This Is AuburnElectronic Theses and Dissertations

Show simple item record

A Comparison of Quality Attributes in ‘AU Golden Dragon’, ‘AU Golden Sunshine’, and ‘Hort 16A’ Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) During Storage


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSpiers, Jay
dc.contributor.advisorDoizer, William
dc.contributor.advisorWoods, Floyd
dc.contributor.advisorConeva, Elina
dc.contributor.authorStroman, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-15T17:57:44Z
dc.date.available2011-08-15T17:57:44Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10415/2789
dc.description.abstractThis research focused on the effects of fruit size and cultivar on fruit quality and postharvest storage life of three cultivars of Actinidia chinensis. In the first experiment, the fruit quality attributes of ‘AU Golden Dragon’, ‘AU Golden Sunshine’ and ‘Hort 16A’ were determined for three different sizes of kiwifruit over 14 weeks in cold storage. Soluble solids (SS) content, SS:titratable acidity (SS:TA), internal color and external color development increased as fruit firmness and titratable acidity decreased due to time in cold storage. Based on fruit firmness results, smaller sized A. chinensis fruit appear to have greater cold storage life potential than larger sized fruit. In the second experiment, fruit quality attributes and storage life of ‘AU Golden Sunshine’ was compared to ‘Hort 16A’. ‘Hort 16A’ fruit had a greater SS, SS:TA and percent dry weight (% DW) compared to ‘AU Golden Sunshine’. ‘AU Golden Sunshine’ and ‘Hort 16A’ fruit were stored for 14 weeks before firmness decreased below optimum eating quality.en_US
dc.rightsEMBARGO_NOT_AUBURNen_US
dc.subjectHorticultureen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Quality Attributes in ‘AU Golden Dragon’, ‘AU Golden Sunshine’, and ‘Hort 16A’ Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) During Storageen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.embargo.lengthNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.embargo.statusNOT_EMBARGOEDen_US

Files in this item

Show simple item record