Analysis of the Hierarchical Nature of Clinicians’ Organization of Mental Disorders
Metadata Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Blashfield, Roger | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Katz, Jeffrey | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lazarte, Alejandro | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Keeley, Jared | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-09-09T21:21:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-09-09T21:21:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-08-15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10415/684 | |
dc.description.abstract | The organization of mental disorders by clinicians can be viewed as a type of folk taxonomy. If this is true, the organizations of clinicians should exhibit certain properties; specifically, they should be hierarchical. This hierarchical nature is implicit in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), which is the current organizational standard in the field of mental health. This study examined the organizations of three samples of clinicians: two expert samples (N = 7 and 21, respectively) and one novice sample (N = 13). The results indicate that clinicians do organize mental disorders in a hierarchical fashion, but not to the degree found in the DSM-IV. Remarkably, clinicians of varying experience and geographic location tested under separate methodological conditions produced the same hierarchical pattern. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychology | en_US |
dc.title | Analysis of the Hierarchical Nature of Clinicians’ Organization of Mental Disorders | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.embargo.length | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.embargo.status | NOT_EMBARGOED | en_US |