Retrieval Blocking Supports the Testing Effect with All-of-the-Above Questions on a Multiple-Choice Test
Metadata Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Callender, Aimee | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Paneerselvam, Bavani | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-08T15:56:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-08T15:56:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-05-08 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10415/4622 | |
dc.description.abstract | Poorly constructed multiple-choice-questions (MCQ) can have dire consequences on students' exam performance (e.g. negative testing effect). For example, either increasing the answer options (Roediger & Marsh, 2005) or including the correct "none-of-the-above" option (Odegard & Koen, 2007) on a MCQ can lead to poor performance. However the impact of “all- of-the-above” (AOTA) option on the testing effect has not been adequately researched. The present study examined the role of the “all-of-the-above" option on the testing effect. The findings were discussed in light of two types of retrieval hypotheses: retrieval blocking and retrieval fluency. Participants read a set of passages and took an intervening MCQ test for half of the passages and reread half of the passages prior to taking a final MCQ test. Results revealed that previous testing with the correct-AOTA option promoted the testing effect whereas the wrong-AOTA option attenuated the testing effect. This finding is consistent with the retrieval blocking theory. This result will shed light on developing test questions that can help students' retention. | en_US |
dc.rights | EMBARGO_GLOBAL | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychology | en_US |
dc.title | Retrieval Blocking Supports the Testing Effect with All-of-the-Above Questions on a Multiple-Choice Test | en_US |
dc.type | Master's Thesis | en_US |
dc.embargo.length | MONTHS_WITHHELD:61 | en_US |
dc.embargo.status | EMBARGOED | en_US |
dc.embargo.enddate | 2020-05-31 | en_US |