Skip to Navigation
Auburn University Homepage
A-Z Index | Map | People Finder
Auburn University Logo
Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Skip to Main Content
Main Navigation 
  • AUETD Home
  • Graduate School
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  •   AUETD Home
  • View Item
  •   AUETD Home
  • View Item

Development of a Biennial Review Procedure for Updating Liquidated Damage Rates Used in Construction Contracts

View/Open
Extracted text (333.6Kb)
BAILEY_CLARK_37.pdf (2.261Mb)
Date
2007-08-15
Author
Bailey, Clark
Type of Degree
Thesis
Department
Civil Engineering
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This research effort sought to develop statistically justifiable means for developing a schedule of liquidated damage (LD) rates to be adopted by the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT). The procedure outlined is to be used biennially to update the LD rates found in ALDOTs standard specifications for highway construction contracts, since their current schedule and review procedure has come under legal scrutiny. After a review of pertinent literature on the subject, it was determined that there was lack of documentation concerning State Highway Agencies (SHAs) use of LDs. As a result, an electronic survey was created and sent out to all SHAs to determine the state-of-the-practice regarding the use of LDs by SHAs in construction contracts. This survey experienced a 100% response rate. Using the knowledge obtained from the survey, two statistically justifiable methodologies were developed to calculate LD rates using historical project cost accounting data: i.) a traditional LDs provision based on FHWA guidelines with the LD rates stipulated in a table as a function of the contract value, and ii.) a more complex table in which the LDs rates are categorized by contract value as well as by project type (i.e. bridge, road, building, etc.). These methods were then compared to the current ALDOT procedure. The first methodology which stipulates LD rates in a table by contract value was determined to be the most robust method. The project type method successfully stipulated LDs by both contract value and project type, but assumptions had to be made concerning the project type designations in the historical project data, introducing bias to the procedure weakening its objectivity. The final product of this research effort is a set of stepwise guidelines for practitioners to utilize on a biennially basis to update their schedule of LD rates. Future research stemming from this effort could develop a standardized method for determining LDs on a project specific basis allowing for the incorporation of road user costs; and a more detailed policy for the FHWA to use in providing guidance to SHAs in development of their LDs policy.
Files
Name:
BAILEY_CLARK_37.pdf.txt  
Size:
333.6Kb
Name:
BAILEY_CLARK_37.pdf  
Size:
2.261Mb
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10415/858

Browse

All of AUETDBy Issue DateAuthor / AdvisorTitlesDepartments

My Account

Login

Auburn University Libraries | 231 Mell Street | Auburn, Alabama 36849 | (334) 844-4500 or (800) 446-0387 |

 

Auburn University |Auburn, Alabama 36849 |(334) 844-4000 |

Website Feedback |Privacy |Copyright ©