Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSvyantek, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.advisorFranco-Watkins, Ana M.
dc.contributor.advisorJones-Farmer, Allison
dc.contributor.advisorMossholder, Kevin W.
dc.contributor.authorCullen, Kristin L.
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-08T19:49:10Z
dc.date.available2011-07-08T19:49:10Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10415/2667
dc.description.abstractPeer- and self-ratings are common components of performance appraisals for many organizations, including companies relying on team-based work. Self- and peer-ratings may represent the best way to monitor performance in both co-located and virtual teams. However, biases may affect performance ratings in the form of perceiver tendencies (e.g., leniency) or relationship-specific effects. In the current study, I examined team members’ ratings of task performance (i.e., contribution to the team’s project) and contextual performance. These behaviors are relevant to effective team performance, regardless of the particular team or the specific task. Using the social relations model, I examined the extent to which perceiver and target tendencies as well as unique perceiver-target relationships contribute to performance ratings. I also examined several other indicators of the types of processes that underlie peer performance ratings (i.e., reciprocity, true halo, halo bias, and self-other agreement). The results of this study provide further insight into the factors influencing peer performance ratings and whether the contribution of these factors to performance ratings differs for co-located and virtual teams.en_US
dc.rightsEMBARGO_NOT_AUBURNen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleExamination of Peer Contextual Performance Ratings in Co-located and Virtual Teams Using the Social Relations Modelen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.embargo.lengthMONTHS_WITHHELD:24en_US
dc.embargo.statusEMBARGOEDen_US
dc.embargo.enddate2013-07-08en_US


Files in this item

Show simple item record