This Is AuburnElectronic Theses and Dissertations

Show simple item record

Evaluating alternatives for the implementation of Curve Number in SWMM for an urbanized watershed


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVasconcelos, Jose
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Han
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-27T22:00:54Z
dc.date.available2022-11-27T22:00:54Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-27
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.auburn.edu//handle/10415/8457
dc.description.abstractModeling hydrological abstraction, particularly infiltration, in urbanized areas is a complex task. Without field validation data, researchers and engineers often rely on readily available methodologies on semi-empirical formulations such as the Curve Number (CN) method. Curve Number is a factor that depends on land cover, antecedent moisture conditions, and hydrologic soil groups to determine the maximum soil moisture storage capacities derived by Soil Conservation Service (SCS). Many hydrological models have implemented the CN method in their formulation, including Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). The CN method in SWMM is used to determine only the cumulative infiltration changes with cumulative rainfall during the rainfall events instead of direct runoff in the original SCS CN method. The CN method is highly suggested to apply only to the pervious area of the subcatchments with assigning the corresponding percent of impervious area of the subcatchments in SWMM. However, it is relatively complex and sophisticated to specify the percentage of impervious area by subjective assumptions and average the CN only for the rest of pervious area. This research tested two alternative ways of setting up the CN method in SWMM based on the QGIS plugin “CurveNumberGenerator” to find the shortcut. The model results were compared with field data collection performed at the headwater reaches of Moore’s Mill Creek in Opelika and Auburn, AL. Research results indicated that the Fully Composite CN approach yielded better for more impervious watersheds. Regarding the CN Cut-off approach, a cut-off value of 90 presented the optimum results for most cases of the mixed urban areas and undeveloped areas with hydrologic soil group A/B.en_US
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.titleEvaluating alternatives for the implementation of Curve Number in SWMM for an urbanized watersheden_US
dc.typeMaster's Thesisen_US
dc.embargo.statusNOT_EMBARGOEDen_US
dc.embargo.enddate2022-11-27en_US

Files in this item

Show simple item record