Habitat Associations Among Bats on Redstone Arsenal, Alabama
Metadata Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Best, Troy | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Armstrong, James B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lishak, Robert | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gardner, Sara | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-23T15:54:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-23T15:54:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-12-15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10415/1414 | |
dc.description.abstract | As forests become more fragmented, more research about use of forests by bats at the landscape level is needed. I employed 2 methods to investigate use of forest by foraging bats; mist-net surveys and ultrasonic-detection surveys. I sampled at a total of 341 sites (248 mist-net sites and 93 ultrasonic-detection sites). I captured 185 bats in mist nets at 82 sites representing 7 species, and I ultrasonically detected bats at 45 sites representing 6 species. This study documented use of Redstone Arsenal as foraging habitat for one endangered species (Myotis grisescens) and two species of highest conservation concern (M. austroriparius and M. septentrionalis). I also compared number of species detected per night using the 2 methods. The ultrasonic-detection method detected more species per night. Unlike other studies, I detected more species overall using mist-net surveys (7 species) than ultrasonic detection (6 species). All species that I recorded using ultrasonic-detection were captured in mist nets. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Biological Sciences | en_US |
dc.title | Habitat Associations Among Bats on Redstone Arsenal, Alabama | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.embargo.length | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.embargo.status | NOT_EMBARGOED | en_US |