 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase nedd-4 CPIJ016865 conserved hypothetical protein cAMP-binding domain-like CPIJ004551 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005277 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005279 cGMP-dependent protein kinase CPIJ006213 cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel 4 CPIJ015446 cyclic-nucleotide-gated cation channel CPIJ015653 cGMP-dependent protein kinase CPIJ015942 c-AMP dependent protein kinase typeI-beta regulatory subunit 231 CPIJ018420 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019876 cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel beta 3 DBL homology domain (DH-domain) CPIJ001482 pak-interacting exchange factor, beta-pix/cool-1 CPIJ004982 rho guanine exchange factor CPIJ011504 RHO guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor CPIJ013987 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015421 Rho GEF and pleckstrin domain protein CPIJ017598 guanine nucleotide exchange factor Family A G protein-coupled receptor-like CPIJ006268 cardioacceleratory peptide receptor CPIJ006269 cardioacceleratory peptide receptor CPIJ011619 leucine-rich transmembrane protein CPIJ014487 beta adrenergic receptor CPIJ014753 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015979 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016092 adenosine A2 receptor Frizzled cysteine-rich domain CPIJ011799 conserved hypothetical protein Growth factor receptor domain CPIJ009117 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015183 proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 4, furin CPIJ017374 conserved hypothetical protein GTPase activation domain, GAP CPIJ010879 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012517 cdc42 GTPase-activating protein CPIJ015825 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019727 conserved hypothetical protein Insect pheromone/odorant-binding proteins CPIJ001867 hypothetical protein CPIJ001871 hypothetical protein CPIJ001874 Odorant-binding protein 56a CPIJ003865 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003866 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004634 odorant-binding protein CPIJ004635 odorant-binding protein OBPjj7a CPIJ007337 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010787 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010788 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018881 tRNA delta Insulin-like CPIJ018049 conserved hypothetical protein Nicotinic receptor ligand binding domain-like CPIJ007639 acetylcholine receptor protein alpha 1, 2, 3, 4 invertebrate CPIJ016909 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, beta-2 subunit Nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain CPIJ002963 ecdysone receptor CPIJ004609 nuclear hormone receptor CPIJ008215 nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 232 CPIJ009588 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014945 nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 CPIJ015542 nuclear receptor 3 CPIJ016024 retinoid x receptor Nucleotide cyclase CPIJ004739 adenylate cyclase CPIJ015189 adenylate cyclase CPIJ017081 guanylate cyclase soluble subunit beta-1 CPIJ017287 adenylate cyclase type CPIJ019946 adenylate cyclase type 5 PDZ domain-like CPIJ001710 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ003808 partitioning defective 3 CPIJ004495 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005564 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 9 CPIJ006020 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006377 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007358 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ007684 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010875 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015012 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016071 golgi reassembly-stacking protein 2 CPIJ018273 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018340 ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 CPIJ019226 Glutamate receptor binding protein CPIJ019766 conserved hypothetical protein PH domain-like CPIJ000361 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ004690 numb protein CPIJ004706 vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein CPIJ005592 decapping protein 1 CPIJ005688 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ006699 wiskott-aldrich syndrome protein CPIJ007927 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009368 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009993 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010369 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010878 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ011071 structure-specific recognition protein CPIJ011748 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ012737 nucleoporin 50kDa CPIJ013583 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013686 signal transduction protein lnk-realted 233 CPIJ013709 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ013938 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018995 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019612 myosin xv CPIJ019728 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019740 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ020011 FACT complex subunit Ssrp1 PX domain CPIJ001623 sorting nexin CPIJ005342 sorting nexin-6 CPIJ006689 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010119 sorting nexin-9 CPIJ013306 conserved hypothetical protein PYP-like sensor domain (PAS domain) CPIJ003682 hypoxia-inducible factor CPIJ013448 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014773 arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator Rap/Ran-GAP CPIJ018142 rap GTPase-activating protein Ras GEF CPIJ005593 ras GTP exchange factor, son of sevenless CPIJ005901 ral guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2 CPIJ017680 c-AMP-dependent rap1 guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Regulator of G-protein signaling, RGS CPIJ004658 beta-adrenergic receptor kinase CPIJ006996 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ015931 regulator of g protein signaling SH2 domain CPIJ000806 growth factor receptor-bound protein CPIJ003100 cytoplasmic protein NCK1 CPIJ003380 suppressorsof cytokine signalling CPIJ010659 proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase src CPIJ012129 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014900 corkscrew phosphatase SH3-domain CPIJ006389 abl interactor 2 CPIJ002311 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002634 membrane traffic protein CPIJ003002 nebl protein CPIJ006223 Plenty of SH3s CPIJ010657 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016081 endophilin a CPIJ017698 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018548 abl interactor 2 TRAF domain-like CPIJ001208 autoimmune regulator CPIJ001213 tripartite motif-containing protein 37 CPIJ009247 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase sina 234 CPIJ010192 conserved hypothetical protein Transducin (alpha subunit), insertion domain CPIJ016397 guanine nucleotide-binding protein G Transducin (heterotrimeric G protein), gamma chain CPIJ005863 guanine nucleotide-binding protein gamma-1 subunit Ypt/Rab-GAP domain of gyp1p CPIJ016901 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008317 TBC1 domain family member 22B CPIJ010266 GTPase-activating protein gyp2 CPIJ011634 gh regulated tbc protein-1 Other Unknown function alpha/beta knot CPIJ006883 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ010464 conserved hypothetical protein Anti-sigma factor antagonist SpoIIaa CPIJ006006 sulfate transporter CPIJ000611 sulfate transporter 1.2 CPIJ005331 sulfate transporter CPIJ012147 sulfate transporter CPIJ017095 sulfate transporter beta-sandwich domain of Sec23/24 CPIJ008805 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ009281 Sec24B protein CPIJ014598 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ017651 conserved hypothetical protein BtrG-like CPIJ005346 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008797 conserved hypothetical protein Crustacean CHH/MIH/GIH neurohormone CPIJ003972 ion transport peptide Cysteine alpha-hairpin motif CPIJ000336 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ014050 predicted protein CPIJ019817 cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein COX19 Cysteine-rich domain CPIJ000792 myotonin-protein kinase CPIJ006705 protein kinase C CPIJ006920 conserved hypothetical protein Delta-sleep-inducing peptide immunoreactive peptide CPIJ006273 conserved hypothetical protein E set domains CPIJ002638 KDEL motif-containing protein 2 CPIJ002736 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ002737 MPA2 allergen CPIJ004282 hexamerin 2 beta CPIJ004652 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005750 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ008373 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ016072 SEC63 protein CPIJ016988 beta-arrestin 1 Frataxin/Nqo15-like CPIJ014024 frataxin, mitochondrial GckA/TtuD-like CPIJ004803 glycerate kinase 235 Hairpin loop containing domain-like CPIJ005068 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ005070 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ018970 conserved hypothetical protein HCP-like CPIJ001345 conserved hypothetical protein Hook domain CPIJ018678 hook protein Ligand-binding domain in the NO signalling and Golgi transport CPIJ010765 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019438 conserved hypothetical protein MAL13P1.257-like CPIJ013731 conserved hypothetical protein PIN domain-like CPIJ018772 conserved hypothetical protein PTPA-like CPIJ017735 serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunitB' Pym (Within the bgcn gene intron protein, WIBG), N-terminal domain CPIJ006916 conserved hypothetical protein Roadblock/LC7 domain CPIJ002048 dynein light chain CPIJ011264 mitogen-activated protein-binding protein-interacting protein CPIJ014786 conserved hypothetical protein Subunits of heterodimeric actin filament capping protein Capz CPIJ010373 F-actin capping protein subunit beta CPIJ011271 f-actin capping protein alpha CPIJ011272 conserved hypothetical protein CPIJ019319 F-actin capping protein subunit beta YggU-like CPIJ001196 conserved hypothetical protein YjeF N-terminal domain-like CPIJ011786 conserved hypothetical protein YjgF-like CPIJ008399 conserved hypothetical protein Zinc beta-ribbon CPIJ001855 DNA-directed RNA polymerase II 15.1 kDa polypeptide Viral proteins Arp2/3 complex 16 kDa subunit ARPC5 CPIJ012795 arp2/3 complex 16 kd subunit Retrovirus zinc finger-like domains CPIJ001891 conserved hypothetical protein Tetrapyrrole methylase CPIJ008675 diphthine synthase Eferin C-derminal domain-like CPIJ003754 conserved hypothetical protein ERH-like CPIJ013494 enhancer of rudimentary protein Expressed protein At2g23090/F21P24.15 CPIJ002299 conserved hypothetical protein ?Differentially expressed genes represent those genes that differed in their expression level (FPKM) in HAmCqG8 by more than two fold when compared to the parental strain HAmCqG0. *SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) **Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.2, June 2008; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ ?Vectorbase annotation taken from CpipJ1.2, June 2008; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ with the exception of cytochrome P450 genes whose annotations were taken from the most current P450 annotation based on: Nelson, DR (2009) The Cytochrome P450 Homepage. Human Genomics 4, 59-65: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html 236 ?NONA: Not annotated 237 Appendix 3.5. List of differentially upregulated genes in HAmCqG8 which contained functionally-enriched Gene Ontology terms. Gene? Annotation* GO TERMS** ca taly tic activ ity (GO:0 00 38 24 ) ox ido red uctase activ ity (GO:0 01 64 91 ) hem e b ind ing (GO:0 02 00 37 ) tetr ap yrr ole bin din g ( GO:0 04 69 06 ) iro n io n b ind ing (GO: 00 05 50 6) elec tro n ca rrier ac tiv ity (GO:0 09 50 5) mo no ox yg en ase activ ity (GO: 00 44 97 ) hy dro lase a ctiv ity (GO:0 01 67 87 ) pep tid ase activ ity (GO:0 00 82 33 ) pep tid ase activ ity , ac tin g o n L -am ino ac id pep tid es ( GO:0 07 00 11 ) en do pe ptid ase activ ity (G) :00 04 17 5) ser ine -ty pe en do pe ptid ase activ ity (GO:0 00 42 52 ) ser ine -ty pe pe ptid ase activ ity (GO: 00 08 23 6) ser ine hy dro lase a ctiv ity (GO:0 01 71 71 ) metallo pep tid ase activ ity (GO :00 08 23 7) ex op ep tid ase activ ity (GO:0 00 82 38 ) hy dro lase a ctiv ity , ac tin g o n g lyco syl b on ds (GO:0 00 82 38 ) hy dro lase a ctiv ity , h yd roly zin g O -gly co syl c om po un ds (GO :00 04 55 3) ox yg en tran spo rter ac tiv ity (G O:0 00 53 22 ) CPIJ020229 CYP4D42v2 +? + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ017244 CYP304B5 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ017243 CYP304B4 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ015958 CYP325BC1 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ015681 CYP4H37v2 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ014218 CYP9M10 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ012470 CYP9AL1 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ011127 CYP4H34 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010546 CYP9J34 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010544 CYP9J33 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010543 CYP9J40 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - 238 CPIJ010542 CYP9J38 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010538 CYP9J46 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010537 CYP9J45 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010227 CYP12F13 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010225 CYP12F14 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ009478 CYP4D42v1 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ009085 CYP6AG13 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ008566 CYP6Z15 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ007188 CYP4H30 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ006721 CYP4H37v 1 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005959 CYP6AA7 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005957 CYP6AA9 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005956 CYP6BZ2 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005955 CYP6P14 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005953 CYP6BB3 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005952 CYP6BB4 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ002538 CYP6AG12 + + + + + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004088 guanylyl cyclase receptor + - + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ019428 trypsin 2 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ019007 polyserase-2 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ018037 serine protease + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ016102 transmembrane protease + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ016012 tryptase-2 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ014523 elastase-3A + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ010641 prostasin + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ006543 urokinase-type plasminogen activator + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ006542 chymotrypsin-2 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ006076 hypodermin-B + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ005272 trypsin 3A1 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ004594 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ003623 coagulation factor XII + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002156 chymotrypsin BI + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002142 chymotrypsin BI + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002140 chymotrypsin BI + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002139 HzC4 chymotrypsinogen + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002138 chymotrypsinogen + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002137 serine protease1/2 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002135 trypsin alpha-4 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002133 trypsin epsilon + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ002130 kallikrein-7 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - 239 CPIJ002128 mast cell protease 2 + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ001979 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ001111 proacrosin + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ000617 clip-domain serine protease + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ000616 clip-domain serine protease + - - - - - - + + + + + + + - - - - - CPIJ019029 metalloproteinase + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ013319 metalloproteinase + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ010224 metalloproteinase + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ009594 nephrosin + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ007383 endothelin-converting enzyme 1 + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ002945 zinc metalloproteinase dpy-31 + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ002943 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ002942 zinc metalloproteinase nas-12 + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ002941 high choriolytic enzyme 1 + - - - - - - + + + + + - - + - - - - CPIJ012036 aminopeptidase N + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ010805 carboxypeptidase A1 + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ009106 angiotensin-converting enzyme + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ004086 angiotensin-converting enzyme + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ001745 zinc carboxypeptidase + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ001744 zinc carboxypeptidase + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ001743 carboxypeptidase A2 + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ001742 zinc carboxypeptidase + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + + - - - CPIJ008876 lysosomal pro-X carboxypeptidase + - - - - - - + + + - - + + - + - - - CPIJ008873 prolylcarboxypeptidase + - - - - - - + + + - - + + - + - - - CPIJ001240 cathepsin B-like thiol protease + - - - - - - + + + + - - - - - - - - CPIJ001239 cathepsin B + - - - - - - + + + + - - - - - - - - CPIJ001050 protease m1 zinc metalloprotease + - - - - - - + + + - - - - + - - - - CPIJ014110 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ009738 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ010716 luciferin 4-monooxygenase + + - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005187 phenoloxidase subunit 1 + + - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ019598 basic endochitinase CHB4 + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ018802 endochitinase A + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ009306 neutral alpha-glucosidase ab + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ008904 alpha-glucosidase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ008528 glycoside hydrolase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ006585 glycoprotein + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ006166 deltamethrin resistance-associated NYD-GBE + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ005451 lysozyme + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ004323 gram-negative bacteria binding protein + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - 240 CPIJ004320 gram-negative bacteria-binding protein 1 + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ002104 plasma alpha-L-fucosidase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + + - CPIJ005725 alpha-amylase A + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + - - CPIJ005060 alpha-amylase B + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + - - CPIJ019948 myosin vii + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ019917 triacylglycerol lipase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ018233 carboxylesterase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ018231 carboxylesterase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ017110 fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ016336 esterase B1 + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ015649 DNA-binding protein smubp-2 + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ013085 sarcalumenin + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ007824 esterase B1 + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ007461 epoxide hydrolase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ007035 lipase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ006560 peptidoglycan recognition protein-lc + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004695 dynein-1-beta heavy chain + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004222 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ002103 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ002067 vacuolar ATP synthase subunit C + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ001520 multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ000853 myosin heavy chain + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ000852 myosin-Id + - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ003495 fatty acid synthase S-acetyltransferase + + - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ014287 ferritin heavy chain + + - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005308 conserved hypothetical protein - - + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004595 cytochrome b5 - - + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004125 succinate dehydrogenase - - + + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ018869 NADH dehydrogenase iron-sulfur protein 7, mitoch. + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ016440 dihydroceramide delta (4)-desaturase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ016322 alkyldihydroxyacetonephosphate synthase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ016321 alkyldihydroxyacetonephosphate synthase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ013647 alkyldihydroxyacetonephosphate synthase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ009438 aldehyde dehydrogenase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ007620 choline dehydrogenase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ005656 oxidoreductase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004600 oxidoreductase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004379 steroid dehydrogenase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ003802 NADP-dependent leukotriene B4 12-hydroxydehydrog. + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ003059 acyl-CoA oxidase + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 241 CPIJ001318 d-lactate dehydrognease 2 + + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ018631 glutathione-s-transferase theta, gst + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ015996 ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ015088 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ014577 phosphoglycerate mutase 2 + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ012763 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ011827 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ009929 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ009094 ornithine decarboxylase 1 + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ008853 maltose phosphorylase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ008110 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ007538 arginine kinase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ006619 cystathionine gamma-lyase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ006508 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B4 + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ006459 long-chain-fatty-acid-CoA ligase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ006339 receptor of activated protein kinase C 1 + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ006160 glutathione s-transferase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ004867 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ003692 glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ002663 glutathione S-transferase 1-1 + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ001427 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ001091 lactosylceramide 4-alpha-galactosyltransferase + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ000791 conserved hypothetical protein + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CPIJ018825 larval serum protein 1 beta chain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + CPIJ018824 larval serum protein 1 beta chain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + CPIJ009032 larval serum protein 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + CPIJ007783 arylphorin subunit alpha - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + CPIJ006538 larval serum protein 1 beta chain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + CPIJ006537 larval serum protein 1 beta chain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + CPIJ001820 larval serum protein 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + CPIJ000056 larval serum protein 1 beta chain - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + ?Genes within the functionally enriched GO terms for the differentially upregulated gene set in HAmCqG8 when tested by gProfiler *Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.2, June 2008; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ Annotations for cytochrome P450 genes were taken from the most current annotation based on: Nelson, DR (2009) The Cytochrome P450 Homepage. Human Genomics 4, 59-65: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html **Gene Ontology consortium (version 1.2084; release date: 12:07:2011) ? A ?+? sign indicates GO terms within column that are assigned to the gene in the list, while a ?-? sign indicates that GO terms within the column are not. 242 Appendix 4.1. List and sequences of the qRT-PCR primers used. Gene* Sense primer (5' to 3') Antisense primer (5' to 3') 18S rRNA CGCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCACTA GCATCAAGCGCCACCATATAGG CPIJ002139 TAATCTGTCGTGTCAATTGTCGTA GGAAGCTATGTATTCCGATGAGAT CPIJ001240 AGGACGTGAATATCGTTCTGAAAT GTTCTGATAGATCTCGGCTTTCAT CPIJ002156 CACTGCGTCGTTGATGCTAC CCACATCATTTCGCACAATC CPIJ016012 GGGAGTTATGTTGAGGACTTGAAA GAAGGGTGGCACAGTTATTTATTC CPIJ002142 TGAAATCCTTAGTAGTGCTTGCAG TGACCAGAGAGAAGGATGTTGATA CPIJ009594 GAAGTATCAGACAACCGCATTCTA TTTCAAGTTGTTCATCACTGGTCT CPIJ018233 GTCTGCTTGGGTTCTTCAGC CGTCACATTGTTCGGATCAC CPIJ001820 GTTGAATTCTACAAGCACGGTATG CGTAGTAGAAAACGTGGAACAGAG CPIJ000056 GAGCTACCTGCCATACTACACCTT GAAGAAGTCAAAGTACGTGAGCAG CPIJ009033 ATCGACTTCAGCTATTTCTTCACC GTCGGTAGTGTTTAGTACGACGTG CPIJ009032 AGTTGAGATCAAGGAGTTTTCCAG GGGAGTTCTTGTAGTTGAAGGGTA CPIJ007783 ACTACCAATTCAAGGATCACCTTC AGTATGTGACCAACTTGTCAATGG *Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.3 http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ 243 244 Appendix 4.2: Genes up-regulated in the pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Culex quinquefasciatus following permethrin challenge. SCOP functional annotation? Vectorbase annotation? FPKM? Fold change (24h) General Detailed Superfamily Accession Gene Untreated Acetone Permethrin LC50 LC70 Extra- cellular processes Cell adhesion C-type lectin- like CPIJ019507 salivary C-type lectin 52.8 1.7 3.9 4.2* CPIJ016716 conserved hypothetical protein 23.8 3.4* 2.7 8.2* Immunoglobulin CPIJ015022 stretchin-mlck 0.5 2.5 3.7 6.5* RNI-like CPIJ001238 conserved hypothetical protein 1.9 3.7* 4.1* 4.0* CPIJ018057 conserved hypothetical protein 0.6 3.5 4.1* 4.2 Toxins/defe nse Superantigen toxins CPIJ003460 M12 mutant protein precursor, putative 0.3 4.2 4.2 6.4* General General ARM repeat CPIJ005388 conserved hypothetical protein 1 4.2* 3.5 4.4* CPIJ801656 armadillo repeat-containing protein 4 1 3.7* 3.9* 3.6 EF-hand CPIJ002594 NADPH oxidase 1.4 2 4.4* 3 CPIJ008636 conserved hypothetical protein 1.2 3.3* 3.3 3.1 CPIJ001307 predicted protein 0.9 4.9 9.5* 5.4 GLA-domain CPIJ802301 conserved hypothetical protein 29.6 5.8* 3.7 14.3* Kelch motif CPIJ011586 actin binding protein, putative 5 1.6 1.8 3.8* CPIJ003681 ring canal kelch protein 0.7 3.6* 4.3* 3.2 L domain-like CPIJ802473 conserved hypothetical protein 3.4 2.1 7.1* 7.3* CPIJ002160 conserved hypothetical protein 1.6 1.9 4.6* 4.5* CPIJ802491 conserved hypothetical protein 1.3 1.8 7.0* 7.4* CPIJ802477 leucine rich protein 1.3 1.3 4.4* 4.1* Spermadhesin, CUB domain CPIJ015617 conserved hypothetical protein 1.1 1.8 4.4* 2.5 WD40 repeat- like CPIJ000996 axonemal dynein intermediate chain polypeptide 0.7 3.1 4.2* 3.2 Protein interaction Ankyrin repeat CPIJ801726 conserved hypothetical protein 18.9 3.2* 4.1 3.4 POZ domain CPIJ008757 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 10.0* 6.1* 23.0* Small molecule binding FAD/NAD(P)- binding domain CPIJ001367 glucose dehydrogenase 3.7 1.9 4.9* 3.6 CPIJ017482 choline dehydrogenase 2.7 1.8 3.9* 3.2* CPIJ017491 glucose dehydrogenase 2 1.5 5.1* 3.2 CPIJ013724 dimethylaniline monooxygenase 1.7 1.3 2.4 4.3* CPIJ007619 glucose dehydrogenase 1.4 2.3 4.9* 3.2 CPIJ017490 glucose dehydrogenase 0 1.3*? 1.7*? 2.3*? GST C-terminal domain-like CPIJ002679 glutathione S-transferase theta-2 8.7 1.9 15.6 15.0* NAD(P)- binding Rossmann-fold domains CPIJ017620 hypothetical protein 97.2 3.5* 5.5 8.2* CPIJ009105 hypothetical protein 27 2.5 7.6* 5.1* CPIJ007450 conserved hypothetical protein 2.2 2.8* 2.7* 5.7* CPIJ004391 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 25.6 4.4* 6 10.3* CPIJ011767 short-chain dehydrogenase 22.5 4.2 3.5 11.8* CPIJ003056 hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 10.6 2.0* 1.6* 4.5* CPIJ019942 conserved hypothetical protein 9.1 4.1 5.0* 10.5* CPIJ019941 conserved hypothetical protein 7.1 2.2 3.2* 6.9 CPIJ014121 short-chain dehydrogenase 3.5 1.4 4.0* 2.5 CPIJ007244 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 2.4 2.3 4.8 5.1* CPIJ007245 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 1.3 3.2 7.2* 7.2* CPIJ004392 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 2 1.1 4.0* 7.4* 8.0* 245 P-loop containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases CPIJ009593 conserved hypothetical protein 1.3 4.1* 4.1* 4.6* CPIJ000848 myosin-2 heavy chain 0.9 2.5 3.8* 4.6* CPIJ012205 dynein-1-beta heavy chain 0.4 2.6 3.6* 3 CPIJ007215 ciliary dynein heavy chain 5 0.3 2.8 4.1* 3.1 CPIJ012527 ciliary dynein heavy chain 5 0.3 3.2* 3.9* 3.9* CPIJ002912 ciliary dynein heavy chain 11 0.3 3.1* 3.5 3.1 CPIJ001823 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 3.2* 3.2 3.3 CPIJ013371 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 3.7* 4.6* 3.9 CPIJ004695 dynein-1-beta heavy chain 0.2 3.2* 4.3* 4.7* CPIJ017862 sulfotransferase 0.1 4.3 1.3 11.9* CPIJ005250 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 6.6* 8.7* 5.8 CPIJ011001 sulfotransferase 0.1 22.7 4.8 43.1* CPIJ009296 conserved hypothetical protein 0.5 4 5.5* 6.5* Thiamin diphosphate- binding fold (THDP-binding) CPIJ011488 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 11.8 41.0* 40.2* Informatio n Chromatin structure Histone H3 K4- specific methyltransferas e SET7/9 N- terminal domain CPIJ009321 conserved hypothetical protein 1.6 1.9 5.1* 4.5* CPIJ801398 conserved hypothetical protein 1 4.4* 3.9 4.3 DNA replication/ repair FYVE/PHD zinc finger CPIJ011620 conserved hypothetical protein 1.7 4.0* 4.0* 4.0* Nucleic acid- binding proteins CPIJ000529 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 3 1.9 10.9* RING/U-box CPIJ007874 predicted protein 0 0.6? 0.6? 1.2*? CPIJ015248 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 7.6 9.2* 6.6 Translation Ribosome inactivating proteins (RIP) CPIJ009211 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 7.1* 7.2* 15.4* Intra- cellular processes Cell cycle, Apoptosis Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) repeat CPIJ006918 conserved hypothetical protein 38.8 2.1 5.5* 5.9* Cell motility Outer arm dynein light chain 1 CPIJ802497 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 7.9 18.6* 21.0* Phase 1 flagellin CPIJ009539 hypothetical protein 22.5 2.2 4.8* 4.0* Tropomyosin CPIJ001907 conserved hypothetical protein 2.4 1.9 3.5 3.8* CPIJ802332 conserved hypothetical protein 0.6 3.8 3.6 4.7* Tubulin C- terminal domain-like CPIJ001353 tubulin alpha chain 4.5 5.4* 5.6* 5.3* Tubulin nucleotide- binding domain- like CPIJ018045 tubulin alpha-1 chain 1.2 5.3* 5.4* 4.8* CPIJ012634 tubulin beta-3 chain 0.3 5.7* 6.7* 5.4* Ion m/tr Cupredoxins CPIJ010466 laccase-like multicopper oxidase 1 2.4 1.8 3.6* 3.2 Ferritin-like CPIJ000900 conserved hypothetical protein 16.1 2.6 5.7* 3.8 MFS general substrate transporter CPIJ002794 hypothetical protein 4.8 3.3 7.1* 6.4* CPIJ015621 cis,cis-muconate transport protein MucK, putative 3.3 2.2 1.3 5.4* 246 CPIJ002172 oligopeptide transporter 2.5 2.1 4.7* 4.2* CPIJ008813 sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 1.1 3.5* 2.9 3.4 CPIJ018461 mfs transporter 0.6 4.3 2.9 11.0* CPIJ002957 sugar transporter 0.4 3.2 1.7 7.5* CPIJ019487 organic cation transporter, putative 0.3 3.4 2.6 10.3* CPIJ002956 sugar transporter 0.3 3.4 3.8 6.7* Periplasmic binding protein- like II CPIJ008094 conserved hypothetical protein 3.9 1.6 4.1* 3.3 SET domain CPIJ019392 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 11.0* 5 40.9* Phospholipi d m/tr CRAL/TRIO domain CPIJ801421 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein 7.6 1.8 3.9* 5.9* CPIJ014225 CRAL/TRIO domain-containing protein 8.3 3.4* 3.3 8.3* CPIJ013676 cellular retinaldehyde binding protein, putative 4.1 1.5 4.0* 4.2* CPIJ013463 conserved hypothetical protein 1.8 1.6 4.1* 2.7 Proteases Cysteine proteinases CPIJ001240 cathepsin B precursor 28.2 -1.6 2.5* 2.2* LuxS/MPP-like metallohydrolas e CPIJ013977 conserved hypothetical protein 3 2.0* 3.8 2.7 Metalloprotease s ("zincins"), catalytic domain CPIJ009594 nephrosin 14.1 -1.1 22.2* 15.6* CPIJ001808 conserved hypothetical protein 2.3 1.5 3.7* 3.2 CPIJ012680 ADAM 12 precursor 0.5 2.5 3.2 5.1* CPIJ009594 Astacin precursor 14.1 -1.1 22.2* 15.6* Pyrrolidone carboxyl peptidase (pyroglutamate aminopeptidase) CPIJ009328 conserved hypothetical protein 1.9 3.7 7.5* 8.4 Serine protease inhibitors CPIJ012287 hypothetical protein 52.1 -5.9 3.8* 2.1 Serpins CPIJ010576 endopin-1 precursor 2.9 1.2 2.5 4.1* Subtilisin-like CPIJ014726 conserved hypothetical protein 0.5 2.4 5.6* 3.2 Trypsin-like serine proteases CPIJ010091 hypothetical protein 43.5 3.3* 3.2* 3.5* CPIJ801497 serine protease 1.5 2.1 2.8 4.6* CPIJ006544 chymotrypsinogen 2 precursor 43.6 2.5 7.4* 6.0* CPIJ011901 polyserase-2 precursor 13.3 1.5 3 4.0* CPIJ018800 ovochymase-2 precursor 8.3 1.4 3.7 4.0* CPIJ003994 serine collagenase 1 precursor, putative 8.2 2.3 3.4 5.3* CPIJ010615 proclotting enzyme precursor 2.9 1.8 4.8* 3.9* CPIJ009891 serine protease 1.8 1.4 3.9* 2.7 CPIJ017797 neurohypophysial hormones 0.7 2 5.2* 4.5* CPIJ004092 oviductin 0.6 5.6* 8.1* 14.5* CPIJ015103 trypsin-5 precursor 0.6 2.3 3.2 5.9* CPIJ019781 trypsin 1 precursor 0.1 90.2* 25.3* 222.0* CPIJ003325 anionic trypsin-2 precursor 0 1.6*? 0.0? 3.2*? CPIJ006869 mast cell protease 3 precursor 0 0.1? 0.3? 1.0*? CPIJ004984 serine proteases 1/2 precursor 0 1.6*? 0.0? 5.5*? CPIJ018529 trypsin 1 precursor 0 0.7? 0.4? 1.3*? CPIJ002140 collagenase precursor 124 1 2.6* 3.2* CPIJ016012 collagenase precursor 85.6 1.3 1.5* 1.1 Zn-dependent exopeptidases CPIJ000990 cytosol aminopeptidase 12.7 3.9* 4.5* 4.4* CPIJ003539 cytosol aminopeptidase 12.1 3.6* 3.4 4 247 CPIJ009640 cytosol aminopeptidase 3.4 3.2* 3.5 3.4 CPIJ011999 zinc carboxypeptidase A 1 precursor 0.1 6.2 2.5 13.7* Protein modificatio n HSP20-like chaperones CPIJ005642 heat shock protein 27 1.9 1.3 -2.1 6.3* CPIJ005646 alphaA-crystallin, putative 1.1 3.4 -4.7 11.4* Transport Integral outer membrane protein TolC, efflux pump component CPIJ013907 conserved hypothetical protein 1.2 2.4 4.6* 3.6 CPIJ018992 conserved hypothetical protein 0.8 2.7 5.4* 3.6 Lipocalins CPIJ015730 apolipoprotein D, putative 13.5 -1.1 5.8* 5.4* CPIJ015727 apolipoprotein D, putative 0.9 -1.3 2.9 5.4* Mitochondrial carrier CPIJ005941 ADP,ATP carrier protein 2 1.4 2.3 1.8 4.4* SNARE fusion complex CPIJ009052 myosin motor, putative 1.8 3.1* 3.4 3.6 t-snare proteins CPIJ014869 conserved hypothetical protein 1.8 3.6* 3.9 3.7 Metabolis m Amino acids m/tr Glutamine synthetase/guani do kinase CPIJ002029 arginine kinase 5.4 3.9* 4.3* 3.9* Carbohydra te m/tr (Trans)glycosida ses CPIJ013084 brain chitinase and chia 3.4 1.8 1.9 3.8* CPIJ008532 glycoside hydrolases 1.1 3.5* 1.6 12.4* CPIJ019693 alpha-glucosidase precursor 0.5 -1.3 2.3 5.1* Invertebrate chitin-binding proteins CPIJ000248 conserved hypothetical protein 16.4 1.8 4.3* 2.3 CPIJ006133 conserved hypothetical protein 16.2 2.1 2.7 4.2* CPIJ003962 conserved hypothetical protein 6.7 1.6 4.3* 3.4 CPIJ009451 conserved hypothetical protein 6.3 6.5* 10.5* 13.3* Xylose isomerase-like CPIJ005176 protein G12 precursor 0 1.3? 0.0? 2.1*? Coenzyme m/tr Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase NM domain-like CPIJ016452 acyl-coa dehydrogenase 3.7 4.2* 1.8 2.4 CPIJ016453 acyl-coa dehydrogenase 0.3 20.0* 7.7* 13.5* Cell wall binding repeat CPIJ006797 conserved hypothetical protein 7.4 1.7 3.9* 2.8 Glutathione synthetase ATP- binding domain- like CPIJ006090 conserved hypothetical protein 0.7 3.9* 4.2* 3.8 Precorrin-8X methylmutase CbiC/CobH CPIJ019685 conserved hypothetical protein 0 0.5*? 0.5*? 1.0*? E- transfer Cytochrome c CPIJ010388 cytochrome c-2 7.5 3.6* 3.7 4.1* CPIJ000571 conserved hypothetical protein 3.4 4.7 4.3* 4.2* Energy Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIa CPIJ014384 conserved hypothetical protein 4.4 2.5* 4.4* 4.4* Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIIb (aka IX) CPIJ008751 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 18.2* 9.7* 55.9* Lipid m/tr Apolipoprotein A-I CPIJ802074 conserved hypothetical protein 35 1.4 6.7* 6.5* CPIJ801556 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 37.0* -2.1 81.5* Nucleotide Nucleoside CPIJ012972 conserved hypothetical protein 11 1.7 5.2* 3.2 248 m/tr hydrolase Other enzymes Acetyl-CoA synthetase-like CPIJ015716 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 0.1 20.0* 8.6 51.4* CPIJ003423 AMP dependent ligase 4.1 4.1* 4.8* 10.8* Actin-like ATPase domain CPIJ014564 heat shock protein 70 B2 1.3 4.0* 4.6* 3.9* alpha/beta- Hydrolases CPIJ019227 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase precursor 4.7 1.1 3.2 4.5* CPIJ005348 lipase 3 precursor 11.7 1.1 4.0* 5.5* CPIJ002073 juvenile hormone esterase 9 1.3 4.1* 3.8 CPIJ013679 alpha-esterase, putative 1.8 2.3 3.8* 2.5 CPIJ016686 esterase FE4 precursor 1.5 -1.6 7.4* 5.0* CPIJ006547 hepatic triacylglycerol lipase precursor 0.4 1.1 8.5* 5.8* CPIJ002720 lysosomal acid lipase, putative 0.2 5.4 8.6* 11.5* Galactose mutarotase-like CPIJ802328 conserved hypothetical protein 0.7 4.5* 4.4* 3.2 Glycoside hydrolase/deacet ylase CPIJ018088 conserved hypothetical protein 4.1 2.4 4.2* 4.4* Lysozyme-like CPIJ009668 conserved hypothetical protein 0.7 9.4* 1.4 3.3 CPIJ014435 hypothetical protein 20.5 3.7* 6.2* 7.1* SGNH hydrolase CPIJ012577 phospholipase b, plb1 1.2 2.4 4.8* 4.1 CPIJ012575 phospholipase b, putative 0.4 2.3 5.9* 5.6* N-terminal nucleophile aminohydrolase s (Ntn hydrolases) CPIJ019795 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 5.9* 7.4* 6.2* Polysaccha ride m/tr UDP- Glycosyltransfer ase/glycogen phosphorylase CPIJ000038 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1-3 precursor 0.9 -1.3 5.0* 4.9 CPIJ000040 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B1 0.1 2 13.3* 11.7* CPIJ009316 hypothetical protein 37.2 3.1* 6.3 7.5* CPIJ802191 glucosyl transferase 6.5 -1.5 3.7* 3.4 Redox Aminoacid dehydrogenase- like, N-terminal domain CPIJ011318 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 2.0* 7.0* 7.6* Aromatic aminoacid monoxygenases, catalytic and oligomerization domains CPIJ014156 conserved hypothetical protein 33.9 2.8 3.7 6.3* Cytochrome P450 CPIJ017198 CYP325BF1-de1b? 0.8 2.7 8.1* 4.2* CPIJ015953 CYP325BF1v2? 0.5 2.3 5.0* 3.6 CPIJ019704 CYP6N11? 2.1 -1.0* 6.8* 10.0* CPIJ800210 CYP6BY2? 8.4 -1.3 13.9* 14.7* CPIJ800176 CYP6M14? 8.1 -1.2 4.0* 3.4 CPIJ800256 CYP4H34? 6.9 1 4.8* 4.4 CPIJ800180 CYP6N19? 3.3 -1.1 10.9* 12.4* CPIJ800178 CYP6M16? 2.6 -1.8 3.7* 4.2* CPIJ800175 CYP6M13? 1 -2.5 6.2* 5.6* CPIJ800177 CYP6M15? 0.3 0 8.9 10.2* Formate/glycera te dehydrogenase CPIJ002343 conserved hypothetical protein 0.8 1.8 4.2* 3.2* 249 catalytic domain-like LDH C-terminal domain-like CPIJ004727 conserved hypothetical protein 0.5 4 4.2* 4.5 NAD(P)-linked oxidoreductase CPIJ000901 conserved hypothetical protein 7.6 2.1 5.0* 3.5* CPIJ009681 translocator protein 1.8 4.5 4.1* 4.7* Thioredoxin- like CPIJ010478 conserved hypothetical protein 1.1 3.4 3.8* 4.2 Secondary metabolism Concanavalin A- like lectins/glucanas es CPIJ001299 keratinocyte lectin, putative 1.4 1.4 5.1* 4 CPIJ016495 thrombospondin-4, putative 0.2 1.4 4.2 5.7* Dimeric alpha+beta barrel CPIJ002813 conserved hypothetical protein 3.4 1.5 5.4* 2.7 PR-1-like CPIJ000211 cysteine-rich secretory protein-2, putative 1.7 2.2 6.8* 9.5* Transferase s PLP-dependent transferases CPIJ010034 glutamate decarboxylase 1.7 6.0* 3.2 17.7* No annotation No annotation No annotation CPIJ007504 bumetanide-sensitive sodium- (potassium)-chloride cotransporter 2.9 2.1 5.4* 4.0* CPIJ004245 cationic amino acid transporter 1.8 2.2 6.7* 4.5* CPIJ010699 cecropin 25 1.5 1.7 4.6* CPIJ005108 cecropin 12.5 2.5 7.7* 8.0* CPIJ004293 cuticle protein, putative 10 1.9 5.1* 4.7* CPIJ003491 cuticle protein, putative 11 5.1* -1.5 10.9* CPIJ017925 cuticle protein, putative 7.7 1.8 1.8 4.0* CPIJ001839 cuticle protein, putative 6.5 2.6 7.3* 4.4* CPIJ000106 elongase, puatative 4.3 1.4 3.8* 2.4 CPIJ013663 elongase, putative 9.3 2.2 2.1 3.7* CPIJ003687 elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 4 0.3 2.5 8.9* 7.9* CPIJ006964 high affinity nuclear juvenile hormone binding protein, putative 3.2 2.3 5.0* 4.0* CPIJ016318 larval cuticle protein 8.7 2.5 1.8 4.4 5.0* CPIJ004289 larval cuticle protein A3A 9.5 1.8 6.6* 6.5* CPIJ002801 larval/pupal cuticle protein H1C precursor 36.7 1.9 5.8* 4 CPIJ005349 lysosomal acid lipase, putative 5 1.2 4.0* 6.3* CPIJ004704 myosin motor, putative 0.3 4.5* 3.4 3.4 CPIJ007819 NADH:ubiquinone dehydrogenase, putative 4.7 3.9 4.8* 6.4* CPIJ008136 osiris 11 3.7 3.3* 5.0* 7.3* CPIJ009829 osiris 18 15.5 1.4 4.1* 2.4 CPIJ004911 osiris 21, putative 0.5 3 2 6.4* CPIJ008140 Osiris, putative 7.3 1.9 2.6 4.9* CPIJ011100 Osiris, putative 1.5 1.9 4.8* 3.6 CPIJ001618 protofilament ribbon protein 2.5 3.1* 3.3 3.6 CPIJ006318 proton-coupled amino acid transporter 1 2.8 3.0* 2.9 6.0* CPIJ009324 pupal cuticle protein 78E, putative 7.2 2.3 5.7* 5.7* CPIJ018582 pupal cuticle protein, putative 11.9 1.7 4.4* 3.5 CPIJ008231 pupal cuticle protein, putative 10.8 1.7 4.6* 3.2 CPIJ010700 putative 4.2 kda basic salivary peptide 2.5 2.3 2.4 10.3* CPIJ008286 serine protease, putative 6 1.6 4.3* 2.8 CPIJ012056 sodium-dependent serotonin 2.9 2 4.1* 3 250 transporter CPIJ801536 sodium/potassium-dependent ATPase beta-2 subunit 0.8 14.2* 32.5* 24.9* CPIJ012066 sodium/shloride dependent amino acid transporter, putative 1.9 2.4 44.6* 42.7* CPIJ801722 sodium/solute symporter 2 -1.1 6.0* 5.1* CPIJ801721 sodium/solute symporter 0.5 2.4 7.5* 3.7 CPIJ015023 stretchin-mlck 0.2 2.5 5 12.2* CPIJ013788 structural contituent of cuticle, putative 90.5 2 5.1* 4.2 CPIJ012065 tryptophan transporter 0.8 2.9 17.5* 21.2* CPIJ802272 conserved hypothetical protein 46.8 3.5* 4.1* 3.8 CPIJ018910 conserved hypothetical protein 36.2 3.5* 3 9.3* CPIJ007289 conserved hypothetical protein 22.1 1.8 5.1* 3.4 CPIJ014232 conserved hypothetical protein 19.8 4.4* 2.2 11.2* CPIJ017629 conserved hypothetical protein 19.5 3.0* 3.5 3.3 CPIJ004475 conserved hypothetical protein 19.1 1.9 4.1* 3.7* CPIJ012507 conserved hypothetical protein 16.1 2.9* 4.0* 5.4* CPIJ008525 conserved hypothetical protein 14.2 4.3* 4.9* 5.1* CPIJ017913 conserved hypothetical protein 13.4 3.0* 3.6 3.4 CPIJ802297 conserved hypothetical protein 12.5 2.1 2.2 5.1* CPIJ009334 conserved hypothetical protein 12.3 1.2 4.0* 2.5 CPIJ006965 conserved hypothetical protein 10.1 2 3.8* 5.5* CPIJ002836 conserved hypothetical protein 8.8 1.1 3.5 4.3* CPIJ010705 conserved hypothetical protein 6.6 1.4 3.8* 3.2 CPIJ010748 conserved hypothetical protein 6 1.7 4.1* 3.5 CPIJ801448 conserved hypothetical protein 5.7 1.5 3.8* 2.6 CPIJ006959 conserved hypothetical protein 5.5 2.4 5.4* 4.0* CPIJ009100 conserved hypothetical protein 5.3 2.3 4.9* 4.3* CPIJ004790 conserved hypothetical protein 5 2.1 4.3* 3.6 CPIJ008211 conserved hypothetical protein 4.6 2.9 -2.8 5.5* CPIJ007448 conserved hypothetical protein 4.1 8.2* 5.9* 19.5* CPIJ000450 conserved hypothetical protein 4 1.8 3.8* 3.3 CPIJ016842 conserved hypothetical protein 3.7 1.6 4.1* 3.2 CPIJ011498 conserved hypothetical protein 3.7 1.4 4.0* 3.8* CPIJ010184 conserved hypothetical protein 3.3 3.4* 4.7* 4 CPIJ007813 conserved hypothetical protein 3 3.2* 4.8* 3.4 CPIJ020250 conserved hypothetical protein 2.7 4.9* 4.2* 5.8* CPIJ006892 conserved hypothetical protein 2.3 3.1 8.0* 4.9* CPIJ002597 conserved hypothetical protein 2.1 2 3.9* 3.1 CPIJ013908 conserved hypothetical protein 1.9 2.5 4.2* 3.7 CPIJ010176 conserved hypothetical protein 1.8 2.1 4.2* 4.5* CPIJ007344 conserved hypothetical protein 1.7 1.6 4.0* 3.1 CPIJ006083 conserved hypothetical protein 1.7 2.7 4.6* 3.9 CPIJ008664 conserved hypothetical protein 1.4 5.6* 13.6* 10.2* CPIJ016283 conserved hypothetical protein 1 2.1 1.6 6.6* CPIJ014725 conserved hypothetical protein 0.9 -1 6.1* 2.3 CPIJ011914 conserved hypothetical protein 0.9 4.2* 3.2 4.4 CPIJ018462 conserved hypothetical protein 0.8 6.1* 5.2 16.8* CPIJ008775 conserved hypothetical protein 0.7 5.0* 2.4 2.8 CPIJ016278 conserved hypothetical protein 0.6 6.1* 5.0* 6.1* CPIJ011487 conserved hypothetical protein 0.6 5.9 10.9* 10.7* CPIJ018794 conserved hypothetical protein 0.6 2.3 3.5 6.3* CPIJ005199 conserved hypothetical protein 0.4 2.6 6.2* 3.4 CPIJ006046 conserved hypothetical protein 0.4 74.4* 4.8 259.6* CPIJ018443 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 4.5* 4.5 5.2* CPIJ007442 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 3.3 9.9* 5.9 CPIJ008147 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 5.7 5 12.4* CPIJ017621 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 6.6 9.2* 7.8 CPIJ002735 conserved hypothetical protein 0 2.5*? 2.2*? 2.9*? CPIJ006215 conserved hypothetical protein 0 2.0? 0.8? 7.3*? CPIJ014238 conserved hypothetical protein 0 0.2? 0.5? 1.3*? 251 CPIJ014355 conserved hypothetical protein 0 1.3? 0.8? 3.5*? CPIJ802086 hypothetical protein 77.4 2.3 6.5* 4.6 CPIJ010703 hypothetical protein 50.4 2.3 7.0* 5.0* CPIJ009104 hypothetical protein 43.4 1.9 6.3* 4.2* CPIJ012015 hypothetical protein 43 2.8* 2.6 2.8 CPIJ009101 hypothetical protein 38.3 2.1 4.9* 4.7 CPIJ011254 hypothetical protein 31.6 2.1 6.0* 5.2* CPIJ004688 hypothetical protein 23.2 3.9* 5.2* 4.8* CPIJ014436 hypothetical protein 21.4 2.1 5.4* 2.9 CPIJ019329 hypothetical protein 14.6 -5.6 8.2* 9.4* CPIJ000531 hypothetical protein 12.9 1.4 2.4 4.2* CPIJ013119 hypothetical protein 9.2 3.0* 4.2* 7.1* CPIJ010444 hypothetical protein 2.9 3.4 7.0* 6.2* CPIJ018459 hypothetical protein 2.1 2.6 1.3 6.9* CPIJ005376 hypothetical protein 1 2.6 4.5 6.8* CPIJ019239 hypothetical protein 0.7 6.9 42.1* 11.5 CPIJ015171 hypothetical protein 0 1.0? 2.2*? 0.9? Other Unknown function Cysteine-rich domain CPIJ007580 conserved hypothetical protein 0.4 3.1 4.8* 4.6 E set domains CPIJ020106 translocator protein 0.9 6.5* 6.8* 8.2* CPIJ002737 MPA2 allergen 11.4 2 1.7 3.9* CPIJ013180 conserved hypothetical protein 5.5 -1.1 1.1 7.9* Fibrinogen coiled-coil and central regions CPIJ014143 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 4.8* 5.6* 4.7 SpoIIaa-like CPIJ005331 sulfate transporter, putative 1 2.5 1.8 5.2* Regulation DNA- binding beta-beta-alpha zinc fingers CPIJ007837 zinc finger protein 8.2 -1 3.4 4.1* CPIJ016287 conserved hypothetical protein 1.7 3.2* 2.2 2.6 CPIJ018516 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 8.9* 7.3 10.6* Glucocorticoid receptor-like (DNA-binding domain) CPIJ008216 nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 3.1 2.8 4.6* 4.2* Homeodomain- like CPIJ012997 Eip93F 1.8 3.1* 4.6* 4.8* Leucine zipper domain CPIJ019348 sarcolemmal associated protein, putative 0.1 3.4 8.1* 6.1 CPIJ004502 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 10.2* 11.4* 12.8* RPB6/omega subunit-like CPIJ005881 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 9.0* 8.2* 7.1* Kinases/ph osphatases Protein kinase- like (PK-like) CPIJ801694 testis-specific serine/threonine- protein kinase 1 1.5 4.0* 4.9* 4.1* CPIJ005558 conserved hypothetical protein 1.8 -1.9 6.9* 6.5* CPIJ013214 rage-1 0.3 5.9* 4 4.8 CPIJ007354 testis-specific serine/threonine- protein kinase 6 0.2 4.6 6.5* 5.9 CPIJ017094 protein serine/threonine kinase, putative 16 1.7 4.2* 3.4 Receptor activity Cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor CPIJ009621 conserved hypothetical protein 1 3.1* 4.0* 3.5 CPIJ006799 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 5.6* 1.6 15.7* Signal transductio n cAMP-binding domain-like CPIJ008823 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 3.5 5.0* 4.7 CPIJ006213 cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel 4 0.1 3.9 6.1* 6.1* Insect pheromone/odor CPIJ012719 odorant binding protein OBP20 1.9 2.2 4.6* 3 252 ant-binding proteins CPIJ001874 Odorant-binding protein 56a, putative 0.9 31.6* 3 62.1* CPIJ009568 odorant binding protein OBP8 0.3 -1 37.2* 24.0* CPIJ801715 Odorant-binding protein 56a 0.2 36.5* 2.9 63.1* Nicotinic receptor ligand binding domain- like CPIJ016909 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, beta-2 subunit, putative 2.9 1.3 3.4 5.3* Nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain CPIJ014945 nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 8.2 2.6 5.1* 4.0* CPIJ008215 nuclear hormone receptor ftz-f1 4.5 2 4.4* 3.1 PDZ domain- like CPIJ001710 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 4.4 3.6 11.0* PYP-like sensor domain (PAS domain) CPIJ007193 period circadian protein 0.4 3.6* 2.8 2.8 Regulator of G- protein signaling, RGS CPIJ004658 beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 0.5 5.1 7.1* 5.3 Ypt/Rab-GAP domain of gyp1p CPIJ001736 conserved hypothetical protein 0.7 3.7* 3.1 3.9 ?SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html ?Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.3; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ ? Annotations for cytochrome P450 genes were taken from the most current annotation based on: Nelson, DR (2009) The Cytochrome P450 Homepage. Human Genomics 4, 59-65: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html ?Fragments Per Kilo base of gene for every Million reads mapped (FPKM) *Significantly up-regulated compared to the untreated control with a false discovery rate of 0.05. ?Fold expression relative to the untreated sample not calculable, the values represent the actual FPKM values for the genes. **m/tr= metabolism/transport 253 254 Appendix 4.3. Genes down-regulated in the pyrethroid-resistant HAmCqG8 strain of Culex quinquefasciatus following permethrin challenge. SCOP functional annotation? Vectorbase annotation? FPKM? Fold change (24h) General Detailed Superfamily Accession Gene Untreated Acetone Permethrin LC50 LC70 Extra-cellular processes Blood clotting Fibrinogen C- terminal domain- like CPIJ013290 conserved hypothetical protein 4.7 -2.9 -4.3* -3.2* CPIJ018159 fibrinogen and fibronectin 11.1 -3.3* -15.1* -12.0* CPIJ013538 ficolin-1 precursor 32.4 -39.7* -95.8* -48.6* CPIJ017657 salivary secreted angiopoietin, putative 13.4 -5.1* -4.2* -2.1 Cell adhesion alpha- catenin/vinculin CPIJ018558 conserved hypothetical protein 1 -5.8* -1.9 -1.2 C-type lectin-like CPIJ000449 galactose-specific C-type lectin, putative 19.4 -1.6 -3.0* -3.7* CPIJ012307 galactose-specific C-type lectin, putative 62.5 -4.1* -1.5 -1.6 CPIJ016688 galactose-specific C-type lectin, putative 5 -8.1* -1.3 -1.5 FnI-like domain CPIJ000931 conserved hypothetical protein 8.5 -2.2 -3.7* -3.3* RNI-like CPIJ004947 leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 1 33.4 -3.8* -4.2* -3.8* Immune response Staphylokinase/stre ptokinase CPIJ801956 croquemort 179.1 -1.3 -3.3 -3.7* General General EF-hand CPIJ005975 conserved hypothetical protein 482.8 -2.9 -4.1* -5.1* WD40 repeat-like CPIJ000959 conserved hypothetical protein 39.8 -4.7* -2 -2.5* CPIJ004852 conserved hypothetical protein 3.2 1.3 -2.2 -2.9* Small molecule binding FAD-binding domain CPIJ802221 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase 197.8 -3.4* -2.9 -3 FAD/NAD(P)- binding domain CPIJ010903 conserved hypothetical protein 101.7 -3.3* -2.5* -2.3 CPIJ008048 peroxisomal N1-acetyl- spermine/spermidine oxidase 5.3 -2.6 -3.4* -2.8* GST C-terminal domain-like CPIJ018632 glutathione-s-transferase theta, gst 457.8 -6.3* -5.0* -4.3* NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold domains CPIJ000372 L-xylulose reductase 29.9 -3.8* -5.1* -4.5* CPIJ005655 oxidoreductase 55.4 -3.1* -5.1* -4.2* CPIJ005656 oxidoreductase 164.6 -5.6* -6.1* -4.9* Nucleotide-binding domain CPIJ007272 d-amino acid oxidase 31.4 -2.6 -5.1* -3.9* P-loop containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases CPIJ008284 canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1 1.8 -2.1 -3.0* -3.8* CPIJ012368 lipoprotein-releasing system ATP- binding protein lolD 3.2 -5.4* -2.1 -2.7* Thiamin diphosphate- binding fold (THDP-binding) CPIJ011465 C-4 methylsterol oxidase 4.6 -1.3 -3.3* -3.5* Information Chromatin structure Histone H3 K4- specific methyltransferase SET7/9 N-terminal domain CPIJ007018 conserved hypothetical protein 11.7 -1.2 -2.8 -3.1* DNA replication/re pair RING/U-box CPIJ011986 nuclear transcription factor, x-box binding 1 2 -2.6 -1.8 -3.3* 255 Translation Ribosomal protein S5 domain 2-like CPIJ005090 conserved hypothetical protein 10.7 -1.8 -2.1 -2.7* Intra-cellular processes Cell cycle, Apoptosis CAD & PB1 domains CPIJ011935 conserved hypothetical protein 5.5 -14.0* -29.0* -29.5* Ion m/tr MFS general substrate transporter CPIJ017878 permease, putative 60.2 -6.3* -4.0* -2.8 CPIJ007428 Sialin, Sodium/sialic acid cotransporter, putative 35.8 -1.8 -2.1 -2.6* CPIJ012069 sucrose transport protein 5.9 -3.3* -5.0* -4.2* CPIJ012070 sucrose transport protein 9.7 -6.7* -2.6* -2.4* CPIJ008941 sugar transporter 8.7 -3.1* -3.2* -3.7* CPIJ012676 sugar transporter 18 -3.6* -3.4* -3.1* CPIJ017566 synaptic vesicle protein 7 -5.3* -5.0* -7.4* CPIJ003138 UNC93A protein, putative 40 -1.9 -2.9* -2.4 Phospholipid m/tr CRAL/TRIO domain CPIJ014226 cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein 394.7 -1.3 -5.1* -5.5* CPIJ014224 conserved hypothetical protein 15.7 -4.0* -3.1* -3.9* CPIJ014228 conserved hypothetical protein 253.2 -2.5 -3.3* -2.8* CPIJ015060 conserved hypothetical protein 24.6 -3.6* -2.2 -2.5* Proteases Creatinase/aminope ptidase CPIJ015407 xaa-Pro aminopeptidase 1 46.6 -1.5 -2.4 -2.9* Cysteine proteinases CPIJ001239 cathepsin B precursor 91.8 -3.3* 1.9 1.5 Kazal-type serine protease inhibitors CPIJ000733 conserved hypothetical protein 287.5 -3.2* -2 -1.6 Metallo-dependent phosphatases CPIJ800110 conserved hypothetical protein 21.6 -1.7 -6.9* -7.3* Metalloproteases ("zincins"), catalytic domain CPIJ004060 aminopeptidase N precursor 28.5 -1.1 -18.5* -24.9* CPIJ012036 aminopeptidase N precursor 15 -2.1 -3.2* -3.4* CPIJ002943 conserved hypothetical protein 126.3 -1.2 -2.3 -3.0* CPIJ013316 zinc metalloproteinase 2.8 -7.8* 1.7 -1 CPIJ801477 protease m1 zinc metalloprotease 57.5 -1.7 -5.9* -6.7* CPIJ801485 protease m1 zinc metalloprotease 51.5 -1.2 -4.8* -4.9* Serine protease inhibitors CPIJ012287 hypothetical protein 52.1 -5.9* 3.8 2.1 Serpins CPIJ000214 serpin B10 5.6 -3.7* -2.6* -2.3 Trypsin-like serine proteases CPIJ002126 chymotrypsin-1 70.9 -2.9* -17.3* -16.4* CPIJ002138 chymotrypsinogen, putative 93.1 -4.7* -9.0* -7.3* CPIJ011617 chymotrypsinogen, putative 382.8 -2 -3.6 -3.7* CPIJ006076 hypodermin-B precursor 8.2 -4.4* -2.6* -2.1 CPIJ002128 mast cell protease 2 precursor 65.6 -1.1 -4.2* -4.0* CPIJ010641 prostasin precursor 37.9 -2.4 -2.5* -2.5* CPIJ017798 serine protease 4.6 -3.6* -2.5 -1.5 CPIJ002136 serine proteases 1/2 precursor 179.6 -1.5 -5.4* -5.8* CPIJ002137 serine proteases 1/2 precursor 47.1 1.1 -2.9* -3.1* CPIJ007385 serine-type enodpeptidase, putative 32.6 -4.6* -10.8* -12.5* CPIJ011383 serine-type enodpeptidase, putative 1263.6 -2.7 -12.5* -16.5* CPIJ013616 trypsin 5 precursor 18.7 -16.2* -3.9* -5.6* CPIJ002133 trypsin epsilon precursor 22 -2.2 -4.4* -4.8* CPIJ006077 trypsin theta precursor 380.9 -1.8 -4.6* -5.1* CPIJ006079 tryptase gamma precursor 1353.8 -1.3 -7.8* -7.3* CPIJ801807 brachyurin 278.3 -1.9 -7.2* -6.7* CPIJ002142 collagenase precursor 2981.5 -1.4 -3.2* -3.6* CPIJ002156 chymotrypsin BI precursor 145.1 -2.0* 1.4 1.2 Zn-dependent exopeptidases CPIJ010805 carboxypeptidase A1 precursor 141.2 -1.6 -4.7* -4.5* CPIJ010801 carboxypeptidase B precursor 11.6 1.4 -6.2* -5.7* CPIJ009738 conserved hypothetical protein 44.6 -1.5 -3.1* -3.3* CPIJ010806 conserved hypothetical protein 100.4 -1.1 -11.6* -5.3* CPIJ014108 conserved hypothetical protein 19.3 -1.7 -2.9* -3.4* CPIJ801685 carboxypeptidase A2 54.8 -2.9* -4.7* -5.7* CPIJ801679 zinc carboxypeptidase 100.5 -1.6 -4.7* -5.6* 256 CPIJ801680 zinc carboxypeptidase 41.6 -1.7 -3.6* -3.2* Protein modification GroES-like CPIJ013379 sorbitol dehydrogenase 73.6 -4.2* -2.1 -1.8 HSP20-like chaperones CPIJ005645 heat shock protein 22 4 -1.3 -9.2* 3 Peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase CPIJ018565 peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase 9 -3.8* 2.1 2.4 Transport Ammonium transporter CPIJ013531 ammonium transporter, putative 24.4 -3.4* 1.3 -1.7 Lipocalins CPIJ801584 apolipoprotein D 7.8 -4.3* 1 1.3 Mitochondrial carrier CPIJ019873 mitochondrial brown fat uncoupling protein 42.1 -3.1* -3.8* -3.3* CPIJ013697 tricarboxylate transport protein, mitochondrial precursor 47.6 -3.1* -2.2 -2.3 Metabolism Amino acids m/tr Arginase/deacetylas e CPIJ015718 arginase 30.2 -3.0* -3.3* -3.9* PLP-binding barrel CPIJ008556 ornithine decarboxylase 4.1 -8.3* -2.1 -1.5 CPIJ009093 ornithine decarboxylase 6.9 -1.9 -2 -2.5* CPIJ009094 ornithine decarboxylase 1 13.7 -1.6 -3.4* -3.1* Tryptophan synthase beta subunit-like PLP- dependent enzymes CPIJ012752 cysteine synthase 48.5 -4.2* -8.3* -5.5* Carbohydrate m/tr (Trans)glycosidases CPIJ801597 alpha-amylase 1 387.1 1.1 -22.1* -23.6* CPIJ801761 alpha-amylase A 346.3 -1.8 -5.8* -5.4* CPIJ008663 conserved hypothetical protein 219.4 -2 -4.8* -5.7* CPIJ007459 hypothetical protein 23.7 -2.5 -2.7* -1.3 CPIJ005062 alpha-amylase 249.1 -1.4 -3.2 -4.8* CPIJ013169 alpha-glucosidase precursor 13.7 -1.2 -2.6* -2.5* CPIJ003338 beta-galactosidase 62.4 -1.5 -3.2* -3.3* CPIJ013477 beta-hexosaminidase 1.6 1.5 -3.0* -2.1 CPIJ008529 lactase-phlorizin hydrolase precursor 54 -1.9 -4.2* -4.2* CPIJ008530 lactase-phlorizin hydrolase precursor 242.1 -2.9 -16.7* -17.1* CPIJ008531 lactase-phlorizin hydrolase precursor 138.1 -2.5 -5.0* -5.3* CPIJ005725 alpha-amylase A precursor 48.7 -1.5 -4.2* -3.4* CPIJ009306 neutral alpha-glucosidase ab precursor 7.6 -1.9 -5.4* -7.1* Invertebrate chitin- binding proteins CPIJ004731 conserved hypothetical protein 11.9 -5.3* -2 -2.3 CPIJ011623 conserved hypothetical protein 74.9 -3.1* -2.4 -3.1* CPIJ012138 conserved hypothetical protein 546.8 -1.6 -4.3* -5.0* CPIJ014181 conserved hypothetical protein 235.5 -2 -3.1 -3.5* CPIJ014194 conserved hypothetical protein 114.7 -5.1* -1.6 -1.9 CPIJ015734 conserved hypothetical protein 23.9 -5.3* -1.2 -1.4 CPIJ016342 conserved hypothetical protein 58.7 -4.7* -1.2 -1.6 CPIJ003955 predicted protein 211.7 -2.4 -7.9* -4.7* CPIJ004733 predicted protein 50.4 -1.5 -3.7* -4.6* CPIJ018945 predicted protein 13.4 -1.5 -2.9* -4.7* Coenzyme m/tr Cell wall binding repeat CPIJ016313 endocuticle structural glycoprotein SgAbd-2 5.3 0.0* -39.8* 0.0* SCP-like CPIJ015122 sterol carrier protein-2, putative 2729.5 -3 -4.2* -3.6 Single hybrid motif CPIJ016638 glycine cleavage system h protein 112.8 -3.3* -2 -1.9 E- transfer CO dehydrogenase molybdoprotein N- domain-like CPIJ000151 sodium/solute symporter 20.5 -1.3 -2.5* -1.4 Energy Citrate synthase CPIJ010291 citrate synthase, mitochondrial precursor 8.6 -2.5 -3.1* -2.4* PEP carboxykinase- like CPIJ010515 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 87.3 -9.5* -4.2* -2.7 CPIJ010518 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 154.2 -6.2* -4.0* -3.2 Lipid m/tr Acyl-CoA binding protein CPIJ011388 diazepam binding inhibitor, putative 718.5 -5.5* -4.5* -4.6* 257 Tp47 lipoprotein, N-terminal domain CPIJ016325 conserved hypothetical protein 359.9 -2.8* -3.0* -2.8* Nitrogen m/tr RmlC-like cupins CPIJ020056 cysteine dioxygenase 54.1 -1.5 -2.4* -2 Nucleotide m/tr Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases- like CPIJ007938 asparagine synthetase B 11.3 -4.4* -1.8 -1.9 SAICAR synthase- like CPIJ801627 purine biosynthesis protein 6, pur6 104.8 -3.2* -3.8* -2 Other enzymes Acetyl-CoA synthetase-like CPIJ016639 acetyl-coa synthetase 48.5 -2.9* -1.4 -1.2 CPIJ012907 luciferin 4-monooxygenase 17.3 -3.3* 1.3 1.4 Actin-like ATPase domain CPIJ012574 actin 36.4 -1.3 -3.8* -3.6* CPIJ006534 conserved hypothetical protein 19.7 -4.2* -1.5 -1.8 CPIJ011081 heat shock protein 70 B2 1.1 1.7 -5.8* 3.3 CPIJ011082 heat shock protein 70 B2 4.2 -1.3 -7.4* 1.8 CPIJ011083 heat shock protein 70 B2 3.4 -1.6 -7.8* 1.5 Alkaline phosphatase-like CPIJ001264 alkaline phosphatase 33.2 -2.4 -3.7* -5.3* CPIJ001265 alkaline phosphatase 75.5 -1.3 -5.4* -6.5* CPIJ001262 alkaline phosphatase 99.4 -1.6 -4.0* -5.3* CPIJ015241 alkaline phosphatase 8.1 -3.9* -2.9* -2.6* CPIJ018121 membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase precursor 107.2 -2.2 -11.9* -15.4* alpha/beta- Hydrolases CPIJ018233 esterase FE4 precursor 3085 -2.1* -7.9* -8.0* CPIJ001372 bphl protein 30.6 -2.7* -2.6* -2.8* CPIJ018231 carboxylesterase 36.1 -2.2 -12.7* -14.3* CPIJ018232 cholinesterase 259.7 1.2 -4.2* -4.1 CPIJ007461 epoxide hydrolase 21.9 -4.5* -3.0* -2 CPIJ004637 glutactin precursor 41.1 -9.2* -4.3* -4.0* CPIJ001121 kynurenine formamidase 29.7 -3.4* -2.6* -3.0* CPIJ004227 lipase 631.6 -1.9 -19.4* -16.1* CPIJ004228 lipase 1160 -2 -8.5* -9.5* CPIJ004230 lipase 170.5 -1.8 -8.7* -7.0* CPIJ002726 lipase 3 precursor 116.5 -2.3 -8.7* -13.3* CPIJ008876 lysosomal pro-X carboxypeptidase, putative 439.2 -2.3 -10.8* -11.9* CPIJ004224 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase 347.8 -1.6 -4.7* -5.0* CPIJ004226 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase 22.7 -2 -7.2* -5.6* CPIJ019228 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase 7.2 -3.2* 1.4 1.6 CPIJ004225 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase precursor 482.6 -1.8 -6.8* -7.9* CPIJ005462 pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase precursor 19.5 -1.6 -2.4* -3.0* CPIJ008873 prolylcarboxypeptidase, putative 19.4 1.4 -3.1* -3.2* CPIJ008874 prolylcarboxypeptidase, putative 252.8 -1.4 -4.3* -4.5* CPIJ008877 prolylcarboxypeptidase, putative 17.1 -22.6* -4.7* -6.0* CPIJ008878 prolylcarboxypeptidase, putative 13.3 -139.5* -14.4* -22.0* CPIJ002911 retinoid-inducible serine carboxypeptidase precursor 48.1 -2 -6.7* -8.1* CPIJ018060 thymus-specific serine protease precursor 53.7 -1.3 -4.3* -5.7* CPIJ018061 thymus-specific serine protease precursor 6.6 -1.3 -7.7* -5.0* CPIJ801474 conserved hypothetical protein 260 -2.6 -10.7* -11.4* CPIJ801475 conserved hypothetical protein 30.5 -1.5 -30.8* -50.7* CPIJ802425 dipeptidyl peptidase 4 70 -2.1 -3.3* -3.7* Calcium-dependent phosphotriesterase CPIJ007528 anterior fat body protein 116.4 -4.1* -1.9 -1.9 CPIJ007230 regucalcin 72 -8.2* -5.6* -5.1* Carbon-nitrogen hydrolase CPIJ003840 aliphatic nitrilase, putative 59.4 -1.5 -2.2 -2.7* Carbonic anhydrase CPIJ014281 carbonic anhydrase precursor 34.9 -1.4 -2.6* -2.6* Cytidine deaminase-like CPIJ801876 cytidine deaminase 13.3 -3.9* -2.2 -3.0* 258 HAD-like CPIJ008977 pyridoxal phosphate phosphatase 1.6 -6.9* -17.8* -3.6* Isochorismatase- like hydrolases CPIJ008109 conserved hypothetical protein 13.3 -1.4 -3.1* -3.1* Metallo-dependent hydrolases CPIJ003807 allantoinase 85 -5.4* -4.7* -7.8* N-acetylmuramoyl- L-alanine amidase- like CPIJ016771 peptidoglycan recognition protein precursor 4339.8 -1.6 -15.0* -13.6* N-terminal nucleophile aminohydrolases (Ntn hydrolases) CPIJ802450 gamma glutamyl transpeptidase 7.7 -1.4 -7.2* -7.2* Thiolase-like CPIJ005595 fatty acid synthase S- acetyltransferase 80.5 -4.4* -3 -3 YVTN repeat- like/Quinoprotein amine dehydrogenase CPIJ009045 conserved hypothetical protein 24 -22.6* -3.1* -4.3* Photosynthesi s Light-harvesting complex subunits CPIJ005531 conserved hypothetical protein 12.9 -3.4* -2.5* -2.9* Polysaccharid e m/tr Ricin B-like lectins CPIJ013165 16 kDa salivary peptide, putative 11.5 -2 -4.1* -2.2 Redox Acid phosphatase/Vanadi um-dependent haloperoxidase CPIJ013993 amino acid transporter 1.1 -1.1 -1.6 -7.0* ALDH-like CPIJ009438 aldehyde dehydrogenase 84.7 -2.6 -3.1* -2.8 Aromatic aminoacid monoxygenases, catalytic and oligomerization domains CPIJ002149 phenylalanine hydroxylase 34.8 -2.8* -2.2 -1.6 Cytochrome P450 CPIJ800155 CYP15B1 1.4 -1.9 -1.4 -3.2* CPIJ800249 CYP4D42 16.6 -1.5 -2.8* -2.7* CPIJ800254 CYP4H30 21.4 -1.7 -6.5* -6.8* CPIJ800257 CYP4H35 15.8 -2.5 -2.4* -2.4* CPIJ800260 CYP4H38 20.3 -1.7 -3.2* -3.8* CPIJ800227 CYP9J38 5.8 1.1 -1.9 -2.4* CPIJ016284 CYP4J4 1.8 -1.6 -3.3* -2.7 Di-copper centre- containing domain CPIJ007783 arylphorin subunit alpha precursor 3799.6 -7.6* -7.3 -6.8 CPIJ006537 larval serum protein 1 beta chain precursor 68.1 -5.9* -9.0* -9.1* CPIJ006538 larval serum protein 1 beta chain precursor 96.3 -6.2* -6.8* -6.0* CPIJ018824 larval serum protein 1 beta chain precursor 203 -6.0* -6.1* -6.2* CPIJ000056 hexamerin 1.1 precursor 1590 -4.9* -5.4* -4.3* CPIJ007783 hexamerin 1.1 precursor 3800 -7.6* -7.3* -6.8* CPIJ009032 hexamerin 1.1 precursor 357 -3.7* -3.6* -2.8* CPIJ009033 hexamerin 1.1 precursor 15465.4 -1.9* -1.5 -1.6 CPIJ001820 Larval serum protein 2 precursor 6341.4 -5.7* -5.4* -6.0* Thioredoxin-like CPIJ018629 glutathione-s-transferase theta, gst 96.5 -3.0* -1.7 -1.8 CPIJ008450 peroxiredoxin-6 183.5 -4.0* -3.1* -3.4* Secondary metabolism Concanavalin A- like lectins/glucanases CPIJ001786 collagen alpha chain 6.8 -2.1 -3.7* -4.0* CPIJ006421 conserved hypothetical protein 16.2 -2 -2.4 -2.5* CPIJ004229 gram negative bacteria binding protein 2 1.3 -2.7 -12.6* -25.6 CPIJ004321 gram-negative bacteria binding protein 199.5 1.3 -4.0* -4.6* CPIJ004323 gram-negative bacteria binding protein 141.5 -1.4 -3.2* -3.2* CPIJ004325 gram-negative bacteria binding 11.1 -2 -2.9* -4.7* 259 protein CPIJ004320 gram-negative bacteria-binding protein 1 precursor 134.9 -2.9 -38.1* -24.8* Transferases Acyl-CoA N- acyltransferases (Nat) CPIJ015296 retinol-binding protein 5.7 -3.6 -3.6 -5.7* Glycerol-3- phosphate (1)- acyltransferase CPIJ802146 1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 25.1 -2.5 -3.2* -3.0* PLP-dependent transferases CPIJ006619 cystathionine gamma-lyase 56.9 -1.6 -4.5* -4.0* CPIJ004400 ornithine aminotransferase, mitochondrial precursor 110.7 -4.9* -5.8* -6.5* CPIJ008287 phosphoserine aminotransferase 31.3 -3.5* -2.3 -1.6 No annotation No annotation No annotation CPIJ017146 2-acylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2- A 63.9 -1.6 -2.6 -2.8* CPIJ013992 amino acid transporter, putative 5.1 -1.6 -3.1* -2.3 CPIJ802440 cuticle protein CP14.6 232.4 -5.6* -5.4* -5.8* CPIJ003483 cuticle protein, putative 61.1 -3.6* -4.5* -3.6* CPIJ003484 cuticle protein, putative 59.5 -3.9* -3.8* -3.3* CPIJ003485 cuticle protein, putative 42.3 -1.9 -4.7* -3.1* CPIJ007171 proton-coupled amino acid transporter 1 7.6 -1.9 -3.4* -2.8* CPIJ801724 sodium/solute symporter 18.1 -3.4* -2.7* -2.8* CPIJ003879 lipid storage droplets surface- binding protein 1 60.2 -3.0* -1.2 1.1 CPIJ000534 hypothetical protein 17.2 -2.8 -4.1* -1.9 CPIJ000535 hypothetical protein 28.6 -2.7 -3.3* -2.3 CPIJ007722 hypothetical protein 534.9 1.1 -3.3* -2.6 CPIJ011256 hypothetical protein 74.8 -1.7 -2.5* -1.5 CPIJ019329 hypothetical protein 14.6 -5.6* 8.2 9.4 CPIJ005479 hypothetical protein 22.2 -18.7* -2.4 -3.8* CPIJ008508 predicted protein 2.2 -3.7 -7.0* -2.7 CPIJ009902 predicted protein 16.7 -2.3 -12.7* -12.9* CPIJ017828 predicted protein 841.3 -8.2* -5.7 -3.6 CPIJ017829 predicted protein 78.8 -3.4* -4.4* -4.1* CPIJ801843 conserved hypothetical protein 230 -3.0* -3.6* -2.2 CPIJ801846 conserved hypothetical protein 380.2 -2.4 -3.2* -1.6 CPIJ801847 conserved hypothetical protein 137.5 -7.3* -10.4* -2.5* CPIJ002115 conserved hypothetical protein 7 -3.5* -1.2 -1.4 CPIJ002309 conserved hypothetical protein 66.7 -3.8* -3.2* -2.5* CPIJ003026 conserved hypothetical protein 6 -5.0* -4.0* -6.4* CPIJ003129 conserved hypothetical protein 10.8 -3.3* -1.6 -1.5 CPIJ008107 conserved hypothetical protein 4.3 1 -2.5* -1.7 CPIJ008353 conserved hypothetical protein 55.9 -1.8 -2.2 -2.5* CPIJ008379 conserved hypothetical protein 466.9 -1.7 -4.3* -2.6 CPIJ009330 conserved hypothetical protein 12.6 -6.8* -8.6* -8.3* CPIJ010904 conserved hypothetical protein 128.4 -2.9* -2.1 -2.5 CPIJ011137 conserved hypothetical protein 3.9 -3.4 -3.2* -1.5 CPIJ011505 conserved hypothetical protein 39.6 -4.1* -2.1 -1.6 CPIJ017076 conserved hypothetical protein 21.6 -1.9 -3.8* -7.8* CPIJ017687 conserved hypothetical protein 21.8 -3.4* -2 -1.1 Other Unknown function E set domains CPIJ018825 larval serum protein 1 beta chain precursor 154.6 -6.0* -6.6* -5.5* CPIJ002744 conserved hypothetical protein 670.9 -1.3 -7.8* -8.6* CPIJ018326 conserved hypothetical protein 1192.8 -8.2* -1.7 -2.1 CPIJ004282 hexamerin 2 beta 44.8 -2.1 -4.3* -5.9* Viral proteins Head and neck region of the ectodomain of NDV fusion glycoprotein CPIJ802080 conserved hypothetical protein 3 -1.8 -2.7 -3.2* Regulation DNA-binding "Winged helix" DNA-binding domain CPIJ801885 conserved hypothetical protein 9.1 -1.7 -2.6* -2.8* ParB/Sulfiredoxin CPIJ009003 conserved hypothetical protein 44.2 -2 -2.4* -2.7* 260 ROP protein CPIJ009715 conserved hypothetical protein 1050.3 -2 -18.7* -21.7* Kinases/phos phatases Protein kinase-like (PK-like) CPIJ018315 NIMA-family kinase NERCC1 2.5 -2.5 -4.1* -5.9* CPIJ010321 conserved hypothetical protein 4.9 -3.6* -3.0* -2.9* CPIJ007628 Juvenile hormone-inducible protein, putative 28.1 -2.6 -2.5* -2.2 CPIJ010315 Juvenile hormone-inducible protein, putative 16.5 -2.3 -8.2* -8.4* Receptor activity Chemosensory protein Csp2 CPIJ801979 serine/threonine kinase 6.5 -33.4* -4.3* -5.0* CPIJ801985 serine/threonine kinase 5.2 -4.3 -7.9* -6.4* SRCR-like CPIJ006993 protein-lysine 6-oxidase, putative 6.6 -2.7 -2.7* -2.4* Signal transduction Growth factor receptor domain CPIJ005087 cell wall cysteine-rich protein 8.1 -4.2* -2.7* -2.6* Insect pheromone/odorant -binding proteins CPIJ010787 odorant binding protein OBP51 71.2 -3.6* -1.5 -1.5 CPIJ004635 odorant-binding protein OBPjj7a 115.4 -3.4* -2.3 -1.7 CPIJ012786 predicted protein 13.3 -4.4* -4.9* -3.4* CPIJ801711 hypothetical protein 426.8 -7.3* -5.8* -4.7* CPIJ801713 hypothetical protein 22.5 -9.4* -12.6* -9.0* CPIJ801712 predicted protein 430.7 -4.9* -4.4* -2.9* CPIJ801709 predicted protein 8.8 -5.8* -9.6* -3.3* PH domain-like CPIJ801535 sodium/potassium-dependent ATPase beta-2 subunit 16.8 -9.4* -2.1 -3.8* ?SCOP general and detailed functions using the predicted Cx. quinquefasciatus annotation information available at the Superfamily website (version 1.75) supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/index.html ?Culex quinquefasciatus genome, Johannesburg strain CpipJ1.3; http://cquinquefasciatus.vectorbase.org/ ?Annotations for cytochrome P450 genes were taken from the most current annotation based on: Nelson, DR (2009) The Cytochrome P450 Homepage. Human Genomics 4, 59-65: http://drnelson.uthsc.edu/CytochromeP450.html ?Fragments Per Kilo base of gene for every Million reads mapped (FPKM) *Significantly down-regulated compared to the untreated control with a false discovery rate of 0.05. **m/tr= metabolism/transport 261 262 Appendix 6.1. List of primers used for the qRT-PCR determination of genes. Vectorbase? Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse primer (5'-3') CPIJ000841 CTTGATCTGGGCGTGAACA TTTTCCATGGGCTCCAAAG CPIJ001357 TCGGGATCGTCATCTTCTTC GACCGATCGGCAGTGTACG CPIJ002046 AATTCCGAACCGTCGTCAC GTAGGTCGCGGCATAGCTC CPIJ003456 GCACATCCCCGAAGTGTC CCAGCTGGGCGTAAATGA CPIJ003525 GGCGTAACGTGGATGTTTCT ATAAACTTGAACGCCGTTGG CPIJ003531 ACGAATCGTACGACCTGGAC CTTCTGGCCAAGCTTCAAAC CPIJ003879 CAGCTGGCAGTGTTGCTG TCCAAGTGGACGGCCTTA CPIJ003915 GACGAGCACGTTACGCTCA ACGGACCACCAGAGTCACC CPIJ004290 AAGGCCGTCGATGACTACG AATCCGTTGACGGGATCAG CPIJ004640 TTCCAGGTGTCCCTCATCC TCAGCGCGTTGTAGTTTGG CPIJ004660 GAACCGATTCACCGTCCTG ATCCACCGCAGAAGTGTCC CPIJ005273 GAACCGGCTGACGAGAGTC GCGTCCTTTCCTCCTTCCT CPIJ005473 CCTGCCGGACAAAGACTAAG TCGGGGGTTGTTAGTACCAG CPIJ005952 TACGAGCTGGCCCTTAATCCGTTT AGACTTTCCGCAGGTGGGTACTTT CPIJ006502 GTTCCACCACATCCCAACTC CGGCTCAAACAGATCAGACA CPIJ007079 ATCCATCATCTCGCCCAAG TTCAGCTCCAGCAGGGAGT CPIJ007193 ACGACGCCCAGTATTACGC ATACTTGCGCAGCATCACG CPIJ007471 TGGATCTGCTGCGTCTGA AGCGCCAGTTTGAGTTGC CPIJ008286 GACCGGGAAGTCAGATCCA TGCGTTCCAGATGAAGGTG CPIJ008515 GATCCTCAGCGATCGAAGC CAGCAGCTCGTTGCACACT CPIJ010190 AACGCTTCTGCCAGTGTC AAAACCACATGCCAGCATTC CPIJ011837 TTATTCCGTTCAGTGGAGGCACGA TTCAGCAGTGCTTCAAACCGGAAG CPIJ012470 TGAACGTCCTTAGGGATGGCGAAA TTGCTAGTCGCGGAAACGAACTGA CPIJ012707 CCGACATGGGACCTGTGTA CTGCATCGCAGCACATTC CPIJ012708 TCCTGCGTTGCTCCAAAT GTACCCCGCATTGCAGTC CPIJ012716 TGCCATCATTTCCCTAGCC AGAAGCACTGCACGAAGCA CPIJ012719 CTGACCATCGAGCAGCAGA CGACGGTCTTTTCCTGGAC CPIJ012721 CCAAGTGTTTCGTGCGTTG CCGGTTCCGATAGAAGCAC CPIJ013321 GCAAACTCTGCTGGGCTATC CGTGTCCAGGTGCTTGTAGA CPIJ013633 CCAGGTCTCGTTCCTGCAT CAGGTAGGGCTTCCACCAG CPIJ015385 GCCAATCCGTGCTTCAAC AGGTTGCACGGACACCAC CPIJ015960 AGTGCATTCGGAGGTCCTTCATGT AGACTTGTCACCAGCTTATCGGCA CPIJ016702 CAGCAGCAGCAAAAAGTGC GTGTTCGCACTGGAGACGA CPIJ019052 GCCTTGATTTCCGGGACTT CGCCCAGATCTTTGTGCTT CPIJ019581 CAACTACGAGTGGGGCAAGT ACTCAAGACGGCAATGATGA CPIJ020018 TGTCCAAGTTTCGGTTCGAGGCTA AGGTGATGGCATCCGTTGAGGTAT rRNA CGCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCACTA GCATCAAGCGCCACCATATAGG ?Cx. quinquefasciatus genome Johannesberg strain v1.2, www.vectorbase.org 263 Appendix 6.2. Complete list of up- and down-regulated genes for sugar-fed only females for the HAmCqG8 strain of Culex quinquefasciatus for the initial 72h post-eclosion. Time interval SCOP? general function Gene Vectorbase anotation? FPKM* (time 1) FPKM (time 2) Fold change 2 to 12h General CPIJ002675 glutathione S-transferase 1 1.0 21.8 22.5 Information CPIJ009133 salivary endonuclease 3.2 94.6 29.4 Intra-cellular processes CPIJ001773 synaptic vesicle protein 0.2 6.3 29.0 CPIJ001774 synaptic vesicle protein 0.3 5.1 17.7 CPIJ001775 synaptic vesicle protein 0.7 21.9 31.0 CPIJ008945 sugar transporter 2.5 25.7 10.3 CPIJ008946 sugar transporter 3.0 34.3 11.3 CPIJ017478 conserved hypothetical protein 3.4 28.0 8.3 CPIJ019591 solute carrier family 2 10.8 125.7 11.6 CPIJ001239 cathepsin B 2.0 96.0 49.2 CPIJ001240 cathepsin B-like thiol protease 0.4 7.9 21.3 CPIJ002595 zinc carboxypeptidase 1.3 12.5 9.4 CPIJ004640 trypsin 5G1 5.7 354.0 61.8 CPIJ004984 serine protease1/2 1.1 29.8 26.0 CPIJ005273 trypsin 2 2.7 76.8 27.9 CPIJ006502 late trypsin 3.1 324.9 104.5 CPIJ007025 FXa-directed anticoagulant 1.7 43.0 24.7 CPIJ008388 aminopeptidase N 0.5 20.9 40.9 CPIJ010521 serine protease inhibitor dipetalogastin 0.5 7.4 13.6 CPIJ011998 zinc carboxypeptidase A 1 2.5 23.8 9.6 CPIJ012161 sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1.0 42.5 42.6 CPIJ014781 cysteine-rich protease inhibitor 0.5 26.2 55.8 CPIJ016348 serine protease1/2 2.5 243.5 97.7 CPIJ016937 coagulation factor X 1.3 37.5 29.6 CPIJ017414 trypsin 4 0.3 19.6 68.3 CPIJ017964 trypsin 7 0.3 13.0 51.6 CPIJ017965 trypsin 7 0.5 10.0 19.5 CPIJ018871 salivary apyrase; 5' nucleotidase 0.6 15.0 24.2 CPIJ019168 salivary apyrase 1.3 12.0 9.6 CPIJ020192 trypsin-like salivary secreted protein 0.4 14.6 36.0 Metabolism CPIJ017521 alpha-amylase I 5.7 180.2 31.6 CPIJ011388 diazepam binding inhibitor 63.4 626.6 9.9 CPIJ001082 cat eye syndrome critical region protein 1 3.0 36.6 12.3 CPIJ005463 salivary lipase 1.0 13.3 12.8 CPIJ006549 lipase member I 0.1 4.4 72.7 CPIJ008977 pyridoxal phosphate phosphatase 12.5 247.6 19.7 CPIJ012882 argininosuccinate synthase 1.4 20.0 14.2 CPIJ016050 hepatic triacylglycerol lipase 0.2 7.9 32.9 CPIJ017178 myoinositol oxygenase 14.5 155.4 10.7 CPIJ018802 endochitinase A 0.3 4.7 16.1 CPIJ000040 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B1 2.1 51.6 24.1 CPIJ015713 conserved hypothetical protein 8.8 84.8 9.6 CPIJ019044 15.3 kDa basic salivary protein 1.5 67.3 46.2 CPIJ000294 cytochrome P450 4C1 3.2 25.6 8.0 CPIJ005952 cytochrome P450 11.9 339.4 28.4 CPIJ009032 larval serum protein 2 1.9 22.7 12.2 CPIJ010225 cytochrome P450 12b1, mitochondrial 1.7 15.0 9.0 264 CPIJ010227 cytochrome P450 12b1, mitochondrial 2.8 32.0 11.5 CPIJ010546 cytochrome P450 9c1 0.1 7.7 106.0 CPIJ011837 cytochrome P450 5.1 58.3 11.4 CPIJ011996 10-formyltetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 3.4 62.5 18.3 CPIJ012470 cytochrome P450 9b2 5.6 60.9 10.9 CPIJ019586 cytochrome P450 6d3 2.2 19.2 8.7 CPIJ019587 cytochrome P450 6d3 6.3 57.8 9.1 CPIJ020018 cytochrome P450 6d3 7.1 70.8 10.0 CPIJ000021 salivary protein 5.9 135.2 23.0 CPIJ004030 venom allergen 0.6 8.2 13.5 CPIJ015956 glycine N-methyltransferase 2.2 31.1 13.9 No Annotation CPIJ000835 chymotrypsin-2 5.6 111.7 20.0 CPIJ001276 defensin-A 18.5 154.3 8.4 CPIJ001685 conserved hypothetical protein 0.8 15.2 19.0 CPIJ001686 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 11.6 39.1 CPIJ002046 salivary protein 1.8 84.0 46.6 CPIJ002089 salivary protein 7.8 183.4 23.6 CPIJ002476 hypothetical protein 2.9 50.5 17.6 CPIJ002532 sodium-dependent multivitamin transporter 4.1 35.7 8.6 CPIJ003019 conserved hypothetical protein 1.4 21.9 15.3 CPIJ003054 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 8.0 58.9 CPIJ003129 conserved hypothetical protein 1.6 14.0 8.5 CPIJ003456 uricase 5.1 91.6 18.1 CPIJ003468 hypothetical protein 151.1 3496.9 23.1 CPIJ003615 salivary protein 21.6 368.5 17.1 CPIJ003879 lipid storage droplets surface-binding protein 1 22.9 239.8 10.5 CPIJ004054 hypothetical protein 0.2 5.9 23.9 CPIJ004641 trypsin 0.5 135.2 286.0 CPIJ005906 conserved hypothetical protein 2.3 41.6 17.9 CPIJ005910 7.8 kDa basic salivary peptide 22.7 191.1 8.4 CPIJ006908 carboxylesterase-6 9.3 102.1 11.0 CPIJ007079 trypsin-1 70.9 928.5 13.1 CPIJ007333 amylase 2.9 65.2 22.4 CPIJ007452 8.9 kDa basic salivary peptide 12.0 311.6 26.0 CPIJ007471 oskar 2.1 44.9 21.7 CPIJ007646 conserved hypothetical protein 0.4 200.4 458.4 CPIJ007741 conserved hypothetical protein 5.3 42.9 8.1 CPIJ007742 30.5 kDa secreted protein 30.5k-1 3.5 40.0 11.5 CPIJ007838 chymotrypsin-2 3.4 36.4 10.8 CPIJ008014 oxidase/peroxidase 3.1 101.8 33.1 CPIJ008032 conserved hypothetical protein 0.8 7.6 9.9 CPIJ008464 hypothetical protein 0.3 69.0 235.6 CPIJ008471 hypothetical protein 6.8 269.7 39.5 CPIJ008479 9.7 kDa salivary peptide 6.4 146.7 22.9 CPIJ010046 threonine-rich salivary mucin 27.5 394.3 14.3 CPIJ010333 conserved hypothetical protein 1.5 26.0 17.6 CPIJ010337 hypothetical protein 2.9 1053.0 365.9 CPIJ010338 conserved hypothetical protein 4.6 684.0 149.2 CPIJ010339 conserved hypothetical protein 1.0 173.3 182.4 CPIJ010699 cecropin A 12.3 190.6 15.5 CPIJ010772 16 kDa salivary peptide 0.2 43.1 259.7 CPIJ010773 16.8 kDa salivary peptide 0.2 29.5 183.0 CPIJ010792 16.7 kDa salivary peptide 0.3 10.6 33.7 265 CPIJ011013 apyrase 2.8 24.5 8.8 CPIJ011505 conserved hypothetical protein 19.7 193.9 9.9 CPIJ012056 sodium-dependent serotonin transporter 2.5 56.8 22.4 CPIJ012254 conserved hypothetical protein 1.3 36.5 29.1 CPIJ012707 wnt inhibitory factor 1 3.6 108.3 30.4 CPIJ012708 wnt inhibitory factor 1 2.2 111.2 51.0 CPIJ012783 7.7 kDa salivary cysteine-rich peptide 2.0 34.5 17.6 CPIJ012900 als 1.4 20.5 14.8 CPIJ013450 hypothetical protein 0.2 5.0 20.9 CPIJ013702 17.2 kDa salivary peptide 8.7 136.2 15.6 CPIJ013705 conserved hypothetical protein 13.1 127.3 9.7 CPIJ013706 conserved hypothetical protein 11.0 129.7 11.8 CPIJ014402 hypothetical protein 0.2 13.1 75.5 CPIJ014545 short form D7clu32 salivary protein 1.0 13.3 13.7 CPIJ014861 conserved hypothetical protein 4.8 47.8 9.9 CPIJ015385 vitellogenin 0.3 54.3 158.5 CPIJ015502 16.8 kDa salivary protein 0.7 41.0 60.1 CPIJ015613 galactose-specific C-type lectin 2.4 124.0 51.8 CPIJ015614 galactose-specific C-type lectin 3.0 208.0 68.8 CPIJ015615 salivary C-type lectin 2.1 33.4 16.2 CPIJ015774 34 kDa salivary secreted protein 34k-2 0.3 4.8 16.8 CPIJ016318 larval cuticle protein 8.7 102.4 3783.8 37.0 CPIJ016702 calbindin-32 10.9 223.0 20.5 CPIJ016792 hypothetical protein 1.0 16.4 17.0 CPIJ016936 Trypsin 1.3 47.5 36.7 CPIJ016972 salivary secreted protein 62k-3 1.0 14.2 14.8 CPIJ017043 hypothetical protein 4.9 104.4 21.2 CPIJ017044 hypothetical protein 1.9 91.3 47.5 CPIJ017687 conserved hypothetical protein 4.6 81.3 17.8 CPIJ017960 hypothetical protein 4.6 117.3 25.2 CPIJ018205 chymotrypsin-2 2.2 23.0 10.3 CPIJ018773 hypothetical protein 8348.3 68893.7 8.3 CPIJ018872 salivary mucin 0.5 18.6 37.9 CPIJ019040 15.8 kDa salivary peptide 12.9 313.1 24.4 CPIJ019051 16.7 kDa salivary peptide 0.6 63.0 104.6 CPIJ019052 13.1 kDa salivary protein 0.3 70.6 216.7 CPIJ019055 17.5 kDa salivary peptide 0.4 60.8 137.1 CPIJ019252 salivary mucin 0.3 32.7 96.0 CPIJ019253 apyrase 0.2 9.3 42.8 CPIJ019268 calbindin-32 14.8 237.5 16.0 CPIJ019284 hypothetical protein 6.6 116.4 17.6 CPIJ019552 calbindin-32 9.1 198.1 21.8 CPIJ019905 hypothetical protein 10.5 886.2 84.7 CPIJ019944 hypothetical protein 9.5 132.9 14.0 CPIJ019945 hypothetical protein 6.9 101.9 14.7 Regulation CPIJ010170 conserved hypothetical protein 0.3 4.9 17.6 CPIJ010171 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 1.3 15.5 CPIJ013451 zinc finger protein 0.2 6.2 26.8 CPIJ001084 low molecular weight protein-tyrosine- phosphatase 2.4 35.9 14.9 CPIJ010312 conserved hypothetical protein 20.2 224.9 11.1 CPIJ009440 cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 0.1 4.7 32.5 CPIJ004145 predicted protein 1.5 18.8 12.8 CPIJ007193 period circadian protein 9.1 89.2 9.9 266 CPIJ010788 conserved hypothetical protein 12.1 98.2 8.1 CPIJ014546 salivary short D7 protein 4 1.0 22.9 22.3 CPIJ014550 long form D7Bclu1 salivary protein 1.1 19.8 17.6 CPIJ014553 salivary long D7 protein 3 5.0 57.3 11.5 CPIJ015944 predicted protein 0.3 8.4 30.8 Extra-cellular processes CPIJ017322 conserved hypothetical protein 46.3 5.0 -9.2 General CPIJ011014 peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase COOH-terminal interactor protein-1 18.9 2.3 -8.3 CPIJ000841 dimeric dihydrodiol dehydrogenase 420.9 10.6 -39.7 CPIJ005895 conserved hypothetical protein 15.4 1.6 -9.4 CPIJ013724 dimethylaniline monooxygenase 117.3 0.6 -186.6 CPIJ017482 choline dehydrogenase 76.8 3.4 -22.7 CPIJ017483 glucose dehydrogenase 27.2 0.3 -96.4 CPIJ017487 glucose dehydrogenase 1.7 0.1 -23.8 Intra-cellular processes CPIJ008515 cellular retinaldehyde binding protein 190.2 17.4 -10.9 CPIJ008722 conserved hypothetical protein 90.2 9.4 -9.6 CPIJ003915 chymotrypsin 1 166.1 0.5 -348.2 CPIJ004215 conserved hypothetical protein 16.5 1.2 -13.6 CPIJ004659 trypsin 7 5.0 0.1 -57.6 CPIJ004660 trypsin 1 339.9 17.5 -19.4 CPIJ012643 conserved hypothetical protein 57.1 1.4 -39.5 CPIJ017794 220 kDa silk protein 13.8 1.4 -9.5 CPIJ019781 trypsin 1 20.4 0.4 -47.1 CPIJ011555 mitochondrial carrier protein 105.9 11.4 -9.3 Metabolism CPIJ002066 alpha-galactosidase A 23.8 1.6 -15.0 CPIJ010945 acidic mammalian chitinase 43.0 3.4 -12.7 CPIJ002725 lipase 1 58.4 0.9 -67.8 CPIJ004802 endothelial lipase 3.1 0.2 -15.9 CPIJ013029 esterase FE4 1.9 0.1 -16.2 CPIJ011840 cytochrome P450 33.6 0.9 -35.9 CPIJ011841 cytochrome P450 34.7 1.9 -17.8 CPIJ015954 cytochrome P450 14.8 1.6 -9.4 CPIJ015960 cytochrome P450 4A6 152.1 14.1 -10.8 CPIJ015961 cytochrome P450 37.0 2.5 -15.1 CPIJ017484 glucose dehydrogenase 26.2 0.4 -67.3 No Annotation CPIJ000499 hypothetical protein 10.5 0.3 -30.6 CPIJ001222 conserved hypothetical protein 252.2 2.0 -126.7 CPIJ001839 cuticle protein 54.4 1.0 -56.9 CPIJ002800 larval/pupal cuticle protein H1C 16.4 0.5 -31.9 CPIJ002801 larval/pupal cuticle protein H1C 9.3 0.5 -17.6 CPIJ003026 conserved hypothetical protein 13.6 0.2 -87.2 CPIJ004287 conserved hypothetical protein 22.5 2.6 -8.6 CPIJ004288 cuticle protein 8.8 0.7 -13.2 CPIJ004290 cuticle protein 249.6 7.6 -32.8 CPIJ004293 cuticle protein 88.7 2.8 -31.4 CPIJ004475 conserved hypothetical protein 210.1 5.1 -41.3 CPIJ005176 G12 11.3 0.3 -33.1 CPIJ006327 metalloproteinase 29.1 0.4 -65.9 CPIJ007055 SEC14 77.9 6.1 -12.9 CPIJ007056 conserved hypothetical protein 71.0 4.8 -14.8 CPIJ007448 conserved hypothetical protein 12.7 0.4 -28.8 CPIJ008211 conserved hypothetical protein 270.1 0.8 -323.1 CPIJ008231 pupal cuticle protein 123.2 4.3 -28.9 267 CPIJ008286 serine protease 813.0 16.9 -48.2 CPIJ008659 metalloproteinase 15.8 0.2 -95.0 CPIJ008974 cuticle protein 28.6 0.9 -32.7 CPIJ009098 conserved hypothetical protein 1444.0 24.9 -58.1 CPIJ009099 conserved hypothetical protein 1853.0 57.2 -32.4 CPIJ009207 conserved hypothetical protein 19.9 0.3 -74.2 CPIJ009585 hypothetical protein 143.3 0.5 -265.3 CPIJ011001 sulfotransferase 5.0 0.3 -19.1 CPIJ012507 conserved hypothetical protein 104.1 2.0 -51.9 CPIJ013663 elongase 179.3 9.9 -18.1 CPIJ013764 cuticle protein 7 12.7 0.9 -14.9 CPIJ013765 cuticle protein 18.6 44.4 2.0 -22.5 CPIJ013931 conserved hypothetical protein 5.3 0.3 -16.0 CPIJ014435 hypothetical protein 89.0 0.7 -120.9 CPIJ014778 conserved hypothetical protein 39.4 3.0 -13.1 CPIJ015291 hypothetical protein 8.3 0.1 -66.9 CPIJ016716 conserved hypothetical protein 59.8 4.9 -12.2 CPIJ017020 hypothetical protein 30.9 0.1 -268.6 CPIJ017620 hypothetical protein 2100.1 8.7 -240.2 CPIJ017806 conserved hypothetical protein 31.1 2.2 -14.3 CPIJ017862 sulfotransferase 6.3 0.5 -12.8 CPIJ018582 pupal cuticle protein 140.8 5.0 -27.9 CPIJ018910 conserved hypothetical protein 64.9 5.7 -11.3 CPIJ019396 hypothetical protein 267.8 23.7 -11.3 Regulation CPIJ012716 odorant-binding protein 134.0 2.8 -48.2 CPIJ012719 general odorant-binding protein 56d 679.5 47.9 -14.2 CPIJ012721 odorant-binding protein 59.0 1.0 -57.7 CPIJ018956 general odorant-binding protein 56d 523.0 42.4 -12.3 12 v 24h Extra-cellular processes CPIJ018858 fibrinogen and fibronectin 4.1 70.7 17.2 CPIJ002173 conserved hypothetical protein 6.2 60.0 9.6 CPIJ014105 galactose-specific C-type lectin 1.7 24.1 13.8 Information CPIJ017289 conserved hypothetical protein 0.0 3.5 N/C* Intra-cellular processes CPIJ000214 serpin B10 9.2 122.6 13.3 CPIJ005273 trypsin 2 76.8 7233.8 94.2 CPIJ011998 zinc carboxypeptidase A 1 23.8 321.9 13.5 CPIJ014254 chymotrypsin BI 0.4 11.6 29.0 CPIJ015161 chymotrypsin 1 0.1 24.6 172.0 CPIJ015162 serine-type enodpeptidase 0.1 9.7 86.6 CPIJ017414 trypsin 4 19.6 368.2 18.8 CPIJ017964 trypsin 7 13.0 110.5 8.5 Metabolism CPIJ017575 low-density lipoprotein receptor 12.7 120.0 9.4 CPIJ002715 lipase 3 0.4 9.8 23.4 CPIJ001886 cytochrome P450 4C1 0.0 2.9 66.5 CPIJ006840 CD109 antigen 0.4 4.7 10.9 No Annotation CPIJ000529 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 3.5 60.6 CPIJ000835 chymotrypsin-2 111.7 4177.6 37.4 CPIJ001237 conserved hypothetical protein 3.2 32.4 10.0 CPIJ004491 sodium/potassium/calcium exchanger 3 1.9 16.9 9.0 CPIJ005637 conserved hypothetical protein 0.0 0.1 0.0 CPIJ006087 sodium/solute symporter 1.3 15.1 11.9 CPIJ008023 olfactory receptor 0.1 3.9 35.5 CPIJ012164 conserved hypothetical protein 0.1 16.4 177.5 CPIJ014969 caldecrin 2.4 33.1 13.7 268 CPIJ015718 arginase 2.1 18.6 9.0 Regulation CPIJ015936 hypothetical protein 0.7 6.9 10.4 Extra-cellular processes CPIJ011368 f-box/lrr protein 69.9 2.1 -32.9 Intra-cellular processes CPIJ000521 sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 4.2 0.3 -12.5 CPIJ010466 laccase-like multicopper oxidase 1 6.8 0.6 -12.3 CPIJ016802 laccase-like multicopper oxidase 1 9.7 0.9 -10.4 CPIJ011997 zinc carboxypeptidase A 1 68.8 1.2 -56.8 CPIJ012680 ADAM 12 23.8 2.1 -11.2 CPIJ016937 coagulation factor X 37.5 3.8 -9.9 Metabolism CPIJ000679 conserved hypothetical protein 142.5 14.0 -10.1 CPIJ000680 conserved hypothetical protein 384.3 19.9 -19.3 CPIJ007603 conserved hypothetical protein 325.4 25.3 -12.8 CPIJ010945 acidic mammalian chitinase 3.4 0.3 -10.6 CPIJ012316 conserved hypothetical protein 30.6 3.6 -8.6 CPIJ005936 carbonic anhydrase II 9.9 0.2 -43.7 CPIJ006311 conserved hypothetical protein 56.7 6.3 -9.0 CPIJ011837 cytochrome P450 58.3 3.4 -17.0 No Annotation CPIJ000641 salivary asparagine-rich mucin 134.3 1.7 -79.1 CPIJ001605 pro-resilin 37.8 1.6 -23.2 CPIJ002016 conserved hypothetical protein 19.2 2.2 -8.9 CPIJ003019 conserved hypothetical protein 21.9 0.8 -27.8 CPIJ003030 adult cuticle protein 13.2 0.2 -57.7 CPIJ003473 cuticle protein 337.4 16.8 -20.1 CPIJ003474 cuticle protein 1824.0 129.9 -14.0 CPIJ005336 conserved hypothetical protein 23.8 1.7 -14.0 CPIJ006195 hypothetical protein 16.2 0.5 -33.3 CPIJ006794 conserved hypothetical protein 141.5 15.8 -9.0 CPIJ006796 conserved hypothetical protein 124.6 13.6 -9.2 CPIJ006797 conserved hypothetical protein 196.3 20.1 -9.8 CPIJ008231 pupal cuticle protein 4.3 0.3 -13.7 CPIJ008489 conserved hypothetical protein 65.9 6.4 -10.3 CPIJ009100 conserved hypothetical protein 586.3 21.4 -27.4 CPIJ009334 conserved hypothetical protein 113.3 2.3 -48.9 CPIJ010338 conserved hypothetical protein 684.0 55.7 -12.3 CPIJ010705 conserved hypothetical protein 32.8 2.2 -14.9 CPIJ012090 actin 373.3 24.4 -15.3 CPIJ012641 pupal cuticle protein 18.6 0.5 -34.8 CPIJ012973 conserved hypothetical protein 5.6 0.4 -15.1 CPIJ013278 conserved hypothetical protein 31.8 0.6 -52.8 CPIJ013783 pupal cuticle protein 31.9 1.7 -19.3 CPIJ013785 conserved hypothetical protein 828.9 2.6 -321.8 CPIJ015249 hypothetical protein 12.0 1.4 -8.4 CPIJ015250 hypothetical protein 61.0 5.3 -11.5 CPIJ016655 conserved hypothetical protein 733.3 45.9 -16.0 CPIJ016702 calbindin-32 223.0 22.7 -9.8 CPIJ016842 conserved hypothetical protein 16.4 1.2 -13.6 CPIJ017736 conserved hypothetical protein 184.0 16.8 -11.0 CPIJ017876 cuticle protein 306.8 13.5 -22.7 CPIJ019699 structural contituent of cuticle 145.7 11.3 -12.9 CPIJ019849 conserved hypothetical protein 13.9 1.5 -9.5 CPIJ019982 conserved hypothetical protein 10.7 0.9 -11.5 Regulation CPIJ000274 conserved hypothetical protein 28.1 1.8 -15.3 CPIJ011799 conserved hypothetical protein 15.7 1.7 -9.2 269 24 v 36h Extra-cellular processes CPIJ000931 conserved hypothetical protein 12.6 1.3 -9.7 CPIJ011371 f-box/lrr protein 23.1 1.8 -12.8 Information CPIJ017289 conserved hypothetical protein 3.5 0.0 0.0 Intra-cellular processes CPIJ000214 serpin B10 122.6 4.4 -27.9 No Annotation CPIJ003470 hypothetical protein 2549.0 37.8 -67.5 CPIJ003473 cuticle protein 16.8 0.5 -31.9 CPIJ003474 cuticle protein 129.9 2.4 -53.9 CPIJ003476 cuticle protein 1099.5 17.3 -63.7 CPIJ003477 cuticle protein 1043.6 16.9 -61.7 CPIJ009100 conserved hypothetical protein 21.4 1.7 -13.0 CPIJ009101 hypothetical protein 80.5 6.0 -13.4 CPIJ009111 conserved hypothetical protein 50.0 5.2 -9.6 CPIJ012090 actin 24.4 2.5 -9.8 CPIJ017874 hypothetical protein 490.3 9.7 -50.5 CPIJ017875 hypothetical protein 1222.8 30.2 -40.5 CPIJ018642 pupal cuticle protein 80.3 8.5 -9.4 CPIJ018939 oxidoreductase 0.1 0.0 0.0 36 v 48h Metabolism CPIJ006495 conserved hypothetical protein 2.3 21.0 9.2 Intra-cellular processes CPIJ000990 cytosol aminopeptidase 6.6 0.1 -79.3 CPIJ002595 zinc carboxypeptidase 19.0 0.1 -170.8 CPIJ003539 cytosol aminopeptidase 6.2 0.0 -146.0 Metabolism CPIJ004028 venom allergen 3 14.2 0.4 -36.0 No Annotation CPIJ007077 trypsin-4 9.5 0.4 -26.2 CPIJ010092 ficolin-3 15.2 0.3 -44.5 CPIJ010778 conserved hypothetical protein 6.1 0.6 -10.5 CPIJ011171 LWamide neuropeptides 47.7 0.3 -178.1 CPIJ011620 conserved hypothetical protein 1.4 0.0 -63.2 CPIJ016384 conserved hypothetical protein 12.2 0.2 -56.0 Regulation CPIJ015944 predicted protein 18.2 0.3 -57.2 48 v 60h Intra-cellular processes CPIJ000990 cytosol aminopeptidase 0.1 2.3 27.2 CPIJ002595 zinc carboxypeptidase 0.1 18.2 163.7 CPIJ003539 cytosol aminopeptidase 0.0 3.0 70.3 Metabolism CPIJ014185 conserved hypothetical protein 1.0 14.8 15.0 CPIJ004028 venom allergen 3 0.4 12.6 31.9 No Annotation CPIJ007077 trypsin-4 0.4 9.6 26.5 CPIJ010092 ficolin-3 0.3 9.0 26.5 CPIJ011171 LWamide neuropeptides 0.3 38.8 144.9 CPIJ016384 conserved hypothetical protein 0.2 15.0 68.8 Regulation CPIJ015944 predicted protein 0.3 7.7 24.1 60 v 72h Intra-cellular processes CPIJ002595 zinc carboxypeptidase 18.2 2.2 -8.4 Metabolism CPIJ009796 lipoprotein lipase 5.0 0.4 -12.0 No Annotation CPIJ001231 conserved hypothetical protein 10.7 0.2 -53.7 CPIJ015506 hypothetical protein 60.2 3.0 -19.9 CPIJ016394 nuclear pore complex protein Nup93 0.4 0.0 -23.7 ?Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database for the Culex quinquefasciatus database (v1.73). http://supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/ ?Vectorbase annotation for the Johannesburg strain of Cx. quniquefasciatus JHBv1.2. http://www.vectorbase.org/ *[Paired end] Fragments Per Kilo bases of gene length per Million RNA-Seq reads mapped. Time 1 and 2 represent 270 the earlier and later time points in the comparison, respectively. **N/C= Not calculable