This Is AuburnElectronic Theses and Dissertations

Show simple item record

Predicting Objective Measures of Performance


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLewis, Philip
dc.contributor.advisorO'Leary, Virginiaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorThomas, Adrianen_US
dc.contributor.advisorVeres, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorChirico, Kristinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-23T15:51:47Z
dc.date.available2009-02-23T15:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2005-08-15en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10415/1286
dc.description.abstractIn todays competitive job market, many organizations use various selection procedures in order to hire the best possible employees. Most selection tools such as structured interviews, mental ability tests, and personality inventories have been shown to predict employee performance in terms of subjective measures (i.e., supervisory ratings). However, organizations are more interested in predicting objective measures of performance (e.g., sales). The purpose of this study was to determine whether biodata, situational judgment, and role-play could be effective in predicting objective measures of performance. Four objective measures (i.e., sales amount, number of orders, debt, and the number of active staff members) were collected from 189 District Sales Managers employed by an international company selling beauty and related products. The results indicated that none of the objective measures are related to the predictors. Several plausible explanations of these results are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsEMBARGO_NOT_AUBURNen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titlePredicting Objective Measures of Performanceen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.embargo.lengthMONTHS_WITHHELD:36en_US
dc.embargo.statusEMBARGOEDen_US
dc.embargo.enddate2012-02-23en_US

Files in this item

Show simple item record