Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKetrin, Scott
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Thomas
dc.contributor.advisorMeyer, Jill
dc.contributor.authorBertagnolli, Shayden
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-19T14:57:30Z
dc.date.available2012-07-19T14:57:30Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10415/3220
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the relationship between dyadic adjustment ratings, individual symptom distress ratings and the therapeutic alliance for males and females was explored. Likewise, the interaction between individual symptom distress and dyadic adjustment predicting fourth session therapy alliance formation was analyzed. Sample data were collected from previous therapy clients at a marriage and family therapy training clinic at a southeastern university. Overall findings revealed the interaction of male symptom distress and dyadic adjustment ratings at intake, significantly and negatively predicted fourth session alliance ratings. Female (married and non-married) findings suggested a significant negative relationship between symptom distress ratings at intake and fourth session alliance.en_US
dc.rightsEMBARGO_NOT_AUBURNen_US
dc.subjectHuman Development and Family Studiesen_US
dc.titleCouple Satisfaction and Symptom Distress: What to Look for When Forming an Allianceen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.embargo.lengthNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.embargo.statusNOT_EMBARGOEDen_US


Files in this item

Show simple item record