Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWorthington, Debra
dc.contributor.advisorFitch-Hauser, Margareten_US
dc.contributor.advisorAgne, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Jillen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-23T15:53:41Z
dc.date.available2009-02-23T15:53:41Z
dc.date.issued2007-08-15en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10415/1385
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the communicative behavior related to a crucial element of the trial process witness testimony. Using a secondary analysis of data initially gathered by the American Society of Trial Consultants (ASTC), this study examines trial consultants perceptions of the role of witness preparation in the litigation process, the goals trial consultants have for witness preparation, as well as the procedures and techniques used during the preparation process. The aim of this analysis is to increase our understanding of the scope of witness preparation practices in two ways. First, it addresses the extent to which established communication techniques are incorporated into the witness preparation process. Second, it examines how the goals and procedures that are utilized reflect the standards and rules of both the American Bar Association (ABA) and the American Society of Trial Consultants (ASTC). Overall, there appear to be three primary themes when discussing witness preparation: procedure, demeanor and/or psychological state, and content. The concept of witness credibility appears to be an important aspect of each theme. Furthermore, knowing what to expect is especially useful in stressful and anxiety-prone situations, such as those common to the courtroom. Similarly, results indicate anxiety reduction as a common goal for witness preparation and is most often reduced through witness education of the process and behavioral techniques such as performance visualization, skills training, and practice. However, preparation regarding the content of witness testimony appears to be an area of uncertainty especially as related to ethical practices. Results of this analysis suggest that additional information regarding standards and guidelines for witness preparation is needed to reduce the ambiguity surrounding the practice, as well as increase understanding as to what is acceptable and what is not.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsEMBARGO_NOT_AUBURNen_US
dc.subjectCommunication and Journalismen_US
dc.titleCommon Practice, But What Are The Rules? An Analysis of the Witness Preparation Process as Reported by Trial Consultantsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.embargo.lengthMONTHS_WITHHELD:36en_US
dc.embargo.statusEMBARGOEDen_US
dc.embargo.enddate2012-02-23en_US


Files in this item

Show simple item record