This Is AuburnElectronic Theses and Dissertations

Show simple item record

Cryptic Tolerant Species and Their Potential Effect on Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) Scores, with the Presentation of an Alternative Metric of Stream Health


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorJohnston, Carol
dc.contributor.authorHilburn, Bryson
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T15:57:30Z
dc.date.available2023-04-17T15:57:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.auburn.edu//handle/10415/8598
dc.description.abstractMetrics such as the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) are often used by management agencies to estimate the abstract property of stream health. These metrics are usually predicated on the belief that certain fish species are tolerant to environmental perturbation while others are sensitive. Species are usually designated as either tolerant or sensitive in these analyses based on inherent ecological or taxonomic characteristics. However, previous literature has shown that certain species from ecological or taxonomic “sensitive” groups experience increased abundance in degraded streams. We term such species “cryptic tolerants”. Using a stream fish assemblage dataset of 433 unique sample locations across the state of Alabama and the National Landcover Dataset (NLCD) (Dewitz 2021), our objectives were to 1) identify the most common cryptic tolerant species, 2) investigate how cryptic tolerant species might inflate metrics of stream health, and 3) compare an alternative metric of stream health in which species are statistically defined rather than defined using the traditional trait-based approach. We identified cryptic tolerants using Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling in each ecoregion. A series of regressions revealed that the proportion of cryptic tolerant species decreased in response to the proportion of forested land in catchments while the proportion of true sensitives increased in all ecoregions except for the Cumberland Plateau. A metric that simply used the percentage of statistically defined, non-tolerant species generally had lower p-values and higher r2 values than IBI scores when both were regressed against percentage of forest in catchment. However, both metrics had low degrees of correlation with expected disturbance, indicating a univariate metric may be inadequate to characterize stream health. Our results highlight a potential issue with applying the IBI to diverse southeastern systems, which may be alleviated by designating species sensitivity based on empirical response to disturbance rather than taxonomic or ecological characteristics.en_US
dc.rightsEMBARGO_NOT_AUBURNen_US
dc.subjectSchool of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciencesen_US
dc.titleCryptic Tolerant Species and Their Potential Effect on Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) Scores, with the Presentation of an Alternative Metric of Stream Healthen_US
dc.typeMaster's Thesisen_US
dc.embargo.lengthMONTHS_WITHHELD:12en_US
dc.embargo.statusEMBARGOEDen_US
dc.embargo.enddate2024-04-17en_US
dc.contributor.committeeFreeman, Mary
dc.contributor.committeeLawson, Katelyn

Files in this item

Show simple item record