This Is AuburnElectronic Theses and Dissertations

The Political Economy of Environmental Technology Developments in the United States

Date

2024-07-30

Author

Sinha, Dibyajyoti

Type of Degree

PhD Dissertation

Department

Economics

Restriction Status

EMBARGOED

Restriction Type

Full

Date Available

07-30-2026

Abstract

This dissertation consists of three chapters that investigate specific aspects of the political economy of environmental technology developments in the United States. It begins with a theoretical perspective of constrained political decision-making on environmental regulations, followed by an empirical analysis of anticipatory investment decisions, and a policy evaluation related to environmental technology. The first chapter explores how a political party with a pro-environmental agenda can encourage a polluting firm to invest in clean technology, especially when there are voters who care about the environment. I find that there is a feasible range of effective regulations that can be used to make adopting clean technology a profitable choice. When the firm adopts clean technology, it benefits the environmentally conscious voters, who in turn, vote for the pro-environmental party. The second chapter studies how environmental policy divergence at the US state level affects the development of environmental technology. I find that pro-environmental policies and the anticipation of the same encourage innovation, beyond the natural trend in environmental innovation in those states – owing to the environmental preferences of the electorate, and the state's dependency on fossil fuels. In the third chapter, I explore the role of the Green Technology Pilot Program, inducted by the US federal government in 2009, to boost the growth of environmental technology. I measure the effect of the program on the quantity and quality of the patents in the environmental technology domain, to find that there has been a positive impact on the quantity of patents in the given field. Yet the effect on quality, measured by citations, remains ambiguous