Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJenda, Overtoun
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Michelen_US
dc.contributor.advisorZalik, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorKendricks, Kimberlyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-09T21:25:33Z
dc.date.available2008-09-09T21:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2007-08-15en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10415/940
dc.description.abstractThe aim is to analyze two very di®erent methods for solving the inverse kinematic robotics problem. The ¯rst method, called the Engineering Approach, uses the Denavit- Hartenberg Matrix, and the second method, called the Mathematician's Approach, uses Groebner Basis Theory and MAGMA, a mathematics computer software package. With each approach, we will solve the inverse kinematics robotics problem for various robot manipulators. By comparing each method, this paper will demonstrate that Groebner Basis Theory is more advantageous, and furthermore, more bene¯cial to the ¯eld of mathematics and robotics engineering. ven_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMathematics and Statisticsen_US
dc.titleSolving the Inverse Kinematic Robotics Problem: A Comparison Study of the Denavit-Hartenberg Matrix and Groebner Basis Theoryen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.embargo.lengthNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.embargo.statusNOT_EMBARGOEDen_US


Files in this item

Show simple item record